to be there in general.
Not sure if 4.0 has a bug associated with it.
--
Darren Dunham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Technical Consultant TAOShttp://www.taos.com/
Got some Dr Pepper? San Francisco, CA bay area
--online invalid
EMC0_2 auto:none --error
EMC0_2 auto--error
[snip]
Do you have the necessary ASLs for the storage installed?
--
Darren Dunham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior
On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 11:19:18PM +, A Darren Dunham wrote:
I have a very large backup that failed. This one image spanned several
volumes.
When I look, I see the last volume it used got cleaned up by a bpexpdate
-deassignempty, but the ones written to (and filled) earlier did
of the volume and plex is ACTIVE ENABLED
Right. The volume is probably fine (otherwise you'd get read errors
from fsck).
--
Darren Dunham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Technical Consultant TAOShttp://www.taos.com/
Got some Dr Pepper
On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 09:23:29PM +0530, Arjun koneru wrote:
if the slices 3 and 4 of your bootdisk are not used for anything - zero them
out using format , run vxdctl enable and try the encap again.
Probably not a bad idea. But remove the disk from the diskgroup first.
--
Darren Dunham
reattach them.
I think at this point you can start the volume just by running vxvol
start with the 'force' option. Or you can examine the plexes
independently (by attaching thme to their own volumes), make sure one
looks good, then sync with that one.
--
Darren Dunham
of 'vxresize'.
Use fsadm to shrink the filesystem first, then use vxassist to shrink
the volume.
I think all 'fsgen' does here is give a hint that the filesystem should
be flushed before shrinking the volume, so there shouldn't be a big
problem with using 'vxresize'.
--
Darren Dunham
data on it. That will remove the VxVM partition
setup on it.
--
Darren Dunham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Technical Consultant TAOShttp://www.taos.com/
Got some Dr Pepper? San Francisco, CA bay area
t8
c1t8d0s2 auto:none --online invalid
--
Darren Dunham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Technical Consultant TAOShttp://www.taos.com/
Got some Dr Pepper? San Francisco, CA bay area
for other filesystems if you want via
'vxmksdpart' as well (assuming you have free slice numbers).
--
Darren Dunham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Technical Consultant TAOShttp://www.taos.com/
Got some Dr Pepper? San
.
--
Darren Dunham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Technical Consultant TAOShttp://www.taos.com/
Got some Dr Pepper? San Francisco, CA bay area
This line left intentionally blank to confuse you
c1t1d0s2 auto:cdsdiskoradata_disk_01 oradata online
-- rootmirror rootdg failed was:c1t1d0s2
Remove the disk from the diskgroup.
vxdg -g rootdg rm rootmirror. If there are no objects on the disk, it
should succeed.
--
Darren Dunham
interpreted it, he no longer is going to have a
mirrored root).
--
Darren Dunham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Technical Consultant TAOShttp://www.taos.com/
Got some Dr Pepper? San Francisco, CA bay area
behavior, but you can't do it in one step (at least not online
with data present in the plex).
--
Darren Dunham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Technical Consultant TAOShttp://www.taos.com/
Got some Dr Pepper? San
probably don't have all that many files.
--
Darren Dunham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Technical Consultant TAOShttp://www.taos.com/
Got some Dr Pepper? San Francisco, CA bay area
This line left intentionally
would normally expect to create a volume and install the zone onto it
with no need to encapsulate anything.
--
Darren Dunham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Technical Consultant TAOShttp://www.taos.com/
Got some Dr Pepper
be
contending with all the writes.
Whether those are good or bad numbers depend on what you've purchased to
produce them, and what your expectations are on the application.
--
Darren Dunham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Technical Consultant TAOS
explain me on how to
calculate the minimum free block requirements
for the relayout process.
I can't guarantee that it's all correct, but there's a technote on
requirements from the Symantec site.
http://seer.support.veritas.com/docs/248062.htm
--
Darren Dunham
of the data, written on the disk.
Indicates from 0 to 70703616 are the used blocks.
Ah, but this is the free command. It should be reporting free blocks
and their extent, not used blocks. It shouldn't be showing anything
that is allocated to a subdisk.
--
Darren Dunham
)
--
Darren Dunham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Technical Consultant TAOShttp://www.taos.com/
Got some Dr Pepper? San Francisco, CA bay area
This line left intentionally blank to confuse you
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 03:09:27PM -0500, Asim Zuberi wrote:
Just recently we observed, during the encapsulation of the rootdrive
process the OS native logging option for
/ and swap is getting turned off. Even though, during the OS install the
logging option was explicitly set.
Well, swap
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 02:09:59PM -0400, Chuck Sedlacko wrote:
Thanks for your help! You were correct on both suggestions. Shrinking
the disk group to a multiple of 16 (in sectors) allowed me to complete
the implementation to move it to the new disk group.
Yay! Glad it worked.
Thanks for
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 10:54:43AM -0500, Barton Wold wrote:
I recently changed jobs and have found that my new place uses Veritas
striped volumes that go to a hardware array that is stripe/mirror'd.
There are a lot of smart people here who have done benchmark testing
to confirm that this is
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 02:14:16PM -0400, Romeo Theriault wrote:
/etc/vx/diag.d/vxprivutil -D set /dev/rdsk/c2t500A098186E7C997d83s3
dgid=newid_number
/etc/vx/diag.d/vxprivutil -D set /dev/rdsk/c2t500A098186E7C997d83s3
diskid=newid_number
I'm not certain that that is sufficient. It could
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 10:51:11AM -0800, Hazel, Geoff wrote:
I have a server I inherited with /export/home at 7GB, with 1.5GB free.
Now, it shows up in vxprint like this:
v home -ENABLED ACTIVE 14363112 SELECT-
fsgen
pl home-01 home ENABLED
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 10:47:33AM +0800, ssloh wrote:
Hi folks,
I would like to take out one disk from a concat volume with 3 subdisks and
want to preserve the data, vxprint as following.
v exp -ENABLED ACTIVE 87166976 SELECT-
fsgen
pl exp-01
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 08:56:49AM -0700, Mike Li wrote:
What will be involved to remove c4t2d14s2 from the appldba diskgroup and vm
to give back to EMC SAN?
Backup DB to tape.
stop DB. Unmount filesystems for vol03, vol07,vol08
vxassist -g appldba move vol03 !c4t2d14
vxassist -g appldba
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 11:39:02AM -0700, Victor Engle -X (viengle - Insight
Global at Cisco) wrote:
Can someone direct me to a document with a good explanation of root disk
mirroring and recovery with veritas vxvm 4.1 for Solaris? I have an
encapsulated root disk with a mirror. I think I have
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 11:42:43AM +0800, Wilkinson, Alex wrote:
Hi all,
I have a LUN that I need to expand via vxresize
vxresize expands volumes and filesystems, not LUNs. Do you have a
volume that is on a LUN that you already expanded?
#df -h .
FilesystemSize Used Avail
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 11:34:46PM +0200, Asiye Yigit wrote:
Hello All;
Is there any way to convert ZFS to VxFS?
Not in-place. You need to pick it up and move it.
UFS and VxFS have a lot of differences, but compared to ZFS they're
practically identical twins. Writing a converter would be a
On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 05:45:09PM -0500, Hudes, Dana wrote:
Future release of whose? I can't see Veritas/symantec putting effort
into migrating away from vxfs+vxvm. Now, I could see Larry Ellison
putting money into anything to take business away from any and every
other company so perhaps
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 03:53:40PM +1030, Robinson, Greg wrote:
I mirrored the data in the normal way, broke the mirror, removed the
disks from the disk group (and this is where I think windows vxvm got
the better of me), and tried to import the disks and create a new disk
group out of them
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 03:58:47PM +0530, Mohd Aslam wrote:
Is there some way I can define that while mirroring, plex data01-02
used 33GB space from disk02 and rest 50GB space from disk04.
Instead of:
# vxplex -g datadg -o rm dis data01-02
# vxresize -F vxfs -x -g datadg data01 +50g disk03
#
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 10:39:07AM -0400, William Havey wrote:
I'm curious as to the purpose of putting a slice in a disk group. Why do it?
I know it was a work-around for rootdg requirements. But that's long gone.
*production* purpose? Don't know.
But I used it all the time for testing
On Sat, May 07, 2011 at 07:07:26PM +0300, Asiye Yigit wrote:
Hello all;
?t is recommended to add raid-5 log device to the volume to recover the
correct data in any case including system crash.
However, I am trying to understand how the data and parity changes are logged
here? Do you
35 matches
Mail list logo