ig info.
(If other members of the Release Team care about having access, we can also
make that happen; I'm just arranging for now to move it somewhere expedient
/ low-overhead.)
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer
ll stable 23.10
> installs, but they have not delivered on that commitment. What is going
> on here?
>
> I have one, simple question for the Technical Board and the Stable
> Release Updates Team: how do we ensure this never happens again?
>
> --
> Simon Quigley
> si...@ts
On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 09:13:59PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 10:34:04PM -0600, Aaron Rainbolt wrote:
> > > One of the points on https://wiki.ubuntu.com/RecognizedFlavors for LTS
> > > approval is
> > >Flavor's support plan presen
hough.
My assessment is that these are all fairly niche APIs that won't block the
vast majority of packages in -proposed, so the only concern is autopkgtest
contention. And for that, the sooner you get this uploaded, the better!
(Even better to upload right before a weekend!)
Thanks,
--
Steve
> >
> > I feel like it's the right way to go. I'm not really knowledgeable
> > about the licensing compliance bits here of course, but I'm sure we
> > can achieve that in a better way than having to provide 6+ isos with
> > source content, which in my opinion nowadays wasn't v
new interfaces, and
wanting unrelated uploads of packages to not get stuck behind glibc in
-proposed if the migration takes a long time.
> * The newer glibc would be tested for less time, although presumably
> that's somewhat offset by it taking less time to reach the release
> pock
Thomas, in that order.
> Simon therefore is the primary contact as he is the Lubuntu Release Manager,
> me and Dan are secondary contacts, and Thomas is the "if all else fails"
> fallback by virtue of him being Team Lead.
Thanks. With that clarification, I am +1 for the 3
lubuntu.me/lts/
>
> [7] https://lubuntu.me/downloads/
>
> [8] https://lubuntu.me/blog/
>
> [9] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/+bug/2046844
>
> [10] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gtk+3.0/+bug/2047705
>
> Warm regards,
> --
> Simon Qui
On Thu, Jan 04, 2024 at 08:28:28AM -0800, Erich Eickmeyer wrote:
> On 1/4/2024 8:21 AM, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > With my flavor lead hat on, as far as I know, there's not a single
> > > official community flavor that is running their own mirror,
> > https://xubu
d we can have that conversation with them
about ensuring it works for EOL releases. But also, the current point
release snapshotting process by the release team ensures we have the
information necessary to produce the corresponding source if ever required,
so that's not urgent either.
--
Stev
On Thu, Jan 04, 2024 at 07:46:25AM -0800, Erich Eickmeyer wrote:
> Not release team, and I don't mean to hijack the thread, but...
> On 1/3/2024 8:55 PM, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > As you point out, the image files are not being distributed together.
> > Mirrors of releases.ub
that would allow me to re-publish the
existing ISOs. debian-cd didn't even enter into it, I was just trying to
drive ubuntu-cdimage to re-publish the previously built images...
Dropping the source ISO builds from the release process (and not having to
continue supporting them in the code) wou
the context of freeze exceptions. But the
dynamic is different there, the stakes are much lower, and if there is
contention it is much more likely to be resolvable via discussion of
technical trade-offs.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Dev
g the Archive Team of mismanagement because of a 4-hour delay
in response to a non-urgent request for dealing with the same bug.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer
//cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/releases/jammy/release/ ?
> >
> > Thank you,
> > Jeremy Bícha
>
>
>
> --
> Łukasz 'sil2100' Zemczak
> Foundations Team
> Tools Squad Engineering Manager
> lukasz.zemc...@canonical.com
> www.canonical.com
>
> --
>
els,
I'm doubly confused as to how this actually matters - haven't all of these
kernels had superseding versions in the ESM archive for pro?
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubun
do not immediately have proposed alternate language that I think
> > appropriately addresses this concern, but as you've been waiting for a
> > response for some time now, I wanted to make sure to surface this. (And
> > apologies for not mentioning it sooner when conside
t the
time.)
> Reference document: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuAdvantageToolsUpdates
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer https://www.debian.org
buntuAdvantageToolsUpdates
This was voted on at today's Technical Board meeting and has been approved.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer
via
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libnginx-mod-http-lua/+bug/2035387).
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer https://www.d
rting on them and fixing them, but they aren't
blockers.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer https://www.debian.o
023-August/042729.html
> Since no one replied and the changes are trivial I went ahead and already
> applied them. Let me know if you spot anything wrong.
Apologies for not applying sooner. I agree with this change.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough an
= 0.142ubuntu9 in mantic-proposed is now depending on
> dhcpcd-base and dhcpd-base got promoted to main.
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dhcpcd/1:10.0.2-3ubuntu2/+build/26512844
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer t
fo/+archive/ubuntu/lp2009544
> [4] https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18151
>
> --
> Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
>
> --
> Ubuntu-release mailing list
> Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailma
ently ignores missing packages.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer https://www.debian.org/
slanga...@ubuntu.com
> Le 05/07/2023 à 18:31, Steve Langasek a écrit :
> > - https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/sync-blocklist.txt exists, so
> >landing the ubuntu-archive-tools changes (including the checkout on
> >ubuntu-archive-toolbox)
> > - pushed the breadcrumb to the old
- https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/sync-blocklist.txt exists, so
landing the ubuntu-archive-tools changes (including the checkout on
ubuntu-archive-toolbox)
- pushed the breadcrumb to the old bzr branch
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free
/sync-blacklist.txt to
~/public_html/sync-blocklist.txt and added compat symlink
- Waiting until the frontend updates and
https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/sync-blocklist.txt is visible
before updating ubuntu-archive-tools
On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 08:18:38AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote
ync-blacklist
> [3]
> https://code.launchpad.net/~seb128/ubuntu-archive-scripts/ubuntu-archive-scripts/+merge/445524
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer
nt
> >> in 0.10.0, but my user has time restrictions and would like to be able
> >> to use dashes '-' in their domain names.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Matthew
>
> --
> Ubuntu-release mailing list
> Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
>
> >> The downside of 3 is that this could be confusing initially, except that
> >> hopefully the explanation will help? It's certainly obtuse regardless.
> >>
> >> IMHO, 3 is the least-worst option.
> >
> >
> > I agree.
> >
> > Cheers,
> &g
at 12:48 PM Robie Basak wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Apr 14, 2023 at 12:45:41PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > I'm happy to have that discussion - I just didn't want to leave the MRE
> > in
> > > its current state as a foot-gun to other SRU team members given the
> &g
On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 01:14:27PM +1200, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote:
> On Sat, 27 May 2023 at 04:16, Steve Langasek
> wrote:
> > Thanks for raising this valid concern.
> > On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 12:47:23PM +1200, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote:
> > > Debian bookworm
is broader than the earlier one
and is therefore lighter weight on the SRUer and the SRU team, so I'm going
to swap out the link on the wiki. If anyone sees something from the earlier
exception that isn't covered by the new one but should be, please shout.
Thanks!
--
Steve Langasek
,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer https://www.debian.org/
slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org
e 64-bit time_t migration this cycle, which I think we definitely want to
do in 23.10, not in 24.04.
So I think we should keep the schedule as-is.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
U
els?
The general policy for apport is to disallow bug report submissions if the
executable or any of the loaded libraries are from out-of-date packages.
But it will still be possible to download these older packages from
Launchpad: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+publishinghis
On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 10:16:24AM +0100, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Apr 2023 at 10:06, Steve Langasek
> wrote:
> > I am therefore intending that, for jammy and later releases, we start to
> > prune NBS kernel packages on an ongoing basis, not just at EOL time
NBS kernel packages on an ongoing basis, not just at EOL time.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer https://www.debian.org/
slanga...@
is also means that regressions on other CPUs can in turn be
performance regressions rather than functional regressions, which makes it
even more difficult to check for in a test suite.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer
On Fri, Apr 14, 2023 at 08:39:59PM +0100, Robie Basak wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 14, 2023 at 11:23:22AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > It is the nature of MRE exceptions that we declare that *such scrutiny is
> > not required*, because we trust that upstream has a microrelease poli
currently on 9.18.12 while bullseye is on
> > > > 9.16.27.
> > > >
> > > > Thank you for your consideration. Please let me know if you need
> > > > any additional information.
> > > >
> > > > Le
he proposed update to the OpenStack policy be reviewed in
> this context as we'd like to get the issues the point releases resolve
> fixed in Ubuntu.
Yes, please update https://wiki.ubuntu.com/OpenStack/StableReleaseUpdates to
include magnum.
I will review the current SRUs in accordan
n the nature of the CVE which might result in images not being
> released on the same day.
I'm comfortable with that. I'd like to see opinions of other Release Team
members as well.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer
gt;
> > --
> > Phil Roche
> > Staff Software Engineer
> > Canonical Public Cloud
> >
>
>
> --
> Phil Roche
> Staff Software Engineer
> Canonical Public Cloud
> --
> Ubuntu-release mailing list
> Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings
html
> > Thank you in advance for considering this request, and please let me
> > know if you need more information.
> I addressed Steve's comments on the wiki page template and filed a first
> MRE request at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/squid/+bug/2013423.
>
s the application process, and official flavor
> > status.
> >
> > Our launchpad team: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntucinnamon-dev
> > Our GitHub: https://github.com/Ubuntu-Cinnamon-Remix
> >
> > Thanks,
> > -Josh
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Łukasz 's
PPA, from
> which we will also run autopkgtests for all of the reverse dependencies as
> well as upstream's testsuite during the package build.
>
> We will also provide a link to upstream's "call for testing" email and to
> the !GitLab jobs that were executed w
if a similar problem recurs before reporting and error
> handling can be separated, then I think it'd be fair to take the same
> action if it's unable to be fixed immediately again.
Perfectly reasonable, thanks!
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Deb
orization(credentials)
> > File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/launchpadlib/credentials.py", line
> > 775, in wait_for_end_user_authorization
> > raise TokenAuthorizationTimedOut(
> > launchpadlib.credentials.TokenAuthorizationTimedOut: Timed out after 900
to make it possible
> > to build the new images in lunar.
> >
> > Let me know what you need from me. Thanks!
> > Erich
> >
> > --
> > Erich Eickmeyer
> > Ubuntu Studio Project Lead
> > Edubuntu Revival Technical Lead
cture should be of prime
importance.
Approved.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer https://www.debian.org/
slanga..
On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 12:17:04AM -0300, Athos Ribeiro wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 07:43:57PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 12:38:05PM -0300, Athos Ribeiro wrote:
> > > I would like to request a Micro Release Exception for the Squid
> > &
esn't fail on a test failure, then I don't consider
that an adequate test plan for an MRE.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer
-cdimage/+merge/435316
https://code.launchpad.net/~xubuntu-dev/debian-cd/+git/debian-cd/+merge/435314
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer
gt; [1] I never remember the correct links to click to find this in LP.
> [2]
> https://errors.ubuntu.com/?package=autopkgtest=2022-09-01=2023-01-02
> [3]
> https://errors.ubuntu.com/problem/1d7e14874f65cef4e2af15a71a79b05a7ec3787c
Done.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give
-Encoding
> > ---
> > Response body:
> > ---
> > b'400 Bad request\nYour browser sent an invalid
> > request.\n\n'
> > ---
> >
> >
> > --
> > Devel-permissions mailing list
> > devel-permissi...@lists.ubuntu.com
> > Modify settings
Ubuntu
> > releases. As such, updating %AGENT PAKCAGE% to more recent upstream
> > releases is required within all Ubuntu releases, so they continue to
> > function properly in their environment.
> Please let me know if you need any further information to support this
> request.
+1 from the
take care of all the necessary steps to write a bug report on this,
> > but this seemed like a unique situation that I needed some advice on first,
> > and seemed like it needed more explanation than I can provide on IRC.
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Erich
>
ooner rather than later and
do the test rebuild in parallel as this maximizes the time developers have
to deal with any regressions (i.e. uploads of packages that FTBFS with 2.36,
that are done before the test results are in, give developers the
information sooner rather than later tha
t;https://wiki.ubuntu.com/RecognizedFlavors>. Having centralized daily
builds is a precondition of being a recognized release flavor, and to turn
those on requires Technical Board approval (not Release Team). This will
also need to be implemented in livecd-rootfs, so patches welcome.
--
Steve La
ckage and
the patches that are included upstream in security drops. Please do not
move it to never_run, we definitely want to know when these test results go
from 'neutral' to 'failed'.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer
now if you need more information. Also, I would like to know the next
> steps in the process; I'm assuming this is going to be discussed in an
> upcoming SRU meeting, but is there anything else I need to provide/do?
MREs only require sign-off from a single member of the SRU team.
Thanks,
--
to learn with this email thread that manila wasn't already
in the list. Yes, please go ahead and add it to the wiki page. (I would do
it, but the wiki continues to not let me log in.)
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to s
then the above would be my
> > preference.
> Awesome. I edited the DockerUpdates wiki page to clarify that .0
> releases of docker.io will not be backported but .0 releases of
> containerd and runc are eligible for backporting. Could you check if it
> is good enough no
On Fri, Apr 08, 2022 at 03:37:11PM -0300, Lucas Kanashiro wrote:
> Em 08/04/2022 14:30, Steve Langasek escreveu:
> > Hi Lucas,
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 07, 2022 at 04:35:13PM -0300, Lucas Kanashiro wrote:
> >> Hi release team,
> >> A couple of days ago, I got ru
makes us think this is no longer a requirement?
If we have NOT been following the rules as stated, that is not something I
was aware of.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubun
roblem; the new images
were building successfully and being published, but incorrectly being
published as .img instead of .iso with the .iso being copied forward from
the previous directory.
I have removed the wrongly-named '.img' files. The next daily build will
produce .iso files again.
--
Steve
limits that have been declared in the code...
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer https://www.debian.org/
slanga...@ubuntu.c
On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 04:59:28PM -0800, Brian Murray wrote:
> I'll won't be performing my SRU shift on 23 November as I'll be out of
> the office. Please keep an eye out for any pings!
Same for me, I'll be out of the office on Nov 24.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek G
On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 01:47:59PM +1000, William Grant wrote:
> On 31/8/21 1:33 pm, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 07:19:06PM -0700, Steve Beattie wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 06:48:29PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > > At long last, I
On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 07:19:06PM -0700, Steve Beattie wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 06:48:29PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > At long last, I've managed to get the pending MP count down to the point
> > that it was feasible to migrate ubuntu-archive-tools to git:
.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer https://www.debian.org/
slanga...@ubuntu.com vor
ar is highly missed so we'd like to
> have it back, one way or another. As I said before, a .deb package is nearly
> impossible at this time as it has descended into dependency hell.
>
> Thanks,
> Erich
> --
> Erich Eickmeyer
> Project Leader - Ubuntu Studio
> Member - Ubu
On Mon, Jun 07, 2021 at 11:43:25AM -0700, Brian Murray wrote:
> On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 05:25:22PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 03:59:06PM -0700, Brian Murray wrote:
> > > The release team was recently discussing the possibility of point
> > &g
w installs
regardless of the phasing, I am a strong +1 for fully phasing them in the
archive to get the behavior in sync.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer
e, and to include all
others in the release media as fully-phased with the expectation that the
archive phasing will catch up soon.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can
on the missing step
and taken down these various stale point release images (most of which, it
should be noted, have an apt that's vulnerable to a known MITM attack and
should not be used under any conditions).
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian
all understand where I'm coming from. I'm sorry for the
> way I expressed my frustrations in my previous email. My bad faith
> accusations and personal attacks were completely unacceptable. So, I
> hope you can all find it in your hearts to forgive me for my actions.
Apology accepted :)
--
hitectures, without having to walk autopkgtest.ubuntu.com
to find the information.
Could you file a bug on https://bugs.launchpad.net/britney to track this?
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I ca
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 05:28:17PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 10:20:14AM +0100, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> > To enable control flow protection (Intel CET) we need to kick of ABI
> > transition for libffi and libnettle, because trampolines / shadow
&g
h bindings
> effectively.
And there's already a libnettle transition ongoing in -proposed. Is that
this one, or is it an unrelated one we should dump?
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move
ll transition is just going to slow everything
down.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer https://www.debia
he failed state to "always failed" on s390x for genext2fs.
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Dimitri.
>
> --
> Ubuntu-release mailing list
> Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release
--
> Regards,
>
> Dimitri.
>
> --
> Ubuntu-release mailing list
> Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough a
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 12:15:29AM +0100, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Jun 2020 at 19:23, Steve Langasek
> wrote:
> > Personally, my desire to manually review proposed-migration output is low :)
> > Is it possible to get diffs between the old and new output, over a
updated the wiki release schedule pages to match.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer https://www.debian.org/
slanga
to our list of supported
packages.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer https://www.debian.org/
slanga...@ubuntu.com
n't consider this something that requires release team approval,
provided that the MIR itself is approved.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer
st a little more. :)
> Warmest regards from cold Seattle,
> Erich
>
>
> Erich Eickmeyer
> Project Leader
> Ubuntu Studio
> ubuntustudio.org
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer
to your reply!
>
>
> Regards,
> handsome_feng
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer https://www.debian.org/
slanga.
se-Depends: Rescued from xapian-core, python-xapian]
> > [Reverse-Recommends: xapian-doc]
> >
> > Please see
> > http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches.txt
> > for the full report.
> >
> > Please contact https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-archi
t
> > for the full report.
> >
> > Please contact https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-archive for problems with
> > this
> > notification.
> >
> > --
> > Ubuntu-release mailing list
> > Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
&
> Does anyone object to this plan?
>
> [1]
> https://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-kde-talk/2019-August/002920.html
> [2] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bugs?field.tag=qt4-removal
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer
list
> Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ub
nk it's many packages, just a few
> (based on the transition tracker for ocaml)
This package is in universe and has never had a security update. The fact
that a rebuild WOULD change the ABI signature is not a reason to force a
rebuild of these packages now.
--
Steve Langasek
ase be marked as force-badtest, due to chromium
> deb2snap transition?
Done.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer
ease is "stable", not just LTS releases. If you don't see it
> that way, then please let's change the discussion to "let's get rid of
> intermediate releases", because it feels to me that this is the
> essential reduction of your point. Supporting more releases does take
>
Freeze date.
> Stein is scheduled to release the week before Ubuntu 19.04 so we at least
> avoid a release week conflict and last minute uploads before the release
> pocket is frozen.
> Please can we have a general freeze exception for the OpenStack package set.
Granted.
Th
archive for these seed changes
to take effect. I've done this now with ubuntustudio-meta 0.184.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer
1 - 100 of 216 matches
Mail list logo
