Thought I would report back that we went with Windows 2008 R2 Standard
Edition. It was less expensive than RHEL with our host site, and our VAR
did not want to go with CentOS onlly because Rocket does not support it.
--dawn
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 9:41 AM, Dawn Wolthuis wrote:
> We have a VAR w
:41 AM
To: U2 Users List
Subject: Re: [U2] CentOS with Universe?
Of course, it is likely to take Rocket LONGER than that to certify U2 on a
newly released OS platform, so no real deal breaker!
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun
, 2013 12:31 AM
To: U2 Users List
Subject: Re: [U2] CentOS with Universe?
The only effective difference is that CentOS is that it will always be slightly
behind RHEL. This is because it is re-compiled from RHEL sources. Those sources
have to be released before work can start. How long? It can be
Has anyone tried running on Windows Core? Thats the preferred option for HIgh
Availability with Sql Server.
Dont know if that is possible for uv.
Sent from my iPhone
On 18 Jul 2013, at 05:11, "Tony Gravagno" <3xk547...@sneakemail.com> wrote:
> Dawn, you and I have had chats about Windows vs L
Dawn, you and I have had chats about Windows vs Linux before. In many
ways the landscape has changed but honestly it's still the same for
many of the reasons you had for avoiding Windows in the first place.
My approach is the be versatile and many of our colleagues do the same
- just use whatever w
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org <
> u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org> on behalf of Dawn Wolthuis <
> dw...@tincat-group.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, 17 July 2013 8:26 PM
> To: U2 Users List
> Subject: Re: [U2] CentOS with Universe?
>
> Thanks to all who respon
Any reason you cannot do Apache on Windows?
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
on behalf of Dawn Wolthuis
Sent: Wednesday, 17 July 2013 8:26 PM
To: U2 Users List
Subject: Re: [U2] CentOS with Universe?
Thanks to all who responded. There is
after carefully considering both, I wouldn't necessarily
> tell them it's a bad idea.
>
> -John
>
> -Original Message-
> From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:
> u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Daniel McGrath
> Sent:
ver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Tony Gravagno
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2013 11:38 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] CentOS with Universe?
> From: Dawn Wolthuis
> We have a VAR who would prefer to load Universe and their application
> on a supported platform, but we woul
Sent: Wednesday, 17 July 2013 12:31 PM
To: U2 Users List
Subject: Re: [U2] CentOS with Universe?
Hi Dan,
When will Universe be 64-bit? This year, next year, never. I am not after
specific dates, but is it on the project lifeline?
Cheers
Phil
-Original Message-
From: u2-users
-Original Message-
From: Anthonys Lists
To: u2-users
Sent: Wed, Jul 17, 2013 12:26 pm
Subject: Re: [U2] CentOS with Universe?
On 17/07/2013 19:09, Bill Haskett wrote:
> Dawn:
>
> I kind of figured. :-) Whatever you decide, I'm sure would be fine.
> I would just not lo
- Original Message -
*From:* antli...@youngman.org.uk
*To:* u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
*Date:* 7/17/2013 12:25 PM
*Subject:* Re: [U2] CentOS with Universe?
On 17/07/2013 19:09, Bill Haskett wrote:
Dawn:
I kind of figured. :-) Whatever you decide, I'm sure wo
On 17/07/2013 19:09, Bill Haskett wrote:
Dawn:
I kind of figured. :-) Whatever you decide, I'm sure would be fine.
I would just not look for anything "free", because nothing is "free".
"It's only free if your time is worth nothing" - I think that's one of
Tony's quotes. Just don't forget,
Sent: Thursday, 18 July 2013 2:57 a.m.
To: U2 Users List
Cc: U2 Users List
Subject: Re: [U2] CentOS with Universe?
While CentOS is effectively RHEL, and generally speaking, runs fine, there is
always the chance that a difference is introduced (say an environment
difference on the machine that
- Original Message -
*From:* dw...@tincat-group.com
*To:* U2 Users List
*Date:* 7/17/2013 10:48 AM
*Subject:* Re: [U2] CentOS with Universe?
Hi Bill -- Ah, this time I'm in the client seat, desiring a hosted solution
for Universe. We will choose the same box for starters for the web serve
8098 · E: dmcgr...@rocketsoftware.com · W: u2.rocketsoftware.com
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Tony Gravagno
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2013 11:38 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [
ssage -
> *From:* dw...@tincat-group.com
> *To:* U2 Users List
> *Date:* 7/17/2013 6:41 AM
> *Subject:* [U2] CentOS with Universe?
>
> We have a VAR who would prefer to load Universe and their application on a
>> supported platform, but we would prefer not to pay for R
> From: Dawn Wolthuis
> We have a VAR who would prefer to load Universe and their
> application on a supported platform, but we would prefer not to pay
> for RHEL 6. I searched the list and found a few tidbits, but does
anyone
> have a good list of what changes might be required to successfully
ru
On 17/07/13 15:31, Robert Porter wrote:
> The only effective difference is that CentOS is that it will always be
> slightly behind RHEL. This is because it is re-compiled from RHEL sources.
> Those sources have to be released before work can start. How long? It can be
> significant... RHEL 6.0
41 AM
*Subject:* [U2] CentOS with Universe?
We have a VAR who would prefer to load Universe and their application on a
supported platform, but we would prefer not to pay for RHEL 6. I searched
the list and found a few tidbits, but does anyone have a good list of what
changes might be requir
I read this as "stable version"
So that's a good thing :)
You don't want to be their beta tester
-Original Message-
From: Robert Porter
To: U2 Users List
Sent: Wed, Jul 17, 2013 7:32 am
Subject: Re: [U2] CentOS with Universe?
The only effective differen
I have been personally using universe on CentOS since version 5.1 (of
CentOS) with ZERO issues, now granted I am using this personally with
the personal edition of universe, the one issue you would have would be
byte ordering (easily fixable) if coming from windows but you would have
that with
While CentOS is effectively RHEL, and generally speaking, runs fine, there is
always the chance that a difference is introduced (say an environment
difference on the machine that compiled the source) that could adversely
support UniVerse. CentOS 32-bit will be easier for you as our RHEL port is
The only effective difference is that CentOS is that it will always be slightly
behind RHEL. This is because it is re-compiled from RHEL sources. Those sources
have to be released before work can start. How long? It can be significant...
RHEL 6.0 released Nov 10, 2010. CentOS 6.0 release July
Dawn,
You could easily spend more on your var's efforts than the RHEL 6 and
have no assurance of success.
Dale
On 07/17/2013 08:41 AM, Dawn Wolthuis wrote:
We have a VAR who would prefer to load Universe and their application on a
supported platform, but we would prefer not to pay for RHEL 6
: U2 Users List
Subject: [U2] CentOS with Universe?
We have a VAR who would prefer to load Universe and their application on a
supported platform, but we would prefer not to pay for RHEL 6. I searched
the list and found a few tidbits, but does anyone have a good list of what
changes might be required
Larry knows more than me!
Dale
___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
puter Services
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Dawn Wolthuis
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2013 6:42 AM
To: U2 Users List
Subject: [U2] CentOS with Universe?
We have a VAR who would prefer to load Universe and
We have a VAR who would prefer to load Universe and their application on a
supported platform, but we would prefer not to pay for RHEL 6. I searched
the list and found a few tidbits, but does anyone have a good list of what
changes might be required to successfully run Universe 11.1 on CentOS? How
29 matches
Mail list logo
