Asad Habib wrote:
.NET and PHP may have better development/deployment environments, but
quite frankly I would rather use Java than C# or PHP to develop web
applications. Just look at the robust Java open-source frameworks that
exist (i.e. Spring, Turbine, Struts, JSF) just to name a few. Also, .N
To re-start tomcat, I start a second instance running on a different port and
after the second instance is running, change the port forwarding to activate
it.
> If so is there an advantage to doing that over clustering?
It's a simple configuration that only requires one machine.
As nice as clu
.NET and PHP may have better development/deployment environments, but
quite frankly I would rather use Java than C# or PHP to develop web
applications. Just look at the robust Java open-source frameworks that
exist (i.e. Spring, Turbine, Struts, JSF) just to name a few. Also, .NET
applications are
Allistair Crossley wrote:
we used to just schedule updates and let all our staff know there would be a
small amount of downtime (for our intranet) but you can't do this on external
production servers, so you need to go with either load balancing/clustering
that allows you to close a node down
Mikolaj Rydzewski wrote:
Seth Ladd wrote:
The frequency is so much that the uptime of all of our applications is
affected as we continually take down Tomcat servers in production to
deploy a new application (or new version of the application). Because
hot deploy does not work (the old favori
Sorry still not following. If Tomcat is being restarted how do you not
have start up time? Is it that you have two instances of Tocmat and you
are having the firewall just point to one instance while you bounce the
second?
If so is there an advantage to doing that over clustering?
George
The net effect is that users have to re-login, but there is no down time. They
get bounced, but can immediately log back in.
Right now, startup time for my hosted machine is running in the area of 5
minutes. So, I'm eliminating a 5 minute startup cycle.
I'm running 60 virtual hosts on one machi
Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: Advice for Hosting Many Individual Webapps?
>
>
>
> I think I missed something here. Are you not still bouncing Tomcat
> here? If so isnt the service still going down? What is the
> benifit of
> changign the ports around? I h
Seth Ladd wrote:
The frequency is so much that the uptime of all of our applications is
affected as we continually take down Tomcat servers in production to
deploy a new application (or new version of the application). Because
hot deploy does not work (the old favorite OOM error w/ too many
Users List
Subject: Advice for Hosting Many Individual Webapps?
Hello,
We are finding outselves hosting more and more individual
webapps, all
running on Tomcat 5.5.9 w/ JDK 1.5. Each of these webapps is
developed
and deployed on a separate schedule, and the number and
frequency of app
files like the context.xml files which is very
error pron.
Any one else have other ideas?
-Original Message-
From: Seth Ladd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 3:12 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Advice for Hosting Many Individual Webapps?
Hello,
We are
Hi,
I very often deploy client's applications in multiple tomcat instances.
It is normal and each application does not affect another. You just need
a strong multiprocessor server with a lot of memory to sustain the last
:) The only difference is that I often configure a separate apache
instance f
TECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 3:12 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Advice for Hosting Many Individual Webapps?
>
> Hello,
>
> We are finding outselves hosting more and more individual
> webapps, all
> running on Tomcat 5.5.9 w/ JDK 1.5. Each of the
Hello,
We are finding outselves hosting more and more individual webapps, all
running on Tomcat 5.5.9 w/ JDK 1.5. Each of these webapps is developed
and deployed on a separate schedule, and the number and frequency of app
deployments is increasing.
The frequency is so much that the uptime o
14 matches
Mail list logo
