This is my understanding also. It (this description) might require a bit of
tweeking but, it is as you say.
- Original Message -
From: Charles Perry Locke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: June 19, 2005 21:41
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Seeming inconsistancy
Terry
, 2005 23:21
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Seeming
inconsistancy
Interesting, but goofy. Terry
DAVEH: Would you expect it to sound otherwise, coming
from one avowed to be antagonistic towards Mormonism?Terry Clifton
wrote:
Charles Perry
Locke wrote:
Terry, it is a lot more
Lance Muir wrote:
Earth to Terry:It is no more GOOFY
than the Christian understanding of the Incarnation.That (the
Incarnation) were it not real and absolutely true is the stuff of
science fiction.
If you would give
@mail.innglory.org
Sent: June 20, 2005 08:36
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Seeming
inconsistancy
Lance Muir wrote:
Earth to Terry:It is no more GOOFY than the
Christian understanding of the Incarnation.That (the Incarnation) were it
not real and absolutely true is the stuff
First hole Lance, you will not find an "eternally
preexisting SON" in scripture. He is the Word of God ie "In the beginning
was the Word and the Word was with God and the Word was God" In Proverbs
He is the Wisdom of God .. and in other places "the angel of His Presence"
He was the Rock
of "revelation," I do not know but I do know we have pictures of grandpa in stripes !!
JD -Original Message-From: Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 03:53:08 -0400Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Seeming inconsistancy
This is my understa
Holier than thou attitude eh Lance? I have not
"villified" anything so far. What I am doing ischallenging your belief
system which is what this list is all about. OTOH you
frequentlycriticize and challenge ppl over who
they are which is much, much, worse. If your sacrosanct "incarnational
I do not feel an explanation is in order. I have made my statement. Dave
evidently wants to carry on a bit.
From: Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Seeming inconsistancy
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 04:52:15
ubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Seeming inconsistancy
Earth to Terry:It is no more GOOFY than the Christian understanding of the Incarnation.That (the Incarnation) were it not real and absolutely true is the stuff of science fiction.
- Original Message -
From: Dave Hansen
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory
@mail.innglory.org
Sent: June 20, 2005 09:15
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Seeming
inconsistancy
Holier than thou attitude eh Lance? I have not
"villified" anything so far. What I am doing ischallenging your belief
system which is what this list is all about. OTOH you
frequentl
Lance Muir wrote:
The Son of God, eternally
preexisting, took on, via an act of the Holy Spirit in His mother, Mary
(virginal conception) humanity so as to Redeem us. Now, if not true,
that's what I'd call 'science fiction'!
I refuse to scavenge and scrounge around for material
Lance and since you are not willing to be forthright and/or forthcoming
there is no dialogue between us. But I have not
gone anywhere - I am right here whenever you are ready. jt
On Mon, 20 Jun 2005 09:22:38 -0400 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL
I have so far supported my claims JD; but Lance has taken his ball
(doctrine) and gone home. It's OK to malign ppl
but just don't touch an idol now... jt
On Mon, 20 Jun 2005 09:44:29 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I do not understand your refusal to support your claims against the
--Original Message-From: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 09:15:24 -0400Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Seeming inconsistancy
Holier than thou attitude eh Lance? I have not "villified" anything so
. IFF you do not then, kindly refrain from so speaking.
- Original Message -
From: Judy Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: June 20, 2005 08:49
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Seeming inconsistancy
First hole Lance, you will not find an "eter
Lance gets knocked off his high horse, read all about it.Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Holier than thou attitude eh Lance? I have not "villified" anything so far. What I am doing ischallenging your belief system which is what this list is all about. OTOH you frequentlycriticize and
uir [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 04:38:34 -0400Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Seeming inconsistancy
Earth to Terry:It is no more GOOFY than the Christian understanding of the Incarnation.That (the Incarnation) were it not real and absolutely true is the stuff
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: June 20, 2005 09:15
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Seeming inconsistancy
Holier than thou attitude eh Lance? I have not "villified" anything so far. What I am doing ischallenging your belief system which is what this list is all a
, if a little
criticism can stop them!
Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
DaveH
makes a good point here, Perry. Care to explain yourself?
- Original Message -
From: "Dave Hansen"
To:
Sent: June 20, 2005 00:41
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Seeming inconsistancy
D
: Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 11:48:00 -0700 (PDT)Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Seeming inconsistancy
Why don't you highminded headyNICOLaitains fill us poor Laity in?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you have an definitive idea as to what
; you just like mouthing off?
JD-Original Message-From: Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 11:48:00 -0700 (PDT)Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Seeming inconsistancy
Why don't you highminded headyNICOLaitains fill us poor Laity in?
[EMAIL PROTECTED
d, no foul? If I have, then correct me. Perry From: Dave Hansen Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org gt; To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Seeming inconsistancy Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 19:52:19 -0700 * I am not positive about a couple of them* DAVEH: Then why wou
: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Seeming
inconsistancy
Holier than thou attitude eh
Lance? I have not villified anything so far. What I am doing
ischallenging your belief system which is what this list is all
about. OTOH you frequentlycriticize and challenge ppl over who
DAVEH: I'm the one who was referring to TT, Kevin. I wonder if our
Moderator has also been pondering why some TTers are not only reluctant
to post, but also reluctant to remain once they visit TT. If so, that
might partially explain his MODERATOR COMMENT post today.
Kevin Deegan wrote:
Who
Good morning, mister Hansen. I have a serious request. Can you explain
to me how Mormons will have wives in Heaven when Jesus plainly teaches
in Matt 22:29-33 that there will be no marriages in Heaven, no husbands
and wives?
Thank you.
Terry
--
Let your speech be always with
DAVEH: And good afternoon to you, Brother Terry! :-)
Let me quote vs 30..
For in the resurrection, they neither marry, nor are given in
marriage, but are as the angels of God in heaven.
Note that he is talking about during/after the resurrection
period, folks will will not
I understand your answer, Dave, but I have problems with it. What
brought about this comment by Jesus was the possibility of more than
one wife here on earth. If your first wife dies, you are free to take
another. We know that God's plan for man has always been one man for
one woman for life.
Terry Clifton wrote:
I understand your answer, Dave, but I have problems with it. What
brought about this comment by Jesus was the possibility of more than
one wife here on earth. If your first wife dies, you are free to take
another. We know that God's plan for man has always been
American demographics from 2001.
May be of interest. More info to follow.
Yes --I am home alone, this evening.
JD
American Adults Religious Identification (Age 18+)
Christian Religious Groups
Catholic
24.5%
Baptist
16.3%
Christian (no denomination
@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Seeming inconsistancy
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 17:48:58 -0700
Terry Clifton wrote:
I understand your answer, Dave, but I have problems with it. What brought
about this comment by Jesus was the possibility of more than one wife here
on earth. If your first wife
Part of what I will be doing in local ministry will include something similar to the following.
Perhaps I am somewhat naive but I include a prayer with such ministries to the effect that I acknowledge and anticipate the Lord's ability to work all things to His advantage.
JD
DID YOU
DAVEH: One might question the statistics of folks that have trouble
spelling Mormon correctly. Here's another perspective
Roman Catholic Church -- 63,683,030 (62,391,484)
Southern Baptist Convention -- 15,960,308 (15,851,756)
United Methodist Church -- 8,340,954 (8,377,662)
Church of
Charles Perry Locke wrote:
Terry, it is a lot more convoluted that you are imagining. Here are
perhaps a couple of points that have not been revealed to you. I am
not positive about a couple of them, so Dave, feel free to correct me
if I understand this incorrectly. (If you don't, I am sure
: Re: [TruthTalk] Seeming inconsistancy
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 17:48:58 -0700
Terry Clifton wrote:
I understand your answer, Dave, but I have
problems with it. What brought about this comment by Jesus was the
possibility of more than one wife here on earth
per hour !!.
JD
-Original Message-From: Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 19:01:07 -0700Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Seeming inconsistancy
DAVEH: One might question the statistics of folks that have trouble spelling Mormon correctly. Here's
@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 19:01:07 -0700
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Seeming inconsistancy
DAVEH:
One might question the statistics of folks that have trouble spelling
Mormon correctly. Here's another perspective
Roman Catholic Church -- 63,683,030 (62,391,484
@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Seeming inconsistancy
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 17:48:58 -0700
Terry Clifton wrote:
I understand your answer, Dave, but I have problems with it. What
brought about this comment by Jesus was the possibility of more than one
wife here on earth. If your
And what do you think of Historic Mormon POLANDRY?
Polyandry:
having more than one husband at a time
Sincenon LDSmarriages are performed by ministers with no binding authority are they null void?
http://scriptures.lds.org/dc/132
And verily I say unto you, that the conditions of this law
have erred, you try to make a big deal out of it. If I have not erred, no foul? If I have, then correct me. Perry From: Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Seeming inconsistancy Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 19
erry From: Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Seeming inconsistancy Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 19:52:19 -0700 * I am not positive about a couple of them* DAVEH: Then why would you try to teach somebody el
The Bible says to have ONE Wife 1 Tim 3:2 the husband of one wifeSidney Rigdon said "The leaders of the church were monsters in human form; that Joseph was cut off for his transgression, that Joseph Smith departed from the living God, and like David and Solomon he contracted a whoring spirit and
41 matches
Mail list logo
