.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/java/sca/tools/eclipse/plugins/core/.classpath
>
--
Luciano Resende
Apache Tuscany Committer
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
/tuscany/java/sca/tools/eclipse/plugins/core/.classpath
Hi,
An Eclipse newsgroup named SCA Tools was created to discuss about the
Eclipse SCA Tools project:
news://news.eclipse.org/eclipse.stp.sca-tools
You need a password to access the newsgroup server [0].
SCA Tools is proposed as a sub-project under the top level project Eclipse
SOA Tools Platform
Hi Jean-Sebastien, all,
Thanks for your comments.
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 8:34 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> The proposal looks pretty good to me. I have a few comments/questions:
>
> - Are you going to have tools to create SCA contributions,
> imports/exports, contribut
Stéphane Drapeau wrote:
Hi,
I created an entry [0] in the Eclipse bugzilla with the proposal.
Your comments are welcome.
Best regards
Stéphane Drapeau
Obeo
[0]: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=225956
The proposal looks pretty good to me. I have a few comments/questions:
- Ar
gt; > context?
> > > >
> > > > Haleh
> > > >
> > > > On 4/2/08, Stéphane Drapeau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Jean-Sebastien, Haleh, all,
> > > > >
> > > > > The propo
l,
The proposal is a 3 pages document describing the scope/intent of the
proposed project.
The outline is:
1. Introduction: the proposition of the transformation of the STP/SCA
component into a sub-project named SCA Tools under the top level
project
STP.
2. Background: presentation of STP +
OTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Jean-Sebastien, Haleh, all,
> > >
> > > The proposal is a 3 pages document describing the scope/intent of the
> > > proposed project.
> > >
> > > The outline is:
> > > 1. Introduction:
mation of the STP/SCA
> component into a sub-project named SCA Tools under the top level project
> STP.
> 2. Background: presentation of STP + presentation of the existing STP/SCA
> component.
> 3. Description: the goals of the new sub-project are to develop a set of
> tools for SCA d
Hi Jean-Sebastien, Haleh, all,
The proposal is a 3 pages document describing the scope/intent of the
proposed project.
The outline is:
1. Introduction: the proposition of the transformation of the STP/SCA
component into a sub-project named SCA Tools under the top level project
STP.
2
wrote:
>
> Stéphane Drapeau wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm Stéphane Drapeau from Obeo. I work on tools for SCA and I lead the
> > Eclipse SCA component which is a component of the STP project [1].
> > Currently, I'm writing a proposal to change the status o
Stéphane Drapeau wrote:
Hi,
I'm Stéphane Drapeau from Obeo. I work on tools for SCA and I lead the
Eclipse SCA component which is a component of the STP project [1].
Currently, I'm writing a proposal to change the status of the STP SCA *
component* to STP/SCA Tools *sub project*.
I
Hi,
I'm Stéphane Drapeau from Obeo. I work on tools for SCA and I lead the
Eclipse SCA component which is a component of the STP project [1].
Currently, I'm writing a proposal to change the status of the STP SCA *
component* to STP/SCA Tools *sub project*.
I would like know if I can ref
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 10:35 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 10:08 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > >Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> I wonder if it's too heavy to develop a maven plugin to merge the
> > >> definitions.
y, March 01, 2008 11:16 AM
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: svn commit: r632646 - in
> /incubator/tuscany/java/sca/tools/maven/maven-definitions: ./ src/
> src/main/
> src/main/java/ src/main/java/org/ src/main/java/org/apache/
> src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/ src/main/java
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 10:08 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I wonder if it's too heavy to develop a maven plugin to merge the
> >> definitions.xml file. BTW, I don't like the all-in-one jar too much as
> it
> >> breaks the mod
Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I wonder if it's too heavy to develop a maven plugin to merge the
definitions.xml file. BTW, I don't like the all-in-one jar too much as it
breaks the modularity and extensibility story.
+1 to that.
Simon Laws wrote:
If we are going to stick using the s
ry.
>
> Thanks,
> Raymond
>
> --
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2008 11:16 AM
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: svn commit: r632646 - in
> /incubator/tuscany/java/sca/tools/maven/maven-defin
TECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2008 11:16 AM
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: svn commit: r632646 - in
/incubator/tuscany/java/sca/tools/maven/maven-definitions: ./ src/ src/main/
src/main/java/ src/main/java/org/ src/main/java/org/apache/
src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/ src/main/java/
Mike Edwards wrote:
Folks,
The real problem here is that the testcase for wsdl2java is cr*p. I'll
raise a JIRA to track this.
Basically, the testcase runs the wsdl2java tool a number of times and
produces some output. Nothing wrong with that, except that all that is
being tested is that t
11, 2008 4:50 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Author: lresende
Date: Thu Jan 10 20:50:35 2008
New Revision: 611046
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=611046&view=rev
Log:
TUSCANY-1936
Modified:
incubator/tuscany/java/sca/tools/wsdl2java/pom.xml
Modified: incubator/tuscany/java/s
t; >> Author: lresende
> >> Date: Thu Jan 10 20:50:35 2008
> >> New Revision: 611046
> >>
> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=611046&view=rev
> >> Log:
> >> TUSCANY-1936
> >>
> >>
und
Yours, Mike.
Simon Laws wrote:
On Jan 11, 2008 4:50 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Author: lresende
Date: Thu Jan 10 20:50:35 2008
New Revision: 611046
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=611046&view=rev
Log:
TUSCANY-1936
Modified:
incubator/tuscany/java/sca/tools/w
On Jan 11, 2008 4:50 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Author: lresende
> Date: Thu Jan 10 20:50:35 2008
> New Revision: 611046
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=611046&view=rev
> Log:
> TUSCANY-1936
>
> Modified:
>incubator/tuscany/java/
rrently have a bunch of tools modules under sca/modules.
>>
>> I'm thinking about moving them to sca/tools as follows:
>> sca/tools/wsdl2java
>> sca/tools/java2wsdl
>> sca/tools/maven/maven-wsdl2java
>> sca/tools/maven/maven-java2wsdl
>> sca/tools/maven/mave
ant elder wrote:
On 10/28/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We currently have a bunch of tools modules under sca/modules.
I'm thinking about moving them to sca/tools as follows:
sca/tools/wsdl2java
sca/tools/java2wsdl
sca/tools/maven/maven-wsdl2java
sca/tools/
On 10/28/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> We currently have a bunch of tools modules under sca/modules.
>
> I'm thinking about moving them to sca/tools as follows:
> sca/tools/wsdl2java
> sca/tools/java2wsdl
> sca/tools/maven/maven-w
Jean-Sebastien,
Seems a good idea to me...
Mike.
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
We currently have a bunch of tools modules under sca/modules.
I'm thinking about moving them to sca/tools as follows:
sca/tools/wsdl2java
sca/tools/java2wsdl
sca/tools/maven/maven-wsdl2java
sca/tools/maven/
Makes sense to me. +1
- Venkat
On 10/28/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> We currently have a bunch of tools modules under sca/modules.
>
> I'm thinking about moving them to sca/tools as follows:
> sca/tools/wsdl2java
> sca/tools/java
We currently have a bunch of tools modules under sca/modules.
I'm thinking about moving them to sca/tools as follows:
sca/tools/wsdl2java
sca/tools/java2wsdl
sca/tools/maven/maven-wsdl2java
sca/tools/maven/maven-java2wsdl
sca/tools/maven/maven-ant-generator
I think it'll better re
On Dec 20, 2006, at 8:19 AM, Matthew Sykes wrote:
Jeremy,
I think where these should end up is dependent how the tools are
positioned within the Tuscany project.
While the wsdl2java tool currently generates interfaces with SDO
parameters, will there ever be extensions to support other dat
Jeremy,
I think where these should end up is dependent how the tools are
positioned within the Tuscany project.
While the wsdl2java tool currently generates interfaces with SDO
parameters, will there ever be extensions to support other data binding
types? Considering WSDL is a first class i
Jeremy,
on the face of it that sounds logical but I don't really know the code
that well. I'd like to understand the full extent of the function,
particularly whether in both directions of the mappings (WSDL2Java and
Java2WSDL) we could substitue the "word" SDO for the word Java and still
conv
Looking at modularizing the tree, it seems to me that the tools and
java2wsdl/wsdl2java plugins don't actually have any dependency on SCA
- they are tools for generating java/wsdl interfaces with SDO
DataObjects.
In light of that, I think they might be better off as part of the SDO
tree -
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-809?page=all ]
ant elder closed TUSCANY-809.
-
Resolution: Fixed
> Update headers for files in sca tools, sca javascript, sca ruby and sca rmi
> pr
...
Thanks.
> Update headers for files in sca tools, sca javascript, sca ruby and sca rmi
> projects
>
>
> Key: TUSCANY-809
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/
Update headers for files in sca tools, sca javascript, sca ruby and sca rmi
projects
Key: TUSCANY-809
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-809
Project
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-723?page=all ]
Jeremy Boynes closed TUSCANY-723.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Patch applied - thanks
> Repository entry missing in SCA tools
> -
>
>
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-723?page=all ]
Lee Surprenant updated TUSCANY-723:
---
Attachment: SCAToolsPomUpdate.patch
pom.xml with the apped eclipse repository
> Repository entry missing in SCA to
Repository entry missing in SCA tools
--
Key: TUSCANY-723
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-723
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Java SCA Tools
Affects Versions
On Aug 1, 2006, at 10:24 AM, Venkata Krishnan wrote:
Hi Jeremy / Jim, first thanks for those answers.
I am able to understand your perspectives. But just that one more
question. If we do not generate a WSDL what do we publish for
clients who
which to connect to this component's service?
I
Hi Jeremy / Jim, first thanks for those answers.
I am able to understand your perspectives. But just that one more
question. If we do not generate a WSDL what do we publish for clients who
which to connect to this component's service? How would client applications
know about the service's inte
On Aug 1, 2006, at 7:27 AM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
On Aug 1, 2006, at 12:43 AM, Venkata Krishnan wrote:
Jim :-)))..
Please help me understand the scope of "not required". If
something is not
required then why have it in the first place? Are these things no
longer
relevant to the current
On Aug 1, 2006, at 12:43 AM, Venkata Krishnan wrote:
Jim :-)))..
Please help me understand the scope of "not required". If
something is not
required then why have it in the first place? Are these things no
longer
relevant to the current Tuscany-Java?
Jim is echoing a goal that SCA shou
31, 2006, at 10:16 PM, Venkata Krishnan wrote:
> Hi Jeremy / Jim / Rick / Ant and others
>
> What is the decision about the sca-tools that existed in M1? Do we
> plan to
> make it a part of the current Tuscany-Java as well?
I think tooling in general is a good thing to have (as long
On Jul 31, 2006, at 10:16 PM, Venkata Krishnan wrote:
Hi Jeremy / Jim / Rick / Ant and others
What is the decision about the sca-tools that existed in M1? Do we
plan to
make it a part of the current Tuscany-Java as well?
I think tooling in general is a good thing to have (as long as it&#
Hi Jeremy / Jim / Rick / Ant and others
What is the decision about the sca-tools that existed in M1? Do we plan to
make it a part of the current Tuscany-Java as well? There is another thread
where David Wheeler was talking about samples around the Axis2 binding.
Wouldn't the sca
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-194?page=all ]
Jean-Sebastien Delfino closed TUSCANY-194:
--
> Fix eclipse warnings for sca/tools
> --
>
> Key: TUSCANY-194
>
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-194?page=all ]
Jean-Sebastien Delfino resolved TUSCANY-194:
Resolution: Fixed
Assign To: Jean-Sebastien Delfino
Thanks for the patch, applied it.
> Fix eclipse warnings for sca/to
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-194?page=all ]
Daniel Kulp updated TUSCANY-194:
Attachment: sca_tools.patch
> Fix eclipse warnings for sca/tools
> --
>
> Key: TUSCANY-194
>
Fix eclipse warnings for sca/tools
--
Key: TUSCANY-194
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-194
Project: Tuscany
Type: Improvement
Components: Java SCA Tools
Reporter: Daniel Kulp
Priority: Minor
Attachments
etween the different tools.
Yours, Mike.
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
I need to drop 2 new sub-projects for our wsdl2java command-line tool
and maven plugin. I'm thinking about using a structure similar to
what we have under sdo.
java/sca/tools
java/sca/plugin
We have a java/tools fol
rent tools.
Yours, Mike.
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
I need to drop 2 new sub-projects for our wsdl2java command-line tool
and maven plugin. I'm thinking about using a structure similar to what
we have under sdo.
java/sca/tools
java/sca/plugin
We have a java/tools folder but I would prefe
I need to drop 2 new sub-projects for our wsdl2java command-line tool
and maven plugin. I'm thinking about using a structure similar to what
we have under sdo.
java/sca/tools
java/sca/plugin
We have a java/tools folder but I would prefer to have these tools under
java/sca, and then
54 matches
Mail list logo
