On 2010/8/15 11:37, Alessandro Antonello wrote:
Well, not everybody has the same wants and needs. There are already quite a
lot of plugins that come with Vim. Why should I download an additional
enormous package (a single tarball with the whole lot of vim.org scripts
maybe?) of which I'll use
Hi Tony!
On So, 15 Aug 2010, Tony Mechelynck wrote:
Well, not everybody has the same wants and needs. There are already
quite a lot of plugins that come with Vim. Why should I download an
additional enormous package (a single tarball with the whole lot of
vim.org scripts maybe?) of
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 8:37 PM, Alessandro Antonello
antonello@gmail.com wrote:
Well, not everybody has the same wants and needs. There are already quite a
lot of plugins that come with Vim. Why should I download an additional
enormous package (a single tarball with the whole lot of
2010/8/7 Tony Mechelynck antoine.mechely...@gmail.com:
On 04/08/10 10:42, H Xu wrote:
On 2010/8/4 14:00, Ricky J. Wu wrote:
On 8月4日, 下午1时56分, Ricky J. Wurichi...@live.com wrote:
Many people quit using vim because they think vim is not as powerful
as emacs.
Learn vim need patients and
On Sat, 2010-08-14 at 16:51 -0700, Britton Kerin wrote:
What I would like to see is something like extended mod packs
created by individual users. In this scheme, expert users would
somehow publish their entire piles of plugins and glue, together
with some explanation of the logic of the
On 15/08/10 01:51, Britton Kerin wrote:
2010/8/7 Tony Mechelynckantoine.mechely...@gmail.com:
On 04/08/10 10:42, H Xu wrote:
On 2010/8/4 14:00, Ricky J. Wu wrote:
On 8月4日, 下午1时56分, Ricky J. Wurichi...@live.com wrote:
Many people quit using vim because they think vim is not as powerful
Well, not everybody has the same wants and needs. There are already quite a
lot of plugins that come with Vim. Why should I download an additional
enormous package (a single tarball with the whole lot of vim.org scripts
maybe?) of which I'll use only a percent or two? (and the next guy will
On 04/08/10 10:42, H Xu wrote:
On 2010/8/4 14:00, Ricky J. Wu wrote:
On 8月4日, 下午1时56分, Ricky J. Wurichi...@live.com wrote:
Many people quit using vim because they think vim is not as powerful
as emacs.
Learn vim need patients and times, and also the plugin dose.
The more configurable the
On 04/08/10 13:59, H Xu wrote:
On 2010/8/4 17:05, Boyko Bantchev wrote:
On 3 August 2010 21:54, H Xuxusu...@gmail.com wrote:
Many people quit using vim because they think vim is not as powerful as
emacs. However, mostly this is because they don't install vim plugins.
The way you put it
On 8月4日, 下午1时56分, Ricky J. Wu richi...@live.com wrote:
Many people quit using vim because they think vim is not as powerful
as emacs.
Learn vim need patients and times, and also the plugin dose.
The more configurable the system is, the more powerful feature you
get.
You might need
On 2010/8/4 14:00, Ricky J. Wu wrote:
On 8月4日, 下午1时56分, Ricky J. Wu richi...@live.com wrote:
Many people quit using vim because they think vim is not as powerful
as emacs.
Learn vim need patients and times, and also the plugin dose.
The more configurable the system is, the more powerful
On 3 August 2010 21:54, H Xu xusu...@gmail.com wrote:
Many people quit using vim because they think vim is not as powerful as
emacs. However, mostly this is because they don't install vim plugins.
The way you put it already places Vim in an inferior position w.r.t.
Emacs. As if something must
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 12:05:21PM +0300, Boyko Bantchev wrote:
On 3 August 2010 21:54, H Xu xusu...@gmail.com wrote:
Many people quit using vim because they think vim is not as powerful as
emacs. However, mostly this is because they don't install vim plugins.
The way you put it already
On 2010/8/4 17:05, Boyko Bantchev wrote:
On 3 August 2010 21:54, H Xuxusu...@gmail.com wrote:
Many people quit using vim because they think vim is not as powerful as
emacs. However, mostly this is because they don't install vim plugins.
The way you put it already places Vim in an inferior
Hello,
Many people quit using vim because they think vim is not as powerful as
emacs.
However, mostly this is because they don't install vim plugins. So I
think it is
necessary to put a plugin package onto vim.org which contains common plugins
for those people who don't want to look for
Hi H!
On Mi, 04 Aug 2010, H Xu wrote:
Many people quit using vim because they think vim is not as powerful as
emacs.
However, mostly this is because they don't install vim plugins. So I
think it is
necessary to put a plugin package onto vim.org which contains common plugins
for those
On Aug 3, 1:54 pm, H Xu xusu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Many people quit using vim because they think vim is not as powerful as
emacs.
However, mostly this is because they don't install vim plugins. So I
think it is
necessary to put a plugin package onto vim.org which contains common
* Teemu Likonen tliko...@iki.fi [100803 11:15]:
* 2010-08-04 02:54 (+0800), H. Xu wrote:
Many people quit using vim because they think vim is not as powerful
as emacs.
I don't know if many people quit using Vim because of that. How did you
get that impression? I believe that Vim is a
To Teemu Likonen, Christian Brabandt, Ben Fritz, Tim Johnson,
To Teemu Likonen: you said vim is much more popular than emacs, I
believe that the version of vim which is very, very popular is the
minimal version, because some Linux distributions have used minimal vim
as there standard vi. For
Срд, 04 Авг 2010, H Xu писал(а):
use emacs. These people don't use both vim or emacs. For people who
decide to use vim or emacs, they have to preview both of them. Emacs has
bundled many plugins, so emacs can integrate with gdb, edit tex file
efficiently and some other things without
Many people quit using vim because they think vim is not as powerful
as emacs.
Learn vim need patients and times, and also the plugin dose.
The more configurable the system is, the more powerful feature you
get.
You might need learn and configure plugin by yourself and find whether
is it
21 matches
Mail list logo
