vPIP rocks!
I've been using vPIP for over a year, and as I rebuild my site, vPIP
is there to make my life easier. I use to only output to .mp4 and
.wmv, vPIP handles both. Now I use .mov and .flv formats and .vPIP is
there to make them look good.
I have ideas of delving into AppleTV format and
I've added Ogg support to the .ogv and .oga extensions in vpip.js.
And it will be in the next release. I don't think cortada.jar cares
about extension, but the internal format -- so it should work with them.
Someone can specify any file with or without extension in the
Vlogsplosion Ogg media
I'll have another release probably before next week that fixes a bug
in the embed code (if you have ThickBox off it still puts the embed
code to use ThickBox, but with the ThickBox script reference missing.)
And the embed code will match the layout of your vPIP entry with it's
own share-embed
jay you are SO wrong.
its a 12 year old kid, not a 17 year old kid!
get your facts right.
free john johansen!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jon_Johansen
On 9/1/07, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think people want, more than anything, the choice.
The thing people hate about DRM is it
jay you are SO wrong.
its a 12 year old kid, not a 17 year old kid!
2007 - 1983 = 24 doh!
Jon Lech Johansen (born November 18, 1983 in Harstad, Norway)
:-)
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Irina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jay you are SO wrong.
its a 12 year old kid, not a 17 year old
when he was charged with his crime he was about 12
from what i remember. jon told me his father had to get him
from school to take him to court.
:)
On 9/3/07, bordercollieaustralianshepherd
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jay you are SO wrong.
its a 12 year old kid, not a 17 year old kid!
2007
For the record, I would be opposed to ANY sort of DRM, or any other sort of
tech road block for distributing my content. Please Blip.tv don't spend your
time and energy making it more difficult for people to get to my content.
The problem is, of course, that the DRM makes this assumption that the
Don't worry, Richard. There's no DRM on our road map. However, your concern
about DRM is that it has the unfortunate side effect of impeding your actual
target audience. So you seem to be against crude, inexact DRM, and not the
ideal type which would only be noticed by violators of the
I think people want, more than anything, the choice.
The thing people hate about DRM is it being forced on them and
limiting their fair use rights.
I think that letting content creators choose how to publish their
content is the way forward. DRM is never going to be a one size fits
all
Charles,
I don't really want perfect DRM. First, of course, it's hard to imagine it
can be done, since the ones who want to violate it are really good at
breaking it. But that's not a real argument, of course, since the perfect
is hypothetical and, in any case, you are infinitely more expert and
I think people want, more than anything, the choice.
The thing people hate about DRM is it being forced on them and
limiting their fair use rights.
I think that letting content creators choose how to publish their
content is the way forward. DRM is never going to be a one size fits
all
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The main features of this release is being able to play Ogg video with
the included cortado Ogg player. And on wordpress you can share the
embed code of your videos so viewers can embed the video on their
sites.
That's an excellent point. Do we have specs on setting up Compressor
for ogg output? Data Rate, etc? Or do you use the same settings as,
say, MOV, but just switch the codec?
we need to do some testing using the QT plugin:
http://xiph.org/quicktime/download.html
the default settings look
I see. You're right. Default looks good.
I used export - movie to ogg from Quicktime player. It
introduced a slight lag, maybe 1 or 2 frames with the video trailing
the audio. That may have something to do with the FPS reading 48.01,
or it may have something to do with watching it in
I used export - movie to ogg from Quicktime player. It
introduced a slight lag, maybe 1 or 2 frames with the video trailing
the audio. That may have something to do with the FPS reading 48.01,
or it may have something to do with watching it in Quicktime player,
because it had to load
not sure if this means what i think it means but:
...the big seller for Adobe is the ability to include in Flash movies
so-called digital rights management (DRM) - allowing copyright holders to
require the viewing of adverts, or restrict copying.
from
DRM is understandably unpopular, but lets not get too carried away
with its implications.
DRM mechanisms are already present in many of the formats people use
today. It causes no problem at all for unprotected media. Its only a
restriction if the content creator/distributor chooses to use it, so
I think some vloggers here would appreciate DRM technology that thwarts
disreputable aggregators who disregard Creative Commons licensing.
Steve Watkins wrote:
DRM is understandably unpopular...
Well yes its a good thing to support formats that are apparently
unimpinged by patents, and where encoding and decoding stuff for the
formats is available as open source.
I dont think the example of DRM is a very likely future nightmare
reason why people would abandon flash or quicktime, as
An example of people wanting to switch away from h264 in future would
be if they put some silly licenses costs on content creators who use
h264, when these terms are updated in 2010 or something.
Or yeah if Adobe went insane and did something to flash player that
made people not want it
Share button ROCKS!!! :D
--
billcammack
http://realfans.tv
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The main features of this release is being able to play Ogg video with
the included cortado Ogg player. And on wordpress you can share the
embed code of your
Thanks!
Unfortunately I made a mistake and modified an older version of vPIP.
I've corrected that and as of 12/9/06 1:44 am Pacific Time USA, the
correct one should be up. If you downloaded vPIP 0.16g before then,
you may want to get the update.
;),
Enric
--- In
The HTML code is compatible with prior versions. So there shouldn't
be a problem. Let me know otherwise.
-- Enric
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Jan / The Faux Press
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has the html code to be added to templates changed? i.e. do I have
to redo
all the
Enric,
I just tested this on one of my sites and I have to say...AWESOME!
Thanks to you and whoever else was involved in the creation of this
great and useful code!
Adam
http://oneeyedview.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The HTML code is
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The HTML code is compatible with prior versions. So there shouldn't
be a problem. Let me know otherwise.
-- Enric
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Jan / The Faux Press
jannie.jan@ wrote:
Has the html code
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Ron Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a question about vPIP.
Does it monkey with SSL at all? I am having a devil of a time with
getting my site secured and one of the only differences between the 2
sites is vPIP.
vPIP does not interact with
Can we go through this in IM? Did you get my email?
-- Enric
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Ron Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That is exactly what I was thinking.
I also thought that the script was not converting to https: and the
browser expects all objects to be embedded
I've put up a new version of the vPIP code generator. It allows you
to set ThickBox for the image link separate from the movie link. So
if you want to install this version into wordpress from
http://www.utilities.cinegage.com/videos-playing-in-place/#WordpressInstall
or
Replace the items in your wordpress vPIP folder with the newer version at:
http://utilities.cinegage.com/videos-playing-in-place/#WordpressInstall
or
http://tinyurl.com/k296y
the direct download link for vPIP 0.14 is:
http://utilities.cinegage.com/downloads/vPIP0.14/vPIPwp.zip
NOTE: The
how do you toggle between thickbox or embedded etcOn 5/22/06, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Replace the items in your wordpress vPIP folder with the newer version at:http://utilities.cinegage.com/videos-playing-in-place/#WordpressInstall
orhttp://tinyurl.com/k296ythe direct download link for
After you have chosen your media in the code generator you will see a
box in the media tab that you can check the box next to Play in thickbox
Goto my vlog to see the difference, the first one (Immelman) is
thickbox and the second one (ticket) is the embedded video (tickbox
unchecked).
Have separate links for a embed and a ThickBox version. For example
for the Winnie Cooper Comes Home entry:
a href="" href="http://www.blip.tv/file/get/Joshleo-WinnieCooper903.mov">http://www.blip.tv/file/get/Joshleo-WinnieCooper903.mov
rel=enclosure type=video/quicktime >
I meant to send the below to the list (just FYI) ... On 5/22/06, Richard (Show) Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:Enric,In the directions it says that, If using Word
2.x, clear the persistent cache under ../wp-content/cache/I am using 2.0.2, so I'm assuming I need to do this.I can find the path to
Delete all the folders under the cache directory, the cache will
recreate itself when deleted.
-- Enric
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Richard (Show) Hall
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I meant to send the below to the list (just FYI) ...
On 5/22/06, Richard (Show) Hall [EMAIL
Enric,I tried using vPIP with two .swf files, which are now on my front page.Neither seems to work and I'm wondering if you have any ideas, both are on my front page
http://www.richardshow.com1) Windows/IE: You click and there is a blank box2) WindowsApple/Mozilla: Nothing seems to happen.3)
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
.
vPIP 0.15 will have a Flash FLV Player packaged within for playing FLV
movie files.
..
Will it have a Flash 8 Player (I hope)?
I like the feature of closing a video when a new link is clicked! I am
looking
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Stan Hirson, Sarah Jones
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Enric enric@ wrote:
.
vPIP 0.15 will have a Flash FLV Player packaged within for playing FLV
movie files.
..
Will it have a Flash 8 Player (I
This great utility is also accessable via this link;
http://vlogassist.com/vPIP0.14/vpip.js
as well as the older version.
blips
http://vlogassist.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
video Playing In Place (vPIP) 0.14 Beta is out. The
installation and
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
.
Right now I'm probably going to have both a Flash 7 player and Flash 8
player download package. So people can choose which player they
prefer for their site. My preference is also for a Flash 8 FLV player
and I
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Stan Hirson, Sarah Jones
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Enric enric@ wrote:
.
Right now I'm probably going to have both a Flash 7 player and Flash 8
player download package. So people can choose which player
Thanks, Michael.
I haven't use podpress yet. I've heard a bit about it and looked at
their site. Sometime later I'll drive it around the block.
;),
Enric
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Michael Meiser
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sweet plugin Enric. I know I've been quiet, but
It all looked correct to me on a quick overview of the HTML. Then
testing it, I saw that flash FLV is being used. FLV is not yet
supported in vPIP, flash SWF is supported. I'll put that limitation
in the documentation, thanks for bringing this example to my
attention. I will support FLV's in a
thanks for the quick reply, Enric, that explains it ... thanks ... I'll give .swf a try ... RichardOn 3/27/06, Enric
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:It all looked correct to me on a quick overview of the HTML.Then
testing it, I saw that flash FLV is being used.FLV is not yetsupported in vPIP, flash
for the record, what is the advantage of .flv vs. .swf?... RichardOn 3/27/06, Richard Show [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:thanks for the quick reply, Enric, that explains it ... thanks ... I'll give .swf a try ... Richard
On 3/27/06, Enric
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:It all looked correct to me on a
FLV is the Flash Video File Format. SWF is the file format for Flash
applications. You create a SWF player for viewing the FLV file in the
Flash development environment. FLV can't be viewed on it's own, it
needs a player to access it. Similar to MP4 requires the quicktime or
windows media
Enric ... thanks again for the quick reply, and, not to be annoying or anything ... and I will still definately try out your cool tool with .swf files ... but, what I wondered is why would .flv be BETTER than .swf. So, for example, why would you be motivated to create an application for .flv
They are apples and oranges, or rather tape video tape and
videoplayer. One is not better than the other, one (SWF) is required
for the other (FLV) to be viewed. FLV is like a video tape, you can't
view it by pulling the tape out of the cartride and looking at it.
You need a videoplayer to see
You're welcome.
;),
Enric
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Eddie Codel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We're (GETV) using the new version now. Looks like it works as
advertised. Thanks a ton for this Enric!
-eddie
On Sun, Mar 26, 2006 at 03:16:30AM -, Enric wrote:
vPIP
Yes I use Firefox (and sometimes Camino), mainly for vlogging and blogging
related
issues (blogger doesn´t like Firefox, my favorite browser).
Thank you for your time and effort Enric.
Miguel.
The cleanest way I see right now to implement vPIP into Blogger (and
possibly
Based on the conversations today in the videoblogging flash meeting
and looking further into the javascript Andreas provided for doing
similar dynamic movie embedding, I'm going to create a new version of
the code. So hold off on trying vPIP 0.02. I should have a new one
by Monday, vPIP 0.03
This looks great, is it possible to have it working in blogger?
Miguel.
I've placed the image in the first a href surrounded by
noscript/noscript. My assumption was that feedburner and other
aggregators would use the first a href found to pull out the media
(video or audio), so
The cleanest way I see right now to implement vPIP into Blogger (and
possibly other blogging software like Typepad) is to make a FireFox
extension. Do you use FireFox?
I'll look at doing that after I get a stable beta of vPIP as a
Wordpress Plugin.
-- Enric
--- In
On Fri, 03 Mar 2006 17:15:25 +0100, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The cleanest way I see right now to implement vPIP into Blogger (and
possibly other blogging software like Typepad) is to make a FireFox
extension. Do you use FireFox?
Off the top of my head it sounds easier to write a
Wow that's a lot of code...
As you probably know this isn't the first time a playing-in-place script
has been talked about. :o)
It's my opinion that all the mark-up a blogger should have to write is
something like:
a href=[URL] rel=enclosure type=video/quicktimeimg ... //a
The
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 03 Mar 2006 17:15:25 +0100, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The cleanest way I see right now to implement vPIP into Blogger (and
possibly other blogging software like Typepad) is to make a
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wow that's a lot of code...
As you probably know this isn't the first time a playing-in-place
script
has been talked about. :o)
It's my opinion that all the mark-up a blogger should have to write
On Fri, 03 Mar 2006 18:36:22 +0100, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cool, I'll look into Greasemonkey. Do Firefox extensions also work in
Opera? (too lazy too look it up :))
Nope, Opera doesn't do any kind of plugins. Greasemonkey scripts work
(along with Opera's own user javascripts, which
I just use the OBJECT ../OBJECT tag in the philosophy of
microformats. I originaly had a completely custom tag called vPIP
... /. The tag (OBJECT ../OBJECT) is only used by the plugin
to discover the parameters for constructing an embed object (with a
href ...). It is entirely
Thanks, this is an early unoptimized version. I will be implementing
a graphical interface for filling out the parameters and supporting
other media types than mov in the plugin.
;),
Enric
-===-
http://www.cirne.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Ronen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nobody's business but our own :)
Now a serenade to thee:
Please come to San Francisco for the springtime
I'm staying here with some friends
And they've got Vloggercon
You can see the wilde and crazy Califronians on the sidewalk
Stop at a cafe for a double capuccino
Please come to San Francisco
I don't think I explained that too well, so I'm going to give an
example. The OBJECT type=application/vPIP+XML../OBJECT
section is parsed and turned into embed code. Here's an example from
the most recent vlog I put up on http://techalley.cirne.com:
=
script
I wasn't aware that FeedBurner would pick up the media link from an
object tag.
I thought it required an a tag with the href pointing the file to be enclosed.
I ask about using aimg/a because that one pattern we look for in
order to discover thumbnail images for episodes in the FireAnt
See, you're using this convention:
spanimg/span
Why not aimg/a ?
-Josh
On 3/2/06, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think I explained that too well, so I'm going to give an
example. The OBJECT type=application/vPIP+XML../OBJECT
section is parsed and turned into embed code. Here's
You're right, thanks for clarifying that. I'll look to fix that bug next.
:),
Enric
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
See, you're using this convention:
spanimg/span
Why not aimg/a ?
-Josh
On 3/2/06, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've placed the image in the first a href surrounded by
noscript/noscript. My assumption was that feedburner and other
aggregators would use the first a href found to pull out the media
(video or audio), so with that thinking the img entry is copied
there. The sample would change to:
65 matches
Mail list logo
