Hi,
>
> ¡¡ Welcome
Could it be, that is not supported as markup for a Label component
and that you should use something like instead ?
... roland
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/How-to-handle-these-nested-%3Ctable%3E-tags-tf4412208.html#a12
Thank you for your help! But the major problem is The Label Is Not at the same
level as the form , the Label is deep inside those table tags. Is there any
solution to this kind of problem.
Thanks again~
Kevin Liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have a html page that displays "welcome
,XXX" ,or
>>It is absurd. You can deploy your web application wherever you want.
Thanks for explaining the most esoteric aspect of web applications. Perhaps
no one knew it so far :-) . Well, it's not your fault either since this
thread has grown out of proportions, and it's not easy to read all message.
No, it did not work for me using ajax. Until I added one of the
solutions described.
Should I provide a quickstart?
regards Nino
Igor Vaynberg wrote:
as far as i know Image works just fine with ajax. if you want an image that
is not cached use NonCachingImage.
-igor
On 9/9/07, Nino Saturni
Again, try using NonCachingImage instead of Image. I does exacly what
the suggested fix does. I just overlooked it.
-Matej
On 9/10/07, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No, it did not work for me using ajax. Until I added one of the
> solutions described.
>
> Shoul
My point was to show you an alternative to Jetty plugin.
chickabee wrote:
>
>>>It is absurd. You can deploy your web application wherever you want.
>
> Thanks for explaining the most esoteric aspect of web applications.
> Perhaps no one knew it so far :-) . Well, it's not your fault either
thank you for your very detailled answer!
this is what I like here... (and no one gets bashed for asking)
:clap:
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
>
>> YOU GUESS WHAT?!!
>> I JUST RENAMED THE FILE TO "dialogTable.htm" AND NOW IT IS WORKING!!
>> it is the fact of not being able to serve "html"-files!
>> is
I'm not a Wicket core developer guru, but I'm leading a big Wicket based
project in Rome.
I would pleased to attend Cocoon conference and bring my Wicket experience.
Paolo Di Tommaso
On 9/9/07, Grzegorz Kossakowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello Wicket devs and users!
>
> On behalf of Co
I know(and agree), but I just feel that we should somehow warn people
that image won't work with ajax?
regards Nino
Matej Knopp wrote:
Again, try using NonCachingImage instead of Image. I does exacly what
the suggested fix does. I just overlooked it.
-Matej
On 9/10/07, Nino Saturnino Martine
Hi,
According to the javadoc Form.updateFormComponentModels should update
all the models of all FormComponents in a form (without validation
presumably?). This sets all the model objects to the convertedInput
value (in FormComponent.updateModel), unfortunately convertedInput is
only set after
I just wanted to let you know, that our Wicket-based website gone on-line:
http://www.syntevo.com
If somebody finds a problem, please let me know.
We really liked the flexibility of Wicket. Although not supported out-of-the
box, we configured Wicket, so our templates can be 100% pure HTML (ex
Hi,
Wicketstuff dojo has just been modified in order to build its artifact
on the same location as usually :
http://www.wicketstuff.org/maven/repository/org/wicketstuff/wicketstuff-dojo
Cheers
--
Vincent
Maurice Marrink wrote:
Johan recently made some changes to the wicket-stuff repository
I was one of two people who built kronos, but i have to say that i haven't
worked on it for quite a while, because of time issues, so the dependency is
most likely out of date.
Ted
2007/9/8, Maurice Marrink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Ted, who build kronos, is on vacation and I'm not sure if he is
On 9/10/07, Matthijs Wensveen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Off-topic: Why are so much methods marked final? This might prevent
> API-misuse but also prevents innovative _use_! I can understand you want
> framework users to do it the wicket way, because they will probably only
> spam the users list
Paolo Di Tommaso pisze:
> I'm not a Wicket core developer guru, but I'm leading a big Wicket based
> project in Rome.
No problem, I never have said that we want to speak only Wicke Gurus.
> I would pleased to attend Cocoon conference and bring my Wicket experience.
So hurry up, register and see
hi thomas,
> http://www.syntevo.com
> If somebody finds a problem, please let me know.
looks nice. :-) only thing you should consider is to open external links in a
new browser window (so your site stays available).
regards, --- jan.
-
Matej, I must disagree with you regarding performance issues of the
SecondLevelSessionStore. I've reverted the Application#newSessionStore to
HttpSessionStore and this significantly improved the application overall
performance. Maybe this is not so obvious for small applications, but when
it is ab
Congratulations!
You might want to set setStripWicketTags to true though.
Martijn
On 9/10/07, Thomas Singer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just wanted to let you know, that our Wicket-based website gone on-line:
>
> http://www.syntevo.com
>
> If somebody finds a problem, please let me know.
>
The label doesn't need to be at the same level as the form, just
inside the form. Wicket doesn't care about non-wicket HTML elements
between the form and the label. From Wicket's point of view, your
label component is a direct child of the form.
Maybe I'm missing something obvious here, but
No, LABEL is a valid HTML element for a Label component (it would be
pretty twisted if it wasn't ;)). Besides, if a tag check was failing,
the error message would say so.
But keep the guesses coming. That's all I've been able to for Kevin
so far...
-Ryan
On Sep 10, 2007, at 12:00 AM, Rol
invocation count 1??
So you only do 1 request and you profile that?
thats not a good test. You have to do plenty and multiply on the same time
(10 for 100 request or something like that)
to really see the difference. (and have a warm up phase)
johan
On 9/10/07, Alex Objelean <[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Sep 10, 2007, at 1:31 AM, Jan Kriesten wrote:
looks nice. :-) only thing you should consider is to open external
links in a
new browser window (so your site stays available).
regards, --- jan.
Gah! I thought opening new windows for external links went out with
the blink tag ;) Serious
Maybe the profiling was not a perfect one. But still, I have to give up using
SecondSessionLevelStore just because the responsiveness of the application
is very slow.
Johan Compagner wrote:
>
> invocation count 1??
>
> So you only do 1 request and you profile that?
> thats not a good test. Yo
@vincent
Hmm, looks like you are generating unique id's for your snapshots. I
don't think that is wise as the server will run out of disk space like
that in no time. You should put false
inside the snapshotRepository tag.
Maurice
On 9/10/07, Vincent Demay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Wick
On 9/10/07, Matthijs Wensveen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> According to the javadoc Form.updateFormComponentModels should update
> all the models of all FormComponents in a form (without validation
> presumably?). This sets all the model objects to the convertedInput
no it updates the
that looks very strange to me. We have also a very large app here and we
dont notice a difference
So i am very curious what is happening at your place then. Are you sure for
example that the pages
are serializable ? That we don't have constantly exceptions?
johan
On 9/10/07, Alex Objelean <[EMA
you should call invalidate() anyway instead of invalidateNow()
there could maybe be usecases where you should call the invalidateNow() for
example if you want to invalidate
the current http session and make in the same request a new one (if that is
possible??)
But you should do invalidate() becaus
bebetu wrote:
Hi,
I am experiencing a strange issue with a ModalWindow behavior (I'm using
wicket 1.3 beta3). The main page content contains a flash object (I'm using
a SWFObject to render it) and when a ModalWindow pops-up over this content,
the flash object is still visible below. in Firefox th
Maurice Marrink wrote:
@vincent
Hmm, looks like you are generating unique id's for your snapshots. I
don't think that is wise as the server will run out of disk space like
that in no time. You should put false
inside the snapshotRepository tag.
Tnx Maurice,
I added it.
Cheers
--
Vincent
If the pages wouldn't be serializable, it wouldn't work in development mode.
Is it right?
I think that it is not necessarily about how large is application, in my
case it is about how large is the model I'm working with for that specific
request (ajax request).
My action was: fetch a subview of
Here is the constructor of the class i have:
public CategoryBrowser(final PageParameters parameters) {
// Add the simplest type of label
add(new Label("message", "Welcome to the Category Browser Page"));
System.out.println("Param = " + parameters.getString("id") );
tried https://lilo:8443/whisky/app/cat/id/1 ?
you might want to have a look at QueryStringUrlCodingStrategy
On 9/10/07, chickabee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Here is the constructor of the class i have:
>
> public CategoryBrowser(final PageParameters parameters) {
> // Add the simp
How big is the page? Sounds like a really, really big component
hierarchy. Then it sounds reasonable that the httpsession store is
much faster: it keeps it in ram, and doesn't use serialization until
the session is serialized (server shutting down, deciding to put
session to disk or replication of
yes please change this because else i can keep on deleting constantly stuff
:(
On 9/10/07, Maurice Marrink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> @vincent
> Hmm, looks like you are generating unique id's for your snapshots. I
> don't think that is wise as the server will run out of disk space like
> that
Johan Compagner wrote:
On 9/10/07, Matthijs Wensveen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
According to the javadoc Form.updateFormComponentModels should update
all the models of all FormComponents in a form (without validation
presumably?). This sets all the model objects to the convertedInput
Simply Amazing! It works like a charm.
So the Wicket syntx is:
https://lilo:8443/whisky/app/cat/param1/value1/param2/value2
Gracias para la ayuda Fancis!
=
tried https://lilo:8443/whisky/app/cat/id/1 ?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Param-%3D
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
On 9/10/07, Matthijs Wensveen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Off-topic: Why are so much methods marked final? This might prevent
API-misuse but also prevents innovative _use_! I can understand you want
framework users to do it the wicket way, because they will probably onl
that is the default, you can changed it using a different UrlCodingStrategy
On 9/10/07, chickabee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Simply Amazing! It works like a charm.
>
> So the Wicket syntx is:
> https://lilo:8443/whisky/app/cat/param1/value1/param2/value2
>
> Gracias para la ayuda Fancis!
>
>
i have something similar, an image servlet, rather than re write to load
from wicket, see what i did
add(new Image("imageFromServlet", new ServletImageDynamicResource());
private final class ServletImageDynamicResource extends DynamicImageResource
{
private byte[] imagegif = null;
Thanks again, and what will be the best way to make these url temper proof?
Currently, if i break the key value pairs, the wicket app is very unhappy
like below:
Unexpected RuntimeException
Root cause:
java.lang.IllegalStateException: URL fragment has unmatched key/value pair:
name/foo/id
at
Hi Jan,
only thing you should consider is to open external links in a
new browser window (so your site stays available).
It already should do that. External links should be automatically detected,
decorated with a small graphic and open in a separate window. Which
particular link does not wo
no it is not! - its just 1 way the wicket syntax may be - you should
look at mount and the existing coding-strategys as well as (if youre on
1.3 already) on the new HybridUrlCodingStrategy
you can have fllowing URL flavors out of box:
/app/page/value1/value2
(IndexedURLCoding)
/app/page:0
(hyb
Indeed, it is a very big component hierarchy (It contains at least 3 levels
of nested AjaxTabbedPanel components).
The application is, in fact, a single page and it uses a lot of ajax to
perform the updates. The model reflect the component hierarchy (Appliction
has a single modelObject which nest
The available list should include the full set I think, not just those that
are not currently selected.
Severian.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/palette-problem-tf4413718.html#a12590426
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
I believe the
org.apache.wicket.request.target.coding.AbstractRequestTargetUrlCodingStrategy.decodeParameters(),
shold not throw a RunTime Exception as it does now, if the url is tampered,
instead it should always provide the parameters and values to it's best
guess and then let the user decided
There seems to be something terribly weird going on. Your application
looks like a corner case. On page like that, I wouldn't be surprised
if there was penalty using SecondLevelCacheSessionStore, but the
numbers you've posted are way too bad to be caused by wicket itself.
My guess is that your mod
if you save the page to disk how big is it?
johan
On 9/10/07, Alex Objelean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Indeed, it is a very big component hierarchy (It contains at least 3
> levels
> of nested AjaxTabbedPanel components).
> The application is, in fact, a single page and it uses a lot of aj
severian wrote:
>
> The available list should include the full set I think, not just those
> that are not currently selected.
>
> Severian.
>
>
I've tried this. It doesn't help
-
final Form pupilForm = new PupilForm("pupilForm");
Strin
>Hacker will be
> very happy with the current state of implementation.
why?
chickabee schrieb:
Yes you are right.
I guess the the name u were looking for is:
org.apache.wicket.request.target.coding.MixedParamUrlCodingStrategy
These strategies are pretty nice, but the question remains why the
How can I figure it out?
Johan Compagner wrote:
>
> if you save the page to disk how big is it?
>
> johan
>
>
> On 9/10/07, Alex Objelean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Indeed, it is a very big component hierarchy (It contains at least 3
>> levels
>> of nested AjaxTabbedPanel componen
On 9/10/07, chickabee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> These strategies are pretty nice, but the question remains why the
> decoder()
> method pukes out when there is mismatch of key value pairs. Hacker will be
> very happy with the current state of implementation.
only if you deploy your applicati
Matej, how can I say to my model to serialize some objects and to not others?
If I would detach the entire mode, that would mean that the next ajax
request would require again to call the (very costly) service and this is
not acceptable.
Alex.
Matej Knopp-2 wrote:
>
> There seems to be someth
You can make the reference transient. So it would no be serialized,
bit it would be kept in memory as long as the page is the last
accessed one. And if it eventually becomes null (when you e.g go to
another page and return back), you can reinject it. Or you can just
store it to session (outside the
Turn on SecondLevelCacheSessionStore, and use FilePageStore as
IPageStore (specified in session store constructor). Then go to your
tmp dir and you should be able to find the serialized pages there.
-Matej
On 9/10/07, Alex Objelean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> How can I figure it out?
>
>
>
>
>
Hello everyone!
I've got a problem using component Palette from Wicket-Extensions-1.2.6. The
code I use to add Palette on a Form is cited below:
---
final Form pupilForm = new PupilForm("pupilForm");
List available = new ArrayList();
av
>
>
> Okay, so the difference with Form.process() is that process() does not
> update at all when one of the FormComponents is invalid, and
> updateFormComponentModels updates all that ARE valid, right? So that's
> usually what you want (and what I want in this case). Thanks for making
> this clear
On Monday, September 10, 2007, 12:23:36 PM, chickabee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I still do not see why the wicket should treat it as an internal error if
> there are missing parameters? I guess wicket needs to follow the same
> paradigm as in the raw HttpRequest, let the user pull the parameter
only if you deploy your application in development mode. in deployment mode
only the "internal error" page.
see IApplicationSettings#setInternalErrorPage(Class)
gerolf
Thanks for the good piece of info.
I still do not see why the wicket should treat it as an internal error if
there are missin
It is about 32MB. Kind a big page :)
Matej Knopp-2 wrote:
>
> Turn on SecondLevelCacheSessionStore, and use FilePageStore as
> IPageStore (specified in session store constructor). Then go to your
> tmp dir and you should be able to find the serialized pages there.
>
> -Matej
>
> On 9/10/07,
Yes you are right.
I guess the the name u were looking for is:
org.apache.wicket.request.target.coding.MixedParamUrlCodingStrategy
These strategies are pretty nice, but the question remains why the decoder()
method pukes out when there is mismatch of key value pairs. Hacker will be
very happy wi
I would disagree because this is the first problem any web developer would
like to address, what happens if their urls are being tempered manually, it
should not result into any kind of error by the web framework, rather this
is the application validation issue and to be handled by the applicati
Indeed, making the reference transient improves the responsiveness even with
the SecondSessionLevelStore. Anyway, I am curious, what is your advice for
this kind of applications? Keep using HttpSessionStore or switch to
SecondLevelSessionStore and make the most big objects transient? What is the
b
Pardon? All that's doing is showing their custom error page, exactly
as the other replies have suggested that you'd want to do with Wicket
- I'd be more impressed if it had shown an index of the news for that
date, but as it is, that's just what you can easily do with Wicket.
All you need to do is
Ok, thanks for the help on this. My objective was to be able to have
a structure of HTML and resource dependencies (css, js, img, etc) that could
be easily edited in an HTML editor such that the editor doesn't have
problems resolving the resources and such that Wicket doesn't have problems
reso
I believe that the Wicket Bench for Eclipse does enable you to work
with your stylesheet and the html inside the packages.
Martijn
On 9/10/07, Jason Mihalick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Ok, thanks for the help on this. My objective was to be able to have
> a structure of HTML and resource d
Ok, let me give you a different scenario and see if wicket has a way to
handle it.
Assume there are 10 parameters are being passed to the app as below:
http://some.web.site/wicket/app/page/p1/v1/p2/v2/p3/v3/...p9/v9/p10/v10
Now If I mess-up the key value pair at the end like:
http://some.we
you got to be kidding me...32MB
really? Or is this a nice joke so in the middle of the day :)
johan
On 9/10/07, Alex Objelean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> It is about 32MB. Kind a big page :)
>
>
> Matej Knopp-2 wrote:
> >
> > Turn on SecondLevelCacheSessionStore, and use FilePageStore
:) Unfortunately it's not a joke, but I'm glad you're having fun :D.
Actually, this is result of worst case scenario simulation (I told you that
there are heavy objects in the model). After making transient some of the
fields, the size of the page dropped dramatically.
Alex.
Johan Compagner wro
On 9/10/07, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> you got to be kidding me...32MB
> really? Or is this a nice joke so in the middle of the day :)
Alex did warn us that it was a big page :)
Martijn
--
Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst
Apache Wicket 1.3.0-beta3 is relea
Perhaps template inheritance can help you here. I have a 'base' page
that contains the HTML head tag that all my pages use. For example I
have a Basepage.html:
http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml";
xmlns:wicket="http://wicket.apache.org/";>
...
and a
The only caveat you'll have is whether or not the backbutton is
supported long enough, and how many copies of that page you want to
have in memory.
If the non-2nd level cache way works for you, then there is absolutely
nobody telling you to stop using it. The difference has mostly to do
with provi
You write your own coding strategy, using the existing ones as
guidelines/templates - I've not got any example code as supporting
free-format user-created URL's isn't a scenario that's been relevant
in the applications I've done.
Wicket provides a number of strategies, but the fundamental point is
It is a intranet application, so the number of users for this application is
at most ~30-40 users/day. A back button support is not needed, because there
is a single page and also it doesn't make sense (since it is all ajax).
I'm still wondering, what is best in this case:
* Using HttpSessionSto
Thanks Gwyn for all the clarifications and patience, I believe I have all the
answers now.
Also, what's your take on adding an iterator to PageParameters that will
help in looping over the parameters, rather than pulling them one at at time
the way it is right now. I'm not sure if the same can be
if you just have 1 page with no back button support/all ajax
then httpsessionstore is fine
johan
On 9/10/07, Alex Objelean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> It is a intranet application, so the number of users for this application
> is
> at most ~30-40 users/day. A back button support is not need
Johan, Matej, Martijn,
thank you all for help!
PS: one more reason to love this community :)
Johan Compagner wrote:
>
> if you just have 1 page with no back button support/all ajax
> then httpsessionstore is fine
>
> johan
>
>
> On 9/10/07, Alex Objelean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>
hi thomas,
> It already should do that. External links should be automatically
> detected, decorated with a small graphic and open in a separate window.
> Which particular link does not work?
can't find the page right now - it was a link to subversion.tigris.org (i
suppose it's the missing 'www'
you mean when you add Image using ajax it doesnt show up?
being able to refresh something and it "not working" are two very different
things. if you have a nonversioned page and Image in it you will have the
exact same behavior because the url will remain stable - does that mean
Image is broken in
Okay, I get the whole conversion is validation thingy. Not entirely
convinced whether validation is the only place where conversion should
take place, but I'll leave this subject for now. It's already a lot
clearer to me now.
We have this also because it preserves memory, If you have to make
if he would post a quickstart we would be able to do more.
-igor
On 9/10/07, Ryan Holmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> No, LABEL is a valid HTML element for a Label component (it would be
> pretty twisted if it wasn't ;)). Besides, if a tag check was failing,
> the error message would say so.
>
see sourcecode of the pastebin, i think its on belios. also there is an
article on the wiki about it.
-igor
On 9/9/07, Doug Leeper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> I am looking for an example that obtains an image from the db and displays
> it. Can anyone point me in the right direction? I cou
Along these lines I haven't managed to get images with transparency to
display properly. My PNGs all display black instead of transparent pixels
:(.
Anthony
- Original Message -
From: "Igor Vaynberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2007 4:32 PM
Subject: Re: Image
Thanks for the reply.
Where are your css resources located under this configuration? I have a
similar setup. I have a BasePage.html that refers to the css:
...
But since my BasePage.html is located with my Java classes (at
src/main/java/com///ui/web/page/
and one more advice, for you and people reading about this. if you have
large data like that that you want cached because retrieving it is slow, i
would use an external cache. caching it in wicket-models is not the right
place imho because as you can see wicket sometimes needs to serialize/clone
pa
Hello Wicketeers,
Using Wicket 1.3-beta3, one of my Ajax calls is not working in Safari and
Konqueror (works in Opera, MSIE, FF).
The Ajax-debug log is saying after receiving the response: "ERROR: Error
while parsing the response: Undefined value". There is no error on the
server console.
How can
Is it possible to have a form with a FileUpload field be submitted using an
AjaxSubmit Link?
I receive the following exception:
10:53:57,994 ERROR [RequestCycle] ::: ServletRequest does not contain
multipart content
java.lang.IllegalStateException: ServletRequest does not contain multipart
conten
On 9/10/07, Matthijs Wensveen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Okay, I get the whole conversion is validation thingy. Not entirely
> convinced whether validation is the only place where conversion should
> take place, but I'll leave this subject for now. It's already a lot
> clearer to me now.
it i
google pngfix for explorer
-igor
On 9/10/07, Anthony J Webster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Along these lines I haven't managed to get images with transparency to
> display properly. My PNGs all display black instead of transparent pixels
> :(.
> Anthony
>
> - Original Message -
> From
Another tipp on this topic:
You could provide the CSS twice. Once within a for offline
preview and editing, and again outside that pointing to an url which works
only on your live environment. Or you can add the "live" CSS with a header
contributor in your base page.
I use the latter one, but I
Got it, forget it.
On 9/10/07, Jeremy Levy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Is it possible to have a form with a FileUpload field be submitted using
> an AjaxSubmit Link?
>
> I receive the following exception:
>
> 10:53:57,994 ERROR [RequestCycle] ::: ServletRequest does not contain
> multipart cont
If I remember correctly (this was a while back) it doesn't work over firefox
either...
I'll check up on the link.
Thanks
Anthony
- Original Message -
From: "Igor Vaynberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2007 4:58 PM
Subject: Re: Image from DB example
google pn
>
> The extra memory for the ClickListener is negligible and does give you
> more flexibility because now you can have more than one interested party
> for the link click. My use case (fetch nested component, add listener)
> was already answered sufficiently by Martijn (bad OO, components should
>
>
> and also keep the ui state down to a minimum - which will make your app
> clusterable and thus scalable for the future.
the app is clusterable it could serialize it just fine ;)
32MB and everything is serializeable thats an accomplishment!
johan
I'm currently using DataTable (with PropertyColumn's) to display the results
sql queries.Sometimes data for a given column exceeds the length that
can be formatted well in an html table.I'd like to truncate a column if
it exceeds a length of, say, 40, and add a tooltip to display the full
On 9/10/07, Jason Mihalick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But since my BasePage.html is located with my Java classes (at
> src/main/java/com///ui/web/page/BasePage.html) and my css resources
> are located at src/main/webapp/css , if I try to load the BasePage.html file
> in an HTML editor, it
convertvalue() isn't called for a datefield i think...
because i think the type is set (to Date) and then the converter is called:
convertedInput = converter.convertToObject(getInput(), getLocale());
so i don't think it will be trimmed...
johan
On 9/7/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
Johan Compagner wrote:
The extra memory for the ClickListener is negligible and does give you
more flexibility because now you can have more than one interested party
for the link click. My use case (fetch nested component, add listener)
was already answered sufficiently by Martijn (bad OO, compo
Thanks Rüdiger. I'm trying the method now. Very clever.
Do you know of any links to documentation or examples on how to use the
"live" method for css, js, and image resources?
--
Jason
Rüdiger_Schulz wrote:
>
> Another tipp on this topic:
>
> You could provide the CSS twice. Once within
Thanks Rüdiger. I'm trying the method now. Very clever.
Do you know of any links to documentation or examples on how to use the
"live" method for css, js, and image resources?
--
Jason
Rüdiger_Schulz wrote:
>
> Another tipp on this topic:
>
> You could provide the CSS twice. Once within
Kevin Liu-4 wrote:
>
> Unable to find component with id 'userName' in [MarkupContainer
> [Component id = _relative_path_prefix_14, page =
> com.cmip.web.pages.TopFrame, path =
> 3:topForm:_relative_path_prefix_13:_relative_path_prefix_14.WebMarkupContainer,
> isVisible = true, isVersioned = tr
1 - 100 of 172 matches
Mail list logo
