and handle new
request immediately?
Yours sincerely,
Michal Wegrzyn
requests) and one page, so
I would like to do it without reloading whole page.
Best regards,
Michal Wegrzyn
-Original Message-
From: Martin Grigorov [mailto:mgrigo...@apache.org]
Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2011 11:05
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: abort loading lazy
stCycle.java:251)
at
org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WicketFilter.processRequest(WicketFilter.java:162)
at
org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WicketFilter.doFilter(WicketFilter.java:218)
Best regards,
Michal Wegrzyn
-Original Message-
From: Martin Grigorov [mailto:mgrigo...@apache.org]
Sent: Tuesday, N
5:32:24.183 user [http--2] WARN o.a.w.r.h.render.WebPageRenderer - The
Buffered response should be handled by BufferedResponseRequestHandler
Best regards,
Michal Wegrzyn
-Original Message-
From: Michal Wegrzyn [mailto:michal.wegr...@onior.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2011 13:03
To:
lder:children') are still loading
- User triggers folder change (itemList is replaced)
- Exception occurs
If user triggers folder change when lazy components are completely loaded (or
during loading the last one) there is no exception at all.
Best Regards,
Michal Wegrzyn
-Original Mess
Disabling request logger didn't help, however if this only a trace issue then
it does not matter through.
Even if not, then still this is caused by the main issue, which is that
probably Wicket tries to get lazy component that should be dropped.
Best regards,
Michal Wegrzyn
> -
I've just debugged and indeed problem is that there is no component with id
"29".
So clearly Wicket looks for an lazy "children" component from outdated DataView
component.
Michal
> -Original Message-
> From: Michal Wegrzyn [mailto:michal.wegr...@onior.c
m handling "old" ajax requests? I assume
that's how it should work with DROP channel.
Best regards,
Michal Wegrzyn
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Grigorov [mailto:mgrigo...@apache.org]
> Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2011 17:54
> To: users@wicket.apache.
Hi,
Could you please tell me what is the status of this issue?
Should I create a Jira issue and/or quickstart or is it won't fix/invalid?
Best regards,
Michal Wegrzyn
> -Original Message-
> From: Michal Wegrzyn [mailto:michal.wegr...@onior.com]
> Sent: Friday, November
ndpoint.java:489)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)
15:32:24.183 user [http--2] WARN o.a.w.r.h.render.WebPageRenderer - The
Buffered response should be handled by BufferedResponseRequestHandler
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 10:37 AM, Michal Wegrzyn
> wrote:
> > Hi,
>
easily overridden. Is it possible to introduce
AjaxLazyLoadPanel#getChannel() ?
Best regards,
Michal Wegrzyn
That's great, thanks. I'll try it ASAP.
Best regards,
Michal Wegrzyn
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Grigorov [mailto:mgrigo...@apache.org]
> Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2011 14:50
> To: users@wicket.apache.org
> Subject: Re: abort loading lazy components
&
his is fixed in 1.5.3 (currently in voting)
>
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Michal Wegrzyn
> wrote:
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Martin Grigorov [mailto:mgrigo...@apache.org]
> >> Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2011 9:48
> >> To: users
Done https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-4227
Best regards,
Michal Wegrzyn
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Grigorov [mailto:mgrigo...@apache.org]
> Sent: Monday, November 14, 2011 13:43
> To: users@wicket.apache.org
> Subject: Re: abort loading lazy compon
ing something?
Best regards,
Michal Wegrzyn
Any ideas here? Should I provide a quickstart?
Best regards,
Michal Wegrzyn
> -Original Message-
> From: Michal Wegrzyn [mailto:michal.wegr...@onior.com]
> Sent: Monday, December 19, 2011 23:07
> To: users@wicket.apache.org
> Subject: AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior,
>
> are you validating all form components or just the one which triggered
> the ajax request?
>
> You know AjaxFormSubmitBehavior?
>
> Sven
>
> Am 03.01.2012 09:32, schrieb Michal Wegrzyn:
> > Any ideas here? Should I provide a quickstart?
> >
>
elements have "onchange" of course.
Forgot over them at that point ("ontired" occurred).
Best regards,
Michal Wegrzyn
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Grigorov [mailto:mgrigo...@apache.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2012 10:20
> To: users
nd
> validation
>
> AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior processes a single component only
> (change input, validate, convert), so it doesn't make sense to validate
> all components.
> In that case you should use AjaxFormSubmitBehavior, which processes the
> whole form.
>
> Sven
>
>
your (Wicket team) plans for Wicket 1.5.x and 6.0?
Is 6.0 an experimental or do you plan in the future to focus on 6.0 as a base?
Best regards
Michal Wegrzyn
AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior must be used on a FormComponent (sub)class.
Best Regards,
Michal Wegrzyn
> -Original Message-
> From: Krishna Mohan [mailto:k.krishnamoha...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 9:32
> To: users@wicket.apache.org
> Subject: Re:
Maybe you will find this useful:
http://println.posterous.com/wicket-automatic-ajax-form-validation-marking
Best regards,
Michal Wegrzyn
> -Original Message-
> From: srinash [mailto:avisrid...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2012 10:07
> To: users@wicket.apache.org
&
Are they any other behaviors attached?
Best regards,
Michal Wegrzyn
> -Original Message-
> From: nino martinez wael [mailto:nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2012 14:00
> To: users@wicket.apache.org
> Subject: Re: 1.5 Behaviors
>
> Any clu
,
Michal Wegrzyn
> -Original Message-
> From: Michal Wegrzyn
> Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2012 15:05
> To: 'users@wicket.apache.org'
> Subject: RE: 1.5 Behaviors
>
> Are they any other behaviors attached?
>
> Best regards,
> Michal Wegrzyn
>
&g
Hi Javier,
Check
org.apache.wicket.util.resource.AbstractResourceStream
org.apache.wicket.request.handler.resource.ResourceStreamRequestHandler
Best regards,
Michal Wegrzyn
> -Original Message-
> From: Javier Leyba [mailto:xle...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, February 20, 2
Hi Maaz,
Check wiki:
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/spring.html
Recently sample quickstart integration project has been posted on the list,
maybe you will find it useful:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Wicket-Spring-Boilerplate-td4433541.html
Best regards,
Michal Wegrzyn
Hi,
Did you try using AjaxCheckBox instead of CheckBox with ajax behavior?
Best regards,
Michal Wegrzyn
> -Original Message-
> From: Gytis [mailto:lietuvis...@mail.ru]
> Sent: Friday, March 16, 2012 10:32
> To: users@wicket.apache.org
> Subject: AjaxFormComponentUpdatin
regards,
Michal Wegrzyn
> -Original Message-
> From: Gytis [mailto:lietuvis...@mail.ru]
> Sent: Friday, March 16, 2012 13:13
> To: users@wicket.apache.org
> Subject: RE: AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior after validation problem
>
> Hi, Michal, I`ve tried AjaxCheckBox comp
Hi Gytis,
If you add AjaxFormSubmitBehaviour to your checkbox it should work exactly as
"Submit" button.
Best regards,
Michal Wegrzyn
> -Original Message-
> From: Gytis [mailto:lietuvis...@mail.ru]
> Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2012 8:02
> To: users@wicket.ap
Hi,
You should add "organizationList" to the registerForm object.
Best regards,
Michal Wegrzyn
> -Original Message-
> From: kshitiz [mailto:k.agarw...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2012 15:57
> To: users@wicket.apache.org
> Subject: Error in dynami
Hi Nino,
Check void org.apache.wicket.AttributeModifier.replaceAttributeValue(Component
component, ComponentTag tag).
Probably component is not enabled or value is null. Debug if there is a need.
Best regards,
Michal Wegrzyn
> -Original Message-
> From: nino martine
Are you using ajax? Maybe you are adding appender but form container is not
added to the ajax target?
Best regards,
Michal Wegrzyn
> -Original Message-
> From: nino martinez wael [mailto:nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, March 23, 2012 16:20
> To: users@wicke
h
results in drop, I am getting the same exception as in Wicket-4227.
Best regards,
Michal Wegrzyn
> -Original Message-
> From: Michal Wegrzyn
> Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2011 10:59
> To: 'users@wicket.apache.org'
> Subject: RE: abort loading lazy components
>
-4470 describes
everything.
Best regards,
Michal Wegrzyn
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Grigorov [mailto:mgrigo...@apache.org]
> Sent: Monday, March 26, 2012 12:00
> To: users@wicket.apache.org
> Subject: Re: abort loading lazy components
>
> Hi Michal,
>
Look at VoteEditForm constructor.
Form form = new Form("form",new CompoundPropertyModel(aVote)) {...}
Object aVote is null.
Best regards,
Michal Wegrzyn
> -Original Message-
> From: SudeepShakya [mailto:shakyasud...@live.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 20
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Grigorov [mailto:mgrigo...@apache.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2012 9:41
> To: users@wicket.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Debugging error
>
> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Michal Wegrzyn
> wrote:
> > Look at VoteEdit
We did not fight each other... We fought with your code!
Best regards,
Michal Wegrzyn
> -Original Message-
> From: SudeepShakya [mailto:shakyasud...@live.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2012 10:35
> To: users@wicket.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Debugging error
>
> H
x27;s
FilteringSelect: http://livedocs.dojotoolkit.org/dijit/form/FilteringSelect
Best regards,
Michal Wegrzyn
Hi Martin,
Sounds and looks great!
Will it be added to wicket-core? 6.x?
Best regards,
Michal Wegrzyn
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Grigorov [mailto:mgrigo...@apache.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2012 8:53
> To: users@wicket.apache.org
> Subject: Re: DropDownCho
That's the solution which I have used for the case, where count is not possible.
It has only one slight disadvantage - if count == n*pageSize then the last page
will be blank.
Best regards,
Michal Wegrzyn
> -Original Message-
> From: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:igor.vaynb...@gmail.
works?
Are there any important in-depth aspects of Wicket of which should I be aware
of for creating plugin architecture?
Best regards,
Michal Wegrzyn
mages?
Best regards,
Michal Wegrzyn
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Grigorov [mailto:mgrigo...@apache.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2012 10:48
> To: users@wicket.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Wicket plugin architecture
>
> Hi,
>
> The
header_logo.png", logoReference.getResource() );
WebApplication.get().mountResource(
"img/custom_header_logo.png", logoReference );
It makes for every mounted image new request mapper.
Won't it be a problem for a lot of custom images?
Best regards,
Michal Wegrzyn
> ---
icket side? If not, what is the best way to avoid
StalePageException in this case?
Best regards,
Michal Wegrzyn
I get
the same result.
Best regards,
Michal Wegrzyn
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Grigorov [mailto:mgrigo...@apache.org]
> Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 14:03
> To: users@wicket.apache.org
> Subject: Re: multiple requests and StalePageException
>
> The renderCo
ache.org]
> Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 16:51
> To: users@wicket.apache.org
> Subject: Re: multiple requests and StalePageException
>
> Can you show the code that the applet uses to make requests to the page
> ?
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 4:47 PM, Michal Wegrzyn
&g
());
get.addHeader("Cookie", getCookie());
HttpResponse response = client.execute(get);
String responseText = EntityUtils.toString(
response.getEntity() );
Best regards,
Michal Wegrzyn
> -Original Message-
&
request, then render count from both
PageAndComponentProvider and pageInstance are equal (for example 1).
If applet makes in the final stage three requests, then render count from
PageAndComponentProvider is 1 but render count from pageInstance is 3.
Best regards,
Michal Wegrzyn
> -
Hi Thomas,
Bean edit panel is useful in this sort of scenarios.
http://londonwicket.googlecode.com/files/LondonWicket-BeanEditor.pdf
It is quite old, maybe there is a newer/better option.
Best regards,
Michal Wegrzyn
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Götz [mailto:t...@deco
ug to see what really triggers these GETs.
Thanks for the help Martin.
Best regards,
Michal Wegrzyn
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Grigorov [mailto:mgrigo...@apache.org]
> Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 14:03
> To: users@wicket.apache.org
> Subject: Re: m
ted to all
pages?
Is it possible to workaround it?
Best regards,
Michal Wegrzyn
Thanks Martin.
What is the pageId parameter in getPageManager().getPage(pageId)?
Component id or page version id (present in url)?
For session I would expect all most recent versions of visited pages for a
current user.
For application the same but for all users.
Best regards,
Michal Wegrzyn
Recent = "one".
It would be security issue only if event API has some holes :)
Anyway it would be quite handy to send for example some info events to all
logged users.
Best regards,
Michal Wegrzyn
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Grigorov [mailto:mgrigo...@ap
socket to push
> data to the clients.
>
But only with Wicket >=6.0.0.
Is it hard to affect also "all" "recent" (at least for current user) pages for
events in Wicket?
That would be a nice feature.
>
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Michal Wegrzyn
> wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Grigorov [mailto:mgrigo...@apache.org]
> Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 16:33
> To: users@wicket.apache.org
> Subject: Re: events between pages
>
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 4:28 PM, Michal Wegrzyn
> wrote:
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Grigorov [mailto:mgrigo...@apache.org]
> Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 16:57
> To: users@wicket.apache.org
> Subject: Re: events between pages
>
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 4:50 PM, Michal Wegrzyn
> wrote:
>
> >
; For session this means all pages in the history of this user (the data
> store).
>
>
> >
> > Is it possible to workaround it?
> >
>
> You can get any page by its id:
> session.getPageManager().getPage(pageId)
> and use it as a sink.
>
>
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Michal Wegrzyn
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Martin Grigorov
> jWeekend
> Training, Consulting, Development
> http://jWeekend.com <http://jweekend.com/>
rt of the iframe's document and the JavaScript code
> cannot find them to replace them.
> It is easy to use the 'parent' in the JS code but I see no way to know
> that at the server side. I.e. when using ART#add() to say that the
> component is in the parent document...
>
Hi Marek,
Why are you not using #setVisible(boolean)?
BTW. Instead of creating new AttributeModifier you can use its static methods.
Best regards,
Michał
> -Original Message-
> From: Marek Miglinski [mailto:marekmoff...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, December 17, 2012 15:06
> To: users@wicke
tributionConfig().enableNonConflictMode( "jq" ).withDefaultJQueryUi();"
It seems that components are working, but I see in wicket debug window JS error
saying that "jq" is not defined. For Jqwicket behavior I see no error.
Best regards,
Michal Wegrzyn
o non-conflict mode helped.
Best regards,
Michał
> -Original Message-
> From: Michal Wegrzyn [mailto:michal.wegr...@onior.com]
> Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 9:49
> To: users@wicket.apache.org
> Subject: jqwicket questions
>
> Hi,
>
> Jqwicket has several com
Hi,
We are using modal window with two forms at the moment: FilterForm and Form
(Wicket 1.5.9) (inside bean edit panel with ajax).
FilterForm is not used at the moment (hidden filter fields).
Everything works fine in IE and Firefox but in Chrome tag is not
rendered (only body of the form eleme
Anybody?
Best regards,
Michał Węgrzyn
> -Original Message-
> From: Michal Wegrzyn [mailto:michal.wegr...@onior.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2013 11:22
> To: users@wicket.apache.org
> Subject: ModalWindow and Form problems
>
> Hi,
>
> We are using modal w
Dear,
I am trying to integrate select2, but ordering in head doesn't seem to be good.
What is the easiest way to order resource references in Wicket 1.5.x?
Header decorator? If so, how do I obtain collection with references?
Best regards,
Michal Wegrzyn
ect: Re: header resources order in 1.5.x
>
> Hi Michal,
>
> do you know this?
> https://github.com/ivaynberg/wicket-select2
>
> There are examples.
> Maybe it can help
>
> Cheers
> Per
>
> Am 08.08.2013 17:27, schrieb Michal Wegrzyn:
> > Dear,
>
Original Message-
> From: Martin Grigorov [mailto:mgrigo...@apache.org]
> Sent: Friday, August 09, 2013 9:10
> To: users@wicket.apache.org
> Subject: Re: header resources order in 1.5.x
>
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 11:47 PM, Michal Wegrzyn
> wrote:
>
> >
66 matches
Mail list logo