At 10:34 AM 10/4/2005, Paul Theodoropoulos wrote:
as you might guess from my previous message, i'm installing
qmail-tap for the first time. something that's not entirely clear is
whether qmail-tap is 'self filtering' in the following sense.
if i set up a taps file like this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Thanks so much Sylwester !
- Original Message -
From: "Sylwester S. Biernacki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Fernando Milovich"
Sent: Saturday, May 14, 2005 5:06 AM
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Question about domains in vpopmail
On Saturday, May 14, 2005, 7:44:02 AM, Fer
On Saturday, May 14, 2005, 7:44:02 AM, Fernando wrote:
> People, after i rebuild new 5.4.10 vpopmail version, when i add
> a new domain from CLI, breaks the typical structure of
> ~vpopmail/domains/domain.com
> for this one
> ~vpopmail/domains/1/domain.com
> with numbers like 2,3, etc ... bef
Got it.. I just wanted to make sure that I was understanding what it
was.. thanks :)
On Fri, 17 Sep 2004 10:34:40 -0500, Ken Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 17 September 2004 07:34 am, Matt Hoppes wrote:
> > Hi,
> > On the inter7 qmailmrtg7 graphs.. what exactly is the msg/hour graph
On Friday 17 September 2004 07:34 am, Matt Hoppes wrote:
> Hi,
> On the inter7 qmailmrtg7 graphs.. what exactly is the msg/hour graph
> displaying?
It is displaying the averaged number of messages per hour.
> I know MRTG takes 5 minute averages but what exactly is
> it averaging?
Every 5 mi
On Jun 30, 2004, at 4:18 PM, Ken Jones wrote:
Yep. Looks like whoever added the Warning message code needed to
ifdef it with the big user dir define.
Added to CVS and scheduled for 5.4.7.
--- vpopmail.c 26 Jun 2004 02:20:56 - 1.28.2.4
+++ vpopmail.c 1 Jul 2004 05:29:45 - 1.28.2.5
@@ -262,9
On Jun 30, 2004, at 6:18 PM, Tom Collins wrote:
What version of vpopmail? I thought we took care of that error
message ("Warning: Failed to delete dir_control for test.com") during
the development cycle leading up to 5.4.0. It was due to the domain's
directory getting deleted before the dir_c
On Jun 30, 2004, at 4:13 PM, Brian Feeny wrote:
Thanks for answering. I did see that disable-users-big-dir option,
so I configured with it.
It seems to still do the following though:
1. create .dir-control in the domains directory.
2. complain when removing a domain that it can't delete the dir
c
On Wednesday 30 June 2004 06:13 pm, Brian Feeny wrote:
> Ken,
>
> Thanks for answering. I did see that disable-users-big-dir option,
> so I configured with it.
>
> It seems to still do the following though:
>
> 1. create .dir-control in the domains directory.
> 2. complain when removing a domain t
Ken,
Thanks for answering. I did see that disable-users-big-dir option,
so I configured with it.
It seems to still do the following though:
1. create .dir-control in the domains directory.
2. complain when removing a domain that it can't delete the dir control.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] bin]$ ./vadddomain
On Wednesday 30 June 2004 03:37 pm, Brian Feeny wrote:
> First, is there a way to disable the Dir Control functionality of
> vpopmail?
Sure. Use this option
--disable-users-big-dir
>
> If not, is there any downside to just not using it?
Just the optimization for keeping the number of directories
On Apr 29, 2004, at 7:04 PM, Sean Plaice wrote:
2) Change the evaluation in vadddomain() to use MAX_PW_DIR instead of
MAX_PW_DOMAIN.
Thanks for finding that. You are correct.
--- vpopmail.c 4 Mar 2004 05:17:54 - 1.28.2.1
+++ vpopmail.c 30 Apr 2004 03:49:42 -
@@ -174,7 +174,7 @@
On Tue, 2004-02-24 at 00:42, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Sir,
>
> I do not understand this log message here;
>
> ///
> Feb 22 09:32:54 ns qmail: 1077409974.518163 info msg 3670324: bytes 1742
> from <>
> qp 24127 uid 507
> Feb 22 09:32:54 ns qmail: 10774099
You will notice the message has come from <> which means its likely a bounce
message.
Without turning on more logging it's a little hard to say for certain.
Shane
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, 24 February 2004 2:42 PM
>To: [EMAIL
y, January 17, 2004 7:40 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [vchkpw] Question about roaming
Shane Chrisp wrote:
> I run 15 minutes for open relay and clearopensmtp every minute from
> crontab.
I'm sorry, Shane, but I'm very tired and I don't understand.
--en
ad
to
the system, so I don't see the harm. I would rather have the relay cleared
from
the table sooner than later.
Shane
>-Original Message-
>From: Andrea Riela [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Saturday, 17 January 2004 10:40 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE
Shane Chrisp wrote:
> I run 15 minutes for open relay and clearopensmtp every minute from
> crontab.
I'm sorry, Shane, but I'm very tired and I don't understand.
--enable-relay-clear-minutes=15
*/1 * * * * /home/vpopmail/bin/clearopensmtp
2>&1 > /dev/null
?
Thanks
And
> > If a program invoked from a .qmail file returns an exit status of 99
> > (per qmail-command man page) shouldn't it just stop processing the
> > qmail file? It seems to be deferring the message and trying to
> > redeliver it later.
>
> I just checked the ChangeLog, and that was fixed in 5.3
On Friday, November 28, 2003, at 09:19 PM, Yermo M. Lamers wrote:
I am running the Qmail Toaster as available from www.qmailtoaster.com.
(vpopmail-toaster-5.3.8).
There's something about the behavior of the .qmail files in the
individual vpopmail account directories that I don't understand.
If
> Gary wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Ok i'm got vpopmail installed on my qmail server, now i have a quick
> > question about adding domains
> >
> > when setting up a new domain do i set it up as just
> >
> > vadddomain domain.com
> > or as
> > vadddomain mail.domain.com ( assuming mail. is the
Gary wrote:
Hi all,
Ok i'm got vpopmail installed on my qmail server, now i have a quick
question about adding domains
when setting up a new domain do i set it up as just
vadddomain domain.com
or as
vadddomain mail.domain.com ( assuming mail. is the mx record in dns )
Hi,
What ever the @domain
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I´ve found the solution myself ... in the ChangeLog it sais that with version 5.2.1 "EXITCODE checking for vdelivermail" has been put in and I´m currently using 5.2 :(
So forget about my question, please give me an answer for this one:
Is it save to upgrade from 5.2 to 5
I´ve found the solution myself ... in the ChangeLog it sais that with version 5.2.1
"EXITCODE checking for vdelivermail" has been put in and I´m currently using 5.2 :(
So forget about my question, please give me an answer for this one:
Is it save to upgrade from 5.2 to 5.2.1 on an running system
On Thu, 2003-09-18 at 15:31, Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
> For the sake of vacation replies (since I'm sure those are used far more
> than "Mail robots") I'm going to release a new version with changes to
> the exit codes, but also place a bug report with qmailadmin about this
> activity.
oops, I apolog
On Tue, 2003-09-16 at 18:08, Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
> This is more of an opinion question than a request for help.
>
replying to my own request for advice. After looking further at the
code, it appears that it may be acting properly if it were only to be
used as a standalone autoresponder.
Howev
On Thu, 2003-09-18 at 13:20, Flavio Curti wrote:
> Hi Jeremy
>
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 06:08:39PM -0500, Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
> > AUTORESPOND: I can't handle a message with a Mailing-List header.
> sadly this is not the only time autorespond uses the wrong exit code:
> AUTORESPOND: too many rec
Hi Jeremy
On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 06:08:39PM -0500, Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
> AUTORESPOND: I can't handle a message with a Mailing-List header.
sadly this is not the only time autorespond uses the wrong exit code:
AUTORESPOND: too many received from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(this gets triggered when a user
At 08:49 AM 9/10/2003, Ewald Geschwinde wrote:
Have I done something wrong with the vpopmail installation?
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lvpopmail
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
Ewald...
Make sure you have the following two files:
/var/qmail/vpopmail/etc/inc_deps
/var/qmail/vpopmail/etc/lib_
That's an error from the SMTP server; unless you have
smtp auth or something like that built into it, vpopmail
would not be involved.
David
-Original Message-
From: Remo Mattei [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sat 6/7/2003 7:31 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
PM
> To: David Hubbard; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Question on 553 error
>
>
> This user is not even on my box :)
> She is just sending message to one of my client which is on
> this box :) Thanks and I am open for more suggestions ..
> -- Remo Matt
Linux Trainer & Firewall Development
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> From: "David Hubbard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2003 20:11:44 -0400
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: RE: [vchkpw] Question on 553 error
>
> That's an e
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Theodoropoulos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 10:24 AM
Subject: [vchkpw] question re faq
>
> faq item 34 discusses getting courier-imap to use vpopmail's roaming users
> functionality. i just noticed in the ch
As far as I know, roaming users doesn't work with
the courier-imap authlib, at least with authdaemond.
I've patched my version and when I get cycles planned
on submitting a patch to Mr. Sam to allow authdaemond
to have it work. The problem is that vpopmail relies
on environment variables that are
33 matches
Mail list logo
