Re: Windows Authentication

2016-03-07 Thread tomcat
On 07.03.2016 11:39, André Warnier (tomcat) wrote: On 07.03.2016 06:10, Chanchal Kariwala wrote: The article which suggested that NTLM is being used by Winlogon instead of Kerberos :

Re: Windows Authentication

2016-03-07 Thread tomcat
On 07.03.2016 06:10, Chanchal Kariwala wrote: The article which suggested that NTLM is being used by Winlogon instead of Kerberos : http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5597573/how-to-find-if-ntlm-or-kerberos-is-used-from-www-authenticate-negotiate-header So the token browser sends on first 401

Re: Windows Authentication

2016-03-06 Thread Chanchal Kariwala
The article which suggested that NTLM is being used by Winlogon instead of Kerberos : http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5597573/how-to-find-if-ntlm-or-kerberos-is-used-from-www-authenticate-negotiate-header So the token browser sends on first 401 starts from YHkG... And the second token begins

Re: Windows Authentication

2016-03-06 Thread Chanchal Kariwala
In response to *George Stanchev*, I tried with Chrome and IE 11, same behavior in both. And yes I tried waffle, but in another webapp. Waffle does not prompt for the credentials. In response to *André Warnier*, I tired that to no avail :( In response to *Felix Schumacher*, It is not a problem

Re: Windows Authentication

2016-03-05 Thread Felix Schumacher
Am 04.03.2016 um 10:11 schrieb Chanchal Kariwala: I tries what you asked and I have observed the following 1. Browser sends a request for the resource Server replies with HTTP 401 and WWW-Authenticate: Negotiate in Response Headers 2. Browser sends a new request with the following in Request

Re: Windows Authentication

2016-03-04 Thread tomcat
ant to go over that thread to see it can give you pointers. [1] https://github.com/dblock/waffle/issues/268 -Original Message- From: Chanchal Kariwala [mailto:chanchal.kariw...@seclore.com] Sent: Friday, March 04, 2016 2:52 AM To: Tomcat Users List <users@tomcat.apache.org> Subj

RE: Windows Authentication

2016-03-04 Thread George Stanchev
...@seclore.com] Sent: Friday, March 04, 2016 2:52 AM To: Tomcat Users List <users@tomcat.apache.org> Subject: Re: Windows Authentication But how does the browser decide on Basic Auth? Usually 401 Response contains WWW-Authenticate: Basic realm="MyREALM" to indicate Basic Auth Th

Re: Windows Authentication

2016-03-04 Thread Chanchal Kariwala
But how does the browser decide on Basic Auth? Usually 401 Response contains WWW-Authenticate: Basic realm="MyREALM" to indicate Basic Auth Thanks, Chanchal R. Kariwala Product Engineer Seclore Technology chanchal.kariw...@seclore.com www.seclore.com On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 3:16 PM, André

Re: Windows Authentication

2016-03-04 Thread tomcat
On 04.03.2016 10:11, Chanchal Kariwala wrote: I tries what you asked and I have observed the following 1. Browser sends a request for the resource Server replies with HTTP 401 and WWW-Authenticate: Negotiate in Response Headers Fine. 2. Browser sends a new request with the following in

Re: Windows Authentication

2016-03-04 Thread Chanchal Kariwala
I tries what you asked and I have observed the following 1. Browser sends a request for the resource Server replies with HTTP 401 and WWW-Authenticate: Negotiate in Response Headers 2. Browser sends a new request with the following in Request Headers Authorization: Negotiate

Re: Windows Authentication

2016-03-03 Thread tomcat
On 04.03.2016 07:16, Chanchal Kariwala wrote: I am using Tomcat 8.0.32 and I have followed the guide given at - https://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-8.0-doc/windows-auth-howto.html#Tomcat_instance_(Windows_server) -

Re: Windows authentication : outdated link

2015-03-13 Thread Konstantin Kolinko
2015-03-13 15:04 GMT+03:00 André Warnier a...@ice-sa.com: Hi. Errata : In the page http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-8.0-doc/windows-auth-howto.html#References (and also in the corresponding Tomcat 7 page), the link to Geronimo configuration for Windows authentication leads to :

Re: Windows authentication : outdated link

2015-03-13 Thread Konstantin Kolinko
2015-03-13 15:13 GMT+03:00 Konstantin Kolinko knst.koli...@gmail.com: 2015-03-13 15:04 GMT+03:00 André Warnier a...@ice-sa.com: Hi. Errata : In the page http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-8.0-doc/windows-auth-howto.html#References (and also in the corresponding Tomcat 7 page), the link to

RE: Windows Authentication on Tomcat 7.0.37 and JRE 7u13 / 64-bit

2013-03-01 Thread Chris Fors
.\conf\web.xml Again no calls to jaas.conf, or krb5.ini Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 06:42:35 -0800 From: ma...@apache.org To: users@tomcat.apache.org Subject: Re: Windows Authentication on Tomcat 7.0.37 and JRE 7u13 / 64-bit On 28/02/2013 02:18, Chris Fors wrote: Trying to get Windows

Re: Windows Authentication on Tomcat 7.0.37 and JRE 7u13 / 64-bit

2013-02-28 Thread André Warnier
Chris Fors wrote: Trying to get Windows Authentication operational using the Tomcat Built-in method. Implemented the following but not observed any Windows / Kerberos authentication occuring: - Domain joined windows member server - Domain service account - Delegated

Re: Windows Authentication on Tomcat 7.0.37 and JRE 7u13 / 64-bit

2013-02-28 Thread Mark Thomas
On 28/02/2013 02:18, Chris Fors wrote: Trying to get Windows Authentication operational using the Tomcat Built-in method. Implemented the following but not observed any Windows / Kerberos authentication occuring: - Domain joined windows member server - Domain service account - Delegated SPN

Re: Windows Authentication: Issue 49318 vs 47679

2011-04-11 Thread Tim Whittington
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 7:26 AM, Stefan Mayr ste...@mayr-stefan.de wrote: Hello everybody, as many others before we wanted to do single-sign-on for intranet web applications using integrated windows authentication (negotiate because IE sometimes tries NTLM instead of using plain kerberos -

Re: Windows Authentication: Issue 49318 vs 47679

2011-04-04 Thread André Warnier
Stefan Mayr wrote: Native SPNEGO in Tomcat sounds great. Waiting a little while depends on your scale of little. Is there already some development we can follow? Will this use Java GSS? I never figured out how to configure this with Tomcat. If you are in a hurry, you may want to have a

Re: Windows Authentication: Issue 49318 vs 47679

2011-03-29 Thread Mark Thomas
On 28/03/2011 22:31, Stefan Mayr wrote: Native SPNEGO in Tomcat sounds great. Waiting a little while depends on your scale of little. Is there already some development we can follow? Will this use Java GSS? I never figured out how to configure this with Tomcat. little hopefully means the next

Re: Windows Authentication: Issue 49318 vs 47679

2011-03-29 Thread Mark Thomas
On 29/03/2011 15:20, Mark Thomas wrote: On 28/03/2011 22:31, Stefan Mayr wrote: Native SPNEGO in Tomcat sounds great. Waiting a little while depends on your scale of little. Is there already some development we can follow? Will this use Java GSS? I never figured out how to configure this with

Re: Windows Authentication: Issue 49318 vs 47679

2011-03-29 Thread Borut Hadžialić
Would adding support for client credential delegation be out of scope for this implementation or not? Client credential delegation is when you use the spnego token construct a javax.security.auth.Subject instance that represents the client - which the server side application can use this to

Re: Windows Authentication: Issue 49318 vs 47679

2011-03-29 Thread Borut Hadžialić
Whoops, i reversed the condition of the if statement, it should be: //check if the credentials can be delegated if (context.getCredDelegState()) { ... } On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 9:47 PM, Borut Hadžialić borut.hadzia...@gmail.com wrote: Would adding support for client credential delegation be out

Re: Windows Authentication: Issue 49318 vs 47679

2011-03-29 Thread Mark Thomas
On 29/03/2011 20:47, Borut Hadžialić wrote: Would adding support for client credential delegation be out of scope for this implementation or not? It is in scope with the caveat - as always - that it depends on what the final implementation looks like. I do know (from debug logging) that right

Re: Windows Authentication: Issue 49318 vs 47679

2011-03-29 Thread Borut Hadžialić
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 9:57 PM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote: It is in scope with the caveat - as always - that it depends on what the final implementation looks like. I do know (from debug logging) that right now tokens do not allow delegation. I suspect the hardest part of

Re: Windows Authentication: Issue 49318 vs 47679

2011-03-29 Thread Mark Thomas
On 29/03/2011 21:18, Borut Hadžialić wrote: On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 9:57 PM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote: It is in scope with the caveat - as always - that it depends on what the final implementation looks like. I do know (from debug logging) that right now tokens do not allow

Re: Windows Authentication: Issue 49318 vs 47679

2011-03-28 Thread Borut Hadžialić
Hellos Stefan, if you can't fix your problem with configuration and decide that you want to solve the problem by programming, then this might help you http://blog.springsource.com/2009/09/28/spring-security-kerberos/ After understanding that article a developer should be able to add a SPNEGO

Re: Windows Authentication: Issue 49318 vs 47679

2011-03-28 Thread Mark Thomas
On 28/03/2011 08:42, Borut Hadžialić wrote: Hellos Stefan, if you can't fix your problem with configuration and decide that you want to solve the problem by programming, then this might help you http://blog.springsource.com/2009/09/28/spring-security-kerberos/ After understanding that

RE: Windows Authentication: Issue 49318 vs 47679

2011-03-28 Thread spring
I should have SPNEGO support in Tomcat 7 fairly soon. This would be great! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org

Re: Windows Authentication: Issue 49318 vs 47679

2011-03-28 Thread Stefan Mayr
Hi Mark, Am 28.03.2011 10:49, schrieb Mark Thomas: On 28/03/2011 08:42, Borut Hadžialić wrote: Hellos Stefan, if you can't fix your problem with configuration and decide that you want to solve the problem by programming, then this might help you

Re: Windows Authentication against multiple domains

2007-02-11 Thread Pulkit Singhal
I can't suggest any open-source/free products but allow me to suggest reading the following article if you want to roll your own solution one of these days in the windows world: http://www.microsoft.com/msj/0899/kerberos/kerberos.aspx Once you read it, I hope you will be able to see how you can

RE: Windows Authentication against multiple domains

2007-02-09 Thread Propes, Barry L [GCG-NAOT]
if you find out, please let me know...I'm barking up that tree, too. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 09, 2007 4:50 PM To: users@tomcat.apache.org Subject: Windows Authentication against multiple domains Hi, I am having a

RE: Windows Authentication against multiple domains

2007-02-09 Thread Uwe_77
Sure, I will let you know. Perhaps we need third party tools. Doese someone knows a solution? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/RE%3A-Windows-Authentication-against-multiple-domains-tf3203321.html#a8895171 Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Windows Authentication against multiple domains

2007-02-09 Thread Suneet Shah
Hello, We have this capability in our open source identity and access management solution where you can use more then one use more then one repository for authentication. You may be able to use just the authentication service as taking on the rest of it may be more then what you need. The

RE: Windows Authentication against multiple domains

2007-02-09 Thread John Najarian
I am yet another barking up that tree. --- Propes, Barry L [GCG-NAOT] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: if you find out, please let me know...I'm barking up that tree, too. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 09, 2007 4:50 PM To: