Those 350 requests per user per hour - that's just to the REST api,
not the search api?
Is there any comparable usage for the search api?
We have an app that regularly runs a specific searches for users,
performs some significant analysis on them, and gives them the results
of that analysis. We
Ed, I'm not sure what you mean by: You need to get *all* your users to
*explicitly* authorize the application's *exact* usage of their data!
Of course! that is exactly what we are saying and I'm not sure if you're
really saying you shouldn't get the user's authorization as that doesn't
make
Ryan,
I have asked this a few times, (every time you mention using site
streams) and I realize everyone at twitter is really busy, but it
would be really helpful to know whether it is possible to write
twitter web based apps right now given that there is no whitelisting,
and site streams seems to
Hi Hank,
We believe it to be entirely possible to build a web-based Twitter client
using only the REST API without whitelisting. Where are you thinking that
you would require it? Site Streams makes it easier in some ways, though the
implementation can be more complicated and intensive.
By
Thanks Taylor. So just to clarify, the 350 requests is per user
account, not per server/ip address? We are creating a web application
(not a desktop/mobile client) that will need to query account multiple
times per hour. If the rate limits are per user account then we have
no problem. If the rate
Highly unlikely. At the present time it's either the Streaming API or using
GNIP.
I don't believe there are any use cases where they would provide you with
elevated Streaming API access to the level you desire.
Sent from my iPhone
On 16 Mar 2011, at 04:23, manusis ra...@manusis.com wrote:
We should have been more clear, but elevated levels of streaming was
included in the previous statement about ending the whitelisting
program. There are open levels for each stream or you can contact Gnip
if you are looking for elevated access for the purposes of data
analysis.
Also as we stated
On Wed, 16 Mar 2011 09:10:13 -0700 (PDT), Ryan Sarver (@rsarver)
ryan.sar...@gmail.com wrote:
Also as we stated before, you can use User Streams or Site Streams
and
get more data by getting more users to authorize your application.
Ryan, it's not as simple as getting more users to authorize
Thanks Augusto.
But the same thread indicates that tools like Streaming API will
replace whitelisting. So it does not make sense for me for Streaming
API to put under the same umbrella as whitelisting.
Since then, we've added new, more efficient tools for developers,
including lookups, ID lists,
From that same post :
http://groups.google.com/group/twitter-development-talk/browse_thread/thread/1acd954f8a04fa84/688b8bfe26a5c178
Developers
interested in elevated access to the Twitter stream for the purpose of
research or analytics can contact our partner Gnip for more
information.
Yeah I went through gnip in detail but their pricing is excessively
expensive especially when I care only about twitter data and not the
hundred other sources that they provide. I was hoping that if not
partner track, twitter might be open to give at least restricted
track access to developers.
11 matches
Mail list logo
