Someone pointed to Om Malik's report on Google Video, where a reader
left this comment:
In my ideal world, all forms of digital video would be Quicktime and
encoded in H264, because nothing out there, at this time, comes even
close to even hoping to touch H264's image quality at the lowest
I'm not trying to get into a web traffic pissing contest, but when
people qualify their stats with percentages and make inferences as to
some kind of larger trend, then it helps to know the sample size we're
talking about and whether or not its statistically significant.
-josh
On 12/24/05,
(from a link from the link below) http://www.ipdemocracy.com/Therefore, if a content or application provider wants higher-speed, higher quality delivery to the customer, some kind of access payment would apply. What’s interesting is not this issue — it’s been widely reported — but a statement by
I'mm apparently missing half the conversation but... what the heck is FireANT's traffic rpresentative to in comparison to iTunes... and next too google... really all of us are insignificant... But google would never say... what's the significance of my tiny little site ... when someone does a
generally speaking, large sample sizes are *not* required in order for
the sample to be representative
see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_large_numbers
Deirdre Straughan wrote:
On 12/23/05, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At the risk of sounding like a jerk, do
Representative or not, the actual statistics may tell us something. I have one video (so far) that is available in the three formats under discussion:M4V - viewed in iTunes, but also by some feed readers/aggregators.
SWF - viewable in some feed readers/aggregators.NB: For this particular video
On 12/24/05, Ron Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been posting video online since 1998, you know back in the days of the Information Superhighway,and back then, in Dallas, a T1 line was $800.
Enter eBusiness and what happened? Bandwidth tripled in a year. Just like that, I was priced out
My Groups |
videoblogging Main Page
Reminder from
the Calendar of videoblogging
Big Band Serenade Christmas Special with a mix of classics from the
1940s and Podsafe Music. Hope you enjoy. http://bigband.libsyn.com
Dennis
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
1.2 million kids a year are victims of human trafficking. Stop slavery.
The point of the whole thing was that it was a noble cause when it was being developed, a noble cause led by people just like you, hell maybe even by you. It was going to be the information superhighway then. Then the market took over. There were benefits of the market taking over, for sure, but
My Groups |
videoblogging Main Page
Reminder from
the Calendar of videoblogging
Here's my contribution to the holiday spirit:http://beginningwithi.com/vlog/051224.html-- best regards,Deirdré Straughan
www.beginningwithi.com (personal)www.tvblob.com (work)
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
To unsubscribe from this
for the record, I'm not trying to get into a competition regarding web
traffic between one site or another. But yes, I do believe that
general statements of trends based on statistics should be qualified
by a representative sample size. If I say 50% of my viewers prefer X,
and I'm talking 10 out
Umm... then you need lots of little samples as opposed to a single
large sample to notice any trends.
-Josh
On 12/24/05, Markus Sandy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
generally speaking, large sample sizes are *not* required in order for the
sample to be representative
see
yes, goodwill to all men, and women,
especially those with broadband and 5G iPods
we bring you tidings of good news
the slackers peforming 'little drummer boy' at this year's xmas party at the
knit..
http://feeds.feedburner.com/punkcastpodcast
We're speaking past eachother, I think. There are two kinds of
videoblogging - for the sake of the argument we can call one
videoblogging and the other video podcasting.
The first includes aspects of the blog. It's a remediation of the blog and
tv (among others). Think McLuhan. The latter
I'm only part of the way through this thread, but I figure I'd weigh in on
Mike's comment
with a short thought:
What battle are we fighting?
1. Getting everyday people to make and publish their own media?
2. Debating semantic details of technology that is inevitably going to evolve
over
On 12/23/05, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't buy the argument that its hard for people to install
Quicktime. Quicktime comes bundled with iTunes. If that's considered a wide enough compatability reach for abc, it should be for anybody. (At least anybody picking a single
I tried downloading videos from blip.tv, or going to http://blip.tv.
I get:
...can't open page, because it can't fid the server blip.tv
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
Most low income homes are not online. Make a difference this holiday season!
now it's working..
On Dec 24, 2005, at 7:47 PM, B Yen wrote:
I tried downloading videos from blip.tv, or going to http://blip.tv.
I get:
...can't open page, because it can't fid the server blip.tv
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
~--
Most low income
I don't think Tivo is Television. Classical television cannot not be
automaticaly stored, retrieved, scanned and viewed out of order (this
can be manually performmed with programming recorders -- but just
about anything can be put into a manual process.) So I think this is
an intermediate medium
This makes no sense at all. In fact by your own definitions you don't get the
right to
assert that you are a videoblogger. If I consume your video posts exclusively
through
iTunes or Fireant you're saying it isn't a videoblog it's a videocast???
Conversely, if you published epsiodes of Punky
Will,you are wrong.Andreas is right.I have also been conveying the same thoughts for months.That is why in the debates on definitions and language, I had pushed for the realization of two terms to use.videoblogging and vodcasting (aka video podcasting, video on demand)
Most videobloggers have a
This is a discussion thread from this mailing list dated March 7th 2005.Since the Google Revisited thread has caused some more talk about the nature of videoblogging and vodcasting thought it might be interesting to see some of what was said several months back.
There are several other
Will,
you are wrong.
Andreas is right.
Michael you're wrong.
Will is right.
...because I say so.
--
Vlog: http://www.kashum.com
Feed: http://www.kashum.com/rss2.xml
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
Most low income homes are not online. Make a difference
i dont trust a guy with blue hair.LOLg'nightOn 12/25/05, Richard Bennett-Forrest [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:Will,you are wrong.Andreas is right.Michael you're wrong.
Will is rightbecause I say so.--Vlog: http://www.kashum.comFeed: http://www.kashum.com/rss2.xml Yahoo!
26 matches
Mail list logo
