For Google Video you should be able to download alternate video
formats, such as .mp4 for the video iPod. That should be easier to
convert to a format you can burn to DVD.
For the stuff on YouTube, I'm not sure what to tell you. Ask the
people who made the video if they have it in another format.
My aim is for Windows users to be able to view the
video right in their IE browsers, using whatever Windows software came
pre-installed on their PCs.
DivX does not come pre-installed on PCs.
-Josh
On 4/14/06, Harold Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there,
I just used a tool
This doesn't sounds like an iTunes problem.
Sounds like bad HTML somewhere in one of your blog entries.
If you have an img tag, it should end with a slash like this:
img src=http://my/image/jpg; /
XML is much more strict than HTML, and thus you must make sure that
your HTML is well-formed.
, and other content that quite obviously would
require permission, unless that permission has been granted.
-Josh
On 4/8/06, Kath O'Donnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/9/06, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The top viral clip on vSocial has over 20 million remote views. Its a
clip from
including RSS feeds is not a priblem at all. This is what RSS
syndication is intended for.
FireAnt, MeFeedia, Vlogdir and other sites utilize RSS syndication.
The issue is as Peter has stated, caching and rehosting videos without
permission -- making it seem as though people were members of the
I think copyright is only one part of the problem here. The bigger
problem in my eyes is that by Veoh caching and rehosting videos
without permission they are making it seem as though all these
vloggers are members of the Veoh community, agreeing to Veoh's terms
of service, when this is not the
AAC is usually called mpeg4 audio in those lists... but I don't see
it there anyway.
-josh
On 4/9/06, Andreas Haugstrup [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 09 Apr 2006 18:15:16 +0200, Devlon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
True WMM does ok for vlog editing, but you are still stuck with an avi
that
(a) Yes or no (and only yes or no), have any persons who work for Veoh
or with Veoh (for pay or not) manually input RSS feeds into the system?
I don't see why this question would matter. People manually input RSS
feeds into any aggregator site or feed directory such as FireAnt,
MeFeedia,
that their software has been properly coded to act as a web cache.)
See yaOn 4/9/06, Joshua Kinberg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think copyright is only one part of the problem here. The biggerproblem in my eyes is that by Veoh caching and rehosting videoswithout permission they are making it seem
I agree with this.
The answer cannot be, we allow people to opt out.
The answer must be, we only host videos that users have uploaded or
have opted in for us to pull, trancode, and redistribute.
If there has not been an opt in action on behalf of the content
owner, then answer must be to remove
Adding linkbacks to the entries is not enough.
The issue is rehosting content that you do not have permission to
rehost and assuming it falls under your own terms of use (as though it
were willfully uploaded by a consenting user who has chosen to opt in
to the service).
This denies traffic from
The thing with Veoh is only the latest example of something that has
been pretty rampant and very troubling with many of the new Flickrs
of video -- and that's the institutional disregard for copyright and
the massive amount of infringement that is tolerated.
Veoh just set up an automated
allowing all this
infringement ;-)
On 4/8/06, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And just to hammer home the point at how easy it is to track down
these infringing uses...
look at HH32 on vSocial, and then check out that user's network of
Friends, many of whom also engage in the same
on people's IP and
copyrights.
On 4/8/06, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think looking the other way is a good solution.
Yes, a user could get a new email address and start again, or move on
to another service and do the same. But I think banning the user for
violating
they carry on their networks...
On 4/8/06, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think looking the other way is a good solution.
Yes, a user could get a new email address and start again, or move on
to another service and do the same. But I think banning the user for
violating
telling content owners that they have the right to opt-out when in fact they were never given the choice of opt-in... that was merely assumed, which violates the rights of the content owners.
-JoshOn 4/8/06, Adam Quirk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/8/06, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
in HTML you can make a copyright symbol like this: copy;
But, no, according to copyright law you do not have to display a
symbol or date in order to have copyright protection. Every work is
immediately copyrighted at the point of creation, and if no mark is
present then it is assumed to be All
I think that this thread is pointed toward YouTube and iFilm as well.
I was just using the example of vSocial to point out how easy it is to
discover and ban the accounts of repeat offenders.
iFilm may have never been sued, but I'm certain they've received many
cease and desist letters over their
owners may now opt in to YouTube at their own
discretion. And this is fine. But YouTube had no right to broadcast
their content without permission from the beginning. Same goes for
Google Video, vSocial, and any other video clip sharing site out
there.
-Josh
On 4/8/06, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL
or if they do.On Apr 8, 2006, at 5:21 PM, Joshua Kinberg wrote: So how did SNL lose out when Veoh hosted their clips?
Because SNL's content is owned by a corporate entity who is in the business of licensing that content to other people in exchange for money. Whenever you see SNL on TV anywhere, you
OK, this thread got out of whack... it was not about Veoh, but how
other services are doing roughly what Veoh has done but to mainstream
content owners while hiding behind their supposed inability to enforce
their own terms of use
Just trying to get back on track here. This thread was about
I agree with this whole thread... I find the Veoh service very
troubling and first noticed their revamped site around SXSW. They
are basically seeding their community with other people's content to
make it seem like an active place. They make it seem as though all
these people (many vloggers) are
Does Technorati make RSS feeds with enclosures?I don't think they do.-joshOn 4/3/06, duncan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
has anyone managed to get fireant to download videos from the technorati tag 'videobloggingweek2006', it keeps saying no new videos found? what's the alternative method to
them in the FA aggregator. I have to go to documents and then they open in the original format. Any suggestions?
John http://www.jchtv.com/
Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can try to answer this... though I don't know if you'll be satisfied with the response...FireAnt has a different
that.I'd suggest simplifying the UI on windows version even more.Can you direct me to the BitTorrent Support Documentation? I foget... does it also seed torrents or only download and play?
In other words, is FA a true BitTorrent Client?Thanks,sull
On 4/4/06, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote
thik that's necessary. Both of these already
have usage. And are on the way to becoming defacto standards.)
See ya
On 4/4/06, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does Technorati make RSS feeds with enclosures?
I don't think they do.
-josh
On 4/3/06, duncan [EMAIL
not yet, but on the roadmap...
-Josh
On 4/2/06, Andreas Haugstrup [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 03 Apr 2006 05:47:16 +0200, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
You can also tag your videos at http://FireAnt.tv
... which was also made for just this sort of thing.
Do you read
, blip.tv
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
not yet, but on the roadmap...
-Josh
On 4/2/06, Andreas Haugstrup [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 03 Apr 2006 05:47:16 +0200, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
You can also tag your
or while lip-synching to Backstreet Boys... or while washing a monkey
that is also washing a cat!
-Josh
On 4/3/06, johngaltsjournal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've never seen you skateboard/snowboard in your videos...
But if you did, yer stats would go through the roof! To the moon!
I can try to answer this... though I don't know if you'll be satisfied with the response...FireAnt has a different interface on Windows and on Mac. This is partly due to the fact that we've had very different developers with different styles who were creating on entirely different platforms
You can also tag your videos at http://FireAnt.tv... which was also made for just this sort of thing.-JoshOn 4/2/06,
Adam Quirk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
fwiw, I've never gotten Technorati to work on any blogs I've run, Movable Type or Wordpress. Using both categories as tags and the proper
Just add a link like this to your blog entry:
a href=http://technorati.com/tags/videobloggingweek2006;
rel=tagvideobloggingweek2006/a
-Josh
On 4/2/06, Casey McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can anyone give me a step by step guide for tagging individual posts
in WordPress? I'm at a loss
a way to get a feed for the tag. can you explain where it is? i'm obviously missing something...
On 4/2/06,
Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can also tag your videos at http://FireAnt.tv... which was also made for just this sort of thing.
-JoshOn 4/2/06,
Adam Quirk [EMAIL PROTECTED
Yep, those ads show up on my Flickr page too.
Anybody wanna donate some money to us so we can outbid the
exterminators for the keywords?
:-)
-Josh
http://FireAnt.tv
On 4/1/06, Andy Carvin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had a sneaky feeling you were screwing with us, particularly when I
The link to the MOV file returns a 404 error.-JoshOn 3/30/06, Richard Show [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I originally posted this to the fireAnt list, thinking it was a fireAnt problem and then later figured it was a problem with blip that people were discussing that feedburner was timing out.
You don't. It should redirect you there by going to rocketboom.com-JoshOn 3/30/06, BevSykes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks. I didn't realize I needed '/vlog/'
now.
-- BevBlog: http://funnytheblog.blogspot.com/Journal:
http://funnytheworld.com
- Original Message -
I don't have a video iPod, but I think the cool feature is hooking it
up to your TV.
The Creative Zen Vision can do this too (at least the bigger one
can... haven't seen the small one).
As portable video players go though, I have to say that the Sony PSP
has the best screen and viewing
Hi Greg,
Do you have a blog?
-Josh
On 3/23/06, greg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
greetings all,
well i've got a feed up and running via Feedburner, and soon i'm
ready to add another video clip.
one thing i'm not quite clear on is whether or not i need to update
anything so that the new clip
FireAnt http://FireAnt.tv is both a video aggregator
http://FireAnt.tv/download and video RSS directory. Check it out and
put a 1-click subscription button on your site:
http://FireAnt.tv/buttonmaker
Enjoy!
-Josh
http://FireAnt.tv
On 3/23/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey
If I only had the non-funny coloured money to get there...
-Josh
On 3/23/06, Andreas Haugstrup [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a note to all Europeans, people who like money in funny colours
and Americans who are curious to see what cities that are not built on a
square grid system looks
According to DMCA (which is not international law), breaking DRM is
actually illegal.
-Josh
On 3/22/06, Andreas Haugstrup [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Will you buy a cd burner for every iTunes customer? Will you reimburse
every iTunes customer for the cost of all the cds they have to buy? Will
The other thing about iTunes/iPod is that no one else can sell
copy-protected music for the iPod because iPod only supports Apple's
DRM (which Apple does not allow anyone else to use). So its a
completely closed system. No one else can sell copy-protected files
for the iPod. You could sell non-DRM
Prodoehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joshua Kinberg wrote:
The other thing about iTunes/iPod is that no one else can sell
copy-protected music for the iPod because iPod only supports Apple's
DRM (which Apple does not allow anyone else to use). So its a
completely closed system. No one else can
That's true... but at least you know that traffic is still essentially
a result of RSS syndication.
-Josh
On 3/21/06, Pete Prodoehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joshua Kinberg wrote:
The nice thing about the FeedBurner tracker for enclosures is also that
you'll know the difference between
Maybe I'm just too impatient... takes a rallly long time and I
ended up giving up on it.
-Josh
On 3/21/06, Steve Garfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Works in Firefox for me.
Just takes a while to finish loading.
On Mar 21, 2006, at 1:15 AM, Joshua Kinberg wrote:
one thing I don't
Try a free trial of Sony Vegas:http://www.sonymediasoftware.com/products/showproduct.asp?PID=965FeatureID=8191
-JoshOn 3/20/06, Josh Leo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a friend who uses a camera that records in .mov files but since she has a pc, windows movie maker doesnt work with it...she
The nice thing about the FeedBurner tracker for enclosures is also that you'll know the difference between clickthroughs from your feed vs. clickthroughs from your website.-Josh
On 3/20/06, David Meade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes they do now. Feed burner recently added an ability to track
I like their threaded comments system that appears next to the video.I like their player controls that have multiple download and share options.I think its really interesting the Microsoft is using Quicktime for this project.
-JoshOn 3/20/06, usadutch2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hasanybody
one thing I don't like... they don't seem to use HTML embed tags, only object tags, so it doesn't seem like the video is able to play in Firefox which utilizes the embed tags.-Josh
On 3/20/06, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I like their threaded comments system that appears next
Not a plugin, but you can get the code to make popups with embedded video at http://embedthevideo.com-joshOn 3/19/06,
Brett Gaylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
video Playing in Place should work with Moveable Type from the General
Installation:
Thanks Enric! Now, does anyone know of a plugin
Interesting. There seems to be a bit going on with comedy and net media.
Well, people like to share the funny. I don't think that's a secret.
-Josh
On 3/19/06, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Interesting. There seems to be a bit going on with comedy and net media.
;)
--- In
URLs a certain way.
And I'll shut up now. Promise.
- Andreas
On Fri, 17 Mar 2006 16:44:21 +0100, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Here's my take... it would be great if mime-types solved the problem
and if the enclosure type attribute was always present and always
accurate
Just a note... there seems to be a misconception about embedthevideo.com
Maybe the name is bad... it should probably be
embedthevideoinapopupwindow.com because that's really what it does.
The code it generates is nothing other than a simple link, or an image
link (your preference). When clicked,
code like object ..embed
../embed/object regardless of spacing.
- Enric
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Just a note... there seems to be a misconception about embedthevideo.com
Maybe the name is bad... it should probably
Paul,You're not a bad person and you're probably right that you will likely never receive a take-down notice or any nasty notes from Lawyers. But, if you ever wanted to do more with your work, you probably would have to clear the rights for the soundtracks. I'm not saying its right or wrong,
how about TypePad? Its very easy to use and well worth the money.
-Josh
On 3/18/06, waterloomelissa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Devlon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some video hosting sites offer a blog-like section
I use Blogger (free) and also pay
Here's my take... it would be great if mime-types solved the problem
and if the enclosure type attribute was always present and always
accurate. These things are not true in the wild world of RSS feeds.
The best and most consistent indicator of a file type based on what
people actually do is the
Hi,
Your RSS feed only has 2 enclosures. Your most recent entry does not
have an enclosure.
In addition to embedding the video in the blog entry, you should also
provide a direct link to the file in order to create the enclosure
element in your feed. If you don't want this link to show in your
That could be the case with any URL, whether the file extension is
present or not, or whether the mime-type is correct or not.
-Josh
On 3/17/06, Pete Prodoehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael Sullivan wrote:
let's just call it a pet peeve of mine.
i'm not going to try and convince anyone
This is untrue. There are plenty of videobloggers here who use Wordpress.-JoshOn 3/17/06, Nerissa (TheVideoQueen)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have torecommend that all new video bloggers should avoid using wordpress as their blog service or software of choice. I discovered that wordpress
Could you give me a RSS URL that uses this?
I have never encountered this issue here. We should still be able to
download the files using that URL convention.
-Josh
On 3/16/06, Andreas Haugstrup [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 16 Mar 2006 15:17:15 +0100, Michael Sullivan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Just to reiterate... I believe these URLs work as expected in FireAnt. Please send me an RSS feed that uses this option in Feedburner so I can double check. Thanks.-JoshOn 3/16/06,
Michael Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
true.but it would be so simple if redirect urls with parameters just
this url is logical and cross-compatible
http://feeds.feedburner.com/ spainfulfilms?d=25file=fashion05POD.mp4
I agree with this. If the file is not a real file but rather a
redirect then it shouldn't have a file extension like .mp4.
Not to mention the current way Feedburner has it set up, it
with a query like type=.mp4 work like a charm.-JoshOn 3/16/06, Michael Sullivan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Josh, i tried it in version 1.0.1.72error message was:fireant was unable to recognize any media files in this enclosure etc...
On 3/16/06, Joshua Kinberg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could you
' to 'download anyway'. disregard.
On 3/16/06, Michael Sullivan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Josh, i tried it in version 1.0.1.72error message was:fireant was unable to recognize any media files in this enclosure etc...
On 3/16/06, Joshua Kinberg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could you give me a RSS
Sounds are definitely copyrightable.
The names may also be trademarked.
Then again, it would be hard for them to pursue any action.
-Josh
On 3/16/06, missbhavens1969 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Waitaminute: seriously? I mean, they didn't want you to use the words
phaser or Spock? I
didn't
apply,
so I assume that they are copyrighted just like any other work.
-Josh
http://FireAnt.tv
On 3/16/06, Andreas Haugstrup [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 16 Mar 2006 23:13:01 +0100, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Sounds are definitely copyrightable.
The names may also
Excellent resource on Fair se for filmmakers:
http://centerforsocialmedia.org/fairuse.htm
-Josh
http://FireAnt.tv
Yahoo! Groups Links
* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/
* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL
And as a matter of fact, that example constituted Fair Use.
That case is actually pretty famous as I recently learned, and it
wasn't because the right necessarily needed to be cleared, but that
distributors often require that works be over-cleared. This is because
their insurance providers demand
I agree with you in theory, Andreas, but in practice file extensions
are typically more accurate than mime-types.
That's why you often get garbled junk in the browser with .mp4, .wmv, and .m4v
Thus, we've had to rely on file extensions with FireAnt rather than
mime-types (especially not the
hAtom is a microformat for describing a blog post based on the
concepts from the Atom format. Thus it would naturally have all the
necessary info you're talking about.
But I agree with you, we need a simple microformat for a video that is
a little more specific than relEnclosure. I've made
VideoEgg has some nice simple editing tools, but to my knowledge they
only support 2min. uploads at this time (will likely change in the
future).
I know of some other web-based editing tools that will be released
soon, but can't really talk about them till they launch.
But, unfortunately you'd
Here's a couple more:
http://FireAnt.tv
http://vlogdir.com
-josh
On 3/8/06, Peter Zottolo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.mefeedia.com/ is one that I know of.
-Peter
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Stephanie Bryant
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I realize that there are many
The what is commercial use notion is pretty interesting. I'm sure
there could be many interpretations.
If you look at some stock photo sites, they allow the photos to be
used in commercial settings, but they do not allow the direct
reselling or redistribution of the images. So, for instance you
There is a CC license that marks the work as Public Domain.
But I guess you could do that without CC.
-josh
On 3/7/06, Bill Streeter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I may be splitting hairs here, but the author lists Public Domain
as a type of CC license. But I don' think that this is the case. I
If you look at what is listed for Attribution it says:
You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or
licensor.
For attribution on the web a link back is usually considered appropriate.
In print media, often its a byline of some kind.
-Josh
On 3/7/06, Pete Prodoehl
Yes, any creative work is automatically All Rights Reserved by
default, unless otherwise stated. And one of those rights is the right
to waive your rights.
-Josh
On 3/7/06, Andreas Haugstrup [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 07 Mar 2006 19:51:05 +0100, Brett Gaylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Open Source is wy more confusing than CC.
To be certified Open Source you must use an Open Source license, and
there are way more options than the 18 CC licenses.
Here's a taste of them:
http://opensource.org/licenses/
Open Source is actually pretty tricky and I think a lot of people
throw
Can't you use the iPod like a hard drive and simple copy the files
from one computer onto the iPod, walk across the room and transfer
them onto the Mac?
-Josh
On 3/6/06, Frida Kahlo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi guys
I have a technical problem for the mac boys.
(its ten years since I last
Based on viewing the other videos on the site, I'd say that means the
host is encoding my video into Flash.
And based on that same viewing experience, their encoding looks really terrible.
-josh
On 3/2/06, Steve Garfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just jumped in!
The water is fine.
I
of time too.
-josh
On 3/2/06, Eric Rice [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's slow. Some videos took 12 minutes, others took hours to transcode
Thank GOODNESS our transcoders are fast! ;-)
ER
ericrice.com | audioblog.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote
] wrote:
and mp3 doesn't sound anywhere near as good a vinyl on a linn.
but guess what.
On Mar 2, 2006, at 9:35 AM, Joshua Kinberg wrote:
Based on viewing the other videos on the site, I'd say that means the
host is encoding my video into Flash.
And based on that same viewing experience
Check out Audioblog.com
Maybe Eric Rice can jump in here to tell you more.
-Josh
On 3/2/06, Ms. Kitka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the suggestion, Bill, but I REALLY need unlimited
bandwidth. Had I not gone with LibSyn from the beginning, I would be
in major debt right now...
Kitka
vloggers / vlogging.
On Mar 2, 2006, at 11:57 AM, Joshua Kinberg wrote:
Just stating a fact. Their image quality looks bad.
...
But in terms of audience... I would counter that Rocketboom gets a
substantial regular audience (probably more so in frequency and return
visits than
Also, its strange that you took out most of the relevant lines of my
previous message in your response.
Maybe you should backtrack and read it again... the parts specifically
about creative control.
-josh
On 3/2/06, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The question in this thread
intellectually
examine, alternative arenas.
Regarding the second question, the group interest, it would be cool to
hear from one of the vlogfathers. Does vids.myspace.com offer any
benefit to vlogging / vloggers?
On Mar 2, 2006, at 12:39 PM, Joshua Kinberg wrote:
The question in this thread
if this isn't clear and maybe we can chat in IM.
;),
Enric
-===-
http://www.cirne.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Enric,
Would the same code work with an a tag, rather than within span,
where the href attribute points
and maybe we can chat in IM.
;),
Enric
-===-
http://www.cirne.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Joshua Kinberg jkinberg@
wrote:
Enric,
Would the same code work with an a tag, rather than within span,
where the href attribute points to the enclosure
is young but.and this is a big but.what if they continue to
use it after High School and College?
I think that's as unlikely as your daughter who is into goth still
wearing those clothes in 10 years.
Now Facebook on the other hand I can really see that having
longevity because
Channel101 and Channel102 are really great. If you have the
opportunity to go to a screening, do it. Its fun, the atmosphere is
great, and the content is hysterical. I really enjoyed the format of
live audience screening and its a real fertile ground for upcoming
comedians and comedy writers (some
I did an interview with the founders of Channel102 in NYC several
months back in the middle of the summer:
http://www.joshkinberg.com/blog/archives/2005/07/channel_102_int.php
-josh
On 3/1/06, Vu Bui [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I went to the most recent screening this past Sunday... Wastelander
Sorry to hear you're having trouble with iTunes. I checked out your
feed and it looks all good. Subscribed in FireAnt and saw all your
episodes just fine.
You might think about adding a FireAnt subscription button to your
site. Its really easy, you can get the code to copy and paste here:
Eh, they're probably adding more servers. I really wouldn't worry to
much about it. Its pretty natural for this to happen occasionally with
high traffic websites.
-Josh
On 2/28/06, Deirdre Straughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
YouTube this morning:
You have reached YouTube, the premier
Just a note, scaling does not mean that the aspect ratio changes.
Widescreen is still widescreen.
-Josh
On 2/27/06, David Howell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I vote for no scaling.
If I wanted a larger video, I would have made a larger video to begin
with.
David
http://www.taoofdavid.com
.
-Josh
On 2/27/06, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just a note, scaling does not mean that the aspect ratio changes.
Widescreen is still widescreen.
-Josh
On 2/27/06, David Howell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I vote for no scaling.
If I wanted a larger video, I would have made
These are all good points...
Here's one reason to scale to a consistent size (while retaining aspect ratio):
- Not every video is the same size
There is no way to tell if a video is 320x240 or 1000x2500 without
downloading the file. This information certainly does not exist in the
RSS feed at
Quesiton:
Is this issue about preserving an artist's intentions or is it about
quality of video when rescaled (i.e. viewing at original size is
perceived as best quality)
-Josh
On 2/27/06, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree. At the very least an aggregator should default to the
original
I think its best to make your own generic image. I don't know of any
such default graphic that exists.
-josh
On 2/27/06, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks. But I was looking for a generic one, not specific to a film.
-- Enric
-==-
http://www.cirne.com
--- In
People thought the same about America's Funniest Home Videos about
15-20 years ago.
This is definitely TV on the cheap... what I wonder is who owns the
rights to broadcast that content and are the creators being
compensated appropriately?
-Josh
On 2/27/06, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Human Spam - funniest phrase of the day!
-josh
On 2/27/06, Michael Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
tough not to reiterate here
myspace is good for what its good for and who its good for...
i do believe that if most myspacecadets had a crash course on how to setup
their own 'my
101 - 200 of 700 matches
Mail list logo
