Re: ActiveMQ Classic Broker Stuck in Recovery

2024-04-26 Thread Matt Pavlovich
to reproduce it in a unit test or get a specific error message, we’d be able to give it a shot. If your organization really needs a root cause — checkout out the commercial support options. Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Apr 26, 2024, at 3:19 PM, Derek Zhang wrote: > > Thanks Justin, >

Re: ActiveMQ Classic v6.x - Encrypted passwords for web-based services

2024-04-16 Thread Matt Pavlovich
and service management (even though > authZ can make sure some users only can access the service and some users can > only access the management). > > > BR, > > - Simon > > ____ > From: Matt Pavlovich > Sent: 16 April 2024 05:06

Re: ActiveMQ Classic v6.x - Encrypted passwords for web-based services

2024-04-15 Thread Matt Pavlovich
Note — This also falls under one of the goals for ActiveMQ 7.x’s non-Spring bootstrapping to support single JAAS-provider for all services, that uses broker-wide crypto and config services to handle encrypted macro expansion across authn/authz and config params. > On Apr 13, 2024, at 11:49 PM,

Re: ActiveMQ Classic 5.18.4

2024-04-11 Thread Matt Pavlovich
Hi Stefan- The 5.18.4 release is “in-progress”, so it should update on website and Maven Central shortly. Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Apr 11, 2024, at 1:11 AM, Boeltl, Stefan > wrote: > > Dear ActiveMQ committers, > > One question regarding 5.18.4: has this bee

Re: activemq-6.1.0 missing observation

2024-03-27 Thread Matt Pavlovich
into the Camel side confidently knowing the broker part is good. Camel has its own error handling, and you may need to turn on debugging to see if Camel’s error handler is discarding the message. Ref: https://activemq.apache.org/logging-interceptor Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Mar 27, 2024, at 10:41

Re: Is there an ASF Jira link or other place where I can find a release ETA for ActiveMQ 6.0.2 and other versions ?

2024-03-26 Thread Matt Pavlovich
Hi James- ActiveMQ 6.1.1 is currently in the process of being released and includes Spring 6.1.5. There is no formal schedule published ahead of releases. JIRA tracks the planned issues for each release, and is the best place to track upcoming releases. Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Mar

Re: Future of ActiveMQ 5.x with nearing EOL of Spring 5.3.x

2024-03-25 Thread Matt Pavlovich
5.x will stay on Spring 5. This is all community support, so it is best effort. If you need formalized support, checkout the commercial offerings: https://activemq.apache.org/support Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Mar 25, 2024, at 10:45 AM, Boeltl, Stefan > wrote: > > Dear ActiveM

Re: ActiveMQ 5 read queue issues

2024-03-20 Thread Matt Pavlovich
and aligned properly before looking further at any other issues. Thanks! Matt Pavlovich > On Mar 20, 2024, at 9:09 AM, Frédéric Curvat wrote: > > Hello, > > Here is a poc : https://github.com/fcurvat/amqpoc > > Just start an activemq broker (5.18.3) run the class 'PocAmqAppli

Re: ActiveMQ 5 read queue issues

2024-03-19 Thread Matt Pavlovich
Hi Frédéric- Do you have a small sample project that is able to reproduce the issue that you can share (preferably a simple GitHub project)? Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Mar 19, 2024, at 10:47 AM, Frédéric Curvat wrote: > > Hello, > > Checking back on the case, i playe

Re: [ANN] Apache ActiveMQ 6.1.0 has been released!

2024-03-17 Thread Matt Pavlovich
e sure to have in 6.x and 5.x clients: - Mapping javax / jakarta exception in openwire protocol I’d love to get more feedback from users, such as yourself, on real world scenarios. Thanks! Matt Pavlovich > On Mar 17, 2024, at 5:58 AM, Endre Stølsvik wrote: > > Hi! > Thanks for the re

Re: ActiveMQ 5 read queue issues

2024-03-01 Thread Matt Pavlovich
Hi Fred- Most likely, you are seeing a _redelivery_ vs a bug or actual duplicate message. First thing to confirm that it is in fact the same message by comparing messageId, and not just properties or message body content. There are scenarios where a producer may inadvertently send the same

Re: Issue with network of brokers and active/passive pair

2024-02-28 Thread Matt Pavlovich
me other non-intuitive options that must be configured for > it to work as desired > > For my own edification, is there any explanation anywhere of the differences > between failover and masterslave? I’d be curious to understand how it works. > > Thanks again. > > >

Re: Queue Retrieval Performance after upgrade

2024-02-27 Thread Matt Pavlovich
Hi Steve- These settings are lower than the default and generally lead to degraded consumer performance. Any reason you lowered the maxPageSize from 200 to 10? What only allow 1 message prefetch— the default is 1,000? Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Jan 23, 2024, at 9:58 AM, Steve Hill wr

Re: ActiveMQ 6.0.1 Upgrade from 5.18..3 and JMX Settings

2024-02-27 Thread Matt Pavlovich
/startstop/JMXStartStopTest.java#L699 Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Jan 31, 2024, at 10:34 AM, Jason Jackson > wrote: > > I am working on upgrading ActiveMQ from 5.18.3 to 6.0.1. > > For all previous 5.x version I have set the following JMX settings and there >

Re: Apache Log4j 1.x Multiple Vulnerabilities--Apache ActiveMQ classic version upgrade

2024-02-27 Thread Matt Pavlovich
This looks like you are referencing a log handler that is not shipped as part of the Apache ActiveMQ distribution. Possibly a Fuse or Red Hat A-MQ build? That part of the ActiveMQ configuration needs to be removed and/or modified. Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Feb 1, 2024, at 5:03 PM, Vis

Re: Stomp configuration questions

2024-02-27 Thread Matt Pavlovich
Hi Paul- Yes, log4j2 has a completely different log config file format vs log4j v1. The only docs / blog posts / etc haven’t caught up. If you can share the log sample you are trying (and/or link to ActiveMQ webpage), we can try to get you a log4j2 version. Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Feb

Re: Issue with network of brokers and active/passive pair

2024-02-27 Thread Matt Pavlovich
/documentation/networks-of-brokers Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Feb 22, 2024, at 8:20 PM, Bruce Cooper wrote: > > "static:failover:

Re: AcitveMQ 6.0.1 and Spring Framework CVE-2024-22243

2024-02-27 Thread Matt Pavlovich
hich eliminates usage of the spring-web dependency. Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Feb 26, 2024, at 5:24 PM, James Velasco > wrote: > > Apparently ActiveMQ 6.0.1 uses spring-web v6.0.14 which is impacted by > CVE-2024-22243. > > See https://spring.io/security/cve-2024-

Re: Upgrade to Spring 5.3.32 for ActiveMQ 5.18.4 because of CVE-2024-22243?

2024-02-27 Thread Matt Pavlovich
sole which eliminates usage of the spring-web dependency. Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Feb 27, 2024, at 12:49 AM, Boeltl, Stefan > wrote: > > Hi, > > We're getting security findings regarding CVE-2024-22243 when scanning > ActiveMQ 5.18.3. > Didn't want to raise a ticket s

Re: Message delivery failure and Primary Key violation on load balanced ActiveMQ Broker

2024-02-27 Thread Matt Pavlovich
Hi Jack- This looks like you are using the JDBC backend. I would recommend having the DBA review logs for the database for other indicators. You may have a couple things going on. For sure it appears you have a duplicate publishing attempt based on the PRIMARY KEY violation. -Matt Pavlovich

Re: Messages stuck in schedule queue on ActiveMQ 5.16.3

2023-12-14 Thread Matt Pavlovich
traces from a log, that can lead to a resolution. Best to first rule out any configuration or coding error by the application. Hope this helps. Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Dec 14, 2023, at 11:28 AM, Doug Whitfield > wrote: > > Is there any information we could provide to help find

Re: lock file modification issue in Master/Slave mode with Shared file locker

2023-12-05 Thread Matt Pavlovich
to Kubernetes Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Dec 5, 2023, at 3:05 PM, HOUNGBE, Fabrice (MTL) > wrote: > > Hi, > We have a Master/Slave config with Classic ActiveMQ flavor. Our 2 servers > share the same KahaDB (NFS/SMB). > Since we upgrade the OS from windows server 2016 t

Re: Xbean with ActiveMQ Classic 6

2023-12-05 Thread Matt Pavlovich
> class="javax.script.ScriptEngineFactory.PooledConnectionFactoryFactoryBean"> This is a really out-dated javadoc reference. I’ll look into how we can update it going forward. Essentially, it is an out-dated in-line example of creating a pooledConnectionFactory. Please use the more current examples from activemq-pool/activemq-jms-poo

Re: Xbean with ActiveMQ Classic 6

2023-12-05 Thread Matt Pavlovich
etException: Handler dispatch failed: >>> java.lang.IncompatibleClassChangeError: Class >>> org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConnectionFactory does not implement the >>> requested interface jakarta.jms.ConnectionFactory >>> >>> Need to run a dependency tree. Does ActiveMQ 6 com

Re: Xbean with ActiveMQ Classic 6

2023-12-04 Thread Matt Pavlovich
Hi Raymond- There are a ton of unit tests that use the xbean factory. I suspect a classpath issue. If you can share a simplified code project via GitHub, I’d be happy to look at it this week. Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Dec 4, 2023, at 4:16 PM, ski n wrote: > > I'm currently

Re: ActiveMQ classic - no persistence but need lease-database-locker

2023-11-29 Thread Matt Pavlovich
message flow. Also— for non-persistent HA with two or more brokers, you can use priority url’s to maintain ordering, instead of using a lease locker. Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Nov 29, 2023, at 2:19 AM, Martin Lichtin wrote: > > I'd like to configure ActiveMQ classic for non-persistent

Re: [ANN] Apache ActiveMQ 6.0.0 has been released!

2023-11-27 Thread Matt Pavlovich
Hell Frank- 1. Yes, the client-libraries (in the most common use case of remote client-server mode) are compatible between 5.18.x and 6.0.x and vice-versa. 2. Yes, 5.18.x is still being maintained and updated— at least for now. Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Nov 27, 2023, at 2:39 PM, Rac

Re: Resource adapter for Jakarta EE 10 servers

2023-11-22 Thread Matt Pavlovich
and if they identify anything we need to update we’ll tackle it. Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Nov 22, 2023, at 2:22 PM, Calle Andersson > wrote: > > Hi, > > Many unexpected things occured today but I managed to perform a very quick > test. > > I replaced the ra.xml only sin

Re: Resource adapter for Jakarta EE 10 servers

2023-11-21 Thread Matt Pavlovich
/b90e54be0105d1fa2641b933298b916ed9b9750b/activemq-rar/src/main/rar/META-INF/ra.xml If you use the embedded broker, also update this file: https://github.com/apache/activemq/blob/b90e54be0105d1fa2641b933298b916ed9b9750b/activemq-rar/src/main/rar/broker-config.xml Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Nov 21, 2023, at 10:37 AM, M

Re: Resource adapter for Jakarta EE 10 servers

2023-11-21 Thread Matt Pavlovich
JIRA created: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-9398 > On Nov 21, 2023, at 4:56 AM, Calle Andersson > wrote: > > I did a simple test by placing the files in the deployments directory on a > Wildfly 28 server (since that is how the resource adapter is deployed on my > older Wildfly

Re: Resource adapter for Jakarta EE 10 servers

2023-11-21 Thread Matt Pavlovich
Hi Calle- Yes, ActiveMQ 6.0.0 has Jakarta support for all components. If you are seeing an issue with activemq-ra, it may be a miss in the conversion. I’ll take a look— are you able to hop on the #activemq Slack channel? Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Nov 21, 2023, at 4:56 AM, Calle Anders

Re: Integrate ActiveMQ classic version with Ldap for web console access

2023-11-15 Thread Matt Pavlovich
… but you should use JB’s answer of using a separate JAAS realm for Jetty vs the 5.x-era approach. > On Nov 15, 2023, at 8:46 AM, Matt Pavlovich wrote: > > Hi Simon- > > Yes! The examples/conf folder in 6.0.0 contains the 5.x era configs for > jetty to revert back

Re: Integrate ActiveMQ classic version with Ldap for web console access

2023-11-15 Thread Matt Pavlovich
Hi Simon- Yes! The examples/conf folder in 6.0.0 contains the 5.x era configs for jetty to revert back to dedicated JAAS for jetty-layer. Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Nov 14, 2023, at 10:41 PM, Simon Lundström wrote: > > Morning Matt, > > Is it possible to still separate a

Re: Need support for STOMP with node js

2023-11-14 Thread Matt Pavlovich
/using-stompjs-v5.html Hope this helps! Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Nov 14, 2023, at 11:55 AM, Saurabh Singh > wrote: > > Hello Team, > I need support for activeMq implementation via STOMP protocol in my node > js. Project. > > I have gone through the documentation some

Re: Integrate ActiveMQ classic version with Ldap for web console access

2023-11-14 Thread Matt Pavlovich
this helps, Matt Pavlovich > On Nov 14, 2023, at 12:25 PM, HOUNGBE, Fabrice (MTL) > wrote: > > Hi folks, > Does anyone implement web console access integration with Ldap for ActiveMQ > classic edition ? > I know that the web console configuration is offered using jetty but I

Re: Slack channel invite

2023-11-12 Thread Matt Pavlovich
Invite submitted. You should see a note shortly. -Matt > On Nov 12, 2023, at 9:51 AM, Jean-Pascal Briquet wrote: > > Hello, > > Could I have an invite to join the ActiveMQ slack channel ? > > Many thanks

Re: Jakarta dependencies

2023-11-03 Thread Matt Pavlovich
or other things (web console uses Jakarta Servlet, etc). -Matt Pavlovich > On Nov 3, 2023, at 3:21 AM, ski n wrote: > > I'm planning to move to Jakarta namespace (JEE10). What I understand is: > > 1. ActiveMQ Classic Server: Jakarta is not supported (but will be soon from &g

Re: Native Oauth/OIDC integration in ActiveMQ

2023-11-01 Thread Matt Pavlovich
Hi Raymond— This is good info— can you make a JIRA for with it? Thanks! Matt Pavlovich > On Nov 1, 2023, at 1:58 PM, ski n wrote: > > What I know from my time as a consultant is that it often goes like this. > > The company: > > 1. Requirement 1: We need secur

Re: Native Oauth/OIDC integration in ActiveMQ

2023-11-01 Thread Matt Pavlovich
Hi Scott- Got it, makes sense. Please open a JIRA for the request: https://issues.apache.org/jira/ We’ll be doing roadmap and planning for the next round of release once 6.0.0 is out. Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Oct 31, 2023, at 4:22 PM, SCOTT FIELDS > wrote: > > Yes, using

Re: Native Oauth/OIDC integration in ActiveMQ

2023-10-31 Thread Matt Pavlovich
pAuth pattern" is something else to look into. Have you considered two-way SSL authentication? Stronger security, with expiry and revocation support. Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Oct 31, 2023, at 2:17 PM, SCOTT FIELDS > wrote: > > To my knowledge, there is no nativ

Re: Slack

2023-10-26 Thread Matt Pavlovich
Invite sent > On Oct 26, 2023, at 10:19 AM, Sagar P wrote: > > Hi > > Would it be possible to get a slack invitation to this mail address? > > Sagar

Re: Messages getting stuck on nodes without consumers, even with TTL

2023-10-25 Thread Matt Pavlovich
Hi Nikolas- Images won’t come through the mail server. Best to post the picture to pastbin/imgur/etc and share the link. Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Oct 25, 2023, at 6:25 AM, Nikolas Papaioannou > wrote: > > > > Reference image broke, trying again! > > As tex

Re: AMQ classic 5.19 and 6.0 roadmap

2023-10-13 Thread Matt Pavlovich
hope to have it out in the next 1-2 weeks. Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Oct 12, 2023, at 11:57 AM, Daoud Abdelmonem Faleh > wrote: > > Hi Jean-Baptiste, > > Thanks for your reply. IT was helpful! > > >> 1. Yes, you can us activemq-client-jakarta with connecti

Re: Queue depth determination change in amq 5.18.2?

2023-10-12 Thread Matt Pavlovich
Hi Michaal- Please open a JIRA on this and we can dig in. https://issues.apache.org/jira Project: ActiveMQ Thanks! Matt Pavlovich > On Oct 11, 2023, at 12:27 PM, Hoyt, Michael > wrote: > > Good afternoon. I write on behalf of a client that is using the AMQ REST API > to tr

Re: Message Store and Message Cursors

2023-10-09 Thread Matt Pavlovich
flow patterns. Hope this helps! Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Oct 9, 2023, at 5:56 AM, Iñigo Telleria wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm trying to understand how ActiveMQ's broker manages persistent messages > internally, and I have some questions that I'd like to discuss. >

Re: Upgrading from 5.14 to 5.18 - no ActiveMQComponent and missing messages

2023-10-05 Thread Matt Pavlovich
Hi Andrew- You are welcome! .. and hop in on the Slack channel anytime =) Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Oct 5, 2023, at 6:18 PM, andrew cooke wrote: > > > Hi All, Matt, > > I've been holding off using Slack because I didn't feel I understood > enough of the system to be

Re: Upgrading from 5.14 to 5.18 - no ActiveMQComponent and missing messages

2023-10-03 Thread Matt Pavlovich
Hi Andrew- You are correct, the activemq-camel component was removed since it was largely redundant with the camel-jms component. Troubleshooting code over the mailing list is not really feasible. I sent you an invite to the #activemq slack channel and you are always welcome to checkout

Re: Network connectors issue on link failure

2023-10-02 Thread Matt Pavlovich
Hi Paul- Message flow and cluster troubleshooting is generally beyond what is feasible to support via mailing list. Check out ActiveMQ support options, or try to jump into the #activemq Slack channel (I sent you an invite). Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Sep 29, 2023, at 7:41 AM, Paul Burg

Re: Broker network connection between ActiveMQ Classic and Artemis

2023-09-29 Thread Matt Pavlovich
Hi Jochen- Unfortunately, Artemis currently does not support ActiveMQ 5.x’s network connector. Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Sep 29, 2023, at 5:32 AM, Jochen Walz > wrote: > > Hello, > > I have a solution where ActiveMQ Classic brokers (5.15.x) are running on > remo

Re: Slack channel access

2023-09-20 Thread Matt Pavlovich
Slack invite sent > On Sep 20, 2023, at 12:31 PM, William Greene wrote: > > Greetings, > > Can someone grant me access to the ActiveMQ Slack channel? > > Thanks, > William

Re: Resource adapter for Jakarta EE 10 servers

2023-09-15 Thread Matt Pavlovich
y? > > Regards, > Calle > > ________ > Från: Matt Pavlovich > Skickat: fredag, september 15, 2023 4:38:16 PM > Till: users@activemq.apache.org > Ämne: Re: Resource adapter for Jakarta EE 10 servers > > Hi Calle- > > The nextrelease of

Re: Resource adapter for Jakarta EE 10 servers

2023-09-15 Thread Matt Pavlovich
Hi Calle- The nextrelease of ActiveMQ 5.x will have full jakarta support, including the resource adapter. Stay tuned. Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Sep 15, 2023, at 3:32 AM, Calle Andersson > wrote: > > I have an application which currently communicates with an old remote > Ac

Re: Messages got stuck in ActiveMQ 5.18.2 until restart of server

2023-08-03 Thread Matt Pavlovich
r DB Systel GmbH > SEZ Developer Unit Plot No. TZ-2 & 2A, Sector Tech Zone, Greater Noida, UP > 201308 > E-Mail: gorav.singh-ext...@deutschebahn.com > > -Original Message- > From: Matt Pavlovich > Sent: Friday, June 30, 2023 10:38 PM > To: users@activemq.apache.org > S

Re: Active MQ 5.17.0 and cve-2016-1000027

2023-08-01 Thread Matt Pavlovich
in mind this requires a bad actor to install malicious code on the server, and restart the ActiveMQ process. If they can do all that, they already have compromised the system. Hope this helps. -Matt Pavlovich > On Aug 1, 2023, at 6:57 AM, Marian Stanciu wrote: > > Hi, > &g

Re: Not receiving messages after subscribed to topic with QoS 1 and clean session set to false?

2023-08-01 Thread Matt Pavlovich
Hi John- Best to contact AWS support. ActiveMQ project has no way of knowing what changes they have made. Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Aug 1, 2023, at 9:24 AM, John Damon wrote: > > Hey, > > I’ve been spinning my wheels on this and was hoping someone could help me > under

Re: Strange consumers connections state

2023-07-12 Thread Matt Pavlovich
review those settings and also test with a simple Java-based (no Spring, no Camel) connection to attempt to reproduce or confirm that it is Spring JMS + Camel) Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Jul 12, 2023, at 5:53 AM, Ephemeris Lappis > wrote: > > Hello Matt ! > > I've

Re: Strange consumers connections state

2023-07-10 Thread Matt Pavlovich
developer support. Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Jul 10, 2023, at 4:41 AM, Ephemeris Lappis > wrote: > > Hello again. > > Perhaps you've already seen my previous mail... I've tried some > options and none of them seems to fix my connection issues. > > I've tried first ad

Re: Strange consumers connections state

2023-07-07 Thread Matt Pavlovich
Hi Ephermeris- Recommendations when running in the cloud is to be sure to enable a lot of self-healing features. Networking (esp in kubernetes) can be inconsistent when compared to local developer desktop. 1. Use failover:( .. ) transport in client urls 2. Use PooledConnectionFactory (esp w/

Re: Node.js stomp protocol running with default 61616 and 61613?

2023-07-02 Thread Matt Pavlovich
Yes. If you look at the default configuration shipped in the Apache distribution, most of the protocols are enabled by default on different ports to allow devs to test out-of-the-box. -Matt Pavlovich > On Jul 2, 2023, at 1:50 PM, Wendell Hatcher > wrote: > > Quick question jus

Re: Messages got stuck in ActiveMQ 5.18.0 until restart of server

2023-06-30 Thread Matt Pavlovich
comes into play, but is I wouldn’t change it until you solve for the core issue. Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Jun 30, 2023, at 10:34 AM, Gorav Singh -Extern > wrote: > > Hi Matt, > > Thanks for your reply ! Sure, I will use 5.18.1 version but I am not getting > any e

Re: Messages got stuck in ActiveMQ 5.18.0 until restart of server

2023-06-30 Thread Matt Pavlovich
of messages not dequeuing, then most likely the issue is in the consumer app code. Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Jun 30, 2023, at 2:02 AM, Gorav Singh -Extern > wrote: > > Hi Team, > > We are using activemq-client-jakarta 5.18.0, activemq-broker 5.18.0 with > spring bo

Re: Activemq 5.18.1 integration with Wildfly 28.0.1

2023-06-28 Thread Matt Pavlovich
Anil- Justin brings up a good question— if it is client-side only, then you can use activemq-client-jakarta from 5.18.1 (jakarta support for client-side) Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Jun 28, 2023, at 9:39 AM, Justin Bertram wrote: > > What is the nature of the integration? Are

Re: Activemq 5.18.1 integration with Wildfly 28.0.1

2023-06-28 Thread Matt Pavlovich
Hello Anil- ActiveMQ support for Jakarta is coming in 5.19.x Thanks, -Matt > On Jun 28, 2023, at 5:52 AM, Anil Kumar Ravva > wrote: > > Hi, > Please find my query below. > > > We want to integrate Wildly 28.0.1 with Activemq 5.18.1. > But we are not able to do this, and the excepetions are

Re: When I used JDBC to connect MySQL to build a 2-node master-slave, I found that the table ACTIVEMQ in the database_ LOCK No data

2023-06-27 Thread Matt Pavlovich
Are you using the recommended lease-locker, instead of the default locker? See: https://activemq.apache.org/pluggable-storage-lockers Example config snippet: -Matt Pavlovich > On Jun 27, 2023, at 3:00 AM, ヤ

Re: When I used JDBC to connect MySQL to build a 2-node master-slave, I found that the table ACTIVEMQ in the database_ LOCK No data

2023-06-26 Thread Matt Pavlovich
Hi- 5.15.x is no longer actively supported by the community. If you are seeking community support, please upgrade to 5.18.1 and report back. There were a lot of SQL-based improvements since 5.15.9. Thanks! Matt Pavlovich > On Jun 26, 2023, at 6:09 AM, ヤ艾枫o.-- <1169114...@qq.com.I

Re: Jakarta namespace on the broker

2023-06-19 Thread Matt Pavlovich
+ Spring 6.x Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Jun 19, 2023, at 11:11 AM, ski n wrote: > > For both the Classic (Since 5.18.0) and Artemis (Since 2.17.0) there is > support for the Jakarta namespace in the client: > > 1. Classic: > https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apa

Re: ActiveMQ "Classic" ACL and VirtualTopics

2023-05-29 Thread Matt Pavlovich
as still running on some > node so when ActiveMQ saw the connection from V2 using the same consumer. > > John > > On 2023/05/26 22:19:42 Matt Pavlovich wrote: >> Hi John- >> >> The error message seems to indicate the app is using a wild card >> subscription (or

Re: ActiveMQ "Classic" ACL and VirtualTopics

2023-05-26 Thread Matt Pavlovich
Hi John- The error message seems to indicate the app is using a wild card subscription (or getting one encoded funny), but the authz is named to a specific destinations \u003e = “>" What you have should work fine, but there seems to be a coordination problem. Either the authz needs the “>”

Re: Configuring security for Managmentcontext in activemq.

2023-05-05 Thread Matt Pavlovich
DLINE_ARGS --pid $SPID & Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On May 5, 2023, at 1:32 AM, Dnyaneshwar Kulkarni > wrote: > > Hi Matt, > > I have provided a login.config as 'activemq' but still java is not > considering this. Is this settings are specific to any perticular ActiveMQ >

Re: Configuring security for Managmentcontext in activemq.

2023-05-03 Thread Matt Pavlovich
— adding them to the lib/ folder is not enough, you need to set the classpath with “-cp”. I replied to your SO post as well. Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On May 3, 2023, at 12:30 AM, Dnyaneshwar Kulkarni > wrote: > > Hi Matt, > > Thank you for your response. Currently I &

Re: Configuring security for Managmentcontext in activemq.

2023-05-02 Thread Matt Pavlovich
/AMQ-8391 Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On May 2, 2023, at 1:44 AM, Dnyaneshwar Kulkarni > wrote: > > Hi Team, > > We have enabled the JMX support in our application for activemq. In > actimmq.sql file we have added the Managmentcontext with create connection > as "tru

Re: [External] ActiveMQ-5.15.5 : InFlight showing negative number for Queue

2023-04-24 Thread Matt Pavlovich
hes, no sense doing anything in-between. 5.15.x upgrades to 5.18.x really smooth. Just check the release notes. The only big change off the top of my head is that networkConnectors descreaseNetworkConsumers default value is now ’true’ instead of ‘false’. Thanks, Matt Pavlovich

Re: ActiveMQ-5.15.5 : InFlight showing negative number for Queue

2023-04-24 Thread Matt Pavlovich
Hi Subashree- This is a minor issue that has been fixed since 5.15.5 (recommend upgrading to 5.18.1) that is usually caused by consumers closing or rejecting messages. Check the ‘dispatchedCount’ and see if it is noticeably higher than the dequeueCount. If so, your consumers are probably

Re: Broker redelivery - NACK and authorization issue

2023-04-04 Thread Matt Pavlovich
configuration. Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Apr 4, 2023, at 9:24 AM, CASAUX Nicolas > wrote: > > Hello ActiveMQ users, > > I have a question regarding ActiveMQ 5.16.x and redelivery of messages. > I set up the broker with the configuration described in paragraph “Broker

Re: ActiveMQ / configure queues

2023-04-04 Thread Matt Pavlovich
gt; Regards. > > > Le lun. 3 avr. 2023 à 15:50, Matt Pavlovich <mailto:mattr...@gmail.com>> a écrit : >> Hello Ephemeris- >> >> Right now, the plugin is for all queues and topics. I agree it would make >> sense to add this as options on Destination

Re: ActiveMQ / configure queues

2023-04-03 Thread Matt Pavlovich
Hello Ephemeris- Right now, the plugin is for all queues and topics. I agree it would make sense to add this as options on DestinationPolicy. Feel free to open up a feature request ticket — https://issues.apache.org/jira I’ll work to add it to 5.18.x or 5.19.x Thanks! Matt Pavlovich

Re: ActiveMQ / configure queues

2023-03-31 Thread Matt Pavlovich
Hello Ephemeris- I think this would do it for you: https://activemq.apache.org/timestampplugin Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Mar 31, 2023, at 10:02 AM, Ephemeris Lappis > wrote: > > OK. Is there a chance I find a similar configuration for the classic version ? > I guess that fo

Re: ActiveMQ / Selector on message age

2023-03-31 Thread Matt Pavlovich
Hi Ephemeris- I think you’d want to reverse that logic.. 'JMSTimestamp <= 125252…' <— this needs to be a long value of now() - 360 or whatever calculation you are looking for. Selector examples: https://timjansen.github.io/jarfiller/guide/jms/selectors.xhtml Thanks, Matt Pav

Re: ActiveMQ / Selector on message age

2023-03-31 Thread Matt Pavlovich
Hello Ephemeris- Yes, simply use the JMSTimestamp header as the field in your selector query. Thanks, -Matt > On Mar 31, 2023, at 4:28 AM, Ephemeris Lappis > wrote: > > Hello. > > We need to consume messages from some queues (using Camel JMS > component) only when messages are older than a

Re: ActiveMQ failover transport considers http URIs that share the same hostname/IP & port as duplicates - the path is ignored

2023-03-20 Thread Matt Pavlovich
transactions incur a performance trade-off due to higher latency. If your consumer app can handle the risk of duplication during a failover, then SESSION_TRANSACTED (non-XA), INDIVIDUAL_ACK and CLIENT_ACK can be used. -Matt Pavlovich > On Mar 11, 2023, at 7:05 AM, Paul McCulloch > wrote: >

Re: Copy of duplicate delivery message in DLQ

2023-03-20 Thread Matt Pavlovich
Hello Laetitia- The message in the log is from the ActiveMQConsumer suppressing a duplicate, not a duplicate-from-store scenario. ‘sendDuplicateFromStoreToDLQ’ would not apply to this situation. Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Mar 17, 2023, at 9:22 AM, Laetitia wrote: > > Hi, > &g

Re: ActiveMQ failover transport considers http URIs that share the same hostname/IP & port as duplicates - the path is ignored

2023-03-10 Thread Matt Pavlovich
to change for the different brokers behind a load balancer? Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Mar 10, 2023, at 6:28 AM, Paul McCulloch > wrote: > > Hi, > > I've found what I think is a bug in the failover transport in 5.x. If I use > two https URLs that share a hostname &

Re: Query on OracleJava alternative for ActiveMQ

2023-02-22 Thread Matt Pavlovich
for your reply Matt, I am looking for input if I can use the > following open source third party JDK as an alternative to Licensed Oracle > Java > for my activeMQ to work? > > > > * Amazon Corretto and OpenJDK Adoptium Eclipse Temurin Azul Java* > > On Thu, 23 Feb

Re: Query on OracleJava alternative for ActiveMQ

2023-02-22 Thread Matt Pavlovich
, as the release vote is underway) That being said, it is recommended you test your workload against the JDK+ActiveMQ combination to confirm. Thank you, Matt Pavlovich > On Feb 22, 2023, at 1:32 AM, Jana Manju wrote: > > Hi Team, > > We are in process of configuring ActiveMQ as

Re: Redelivered messages do not get transported to broker with consumers

2023-02-02 Thread Matt Pavlovich
Hi Haritha- The broker network works to optimize performance and also prevent loops. After a number of transfers between brokers, the broker will stop sending messages to prevent looping. This sounds like a common problem if you are using Spring JMS and/or Apache Camel JMS. The problem its

Re: Jakarta namespace support

2023-02-01 Thread Matt Pavlovich
A good time to mention the JMS2 status page for ActiveMQ 5.x: https://activemq.apache.org/jms2 Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Jan 29, 2023, at 11:23 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > Hi, > > FYI, we will include jakarta/JMS2 client in ActiveMQ 5.18.x (currently &

Re: Jakarta namespace support

2023-01-23 Thread Matt Pavlovich
of the regular one) in ActiveMQ for 5.18.x release. As we are > close to 5.18.x release, it would be great. > > WDYT ? > > Regards > JB > > On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 6:53 PM Matt Pavlovich wrote: >> >> Hi Jiří- >> >> I just released a transitional

Re: Jakarta namespace support

2023-01-20 Thread Matt Pavlovich
based off the 5.18.0-SNAPSHOT build. This has only been tested with the most basic send+receive function. io.hyte.activemq activemq-client-jakarta 5.18.0.hyte-1 url: https://github.com/hyteio/activemq-client-jakarta Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Jan 19, 2023, at 4:53 AM, Jiří Kakrda wr

Re: ActiveMQ Classic: Message prioritization affected by persistent/non-persistent

2023-01-16 Thread Matt Pavlovich
from queue://data.input.9 Consumer 2 from queue://data.input.other queue://data.input + priority = 9 -> queue://data.input.9 + priority <> 9 -> queue://data.input.other Documentation here: https://activemq.apache.org/virtual-destinations Hope this helps! Thanks, Matt Pavlovi

Re: ActiveMQ client and server versions

2022-12-26 Thread Matt Pavlovich
5.16.x is *really* similar to 5.17.x right now. Especially with the clients. You should be fine for a while. -Matt > On Dec 26, 2022, at 2:36 AM, Ephemeris Lappis > wrote: > > Hello. > > If I'm not wrong, ActiveMQ server is built and runs for JDK 8 until > version 5.16 included, and for JDK

Re: https://github.com/Hill30/amq-kahadb-tool

2022-12-16 Thread Matt Pavlovich
Hi Wendell- I’ve not used it. Most likely, that would be used for an offline ‘defrag’ of sorts. Please note— that tool is not part of the Apache ActiveMQ community and is quite dated— looks to have been built using ActiveMQ 5.13.x and may not be reliable with newer versions of ActiveMQ. You

Re: AMQ Store Percent usage at 86% Large Khadb storage size concerns.

2022-12-04 Thread Matt Pavlovich
limit is reached. -Matt Pavlovich > On Dec 4, 2022, at 3:00 PM, Brad Rusnak wrote: > > Would an increase of the storageUsage to 225GB from 150GB cause and index > corruption? A message in the activemq.log indicated that there wasn’t > enough storage to use the 225GB setti

Re: AMQ Store Percent usage at 86% Large Khadb storage size concerns.

2022-12-01 Thread Matt Pavlovich
the fragmentation. Also, 5.13.1 is quite dated, consider an upgrade to 5.16.5 or 5.17.3 (releasing in the next day or two). Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Dec 1, 2022, at 11:32 AM, Wendell Hatcher > wrote: > > Hello, I am showing AMQ Store Percent usage at 86% my khahadb folder is &

Re: Info about versions of ActiveMQ Classic and End of Life/End of Support

2022-11-14 Thread Matt Pavlovich
Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Nov 14, 2022, at 3:44 AM, Carlos.Barrie.Aladren > wrote: > > Hello everyone. > > Can someone tell me what versions of ActiveMQ Classic have been released to > date and the End of Life/End of Support dates for each of those versions? > &g

Re: Inbound and Outbound Setting Configuration in ActiveMQ

2022-11-12 Thread Matt Pavlovich
Hi Rebecca- Apache mailing list software removes images, so we are not able to see what you are sharing. Would you post the images to a image share site and share the links instead? Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Nov 11, 2022, at 5:21 PM, Rebecca Newman wrote: > > Hello, > >

Re: ACTIVEMQ WEBCONSOLE BROKE CONNECTION | JNDI Question

2022-11-07 Thread Matt Pavlovich
://activemq.apache.org/jmx <https://activemq.apache.org/jmx> Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Nov 7, 2022, at 12:21 PM, Manjunath Kashyap > wrote: > > Hi All, > > ISSUE: > > We have Installed AMQ in a MASTER/SLAVE pair for both Consumers and Producers. > We also have installed the W

Re: jms messages keep getting stuck in our queues.

2022-10-28 Thread Matt Pavlovich
are a reasonably current version Keep in mind that a restart also causes the application to reconnect to the broker. The majority of issues like this tend to be “distributed computing” related, and not broker problems. Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Oct 28, 2022, at 8:48 AM, Wendell Hatcher >

Re: Message Code: JAVA PLUGIN_1762 AMQ error?

2022-10-25 Thread Matt Pavlovich
Glad to hear! If you would, please share what the fix was so other users will be able to match up this error message with a solution when searching the web. Thanks! Matt Pavlovich > On Oct 25, 2022, at 11:42 AM, Wendell Hatcher > wrote: > > We resolved this. Thanks

Re: Message Code: JAVA PLUGIN_1762 AMQ error?

2022-10-25 Thread Matt Pavlovich
Hello Wendell- That error seems to indicate some sort of protocol mismatch or network timeout issue. Are you able to obtain the logs from the server side? What version of ActiveMQ client jar? What version of ActiveMQ server? Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Oct 25, 2022, at 10:30 AM, Wend

Re: issues with AMQ failover configuration

2022-10-12 Thread Matt Pavlovich
Hello James- First thing— You have an inconsistent url — change "static:(failover:” to uri=“masterslave:(tcp://hosta,tcp:hostb )” .. Network Connectors imply failover and retry, and the ‘masterslave’ discovery does a connect HOSTA, then HOSTB convention. -Matt Pavlovich > On Oct

  1   2   3   >