There are plenty of javascript solutions out there and wicket integrates
very well with these types of libraries (scriptaculous, prototype, dojo,
etc). prototype has a pretty amazing Event API that should do what you
need, but there are plenty of options out there. ex:
for this new
project and a quick description. no point keeping stale info around.
-igor
On 8/23/07, Ryan Sonnek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.jroller.com/wireframe/entry/wicket_and_rss_feeds
Just wanted to post an announcement that there's a new wicket stuff
project
because some feed readers just keep updating
their information (adding the same articles over and over).
Also it helps keep traffic to the site low
Thijs
Ryan Sonnek wrote:
http://www.jroller.com/wireframe/entry/wicket_and_rss_feeds
Just wanted to post an announcement that there's a new
Are there any plans for wicket presentations at the upcoming apachecon? I'm
trying to decide if it's worth my time to go, and any wicket related
presentations or BOF speakers would probably tip the scale for me.
I've been running my app through the YSlow firefox plugin, and have been
*very* impressed on how wicket does the right thing most of the time (ex:
gzip css and javascript). nice work guys!
While digging through the YSlow feedback, it suggested that the javascript
should be minified. This led me
and is
compatible with ASL, I have no objections.
-Matej
On 9/1/07, Ryan Sonnek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been running my app through the YSlow firefox plugin, and have been
*very* impressed on how wicket does the right thing most of the time
(ex:
gzip css and javascript). nice work
PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't see reason why not, you can create a RFE in jira.
-Matej
On 9/2/07, Ryan Sonnek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Creating a pluggable interface for this would allow for non-ASL
solutions
to
be hosted through wicket-stuff projects. The default implementation
could
stay
On 9/1/07, Ryan Sonnek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
excellent! Thanks Matej. Let me know if you have any other ideas
on
this.
As soon as there's an abstraction in place, i'll be happy to create
a
wicketstuff project with the dojo (and maybe YUI) compressors!
https
Dean Edwards also had a recent blog posting on this topic. His
recommendation is to compress and gzip content whenever possible.
http://dean.edwards.name/weblog/2007/08/js-compression/
On 9/2/07, Ryan Sonnek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
gzip and minifing *do* go together.
Here's a really great
to me. maybe gzip doesnt use a
very
high
compression setting to trade off time. but oh well, numbers dont
lie.
-igor
On 9/2/07, Ryan Sonnek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dean Edwards also had a recent blog posting on this topic. His
recommendation is to compress
I do all of my development against wicket 1.3, but i think the current
version should be compatible with the 1.2 branch. can you try the most
recent version?
http://wicketstuff.org/maven/repository/org/wicketstuff/wicketstuff-scriptaculous/1.3-SNAPSHOT/
On 9/12/07, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL
don't forget the wicketstuff-scriptaculous project! it supports drag/drop
as well!
http://wicketstuff.org/confluence/display/STUFFWIKI/wicketstuff-scriptaculous
On 9/12/07, Scott Swank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They have that in an example in the wicket-dojo extension -- though
I've never dug
know if there are any suggestions!
http://www.jroller.com/wireframe/entry/wicket_feedresource
On 9/11/07, Nathan Hamblen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ryan Sonnek wrote:
Okay folks, I think I'm stuck. After releasing my wicketstuff project
that
creates RSS feeds [1], it was suggested to use
I've been investigating performance of the wicketstuff-scriptaculous project
quite a bit recently. Scriptaculous is not what I would call a
lightweight javascript package, but the beauty of wicket is that they
automatically gzip javascript files, and can optionally minify the
libraries. This
For me databinder helps cut the boilerplate code, just as WWB. I just add
annotations to my domain model, and databinder does the rest. It's WWB for
the database side of the app! Imagine putting both working together. I was
able to create CRUD pages with the least amount of code ever. Less
, while your bean is a
part
of the model. It's my opinion that putting view-based annotations on your
model is Not a Good Thing. It confuses the separation of concerns.
-Dan
On 9/16/07, Ryan Sonnek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For me databinder helps cut the boilerplate code, just as WWB. I
It's been a while since this topic was brought up, but I've been able to
verify that wicket 1.3 *breaks* applications using the prototype javascript
library. Anytime I enable strip javascript comments and whitespace, or
configure my app in DEPLOYMENT mode, I get tons of javascript errors.
I've
Just curious how I can get these changes. are there 1.3.0-SNAPSHOTS being
published or do I need to wait for beta4/rc1 to be published?
On 9/19/07, Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, should be fixed in trunk.
-Matej
On 9/19/07, Ryan Sonnek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's been a while
On 9/21/07, Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I dont' understand. You rely on the way how wicket generates IDs? Then
your code is bound to break. If you really need a wicket component's
id in javascript, you either override getMarkupId(), or pass the Id
using javascript (e.g. label
Booyah!
On 9/21/07, Dan Syrstad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/21/07, Craig Lenzen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any interest in a Wicket User Group meeting in Minneapolis?
Count me in!
Register here, http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/community-meetups.html
On 9/22/07, Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, the snapshots are not recent enough. There is one failing unit
test that noone was able to fix yet, as it only fails on bamboo
machine, not locally. So the only way to get the fix now is build it
manually (with maven it should be trivial,
Just to follow up about wicket-hibernate integration...
It's a library that automatically adds wicket validation based upon your
hibernate/JPA annotations. So, if you have a property marked as not-null or
max-length of 10, wicket will automatically add client side validation and
pretty error
let's start with what error are you getting?
On 10/9/07, anita nichols [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I tried to create Sortable list using Wicket Stuff, but the
SortableListView give me an error. What do I do wrong here, below is the
code:
import wicket.contrib.scriptaculous.*;
add(new
I think this is what you're looking for:
add(new AjaxLink(myLink) {
protected void onClick(AjaxTarget target) {
target.appendJavascript(new Effect.Fade(myPanel).toJavascript());
}
});
On 10/16/07, Nick Heudecker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking for some examples using
I just stumbled upon the wicketstuff pickwick project.
http://wicketstuff.org/confluence/display/STUFFWIKI/Pickwick
Just wondering if it's actively maintained, and if there'd be any interest
in using the wicket-rss integration project for building the rss feeds. I
maintain the wicketstuff-rome
don't forget about the scriptaculous autocomplete component as well. It
allows for ajax/dynamic autocomplete, or using a static list of results.
http://wicketstuff.org/confluence/display/STUFFWIKI/Script.aculo.us+AutoCompleteBehavior
On 10/30/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I
Yep,
you need to also do:
add(AbstractScriptaculousBehavior.newJavascriptBinding());
On 10/31/07, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Probably your are missing a HeaderContributor adding the actual
effects.js and prototype.js to your page? Just guessing...
SantiagoA wrote:
Hey everyone, I know this is off topic, but I'm looking for someone with
graphic design experience for something with a very similar look and feel to
the apache wicket website. If anyone knows who designed that site, or put
together the wicketstuff wiki, or is just a good designer familar with
Okay, I've attached a patch that adds the maxlength html attribute.
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 11:24 AM, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 7:11 AM, Ryan Sonnek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do any of the core validators actually implement this interface?
Not yet I think
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 8:54 AM, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Guys
We are having the potential fun of running a site with around 1 million
users, and a lot more over time. What could be great optimizing points?
We have looked at these things
*
Etc. There's a ton more questions to ask, but I'm sure you'll figure
that out in the context of your project :-) One of the most important
decisions you'll make is what parts of your application (maybe even
everything) you'll set up to be stateless and bookmarkable. Keep in
mind that even
Congratulations, this looks like a nice addition so far.
I would recommend checking out a wicket annotation project that has been
around for a little while. It dynamically picks up Hibernate annotations
*directly* from your model objects instead of annotating your pages. these
annotations are
Doh!
Forgot to post the url for info on the project. :)
http://jroller.com/wireframe/entry/hibernateannotationcomponentconfigurator
On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 8:59 AM, Ryan Sonnek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Congratulations, this looks like a nice addition so far.
I would recommend checking out
It's kind of an established standard that by default,
outputMarkupId is false, so in 1.3 or 1.4 I don't see it
could be changed. Later on, if the change is made, maybe it
would be better to change the default for all Components and
not just FeedbackPanel.
+1 from me. I don't see any
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 9:02 AM, Jörn Zaefferer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, then I add: Annotations for form validation. Maybe integrated
with the bean validation JSR, Hibernate Validation or standalone.
Enabled by adding AnnotationValidator instance to a form or indivdual
fields...
I'm trying to accomplish the same thing and think that wicket should
provide such an API. all of the issues mentioned are well known
issues and other web frameworks still provide an API and just
acknowledge the limitations.
This is pretty important for me as I can't necessarily hardcode the
url
Personally I'd rather put it in a config file and know it's right rather
than have it break if someone decides to virtual host/firewall/proxy the
webapp and forgets to tweak the settings just right, (e.g., forgets the
ProxyPreserveHost directive).
That's why you have automated tests to make
-1 for this.
I'm very much against the current static util pattern that the
HeaderContributor object is headed. I would much rather have this
behavior moved into the appropriate class (ex:
JavascriptResource.headerContribution()) instead of bloating
HeaderContributor. this is how i designed the
I don't quite understand this...
Instead of having to know a ton of classes, you just have to know this one.
I really struggled with wicket originally when trying to do these
header contributions. I was using the IDE and searching for
Javascript* or CSS* and nothing relevant came up. Instead, I
of future extension points.
On Nov 29, 2007 2:54 PM, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 29, 2007 11:37 AM, Ryan Sonnek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't quite understand this...
Instead of having to know a ton of classes, you just have to know this
one.
I really struggled
see the complete picture here what you are
describing. So how does XxxxResource.headerContribution() method look
like? What params does it get? How does it get the right response
object? (it has to be an implementation of (Ajax)HeaderResponse)
Johan
On 11/29/07, Ryan Sonnek [EMAIL PROTECTED
this would make a great contribution to the wicketstuff project!
On Dec 16, 2007 5:41 AM, tsuresh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Tames,
It worked when I upgraded from wicket 1.2.6 to 1.3 and showed no error.
Would you please suggest me what change should I make in your code, so that
I would
Whoo hoo!
Nice work. I hope that this is well accepted by the wicket community.
Yet another example of how easy it is to integrate some *excellent*
javascript libraries into wicket.
On Dec 18, 2007 6:47 PM, JulianS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've checked in wicketstuff-suckerfish and
Wonderful work! I've been very interested to try this out in my wicket app!
On Dec 20, 2007 1:00 PM, Dan Kaplan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wow that looks pretty cool. I'm thinking about making a website that may be
able to use that. I bookmarked the article
-Original Message-
From:
excellent work! I've been anxiously waiting for this release. It's
been tough to live without this plugin since I've been working with
1.3 for so long.
On Jan 6, 2008 10:20 AM, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for keep working on this!
Eelco
On Jan 6, 2008 7:57 PM, Joni
markupId, it is possible for the parameter to be a
Component for DraggableTarget.onDrop?
Thanks in advance.
Regards
Boon Ping.
On Jan 7, 2008 11:05 PM, Ryan Sonnek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It sure is still active. I recently upgraded to version 1.8.0 and
haven't heard of any issues.
http
hmmm
this change doesn't really work when dealing with a SortableListView.
With the SortableListView, there's no Component for the
DraggableTarget to work with. It really only has the markupId. Maybe
another wicket dev has an idea for how to do this?
On Jan 7, 2008 9:44 PM, Ryan Sonnek
is there any way to locate a component in a page with only the markup id?
For scriptaculous integration, i have an ajax request with only the
markup id, and i'd like to find the matching wicket component.
-
To unsubscribe,
Edward,
Thanks for the email. I'm currently working on revamping the drag
drop API. if you have any code you'd like to contribute feel free to
drop me an email. maybe we could hash out a great new api to simplify
it's use.
regarding the javascript issues, could you re-open this bug i filed in
i've reopened the issue.
It must only allow whoever filed the issue to reopen it...
On Jan 10, 2008 10:00 AM, Edward Yakop [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
regarding the javascript issues, could you re-open this bug i filed in
wicket?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-987
I can't
On Jan 10, 2008 9:22 AM, Ryan Sonnek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Edward,
Thanks for the email. I'm currently working on revamping the drag
drop API. if you have any code you'd like to contribute feel free to
drop me an email. maybe we could hash out a great new api to simplify
it's use.
Hey
On Jan 11, 2008 9:08 AM, Edward Yakop [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 11, 2008 11:04 PM, Ryan Sonnek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't care if it can be optomized if it introduces more complexity.
How often are people drag/dropping objects on webpages anyways? There
isn't a need to support
I don't care if it can be optomized if it introduces more complexity.
How often are people drag/dropping objects on webpages anyways? There
isn't a need to support 100,000 operations per second for this kind of
operation. Looping over components in a page is blazing fast unless
you have
On Jan 10, 2008 10:10 PM, Edward Yakop [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 11, 2008 11:51 AM, Ryan Sonnek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
if there are other improvements to be made, let me know!
How about committing the [DraggableTargetBehavior] and its support for
multiple drag source type.
Not sure
On Jan 11, 2008 9:37 AM, Edward Yakop [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's not the code for finding the component that bothers me. as you
said, it's very easy. My problem is that now you have to muck with
the scriptaculous javascript callback to extract the component path
instead of just using
don't see this as a very strong usecase. Most usecases will have some
kind of placeholder text instructing the user to drop objects on it.
Does this work for you?
I tried div, span and your example.
Neither work for firefox 2.0 and 1.5 (I haven't test it on another browser).
The only way
Congrats, and wonderful work!
I really hope this project takes off and is adopted by the wicket community!
On Jan 14, 2008 6:57 AM, Dan Syrstad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wicket Web Beans 1.0 (final) has been released. Wicket Web Beans (WWB) is an
Apache Wicket component toolkit for displaying
If you're using scriptaculous in your example, you might be interested
in using the wicketstuff-scriptaculous project. it would simplify
your custom component by:
* automatically adding the javascript for you
* using Java API to do effects instead of writing String javascript functions.
On Jan
http://www.jroller.com/wireframe/entry/wicket_client_side_validation
I've spent the past couple weeks investigating Wicket's support for
client side validation. IMO, using Ajax for validation in Wicket is
really amazing. Lots of folks are touting javascript validation
right now, but I think
out of curiosity, would there be any interest in shipping Wicket with
Ajax form validation turned on *by default* instead of developers
manually adding the AjaxFormValidatingBehavior? Are there any
drawbacks to having this be the default behavior?
On Jan 27, 2008 9:00 AM, Ryan Sonnek [EMAIL
or aren't allowed
to use JavaScript, which also precludes the default enabling of such
functionality.
Martijn
On 1/27/08, Ryan Sonnek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
out of curiosity, would there be any interest in shipping Wicket with
Ajax form validation turned on *by default* instead
On Jan 27, 2008 11:39 AM, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Almost any government site/application must comply with accessibility rules
which often prohibit the use of JavaScript.
section 508 compliance does *not* prohibit javascript or Ajax. You
just have to be careful how you use
On Jan 27, 2008 12:07 PM, James Carman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
True, I guess you could create your own form superclass that does the
default behavior you want.
Yuk...I'd hate to go through my *entire* application and replace
org.apache.wicket.Form with com.mysite.MySpecialForm. very messy.
On Jan 27, 2008 12:04 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
also -1. it is trivial to do it yourself automatically like you said
in your blog. there are plenty of usecases that wont work out of the
box. take a common usecase where the label turns red if the field is
in error, how do you
On Jan 27, 2008 12:15 PM, James Carman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, create an IComponentInstantiationListener that looks for Forms and
adds the behavior to them.
Yep. That's what I posted on my blog.
I'm just asking if there's any interest in making this the *default*
behavior. When people
On Jan 27, 2008 12:20 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but then my app wont work. i add my own ajax behavior that knows how
to do all this... so i would have to override some method on the form
and tell it not to do its default thing? let me quote someone
Yuk...I'd hate to go through
optimally if the field is
standalone only that one field would be validated...
-igor
On Jan 27, 2008 8:04 AM, Ryan Sonnek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
out of curiosity, would there be any interest in shipping Wicket with
Ajax form validation turned on *by default* instead of developers
manually
If your service (http, webservice, whatever) returns some kind of
business object, it'll be very easy to bind it to form values.
MyObject object = service.find();
add(new TextField(name, new PropertyModel(object, name));
make sense?
On Jan 28, 2008 5:32 PM, Michael Mehrle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
That's quite a shocker to me. if it works in the scriptaculous demo,
i don't see why it wouldn't work in wicket.
On Jan 29, 2008 9:29 PM, Lan Boon Ping [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Say if you have trouble with it. I'll look into it then, two pair of
eyes are better than one:)
Hey thats what
I know where you're coming from Zach. I went through something
similar when creating RSS/Atom feeds with Wicket.
You may want to look into the wicketstuff-rome project to see details
on how I integrated these features into Wicket. It ended up being
pretty clean using the Wicket Resource API's,
On Feb 1, 2008 3:26 AM, Lan Boon Ping [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My colleague (Edward Yakop) found out the cause root and have a
solution for it. The reason why this is only occured in IE is because
wicket-ajax.js uses Element.removeChild and Element.addChild to
replace component during ajax
Alright Folks!
Anyone in the minneapolis/st.paul area that is a wicket user should
head over to a newly created google group to start lining up
dates/times to get together. Food, presentations, and good times will
be had by all.
http://groups.google.com/group/wicket-user-group-twincities
feel
No, i haven't yet. the problem for me is that I don't have an install
of IE6/7 to test this out on. I'd be happy to apply any patch that
someone has that has been tested against IE6 and IE7 though.
On Feb 13, 2008 12:54 AM, Edward Yakop [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Thanx for the hints :)
running, i'll be happy to test on safari and
ie6/7/ff ..
Ryan Sonnek wrote:
No, i haven't yet. the problem for me is that I don't have an install
of IE6/7 to test this out on. I'd be happy to apply any patch that
someone has that has been tested against IE6 and IE7 though.
On Feb 13
you can mount the wicket rss feed as a bookmarkable url and use a
filter to ensure security.
Not sure if wicket has the concept of securing application resources
currently built in?
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 9:55 AM, Murat Yücel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All
I have started using the
people roll their own?
-igor
On Feb 19, 2008 6:57 AM, Ryan Sonnek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sounds like a good addition to me. could this be used for the guice
integration project as well?
On Feb 19, 2008 3:49 AM, Bart Molenkamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I created
:
loadableinjectablemodel, abstractreadonlyinjectablemodel, blah blah
blah injectablemodel
-igor
On Feb 19, 2008 7:45 AM, Ryan Sonnek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just because it's trivial doesn't mean it's not useful. Out of the
box functionality is important to a lot of first time users. rolling
your own
I've been looking at doing something similar to this in my
application. any thoughts on contributing this to a new wicketstuff
project?
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 9:14 AM, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am not sure if I follow you here. What do you mean by testing two
pages?
to the
wicketstuff project? Or should I just appy for commit access as
described on: http://wicketstuff.org/confluence/display/STUFFWEB/Home.
Cheers, Lars
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 5:00 PM, Ryan Sonnek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been looking at doing something similar to this in my
application
+1 for complete removal... sf.net will always serve up the binaries,
but no need leaving the rest of the entrails lying around.
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 7:55 PM, Gerolf Seitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
can we remove the old website?
or do we still need it for the 1.2.x releases?
Gerolf
On
There's also an autocomplete textfield that uses the scriptaculous
javascript library. a fancy demo of it can be found here:
http://demo.script.aculo.us/ajax/autocompleter_customized
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 11:27 AM, Martin Makundi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The feature is called autocomplete
there's a wicket project that integrates the scriptaculous sortable
object which might be what you're looking for:
http://wicketstuff.org/confluence/display/STUFFWIKI/Script.aculo.us+SortableListView
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 5:00 PM, jeredm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am looking for an easy way
I think this looks really great. I'm pretty sure the current wicket
builder project has been abandoned, so this would be a welcome
replacement.
I've been dying to dive into grails now that it supports a *real* view
layer! =)
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 8:59 AM, graemer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you looking for how to *publish* RSS feeds, or consume them?
the wicketstuff-rome project helps with publishing RSS feeds from
within your application.
If you're looking to consume rss feeds, ROME makes it pretty trivial
to do. Not sure how much value there is for a generic display RSS
FYI:
you might want to check out the wicketstuff-scriptaculous auto
complete component instead.
http://wicketstuff.org/confluence/display/STUFFWIKI/Script.aculo.us+AutoCompleteBehavior
On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 6:38 AM, i ii [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
that does suck! why would wicket use a
I agree. There's already a JIRA filed for this enhancement. Please
vote for this issue if you want to see it fixed! hopefully it'll make
it into 1.4?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1310
On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 10:27 AM, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and thats why it
Yep. Just what Igor said. I've successfully been using open id with
my wicket app for quite a while.
Once the RequestUtils method was added, it became really simple.
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 12:22 AM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mount a bookmarkable page. get a url for it via
Hey, thanks for the patch.
The only reason it wasn't added is that no-one had requested it. =)
i'll be happy to apply the patch and push out a new release ASAP.
Thanks again!
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 11:21 AM, Thomas Kappler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
first of all, sorry if this is the
done!
patch has been applied. bamboo should publish a new snapshot jar any
minute now.
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 11:27 AM, Ryan Sonnek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey, thanks for the patch.
The only reason it wasn't added is that no-one had requested it. =)
i'll be happy to apply the patch
https://wicket-stuff.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/wicket-stuff/trunk/wicket-contrib-jamon/src/main/java/org/wicketstuff/jamon/
I was browsing the sources for wicketstuff-jamon and I was wondering
how to actually hook it up into my app? How do you use the custom
web request cycle instead of the
We're currently working on it. We use wicketstuff-scriptaculous, and
so far it seems to work, but some things are still missing.
Please let me know if you run into anything that's missing.
Anything that's supported by the core scriptaculous library should be
possible in the wicket library,
There's also a drag/drop reordering of lists available using the
scriptaculous library:
http://wicketstuff.org/confluence/display/STUFFWIKI/Script.aculo.us+SortableListView
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 4:43 AM, Uwe Schäfer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shelli D. Orton schrieb:
hi shelli
I'm
url?
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 9:27 AM, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
I've created a linkedin group for wicket, please feel free to join.. And
I hope it's okay that I created it..
regards Nino
--
-Wicket for love
Nino Martinez Wael
Java
I just published a new wicketstuff-rome component that will allow
users to consume rss feeds in wicket. This is something that I've
been meaning to do for a *long* time, and finally got around to it.
http://www.jroller.com/wireframe/entry/consume_rss_feeds_within_wicket
I've seen a few posts on
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 8:23 AM, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
works fine for me, only problem are that something cant handle if you
have æ ø å in your domain... You then have to use the alternate domain
qualifiyer
That sounds like a ROME specific issue?
I haven't checked out the code yet, but the demo available at
indyphone is *really* impressive. Nice work! This could be a *very*
useful component.
On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 5:26 PM, Rüdiger Schulz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello everbody,
I finally had the time to finish a first beta release
very nice article. well balanced and thoughtful.
The more I see the two compared I can't help but think, People are
*insane* if they choose tapestry over wicket.
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 10:19 AM, cwilkes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hmmmthey worked the last time I checked.
I'll try to take a look, but if you see anything that's obviously
incorrect, let me know.
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 5:58 AM, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I try to run mvn jetty:run I get this error:
2008-04-11
have you looked at the wicketstuff-scriptaculous project? there's an
autocomplete text field that should be what you need.
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 1:53 PM, Ryan Gravener [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Set the model object in getTextValue(java.lang.Object object)
but in your renderChoice(*) do not
the wicketstuff-scriptaculous project adds an attribute autocomplete='off'
to prevent browsers from adding their specific autocomplete suggestions.
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 4:10 PM, ak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I have implemented wicket AutoCompleteBehavior on TextField. All seems to
1 - 100 of 119 matches
Mail list logo
