Also, in place of the INPUT OPT.OUT,1 read to drain, you could use
INPUTCLEAR to do the same thing without actually reading anything.
At 10:54 AM 4/28/2004, you wrote:
We have a program looping through all data files searching
for something
- sometimes it gets to a file containing several
By array I assume you mean dynamic array and, as such, would use:
NEWARRAY = CHANGE(OLDARRAY,@SVM, @VM)
At 12:47 PM 4/27/2004, you wrote:
Hi.
Anybody got the syntax for universe for changing one string to another in an
array? Mostly I use it for changing a subvalued field into a multivalued
Actually, this method has been in the documentation for at least 10
years. Though you'd think it would be documented in the UniVerse User
Reference manual under 'uv', it's actually found under UV.LOGIN. Go
figure. At least it still appears in the rev10 documentation in the same
place.
At
I believe I added this option years ago... try using DET.SUP or DET-SUPP.
At 06:29 PM 4/17/2004, you wrote:
In a message dated 4/17/2004 7:35:30 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
and had to watch the compiler meticulously display those line-by
line asterisks during compiling.
At 09:32 PM 04/06/2004, you wrote:
Under Universe if I attempt to read a record (using READ) from a part file
but using a key which actually maps (via the partitioning algorithm) to a
different part file - then the READ just takes the ELSE clause without
setting STATUS() to anything.
Because
Or you could add CLEARPROMPTS prior to the inline prompt
At 12:47 PM 04/06/2004, you wrote:
I have this VOC item we run:
ED VOC BIN.LOC
7 lines long.
: P
0001: PA
0002: CLEARDATA
0003: CLEARSELECT
0004: SELECT INVMST WITH F12 = ENTER BIN LOCATION TO LIST ITEMS FOR:
0005: SELECT INVMST
Ditto. I signed up for both the DataStage and U2UG forums, but I don't
have time to keep web hopping around. If I check once or twice a week I
would consider that good!! Here's hoping for a new listserver arrangement.
At 09:29 AM 03/30/2004, you wrote:
Well, I'm sorry the lists are
Cliff,
THANK YOU for all your years of service for the list. It's been great.
Now, a question for everyone. Is the U2UG an IBM sponsored web forum that
retains all the info? If so, I'm not going to be there very
long... Thanks for any info on this.
--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL
I knew this!!! I believe there was also a New Zealander, Richard Pearce,
who is eye witnessed to have flown in March 1903. Check out:
http://www.nzedge.com/heroes/pearse.html
At 03:02 AM 03/26/2004, you wrote:
Did you know the Americans weren't even the first to build a successful
aeroplane?
.
Lembit Pirn
7+7 Software
Tondi 1
Tallinn 11313
Estonia
+372 65 66 232
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Glenn Herbert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: U2 Users Discussion List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 4:10 PM
Subject: Re: How to open another process's stdin/stdout to a UV
I do agree that IBM has made a decent effort at keeping UV viable, and that
is a very nice thing indeed. Some of us put in a LOT of ourselves to get
it where it was at 9.6.
I believe that upgrading is a good thing too, although only if
undocumented features are kept at a minimum.
At 09:43
Yeah. It's actually a bug in the program/itype unloading code that won't
allow you to do this. I ran upon this in May 2003 and, subsequently, put
in a fix within the DataStage engine so that it works. Should be an easy
fix once its understood.
At 10:05 AM 03/17/2004, you wrote:
Cannot
Will,
I missed what you were trying to do. Still some people here who might be
able to help if we knew the question.
At 02:39 PM 03/17/2004, you wrote:
Good news (I think) From what I learned - the admin user is set up when you
load the operating system . I was told that if I re-installed my
Will,
According to the manual, you'd first grant CONNECT privileges, then you can
grant DBA.
Not sure why it says the admin id isn't an SQL user. On NT it should
default to the administrator you installed with.
At 02:56 PM 03/17/2004, you wrote:
Glenn, et al.
I have a client who has never
Actually, you don't really INSTALL as non-root. The idea of uvadm is that
it is an ADMINISTRATOR, thus, your initial root install sets the product up
so that internally uvadm can administer all facets of the product without
the need of su-ing to root. The fact remains that you still need to
You can do this from the OS level:
echo Y|delete.file fname
At 12:59 PM 03/10/2004, you wrote:
Sometimes when using DELETE.FILE, the system prompts that the data entry
does not match expected data... because when the file was originally
created LONGNAMES was off and now LONGNAMES is on. Is
So does this mean it's still a 32-bit app that now runs on RH itanium? Or
does this mean its a real 64-bit app
At 03:17 PM 03/09/2004, you wrote:
Brutzman, Bill wrote:
We need to buy a new server. Perhaps we should chill for a few months...
I gather that HP-Ux runs on Itanium now. What
Thanks much for the info.
At 04:09 PM 03/09/2004, you wrote:
Glenn Herbert wrote:
So does this mean it's still a 32-bit app that now runs on RH itanium?
Or does this mean its a real 64-bit app
At 03:17 PM 03/09/2004, you wrote:
I'm sure UV is still a 32-bit app. I doubt there's currently
Yep. Sure do. You could fix that with:
0001 PQ
0002 M
0003 IF #S Oany_text:+
0004 IF S Oany_text+
0005 IP #1
0006 P
0007 GO B
At 03:16 PM 03/08/2004, you wrote:
Seems however, you lose your marker that a select list is active.
George
-Original Message-
From: Glenn Herbert [mailto
I believe (since I wrote all that stuff) that issuing uv -admin will
display all your available options. Since that original version, I've
added additional (DataStage engine only) options for displaying things like
engine status, active users, etc, as well as allowing you to start and stop
to see if it needs
to be resized.
Vance
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Glenn Herbert
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 9:18 AM
To: U2 Users Discussion List; U2 Users Discussion List
Subject: Re: COUNT modifying unix timestamp
Actually, it was added
So what exactly is the particular data item that is causing the grief?
At 02:50 PM 02/18/2004, you wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Glenn Herbert
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 10:32 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: UV write
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Glenn Herbert
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2004 12:06 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: UV write fatal error
So what exactly is the particular data item that is causing the grief?
Trim
I am storing IP address information. My
Actually, it was added in during release 7.x of uniVerse to support the SQL
optimizer. The optimizer used the count to make a determination on how
long it would take to perform certain SQL operations such as outer-joins,
etc, and spit out a warning message something like It will take 4307
Barry,
Sounds like the NMEMOFF value is not correct. What are yourDMEMOFF,
PMEMOFF, CMEMOFF and NMEMOFF values?
At 09:34 AM 02/17/2004, you wrote:
I am attempting to install and activate NLS on a UniVerse system,
10.0.19 on an HP-UX 11.0 box. We just recent upgraded from 9.6.1.14 to
10
vince lombardi
_
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Glenn Herbert
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 9:47 AM
To: U2 Users Discussion List
Subject: Re: UV - NLS
Barry,
Sounds like the NMEMOFF value is not correct
Does the data value actually get inserted into the type 25 file if you
check after the write fails? Also, is the data pre-existing within the
type 25 file and this is an update to that record? Sounds almost like a
memory allocation or rotating file pool problem.
The on error branch (actually
:
No, the value does not get written to the type 25 file. The data is not
pre-existing. The BSCAN is done to verify this fact before attempting
the write.
Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Glenn Herbert
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 9:00
It's because the underlaying function first free's off the memory of X(100)
before storing the value of A into it. Problem is, the contents for A
actually reside in the just free'd up memory location for X(100),
hence you are trying to store something that was previously defined in that
*lol* i agree it's nasty and not readily obvious as to it's intent, but
that wasn't the question posed...
sometimes it's just to exercise the mind
At 02:36 PM 02/13/2004, you wrote:
I understand why this works, but honestly, that's nasty.
array(x)=BITXOR(array(x),array(y));
At 12:12 AM 02/05/2004, you wrote:
[snipped]
The same applies (here) with a BASIC program that :
0011 SENTENCE = \SELECT MD WITH F! RUBBISH\
0012 EXECUTE SENTENCE CAPTURING JUNK RETURNING ERR
In this case ERR = 0 if there's no items, not 401 under vanilla (R83, AP) Pick
Unless.. Is there a
At 06:34 PM 02/03/2004, you wrote:
Goo'day,
Are you sure the IF E = 401 bit works in UV?
This would not work within UV unless proc had been rewritten
(doubtful). The error handling within uv is different and this is one of
those areas affected by that difference. You can only test IF E or IF
The 'uv' command is basically a small front ender to the 'uvsh' executable,
which is really the guts of universe. The uv command does little more (for
universe) then to check ulimit settings, increasing them when necessary,
then issuing an execve() call to uvsh. If you bypass 'uv' and just
At 12:38 PM 02/04/2004, you wrote:
All,
Is there a performance advantage to using one or the other? I realize this
might be a touchy topic but it's one I've been wondering about for some
time. the ProVerb manual makes it sound like procs were a migration tool
of sorts.
Paragraphs are only
How about this one to end this thread?
M
S1
IH%1:U50BB:
T %2,,+
IBP %1
H%1
P
GO B
--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
In universe, the -1 is specifically tested for appending, not an accident
as indicated (in scd.c) Maybe that is how it worked in Pick, but not in PI
or UV.
At 04:21 AM 02/03/2004, you wrote:
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
36 matches
Mail list logo
