Too cool! I am there!!
What's going on for dinner beforehand? I know a wonderful Indonesian
place just one block north.
jonny goldstein wrote:
NYC area vloggers:
Susan Kirkpatrick is going to be in down from Texas before Vloggercon,
so we're getting together at Rudy's Bar and Grill at
Lukas Blakk!!
Jay dedman wrote:
I sure am...can't wait. yourself, Anne, myself, Casey and Rudy makes 5...that I am aware of. I've been meaning to ask this question as well.
All you Canadians going to vloggercon, sound off. We'll have to make sure we all get together at Schlomo's
Hey, whatever! We have the home-field advantage and know how to deal
with real summer heat!
Brett Gaylor wrote:
Freakin EH! Philip and Lukas are coming. We are SO going
to
drink these yanks under the table. Actually, Philip doesn't
drink...dammit.
b
On 5/30/06, Jay dedman
Casey McKinnon wrote:
I seriously believed this ridiculous conversation was over... Smithie
has shown me that it was just the begining and that vloggers are still
dwelling on this issue.
Stand by. I have not yet begun to vlog...
SPONSORED LINKS
I'm on Windows using Windows Movie Maker, but now I need to work with
QuickTime files. My transcoding software is failing for some clips, so
I'm considering buying QuickTime Pro, but on the QuickTime web site I
see an alarming number of complaints from users who paid for the
software and are
Ryanne pulling stinky beige clumps out of her throat.
Heath wrote:
The whole "remember your first time" thing got me thinking and I was
just wondering myself, what was the ONE vlog "episode" that really got
you. The one where you sat up and really noticed, something that moved
you,
Legal loophole: can a work have two licenses simultaneously?
Andreas Haugstrup wrote:
What part of "If you alter, transform, or build upon this work, you *may*
distribute the resulting work *only* under a license identical to this
one" is unclear to you (emphasis mine)?
And from the
Andreas Haugstrup wrote:
Normally, yes, but not in this care. The license says:
"You may distribute, publicly display, publicly perform, or publicly
digitally perform a Derivative Work only under the terms of this License,
a later version of this License with the same License
lephant.) And my new, improved license contains all the same elements
as the two old ones.
Andreas Haugstrup wrote:
On Wed, 24 May 2006 23:23:27 +0200, Charles HOPE [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andreas Haugstrup wrote:
Normally, yes, but not in this care. The license says:
"You
o equal :o)
- Andreas
On Wed, 24 May 2006 23:40:06 +0200, Charles HOPE [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It didn't say "equal to" though. It said "contains the same".
In vernacular English it can go either way. Do you have a picture of
Lindsay
Lohan and one of Keir
ed, 24 May 2006 23:51:09 +0200, Charles HOPE [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
"You may distribute, publicly display, publicly perform, or publicly
digitally perform a Derivative Work only under the terms of this
License,
a later version of this License with the same L
http://chope.blip.tv/posts/?topic_name=new%20york
Mike Moon wrote:
Inspired by something missbhavens said, I present to you, "Tourist in
My Own Town - Lakeview Park, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada".
http://moon.blogspot.com/2006/05/tourist-in-my-own-town-lakeview-park.html
I'd love to
How can I have the right to sell fruit but not have the right to charge
more for the watermelons than the oranges?
David Meade wrote:
Sorry I've been traveling and not had time to keep up ...
On 5/20/06, Charles HOPE [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's interesting here
David Meade wrote:
The magic here is who they are charging. Telcos could charge
the consumer per KB if they wanted. But the dont.
So instead we're supposed to let them prioratize what can be
published? That doesnt make any sense.
Are you demanding that FedEx deliver all packages
http://us.beautifulpeople.net/main_light.asp
Jan McLaughlin wrote:
http://tinyurl.com/jmlcs
Hollywood goes social networking digitally.
Melding "Gmail" invitation theory with "MySpace" social networking via
Hollywood.
Hehehe.
Jan
--
http://fauxpress.blogspot.com
Jan wrote:
I've been mostly deleting this thread, but the
word 'weasely' jumped out at me. You guys aren't stooping to ad hominim
attacks are you? 'Cause if you are, I'm gonna stop this car
Nope.
A weasel word is a word that is intended to, or has the
effect of,
I don't know which is more polite. I fear people are tired of this
thread, but it would be rude to ignore your responses.
David Meade wrote:
I guess because the reason Net Neutrality is
important to me is because
it would prevent "powers that be" from taking action contrary to rights
I
David Meade wrote:
Charles the Bill of Rights isn't about government self regulation
really. It has wording such as "congress shall pass no law that
... " but its REALLY about setting the legal edicts that guide the
country.
According to whom? That's a rather striking reinterpretation.
David Meade wrote:
Its symantics I guess ... but the truth is that The Intent of the Bill
of Rights was not simply to take away rights from the government, but
to ensure certain rights are protected for The People.
I beg your pardon? What is the difference?
The Bill of Rights was created
Nevertheless, it looks like Charles K. wins this round. The Bill of
Rights restricts government power; Net Neutrality restricts the power
of the People (who own and control the wires).
David Meade wrote:
I don't think we disagree. I think we're just looking at
the same thing from two
Zadi wrote:
Nice.
On a similar note: Save The Internet's MySpace page has been deleted.
http://www.myspace.com/savetheinternet
Looks like it's back. Maybe it's just deleted on your ISP!
Andy Carvin wrote:
Net Neutrality is not government regulation ... unless you consider
David Meade wrote:
On 5/19/06, Charles HOPE [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nevertheless, it looks like
Charles K. wins this round. The Bill of
Rights restricts government power; Net Neutrality restricts the power
of the People (who own and control the wires).
Says
Looks like they take after Little Green Footballs in more ways as well:
Comment registration is now closed. We'll post a notice when it
re-opens.
Zadi wrote:
I just found out about that Michelle Malkin has a vlog:
http://hotair.com/
Zadi
http://smashface.com/vlog
She's a credit to her race.
Casey McKinnon wrote:
You've got to admit, though... Michelle Malkin and the golf hottie may
seem uber-fabricated, but it's nice to see more Asian faces than are
normally in the forefront on traditional TV.
Casey
http://www.galacticast.com/
Jen Simmons wrote:
Those corporations want to take over the imagination of
the vlogosphere... and they are. Do we want to fall for that?
What do you mean "take over"? This could be the vector by which the
idea of videoblogging reaches more people. In what way will it drive
out the
Casey McKinnon wrote:
Looks like they found their perfect match... it's a nice little
corporate package.
I can see now why they wanted a woman. I can't picture many men
talking about what to buy...
Oh geez. I guess you know only Real Men then.
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
Are we equating cosmetics with tobacco?
Michael Verdi wrote:
Yes, it diminishes the redeeming qualities - it's like
PSAs from Philip Morris.
-Verdi
On 5/15/06, Josh Wolf
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey
everyone, Current TV is currently working with L'Oreal, a
cosmetics company, to
British Petroleum, an oil company which has gone green and expanded its
scope into sustainable energy. Isn't this what us tree huggers have
been praying for for decades?
Devlon wrote:
ok, clueless moment...who is 'BP'?
On 5/15/06, Mike Hudack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I
francisco_daum wrote:
I think both ad campaigns can be equally deceptive. BP Petroleum,
using the fresh, green, "nature"- friendly imagery can lull the
consumer into thinking emissions are no problem.
L'Oreal's ad campaign can downplay the profiled woman's important
achievements. It
Sure. I've since updated the post with an explanation.
Paul Knight wrote:
Wanna talk about it?
Paul
On 15 May 2006, at 04:26, Charles HOPE wrote:
My response is here: http://blip.tv/file/32587
Paul Knight wrote:
Check this out
http
If you were an American, you would understand that she's not being
racist. Which is an example of her point, really.
I don't know what reaction you were expecting to your video, but we
Americans tend to get heated when people criticize America based on its
external stereotypes without
My response is here: http://blip.tv/file/32587
Paul Knight wrote:
Check this out
http://www.dailymotion.com/paulreyno/video/169001
Love Paul (to all the haters)
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
Everything you need is oneclick away. Make Yahoo!
She should be hired on the basis of her elite picture-finding skills
alone!
pouringdownpix wrote:
hi all,
i told my friend steph about the job listing, and she is psyched!
she asked me to post this for her:
http://tinyurl.com/ozse6
you can contact her at:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
thanks,
I didn't even notice any foul language. I was too busy thinking about
what she was saying.
I guess it's because I'm from NYC.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fair enough. I won't post it any more. For the record, I did not
insult Brittany, I simply said she has a filthy mouth. Did you
Josh Wolf wrote:
Instead, I think we have much more to gain by looking at why so many
vloggers are white-male and what we can do to encourage and support
people outside of this demographic to get involved.
Perhaps we should encourage more white males to video blog. They seem
to
Michael Sullivan wrote:
those who inevitably would like to vlog and have a need to learn...
will find a way to the vlogosphere. i'm not big on convincing people.
its a match or it aint. nothing to worry about.
Thank you for a bit of sanity. I don't like all the handwringing and
guilt.
Mike Hudack and I are going up as well. Looks like we are staying in
the Radisson.
JV wrote:
I'm here in Boston getting ready for the weekend. If anyone wants to
get together, drop me a line. It is a bit rainy, but I'm still up for
meeting anywhere around Harvard.
Look forward to
http://www.snopes.com/language/acronyms/fuck.htm
Anne Walk wrote:
a bit of trivia i found a while ago:
Fuck
is an acronym from the 16-17th centuries as a designation for sins:
If a couple committing adultery were "Found Under
Carnal Knowledge" they would be penalized, with "FUCK"
And I thought from the subject that they were looking for an upload
service run by wimmin.
Richard BF wrote:
At 17:46 +0200 10/5/06, Sian Reynolds wrote:
Can anyone out there help me with this? ... We are looking to hire a
video podcast hostess. What would be the most
Speak for yourself.
Andreas Haugstrup wrote:
The boob is a metonym. :o)
SPONSORED LINKS
Fireant
Individual
Use
Ron Watson wrote:
Josh, you say fight the boob, I say embrace the boob.
Boob marketing is a fact of life.
If I were running a golf show, a hot young lady might be a
necessity. I don't know how many of you golf, but I have been on
several occasions, and one of the
I'd rather hear your opinions even if they aren't "communal".
Josh Leo wrote:
ok then, well I will keep my ideas/opinions to myself and
say
SPONSORED LINKS
Fireant
Individual
Naturally, there are business decisions that work but are unethical.
Why are you generalizing our culture's devaluation of masculinity as a
broad human condition? The ancient Greeks, for instance...
LeanBackVids.com wrote:
It is a business decision and that is it. Again, most
Some of the tacit messages floating around are rather striking, and
would be very offensive but they are so commonly expressed.
Devlon wrote:
On 5/10/06, Josh Leo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Devlon, a man after my own heart
Thanks Josh :)
I for one never used to pay
Brad Webb wrote:
Charles HOPE wrote:
Paul Knight wrote:
Men are very base creatures at the best of times and there is no way
to control them, and every so often men make comments on Breasts etc,
you never hear a woman doing a Knob joke, now do you
Jay dedman wrote:
I just wanted to say my piece about this sillyness, I didn't want to get into a debate, but Men having the same standards as women, come on Jay, when is that gonna happen?
I hear you...
I also cringe when Ryanne goes off about too many white men
I was at dinner last night, with 2 women and 4 guys, and the 2 women
totally dominated the discussion.
Why can't we look at people as individuals that are either assertive or
retiring, and quit looking at their chests for some sort of pattern or
correlation? I won't shut someone up because
missbhavens1969 wrote:
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Brad Webb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's the kicker, too. The only TRULY sexist part of the whole thread
until this point was the fact that they were ONLY looking for an
attractive WOMAN.
No, the
You should try a threaded mail reader such as Thunderbird. Then you can
ignore the subjects that look boring.
Dennis Poulette wrote:
I think the sheer number of
posts per day makes it hard to keep up with the group. In my
situation, I was just a subscriber and checked the group
David Meade wrote:
sigh
On 5/9/06, Andreas
Haugstrup [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
If
people want to be heard they should post. There's no
need to ask for permission, just post.
And yet this insight doesnt seem to do the trick. So ... we're
left with the question that all this
about impact of it.
On 5/9/06, Charles
HOPE [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
David Meade wrote:
sigh
On 5/9/06, Andreas
Haugstrup [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
If
people want to be heard they should post. There's no
need to ask for permission, just
Quite right. I'm sure that most of the viewers were expecting some C
with D porno. I wonder how many stayed through to the end of the video.
Joshua Kinberg wrote:
The thing you may be overlooking here with the viewer
counts on YouTube is the fact that you titled that vlog entry,
Dude, that's so 1.0. This comes with AJAX!
robert a/k/a r wrote:
how is this different from the emailing pdf to fax-out servers that
existed as both an in-house mail server connectors and outside services
that have been around since approx the 90s?
oh wait. soldering on an rssemail
Very cool paper. Reminds me of Aglets.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aglets
Joshua Kinberg wrote:
Julian Bleecker has written about similar topics under the name
"Blogjects," or objects that blog.
http://www.boingboing.net/2006/03/02/manifesto_for_blogje.html
And not to toot my own
bottomunion wrote:
Don't know if this has been mentioned on the list yet, but it is definitely worth a look.
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/18/arts/television/18smit.html?
ex=1146024000en=2c3657f3b71f2a2eei=5070emc=eta1
aka http://tinyurl.com/nzdnl
(Firefox users should install
Peter Van Dijck wrote:
On 4/8/06, robert a/k/a r [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have any persons who work for Veoh or with Veoh (for pay or not)
manually input RSS feeds into the system?
Robert, I don't think that's the issue. The issue is the "re-hosting",
not how many
Devlon wrote:
Any suggestions on which might be the best choice? They all look
pretty obscure to me :)
I've been in your exact situation. I was on Windows, using Adobe
Premiere for editing, and Avid Free DV for QuickTime conversion, looked
at Freevlog, didn't find any AAC
Devlon wrote:
On 4/9/06, Charles HOPE [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sweet! This is exactly what I've been looking for Charles. Thanks.
As for the audio quality when run through Flash transcoding, put on
headphones and judge for yourself.
http://chope.blip.tv/file/875
robert a/k/a r wrote:
Are
you comfortable with not knowing how the feeds got into Veoh's system?
How they got the feeds is relevant given what they did with
them. If all the feeds had been entered in by their owners, there would
be no controversy at all.
The picture that is being painted
In light of the hot discussion going on today, and the low turnout for
recent video conferences, I thought I would remind people of the Flash
conference which will start in about half an hour.
http://voxmedia.org/w/index.php/Videoblogger_Videoconferences
Yahoo! Groups Links
* To visit
WWWhatsup wrote:
My guess is that Dmitry didn't say anything about spidering for
precisely
one reason, VEOH does not actually do any spidering.
Are you saying that somebody sat down and entered in all the zillions
of feeds that they have listed here? I think it's pretty
dmitry_veoh wrote:
We are still removing feeds manually while programmers are working on
fixing the automated systems. Thanks so much for the patience with
your personal requests...moving as fast as we can over the weekend!
Clearly you still don't get it. The only proper thing to
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Charles Iliya Krempeaux
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
The problem with that is that there is NO requirement for
machines/software
to understand or obey the license.
Guns don't kill people, people kill people.
So OK, it's not the responsibility of
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Pete Prodoehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do they have an xoxo list instead?
A xoxo list would be a fair bet. It was developed by one of the
technorati boys (Tantek).
Yahoo! Groups Links
* To visit your group on the web, go to:
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Stephanie Bryant
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, I'm going to say mea culpa. We have many volunteers offering to
help put together the RSS feed, and I just have to pull the feeds
together. It'll be another day, and my apologies for the delay.
I'm in!
Deirdre Straughan wrote:
Or perhaps we need to refer to "the Richard who is Lisa's
father" as opposed to "the Richard who is not."
Mashing up cultures we get Abu Lisa, and Lisa Richardsdottir.
Charles
chope.blip.tv
SPONSORED LINKS
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, David Howell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Is Blip choking on itself again or is it just me? Tried to upload a
video 3 times now and it keeps timing out.
Anyone else having any problems with Blip?
I just tried uploading a video and had no problems. If
Rachel Knight wrote:
Kunga, Enric, Markus,
I realise that this is probably settled by now, but calm down.
People have different opinions, they express them. No need for a punch
up. Remember, cat fights are for girls, stop betraying your hormones.
Yes, gentlemen. That's right.
bleedxapathy wrote:
hahahaha ah this was rather funny, for me to find on my
system anyway, i must say i really do love this pamela plugin.
anywho listen to the attached audio file.
it gets interesting around 1:05
Is that how you thank people who do you favors?
--
Unlike most marine
Barbara Parrish wrote:
hmm...it doesn't bother me personally, but out of curiosity how would
you prefer it be displayed? I work with the guys that wrote this and I
think they'd be interested in your comments.
The background image logo look like a forest on a windy
mountain side.
Crystal wrote:
Hey guys! I seem to be the only one I dunno maybe not but
I'm having issues with blip.tv! When I login and then hit upload video
its kicking me out and says I need to log in or sign up! It won't let
me upload videos!!
I even tried to create a new account thought something
niko_video wrote:
I guess I just keep hoping that the application will change from an
art form to a media form where we will see more video footage from
3rd world countries and more video that the established powers don't
want us to see. It seems like this type of footage could reach the
Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen wrote:
Free speech means that you have the right to respond. It doesn't mean that
someone else has to sponsor your speech.
That's true. But it's good faith and proper manners.
SPONSORED LINKS
havilahland33 wrote:
So what is 'basic' service, what would be beyond 'basic' service?
Basic service is what we offer now, with an ample cap on uploads.
Beyond that lies features yet to be provided, and a much larger cap on
uploads.
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
Visit your
Brad Webb wrote:
Aren't you effectively suggesting we censor those folks that want to
censor you?
This is the argument that BSD people use against the GPL. It's a bit
too relativistic for my taste though, I'm afraid. There is censorship
to promote my ideology and shut out the enemy.
Bill Streeter wrote:
I would agree on a very general level. It's true that technically the
medium itself does not determine a stories truthfulness. But some of
those media are layered with a bureaucratic infrastructure that makes
the truth harder to get out in some cases. Sometimes what is
Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen wrote:
Blogging in itself isn't more true than any other medium.
It's not if I sit around and blog about life on Mars. But when
discussing something that I've experienced first hand, my version is in
fact truer than what would be reported by a journalist who
Your first suggestion to a lousy sounding podcast is "they should use a
better audio codec"
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
Video of right after Monday's Baghdad bombings.
http://tinyurl.com/e3j85
This is the promise of videoblogging.
SPONSORED LINKS
Individual
Fireant
Christopher Bergeron wrote:
I tried Avid Free DV, but I didn't like it very much
and it was a DOG on my PC.
I tried Premiere 6.5 and it started to crash. Now I'm switching to Avid
Free, but I'm finding it a bit counterintuitive since I'm more used to
Premiere. The tutorial isn't the
johngaltsjournal wrote:
"Television over the Net". Hmm. It kinda bothers me. Am I the only
one?
It's not Linux, it's GNU/Linux. And you live in Frisco.
SPONSORED LINKS
Individual
Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen wrote:
Does Avid Free only import DV? I tried to import some random MOV samples
the other day, but it wouldn't import correctly. I'm an unfortunate soul
with no DV camera. :o)
I've been able to import AVIs that were made in Premiere. I haven't
tried
Steve Garfield wrote:
I'd like to hear from them, something to the effect that what is free
now will remain free.
Thanks,
--Steve
It's true. blip.tv will never start charging for what has already been
uploaded! When we go down the "pro accounts" road, the threshold will
be on the
Deirdre Straughan wrote:
Interestingly, none of "them" has responded to this
thread. They've
become so A-List they won't even talk to us poor schlubs?
The First Rule of A-List is...
SPONSORED LINKS
Individual
Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen wrote:
On Mon, 17 Oct 2005 19:14:29 +0200, Bill Streeter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For PDF's it doesn't matter.
When you export you have to remember to check the box that says "Embed all
fonts" - otherwise it *does* matter. :o)
I've
Hey guys, just thought I might let you know that Dina Kaplan and Jared
Klett (both of blip.tv and Jared of spokes.tv) will be teaching an
intro class on videoblogging at the Learning Annex this autumn.
The times are November 16, 2005, December 14, 2005 and January 18, 2006
from 6:45 pm to
What a terrible tragedy. However I don't know what is served by such
divisive rhetoric as:
3.)Men
are the main culprits in stalking, rape, killing, molesting go
look up the stats on google..its not the women and teenagers that i'm
worried about...
I think the proper division between is
aroundtheperimeter wrote:
A female
is not only for sex, try to like her for her mind, thoughts
and ideas...
I love Pamela Anderson for her ideas. Honest!
I don't think the culprit is "men" or "the internet" so much bored
teenagers. You should see the abuse that Jay Dedman gets from that
Justin Chapweske wrote:
One approach to dealing with the recent unreliability of Blip.tv and
OurMedia is to use both rather than just relying on one or the other.
So, if anyone is feeling adventurous, you can try out the LinkGenerator
at (http://swarmcast.net/toys/LinkGenerator),
What
Justin Chapweske wrote:
On Mon, 2005-10-10 at 15:31 -0400, Josh Leo wrote:
who ever said there were problems with blip.tv? the Archive and
blip
use a system where the video can be retrieved from multiple
servers to
balance bandwidth...sorry but stop trying to knock on great
services
That buzzing noise...it is buzz!
http://www.pokkari.com/blog/2005/10/10/blip-in-crains-new-york-business/
SPONSORED LINKS
Individual
Fireant
Jay dedman wrote:
but Im old...32...and in the oldtime days, we just sat
and watched
long streams of uninterrrupted video...
I could be mistaken, but with SMIL, that is exactly what you would
experience in a QT player. So the problem is that SMIL editing tools
aren't popular and creators
Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen wrote:
You can see it in many videoblogs with things such as intro
sequences and credits (and in the discourse, but I don't know if we should
go there).
Let's go there. What are you seeing that is TV-like?
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
Visit
Brett Gaylor wrote:
I just started the process of moving my videos from my
local server to ourmedia, and I was checking some of the stats. Some
of these show upwards of 3000 downloads since then! Is this actual
people who have viewed the videos, or does this number come from
internal
In exclusive stunning admissions to The
BRAD BLOG
some 11 months after the 2004 Presidential Election, a "Diebold
Insider" is now finally speaking out for the first time about the
alarming security flaws within Diebold, Inc's electronic voting
systems, software and machinery. The source is
Randolfe Wicker wrote:
If this is
not possible at the moment, one has to think that it could be at least
technologically possible. Wouldn't that be a help to everyone. I find
myself almost crazed while shooting footage in a location and then
realizing I probably won't be
Adrian Miles wrote:
this is *better* journalism than that practiced by someone at
least
trained in some professional practice, a code of ethics, who
(even
though it is dumb) at least thinks stories have 'two' sides?
I thought objectivity was the significant factor in professional
Andreas Haugstrup wrote:
On
Wed, 07 Sep 2005 19:46:34 +0200, Charles HOPE
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
That's it, isn't it? I'd rather get the story from a local blogger
than
the most
highly decorated war correspondent. The latter is and will always
be an
outsider.
What if we
Andreas Haugstrup wrote:
My
questions spawned a lot of replies. That's great, but it also gives
me
trouble when I want to reply to everything. I think I'll start out
easy...
Charles Hope:
Oh, but it does. If the medium is expensive, only well-funded
institutions can
produce. If it's
Adrian Miles wrote:
around the 5/9/05 Markus Sandy mentioned about Re: [videoblogging]
What's the True Potential of the Videob that:
I see no reason to believe that. It would seem that basic
statistics is
against you on this (FWIW)
I know of no theory that postulates: "If all the people
101 - 200 of 234 matches
Mail list logo
