Re: systemvm-vmware-4.15.1 template - Did not find a guest OS with type otherLinux64Guest

. From: David Larsen Sent: Saturday, October 16, 2021 9:17:14 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: systemvm-vmware-4.15.1 template - Did not find a guest OS with type otherLinux64Guest Hi Wei, My configuration: Cloudstack 4.15 Vmware: Vcenter: latest 6.7 Vsphere

RE: systemvm-vmware-4.15.1 template - Did not find a guest OS with type otherLinux64Guest

there is some new feature about vmware and ova import, but it don't work for systemvm templates in my setup... -David Sendt fra min Galaxy Opprinnelig melding Fra: Wei ZHOU Dato: 15.10.2021 12:30 (GMT+01:00) Til: users Emne: Re: systemvm-vmware-4.15.1 template - Did not find

Re: systemvm-vmware-4.15.1 template - Did not find a guest OS with type otherLinux64Guest

OU > Dato: 15.10.2021 09:18 (GMT+01:00) > Til: users > Emne: Re: systemvm-vmware-4.15.1 template - Did not find a guest OS with > type otherLinux64Guest > > Hi David, > > Which version of vmware do you use ? > > -Wei > > On Thu, 14 Oct 2021 at 16:20, David Lars

RE: systemvm-vmware-4.15.1 template - Did not find a guest OS with type otherLinux64Guest

Hi We use vcenter/vsphere 6.7 Sendt fra min Galaxy Opprinnelig melding Fra: Wei ZHOU Dato: 15.10.2021 09:18 (GMT+01:00) Til: users Emne: Re: systemvm-vmware-4.15.1 template - Did not find a guest OS with type otherLinux64Guest Hi David, Which version of vmware do you

Re: systemvm-vmware-4.15.1 template - Did not find a guest OS with type otherLinux64Guest

Hi David, Which version of vmware do you use ? -Wei On Thu, 14 Oct 2021 at 16:20, David Larsen wrote: > Hi > > I have just tried to install systemvm-vmware-4.15.1 template to prepare > for cloudstack 4.15.2 upgrade. When I choose Hypervisor: VMware, I cannot > choos OS Type afterwards. > The

Re: SystemVm failling from possible libvirtd issue

The error you are seeing in you agent.log seems for me like an "old friend". Take a look into this: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/5491#issue-1003559121 You can check it quiet fast. Connect to one of the hosts and try to mount the nfs-share manually to an temp-folder. suggest to use

Re: SystemVm failling from possible libvirtd issue

It appears that it has the capability to use nfs4 (It's using Ceph Octopus), but it is not clear whether it is using nfs3 or nfs4. I *think* it is using nfs4 On 2021/10/07 16:14:36, "vas...@gmx.de" wrote: > reading the agent.log you have trouble mounting the storage properly. > Does your

Re: SystemVm failling from possible libvirtd issue

reading the agent.log you have trouble mounting the storage properly. Does your nfs-server for providing secondary storage provide nfs4 ? Am Do., 7. Okt. 2021 um 15:33 Uhr schrieb Peter Stine < petrus.st...@gmail.com>: > Hey everyone, > > I had to rework my network and reinstall cloudstack.

Re: SystemVM Storage Tags not taken into account?

Thank you so much! Worked perfectly for us. Used the procedure to reorganize our storages and move quite a number of VRs to defined storage pools. Am Mittwoch, den 06.11.2019, 12:10 + schrieb Richard Lawley: > I wouldn't say this is something we do routinely, mostly to correct > mistakes at

Re: SystemVM Storage Tags not taken into account?

I wouldn't say this is something we do routinely, mostly to correct mistakes at the start. You could end up with problems if you deployed VMs based on an old version of a service offering, then changed tags in such a way that there was no possible location a VM could start up next time. However,

Re: SystemVM Storage Tags not taken into account?

Hi Richard, looks good. Just did an update network_offerings set service_offering_id = where id = and restarted one of the networks from this offering with cleanup. Comes up nicely and new tags are taken into account. Do you use this procedure in production to change tags and parameters

Re: SystemVM Storage Tags not taken into account?

There's nothing in the API or the UI. We just change it in the DB. On Mon, 4 Nov 2019 at 13:48, Melanie Desaive wrote: > > Hi Richard, > > thank you for this hint. > > I had a look in the database, and yes, all Network Offeringns in the > table network_offerings still reference the old

Re: SystemVM Storage Tags not taken into account?

Hi Richard, thank you for this hint. I had a look in the database, and yes, all Network Offeringns in the table network_offerings still reference the old System/Disk offering IDs from disk_offering/system_offering. Is there an intended way to change "network_offerings.service_offering_id" for

Re: SystemVM Storage Tags not taken into account?

Melanie, > Maybe the procedure for resetting the System Offering for Virtual > Routers differs from that for SSVM and CP and I missed some point? The System Offering for Virtual Routers is not taken from the same place as SSVM/CP - it's set on the Network Offering instead, so you can have

Re: SystemVM Storage Tags not taken into account?

VRs are using Cloud.Com-SoftwareRouter as you can see surely. Whatever offering you might be using, simply editing the tags in DB (disk_offering table) should be enough. I once had to wait for a few minutes (no mgmt restart is necessary in my experience), but it definitively should work fine.

Re: SystemVM Storage Tags not taken into account?

Good morning Andrija, yes, I did restart mgmt. Documentation states that. Interestingly the documentation in http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/en/4.11.1.0/adminguide/service_offerings.html#changing-the-default-system-offering-for-system-vms only mentions only resetting the unique_names for

Re: SystemVM Storage Tags not taken into account?

tried restarting mgmt after tag change? Usually not required but might be for systemVMs. On Thu, 31 Oct 2019, 15:21 Melanie Desaive, wrote: > Hi all, > > I just tried to set up storage tags for System VMs, but the behaviour > is not as expected. The deployment planner does not seem to take the

RE: SystemVM template - timeout waiting for response from storage host

figure out which storage host is causing the time out error? Regards, Richard Persaud From: Andrija Panic Sent: Friday, December 28, 2018 3:53 PM To: users Subject: Re: SystemVM template - timeout waiting for response from storage host ⚠ EXT MSG: Hi, did you preseed the systemVM template

Re: SystemVM template - timeout waiting for response from storage host

Hi, did you preseed the systemVM template as in the guide ? i.e. /usr/share/cloudstack-common/scripts/storage/secondary/cloud-install-sys-tmplt -m /mnt/secondary -u systemvm-kvm-4.11.2 -h kvm -s -F After starting the Management server (after you have preseeded the systemVM template

Re: systemvm settings not deployd

db , but without any success.. Regards, Kristian - Original Message - From: "Paul Angus" To: "users" Sent: Monday, August 13, 2018 11:06:58 AM Subject: RE: systemvm settings not deployd Hi, I suspect this may be your issue in the logs: 2018-08-1

RE: systemvm settings not deployd

@shapeblue -Original Message- From: Netlynker Sent: 13 August 2018 06:47 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: systemvm settings not deployd Hi, Log in to system VM as root/password. Run "virt-who" and note the last line of the output. Then check this script /opt/c

Re: systemvm settings not deployd

Hi, Log in to system VM as root/password. Run "virt-who" and note the last line of the output. Then check this script /opt/cloud/bin/setup/cloud-early-config which is responsible for configuring systemvm to correct role (router or consoleproxy or so on). Might not give you solution. but I hope

RE: systemvm

t Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue -Original Message- From: Swastik Mittal <mittal.swas...@gmail.com> Sent: 04 April 2018 18:40 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: systemvm @Paul Yes, I explicitly created it like normal nfs share, and gave the path of the exported direc

RE: systemvm

, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue -Original Message- From: Swastik Mittal <mittal.swas...@gmail.com> Sent: 04 April 2018 18:40 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: systemvm @Paul Yes, I explicitly created it like normal nfs share, and gave the path of the ex

RE: systemvm

ck.sh > > In the ssvm itself > > > > paul.an...@shapeblue.com > www.shapeblue.com > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK > @shapeblue > > > > > -Original Message- > From: Swastik Mittal <mittal.swas...@gmail.com> > Sent: 04

RE: systemvm

- From: Swastik Mittal <mittal.swas...@gmail.com> Sent: 04 April 2018 18:25 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: systemvm Hey Paul Yes, I have my management working as the storage as well. Regards Swastik On 4 Apr 2018 10:39 p.m., "Paul Angus" <paul.an...@shapeblue.com&

RE: systemvm

ces on the same subnet. > > paul.an...@shapeblue.com > www.shapeblue.com > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK > @shapeblue > > > > > -Original Message- > From: Swastik Mittal <mittal.swas...@gmail.com> > Sent: 04 April 2018 11:46 > T

RE: systemvm

<mittal.swas...@gmail.com> Sent: 04 April 2018 11:46 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: systemvm @Stephen "host" in global settings is set to 10.1.0.15 which is the ip address of the management server. Yes, I'll work on getting ssvm-check file. Thanks Swastik On 4/4/18

Re: systemvm

@Stephen "host" in global settings is set to 10.1.0.15 which is the ip address of the management server. Yes, I'll work on getting ssvm-check file. Thanks Swastik On 4/4/18, Swastik Mittal wrote: > @Stephen > > Request to internal server mentioned in the global

Re: systemvm

@Stephen Request to internal server mentioned in the global sec.storage.. after registering the iso successfully, get's stuck on HEAD request. As you mentioned there is an issue in route path from SSVM. Not able to figure out how do I find it. regards Swastik On 4/4/18, Swastik Mittal

Re: systemvm

Swastik, What is your “host” global setting set to? Also – the check script should be in /usr/local/cloud/systemvm/ssvm-check.sh – if this is missing you have other issues – possibly with the systemvm.iso. Regards, Dag Sonstebo Cloud Architect ShapeBlue On 04/04/2018, 11:07, "Swastik Mittal"

Re: systemvm

Hey @Stephen I am able to ping my management from ssvm. Also wget to internal server works fine, it took some time to establish connection initially. I don't have any ssvm-check.sh file. I forgot to mention it on this thread. Outputs: root@s-1-VM:~# ip a s 1: lo: mtu

Re: systemvm

Hu! I'ld recommend to log in to your ssvm and check if everything is able to connect. I second dag's suggestion to double check your network setup. Inside your ssvm I'ld run /usr/local/cloud/systemvm/ssvm-check.sh also ip a s ip r s As an educated guess: did you setup your storage-network

Re: systemvm

@Dag By legacy I meant one way ssl. I have set ca strictness for client as false. I am using 1 nic common for all the network, that is one bridge serving both public and private network. I am setting up a basic zone so I set my management within ip range of 10 and guest within a range of 100,

Re: systemvm

Swastik, Your issue is most likely with your network configuration rather than anything to do with firewalls or system VM templates. First of all – what do you mean by legacy mode? Are you referring to advanced or basic zone? Secondly – can you tell us how you have configured your

Re: systemvm

@jagdish Yes I was using the same link. On 4 Apr 2018 1:07 p.m., "Jagdish Patil" wrote: > Hey Swastik, > > download.cloudstack.org link doesn't look like an issue, but which version > and which hypervisor are you using? > > For KVM, download this: >

Re: systemvm

Hey Swastik, download.cloudstack.org link doesn't look like an issue, but which version and which hypervisor are you using? For KVM, download this: http://download.cloudstack.org/systemvm/4.11/systemvmtemplate-4.11.0-kvm.qcow2.bz2 Regards, Jagdish Patil On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 1:00 PM Swastik

Re: systemvm

Hey @jagdish I was using download.cloudstack.org to download systemVM. Is there any bug within the template uploaded here? @Soundar I did disable firewall services but din't work. I'll check it again though. On 4/4/18, soundar rajan wrote: > disabled firewalld service

Re: systemvm

disabled firewalld service on the hostname and check. you should able to access using console window. On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 10:07 AM, Swastik Mittal wrote: > Hey, > > I am installing ACS 4.11 (legacy mode), with management and host on same > server and out-of-band

Re: systemvm

Hey Swastik, Which SSVM are you using? Install SSVM from this link: http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/systemvm/4.11/ Regards, Jagdish Patil On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 10:07 AM Swastik Mittal wrote: > Hey, > > I am installing ACS 4.11 (legacy mode), with management and host

Re: SystemVM not starting after updating console SSL cert

Thanks Andrija. Will try this and get back to all further update. Regards, Amit From: Andrija Panic <andrija.pa...@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, February 8, 2018 2:14:11 AM To: users Subject: Re: SystemVM not starting after updating console SSL cert H

Re: SystemVM not starting after updating console SSL cert

.2.20120506223416 | 2012-07-02 13:03:10 | Complete | > ++--+-+--+ > > Let me check hypervisor logs. > > > From: Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> > Sent: Wednesday, February 7, 2018 3:46:54 PM > To:

Re: SystemVM not starting after updating console SSL cert

o the machine itself but to the hypervisor it runs on, it might have logs with usefull infromation. ​ > > > Regards, > > > Amit > > ____ > From: Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> > Sent: Wednesday, February 7, 2018 2:02:29 PM >

Re: SystemVM not starting after updating console SSL cert

t might have logs with usefull infromation. ​ > > > Regards, > > > Amit > > ________ > From: Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> > Sent: Wednesday, February 7, 2018 2:02:29 PM > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: System

Re: SystemVM not starting after updating console SSL cert

y the consoleproxy stops again? >> How can I get there if the machine is not running. Regards, Amit From: Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, February 7, 2018 2:02:29 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: SystemVM not star

Re: SystemVM not starting after updating console SSL cert

Amit, couple of questions as I am not sure what you are asking for. When you say this is an old query, do you mean it is an old version of CloudStack? Which version is it? During your install of the new certificates, did you destroy the systemvms and let cloudstack recreate them? And can you get

Re: SystemVM can't start

Can you look if the system vm start in PV mode? We come up with a situation with xs7.1 where the systemvm fail to start because it was in HVM. On Mar 27, 2017 10:29 AM, "Fabiano A. Souza" wrote: > Hi Rafael, > > I just want to thank you for your help. > > I tried to use

Re: SystemVM can't start

Hi Rafael, I just want to thank you for your help. I tried to use the hint of fixing state.db but it did not work. The XML validator return the message that no errors was found on file. I had to recreate the XenServer's Pool. As I had no-critical instances on this pool the downtime impact was

Re: SystemVM can't start

The answer is in my previous email, last line: > You can check if there is something wrong in state.db by passing the > contents of it in an XML validator. There will probably be some broken XML > tags there. > Last time I faced this problem, I put the host in maintenance, powered off or migrate

Re: SystemVM can't start

Very thanks Rafael. I was already imagining that this would be the problem. Do you know any way to fix this problem in XenServer? By your experience do you believe that recreating the pool in XenServer will correct this problem? Again thanks so much for your help. --- FABIANO A. SOUZA

Re: SystemVM can't start

Looking at the log from your XenServer, and as I said before the problem is not in ACS. This kind of log entries: Db_exn.DBCache_NotFound("missing row", "VBD", > "OpaqueRef:e1136dfc-cdbc-ba21-3eb8-94838cc75030") > or > D:424e469aca54 failed with exception Db_exn.DBCache_NotFound("missing >

Re: SystemVM can't start

I am not sure if this is a complete destroy and if ACS re-uses something from the old VMs. >From your logs, > VIF.unplug > R:68394c4e8e7c failed with exception Db_exn.DBCache_NotFound("missing > This probably happened because when the VM was being created and the VIF was not created in the

Re: SystemVM can't start

This is not an Apache CloudStack (ACS) problem per se. "HOST_CANNOT_ATTACH_NETWOR" Something is wrong with your hosts. Are all of the networks of yours hosts working? is everything in place as ACS expects? On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 10:26 AM, Fabiano A. Souza wrote: > After

Re: Systemvm agent state - via api

Hi Erik, Thanks for this, I did check by using developer tools, I just assumed listHosts would only be returning host data. I can see it also includes the systemvm info :-) Thanks again. On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 12:26 PM, Erik Weber terbol...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 1:17 PM,

RE: Systemvm agent state - via api

) Ltd, 2nd Floor, Oudehuis Centre, 122 Main Rd, Somerset West, Cape Town 7130 -Original Message- From: cs user [mailto:acldstk...@gmail.com] Sent: 19 May 2015 01:38 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Systemvm agent state - via api Hi Erik, Thanks for this, I did check by using

Re: SystemVM VMware deleted from VMFS Datastore

Remove the entry from template_spool_ref table and try again On Mar 28, 2015 3:44 AM, joseph_y...@dell.com wrote: Dell - Internal Use - Confidential Hello everyone, Whilst cleaning up my VMFS datastore, cleaning up reminnats of virtual instances past, I accidently deleted the System VM

Re: systemVM network config question

see, exact problem I have faced with HyperV what i did, I created external switch which contains public Ip address and one internal switch which contain private, and need to make sure you can access internet from both switch/bridge. Now in ZONES Physcal Network I have defind the switch name and

Re: systemVM network config question

Also try disabling VLAN tagging, just normally. On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 5:23 PM, Partha Goswami par...@tulisoft.co.in wrote: see, exact problem I have faced with HyperV what i did, I created external switch which contains public Ip address and one internal switch which contain private, and

Re: systemVM network config question

nice to hear On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 6:41 PM, Daniel Kollmer daniel.koll...@tomtom.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/10/2015 12:54 PM, Partha Goswami wrote: Also try disabling VLAN tagging, just normally. Actually I just found out what it was. I had created

Re: systemVM network config question

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/10/2015 12:54 PM, Partha Goswami wrote: Also try disabling VLAN tagging, just normally. Actually I just found out what it was. I had created the cloudbr0 and cloudbr1 interfaces by hand as I had read in the documentation here:

Re: SystemVM attempts to use incorrect hypervisor on router creation after host tags have been applied

I am aware that it cannot find a VMware host that is tagged Xen. That is intentional. I have 2 Xen clusters that are able to run the cloud router but, Cloudstack is still trying to use vmware for the hypervisor to launch the template. I am wondering if there is not logic to use all

RE: SystemVM attempts to use incorrect hypervisor on router creation after host tags have been applied

As per the logs it is not able to find any host with tag=Xen under cluster 7. Check if the host is tagged correctly 2014-07-03 04:56:12,611 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator] (Job-Executor-116:job-31669 FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Looking for hosts in dc: 1 pod:1 cluster:7 2014-07-03