** Reply to message from Rich Sias [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 18 Feb 2004
11:13:28 -0500
Well, I got to start my searching for gainful employment. I have used 2.5 weeks
just working on refining the resume, it is near done soon and I need to gather
potential sites near where I live first.
Jeff,
We use a two pronged attack - I don't think I can share it (sorry) but here
is what it does - none of it should be too difficult to emulate:
First we have some BASIC routines that stamp our programs with a string in
the format:
ADGVERDATA='Version=x;'
ADGVERDATA:=
Well, Ray has spoken, so I guess that makes it gospel. Top posting is
wrong-posting, and only newbies who don't know any better do it. Speak for
yourself, Ray - I, and many others, would rather not have to scroll down in each post
to see the new material. I want to see it at the top, and scroll
I checked the global catalog space for our UniData account and the
subroutines are there and are the same version as are in our UniData bin
directory.
Thanks,
Kerry Gasque
Systems Developer/Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 2/19/2004 1:44:47 AM
on [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote::
I am using Visual Schema
Hi Gwen
We're running UniVerse 10.0.4 (a known baddie as it is) and
Backup Exec,
tho' which I don't know off hand. We also get plenty app
errors
We've had 47 system crashes sinces Aug '03, which IBM have
first blamed
on Backup Exec, then told us that 10.1 would fix it
thereby admitting
the
If it's not at the top it generally goes in the deleted folder. I haven't
got time to go searching through the text for an answer.
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 5:38 AM
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] The aforementioned and
We're running UniVerse 10.0.4 (a known baddie as it is) and
Backup Exec, tho' which I don't know off hand. We also get plenty app
errors
Sorry, I missed the original post...but for what it's worth - we also run
UV10.0.4 on W2k and use Backup Exec with no problems. Only comment is you
should
Subject: UniVerse and Backup Exec
Gwen,
We found the following Techtip (#1299) from Epicor to help with Backup Exec
and Universe.
It has to do with a registry setting to allow Universe and Backup Exec
to play nice on a Windows NT server, the same setting might work for a
Windows 2000
Server.
Hi, it sounds to me that you are not using any indexes.
In UD there is CREATE.INDEX and BUILD.INDEX commands you need to run.
Björn Eklund
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: Cesar Riba [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Skickat: den 19 februari 2004 16:04
Till: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ämne: [UV] Very slow
Are you backing up just a user-accounts partition, or are you backing up
the UV account itself, too?
We had an issue with backup software (I think it was BackupExec) and
backing up the UV account. If the NT client code is the same as the nix
code (ported from nix) that could be your problem ...
snip
Use the wIntegrate execute command on pc function to display the file.
sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
/snip
We do something similar using rsh (wrshdnt runs on each pc)... I think the pc command
you'd want (assumine internet explorer in a default
But what if IE is not the default viewer for jpegs or pdfs? (admittedly
this is a home setup, but I've barred IE from accessing the network!).
As I said, I think invoking the document will fire up the default
viewer, but although I know it can be done I'm not certain whether that
is the way or
I did it your way Anthony. It did in fact fire up the default
viewer, whether I was testing with jpg, bmp or tif. Seems to allow
just what I wanted.
Barry Rogen
Senior Programmer
PNY Technologies
(973) 515 - 9700 ext 5327
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
The quality of a
Good to know. So if I need to, I can do that too :-)
I just wonder who sent the original posting recommending IE (and when)?
I'm convinced our anti-spam is dropping some mail, as I regularly see
replies to emails I've never seen ... (coupled with the tendency now on
this list to oversnip -
Here is a reprint of that for you Anthony...
On Behalf Of Hennessey, Mark F.
Sent: 19 February 2004 15:25
To: U2 Users Discussion List
Subject: RE: WinteGrate
snip
Use the wIntegrate execute command on pc function to display the file.
sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the
Dawn, you're coming to D.C.? Email me privately, and I'll do my best to get
you that desired beverage.
Hugh
___
Hugh Pritchard (Tier), 202-546-3066, cell 301-467-1712
D.C. Ofc of Corporation Counsel, Child Support
First of all, thanks to all who have replied to my post! I'm attempting
to combine all replies in this one e-mail.
A couple people mentioned alternate backup methods. One was to do a
uvbackup and run Backup Exec and the other was to backup remotely.
Since IBM does not want Backup Exec to
QUOTING NAG
Please refrain from quoting all of a message when replying to one or
more points in it.
The general guideline of netiquette when replying to messages is that
you should quote only about four lines of the *most recent* post for
each point to which you are responding. If you are
This issue also exists in UD...
On windows 2000, around 50 UD sessions will make things start to shake
violently.
I personally think IBM/Informix should have their butts kicked for not
CLEARLY documenting this issue, or fixing it.
My solution was to install ArcServe! LOL
-m
-Original
This was meant to be private, not via the list. I am not picking on
Jerry alone, as many who are receiving these reminders will attest.
In-line vs top posting, whatever. Neither is any excuse for the laziness
of not trimming.
--
Regards,
Clif
Moderator wrote:
QUOTING NAG
Please refrain
Cesar,
You need to build the index also, try BUILD.INDEX FILNAME ALL
In Unidata that is.
Björn Eklund
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: Cesar Riba [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Skickat: den 19 februari 2004 17:24
Till: 'U2 Users Discussion List'
Ämne: RE: [UV] Very slow SQL query
Anyone out there got Universe Objects (UVOaif.ocx etc) that is
compatible with version of 9.3 of Universe? We have a client with this
version who has mislaid their disks and IBM cannot supply
replacements.
Graham Hansen
--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes, we have used it heavily (in production) about month or so without any
known problems.
Lembit Pirn
7+7 Software
Tondi 1
Tallinn 11313
Estonia
+372 65 66 232
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Morgan, Katie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February
We are currently running uv 9.6.2.1E on DG/UX (quickly disappearing) and
are considering a simultaneous uv upgrade and shift to Windows OS.
IBM's Product availability Matrix shows uv ver. 10.1.0 available on
WS2K3 released on 12/17/2003. Is anyone currently running at this
version? Any concerns
Folks,
Our system administrators have recently seen a few examples of System Error
Message 100102 get_expbuf: illegal level 0, current level 0. appearing in
the UV ERRLOG.
Can anyone tell me what this means, and what (if anything) we can do about
it?
UV 10.0.15 on Windows 2003 Server
Thanks
snip
System Error Message 100102 get_expbuf: illegal level 0, current level
0. appearing in the UV ERRLOG.
snip
UV 10.0.15 on Windows 2003 Server
snip
Mike,
I can't tell you what your error means but I just noticed your version.
We had some problems implementing this version of UniVerse on
Gwen
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gwen Buck
Sent: Friday, 20 February 2004 9:26 a.m.
To: U2 Users Discussion List
Subject: RE: UNCLASSIFIED [UV] System Error Message 100102
snip
Mike,
I can't tell you what your error
How about getting the PE version of UD 6 replaced with a current build
also.
:-D
SNIP
I had the current clients posted on the PE site to replace the original
6.0
clients.
SNIP
--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Ok, this is a very simple question, and I know I ought to know the answer,
but it's been too long since I've done one...
There is a setting in UniVerse somewhere that tells it whether or not to use
DOMAIN/username or just username.
I want username. After my upgrade, I have DOMAIN/username.
It's in the registry. HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE - SOFTWARE- IBM - UniVerse
- CurrentVersion
Create a DWORD value 1 Key of UseShortUserNames
-Original Message-
From: HENDERSON MICHAEL MR [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 20 February 2004 9:59 AM
To: 'U2 Users Discussion List'
Subject:
IF some condition THEN GO OUT
...however, there is no OUT: label in the paragraph. Somehow,
this works. Is OUT some kinda built-in label?
Don't think so, it seems like any undefined label will abort from the
paragraph.
Thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you, thank
you
I know about the message thing, but as we are doing an upgrade, and the
existing software depended on short usernames...
Again,
Thanks.
--Glenn.
snip
There is a setting in UniVerse somewhere that tells it whether
Ken Wallis wrote (different thread):
With decent tuning you should be able to find a reasonable compromise
between making lots of memory available for big jobs without lumbering
little jobs with a huge footprint. Even on AIX now there are some extended
shared memory facilities which allow
on Thursday, February 19, 2004 5:38 AM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, Ray has spoken, so I guess that makes it gospel. Top posting is
wrong-posting, and only newbies who don't know any better do it.
I think Charlie is write to point out that dogmatism on any matter is
usually wrong. Ray
Our VAR just sent our UniVerse support bill for next year. We are running
UniVerse 10.0.0.1 on Windows 2000 Sever.
It is $72/user license. With 60 licenses, that is $4320, plus the windows
support at 865.00.
We used them for some support over the year, but mostly it was related to
their
go to pickjobs.com. there's one in wilkesbarre.
- Original Message -
From: Rich Sias [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: U2 Users Discussion List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2004 11:13 AM
Subject: [OT] Looking for U2 owners in northern suburbs PA, USA
Well, I got to start my
36 matches
Mail list logo