Re: [Vo]: Cosmic Trigger?

2011-12-22 Thread Horace Heffner
I just saw this post. I am only reading about 1 in 20 posts due to lack of time. I hope if anything technical develops in long threads that new threads with meaningful titles are created. On Dec 20, 2011, at 8:41 AM, David Roberson wrote: On an earlier post I suggested that the LENR

Re: [Vo]: Cosmic Trigger?

2011-12-22 Thread Horace Heffner
On Dec 20, 2011, at 8:41 AM, David Roberson wrote: Second, if a small volume of material achieves reaction and releases several MeV of energy does the material then allow the reaction to spread? Of course the release of many MeV at the active region now would be adequate to enable more

[Vo]:Krivit goes Berserk against Cold Fusion research to promote WL theory.

2011-12-22 Thread Daniel Rocha
I just noticed that Krivit just created a few pages that shows that he is declaring war against anyone that uses Cold Fusion name as a description to LENR. Dr. Mitchell Swartz page, disclosing personal email exchange:

Re: [Vo]:Krivit goes Berserk against Cold Fusion research to promote WL theory.

2011-12-22 Thread Akira Shirakawa
On 2011-12-22 12:08, Daniel Rocha wrote: McKubre's M4 bogus experiment index: http://newenergytimes.com/v2/sr/McKubreM4/McKubre-Experiment-M4.shtml http://newenergytimes.com/v2/sr/McKubreM4/20111221ToWhomItMayConcern.shtml In the above link it appears to me that Krivit is not just attacking

[Vo]:Celani replication boosts Rossi patent

2011-12-22 Thread Aussie Guy E-Cat
Interesting: http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=563cpage=6#comment-154138 1. Sterling Allan http://Leonardo-ECat.com December 22nd, 2011 at 1:59 AM http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=563cpage=6#comment-154138 Here’s the latest recap *E-Cat Weekly — December

Re: [Vo]:Celani replication boosts Rossi patent

2011-12-22 Thread Akira Shirakawa
On 2011-12-22 14:09, Aussie Guy E-Cat wrote: Dear Sterling Allan: The work of Celani (congratulations) shows that in my patent application I gave enough information to allow to an expert to reproduce the effect. What Rossi is implying here is that the information disclosed in his patent

Re: [Vo]:Celani replication boosts Rossi patent

2011-12-22 Thread Aussie Guy E-Cat
Don't shoot me, I'm only the reporter. If you have an issue with what Rossi claims, take it up with him on his blog. AG On 12/22/2011 11:43 PM, Akira Shirakawa wrote: On 2011-12-22 14:09, Aussie Guy E-Cat wrote: Dear Sterling Allan: The work of Celani (congratulations) shows that in my

RE: [Vo]:Krivit goes Berserk against Cold Fusion research to promote WL theory.

2011-12-22 Thread OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson
From Akira: -Original Message- McKubre's M4 bogus experiment index: http://newenergytimes.com/v2/sr/McKubreM4/McKubre-Experiment-M4.shtml http://newenergytimes.com/v2/sr/McKubreM4/20111221ToWhomItMayConcern.sh tml In the above link it appears to me that Krivit is not just

Re: [Vo]:Krivit goes Berserk against Cold Fusion research to promote WL theory.

2011-12-22 Thread Jed Rothwell
This is awful. Krivit's attack on McKubre is beyond the pale. I do not want to say anything more about that. I do not want think about it. One thing though. I hesitate to rake over long-ago controversies, but I would like to point out something about this fax from Swartz to Krivit here:

Re: [Vo]:Krivit goes Berserk against Cold Fusion research to promote WL theory.

2011-12-22 Thread OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
From Akira, McKubre's M4 bogus experiment index: http://newenergytimes.com/v2/sr/McKubreM4/McKubre-Experiment-M4.shtml http://newenergytimes.com/v2/sr/McKubreM4/20111221ToWhomItMayConcern.shtml In the above link it appears to me that Krivit is not just attacking McKubre, but also

[Vo]:Solar photovoltaic (PV) versus concentrating solar power (CSP)

2011-12-22 Thread Jed Rothwell
This is a complicated balancing act. See: http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/news/article/2011/12/value-of-csp-increases-substantially-at-high-solar-penetration This year, PV is widely seen as winning the competition with CSP, even though CSP has some advantages. Sometimes a promising

[Vo]:Defkalion comments on the competent observer visit

2011-12-22 Thread Jed Rothwell
See: http://www.defkalion-energy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=4956#p4956 For the record, I do not think anyone is putting pressure on me. I do not mind any of the questions here or at the Defkalion forum. I regret that I cannot address some of them. I hope I can say more in the near future. As I

Re: [Vo]:Krivit goes Berserk against Cold Fusion research to promote WL theory.

2011-12-22 Thread Jed Rothwell
OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson svj.orionwo...@gmail.com wrote: All I know is that it sure wouldn't be in my own self-interest to look for trouble. This strikes me as terribly reckless behavior. It is particularly reckless when you can make every argument without including accusations of

[Vo]:Mathematical modeling versus a blacksmith

2011-12-22 Thread Jed Rothwell
Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote: Am I to assume you examined the mathematical modeling and resulting curves in the links I provided and have analyzed and rejected them for some good reason? Yes. I have seen blacksmiths at work. I have seen one heat a large chunk of iron, as big as the

Re: [Vo]:Mathematical modeling versus a blacksmith

2011-12-22 Thread Daniel Rocha
Rossi is an extremely common Italian surname. I can see Rossi used as a name of a company everywhere here, since several million people in my country descends from Italians. 2011/12/22 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com Note that Rossi means Smith. Perhaps he comes from a long line of

RE: [Vo]: Cosmic Trigger?

2011-12-22 Thread Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint
Horace: The problem I see with some kind of outside trigger is that the turn-on of excess heat would occur randomly. how does one control when that cosmic ray or muon will initiate the reaction? In one of the demos, it appeared to turn on at a specific temperature. -mark From: Horace

Re: [Vo]:Defkalion comments on the competent observer visit

2011-12-22 Thread Akira Shirakawa
On 2011-12-22 16:44, Jed Rothwell wrote: See: http://www.defkalion-energy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=4956#p4956 On a side note, speaking of Defkalion GT, while reading E-Cat related comments on a different website I found this image originating from PESN [1]: http://i.imgur.com/lFWUT.gif

[Vo]:[OT] New SciFi Author

2011-12-22 Thread Terry Blanton
At least he is new to me. With my commute, I have loads of time to listen to audio books. I usually download these from our library and stumbled across Embassytown by China Mieville. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/China_Mieville He has basically established his own genre called The New Weird and

Re: [Vo]:[OT] New SciFi Author

2011-12-22 Thread Daniel Rocha
Oh, nice, it seems his political orientation aligns pretty much with mine, which is quite rare for SciFi writers. Makes me want to read his books, hmm. 2011/12/22 Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com At least he is new to me. With my commute, I have loads of time to listen to audio books. I

Re: [Vo]: Cosmic Trigger?

2011-12-22 Thread Axil Axil
*I speculate that the trigger results in a release of potential energy to kinetic energy in a quantum mechanical system.* *The nuclear reaction (fusion) is kept in a state of inaction or IOW, quantum mechanical superposition (QMS) for an indefinite timeframe until triggered.* *This trigger

Re: [Vo]:Defkalion comments on the competent observer visit

2011-12-22 Thread Mary Yugo
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 7:44 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote: If I were Mary Yugo, in view of my report I would think twice about making lurid accusations that Defkalion is engaged in fraud. Where did I make lurid accusations of fraud? Links please? I would cut back on the

RE: [Vo]:Krivit goes Berserk against Cold Fusion research to promote WL theory.

2011-12-22 Thread Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint
Jed wrote: Swartz sent me a similar letter when I quoted one of his papers and offered to upload it. He threatened legal action in words similar to this fax if I ever quote his papers or upload one. He sent me two messages like this. That is why I deleted his papers from ICCF Proceedings at

Re: [Vo]:Mathematical modeling versus a blacksmith

2011-12-22 Thread OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
From Mary Yugo: Am I to assume you examined the mathematical modeling and resulting curves in the links I provided and have analyzed and rejected them for some good reason? I assume you addressed this query to Mr. Rothwell. Nevertheless, I have two cents of my own to add. Having run

RE: [Vo]:Krivit goes Berserk against Cold Fusion research to promote WL theory.

2011-12-22 Thread Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint
Daniel Rocha wrote: Now, notice that Krivit declares Holy War against Cold Fusion here (notice that in the linked letter inside the article that most of the arguments are based on religious texts, only): http://blog.newenergytimes.com/2011/12/21/lenrs-versus-cold-fusion-and-the-s

Re: [Vo]:Krivit goes Berserk against Cold Fusion research to promote WL theory.

2011-12-22 Thread Daniel Rocha
Yes, I know the article was written by Larsen. I'm sorry that I was not clear, the linked letter inside the article should be the linked letter inside the blog post. Anyway, Krivit endorses the opinion. 2011/12/22 Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint zeropo...@charter.net Daniel Rocha wrote: ** **

Re: [Vo]: Cosmic Trigger?

2011-12-22 Thread Horace Heffner
On Dec 22, 2011, at 7:41 AM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint wrote: Horace: The problem I see with some kind of outside trigger is that the “turn-on” of excess heat would occur randomly… how does one control when that cosmic ray or muon will initiate the reaction? In one of the demos, it

Re: [Vo]:Krivit goes Berserk against Cold Fusion research to promote WL theory.

2011-12-22 Thread Harry Veeder
The background to this story is that Mitchell lSwartz does not approve of Jed Rothwell and Ed Storms content policy for the LENR library. They have said they prefer to include papers in the library which will raise the credibitily and respectability of the field ( and I don't just mean they prefer

Re: [Vo]: NOT = NOT off topic, 2.188 = 2*1.094

2011-12-22 Thread Man on Bridges
Hi, On 22-12-2011 4:07, Jeff Driscoll wrote: Basically a high energy photon's first step towards becoming matter happens at orbitstate n = 1/137.05999679 which Mills terms the transition state orbitsphere. Here's that number 137 again, is it possibly the same 137 which applies to the maximum

Re: [Vo]:Mathematical modeling versus a blacksmith

2011-12-22 Thread Horace Heffner
On Dec 22, 2011, at 7:29 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote: Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote: Am I to assume you examined the mathematical modeling and resulting curves in the links I provided and have analyzed and rejected them for some good reason? Yes. I have seen blacksmiths at work. I have

Re: [Vo]:Mathematical modeling versus a blacksmith

2011-12-22 Thread Mary Yugo
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 9:10 AM, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson svj.orionwo...@gmail.com wrote: Mary, as already suggested by Mr. Rothwell, I suggest you might want to consider performing an actual physical experiment. I'm sure you have sufficient tools at your disposal to perform such an

Re: [Vo]:Mathematical modeling versus a blacksmith

2011-12-22 Thread Giovanni Santostasi
Jed, Rossi doesn't mean Smith. It is translated sometime by Google as Smith because Smith is such common name in the anglophone world and Rossi is an extremely common (if not the most common) Italian last names. Rossi means red one, probably the ancestors of this family were red headed. The last

Re: [Vo]:Celani replication boosts Rossi patent

2011-12-22 Thread Jouni Valkonen
On 22 December 2011 15:13, Akira Shirakawa shirakawa.ak...@gmail.com wrote: On 2011-12-22 14:09, Aussie Guy E-Cat wrote: Dear Sterling Allan: The work of Celani (congratulations) shows that in my patent application I gave enough information to allow to an expert to reproduce the effect.

[Vo]:A Consolidated List of Defkalion's Claims

2011-12-22 Thread Robert Leguillon
As a background to this, please remember that Rossi claims DGT has never been in possession of the reactor. Defkalion claims that after separating from Rossi, they developed their own core technology. From the Defkalion forum, these are exact quotes from the administrator: Defkalion GT.

Re: [Vo]: NOT = NOT off topic, 2.188 = 2*1.094

2011-12-22 Thread Craig Haynie
On Thu, 2011-12-22 at 19:27 +0100, Man on Bridges wrote: Hi, On 22-12-2011 4:07, Jeff Driscoll wrote: Basically a high energy photon's first step towards becoming matter happens at orbitstate n = 1/137.05999679 which Mills terms the transition state orbitsphere. Here's that number 137

RE: [Vo]:A Consolidated List of Defkalion's Claims

2011-12-22 Thread Robert Leguillon
I wasn't done assembling that list, and sent it by accident. It's been sitting in draft form for awhile, and I was adding a bit. Still, since it's out there: Defkalion has claimed to have 115 Hyperions in simultaneous operation for production of a 1 MW reactor. They've never seen gains

Re: [Vo]:A Consolidated List of Defkalion's Claims

2011-12-22 Thread Mary Yugo
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 12:05 PM, Robert Leguillon robert.leguil...@hotmail.com wrote: I wasn't done assembling that list, and sent it by accident. It's been sitting in draft form for awhile, and I was adding a bit. Still, since it's out there: Defkalion has claimed to have 115 Hyperions

[Vo]:NOT: CFRL News No. 77, carbon in the news

2011-12-22 Thread Horace Heffner
See: http://www.geocities.jp/hjrfq930/News/CFRLEngNews/CFRLEN77.htm A significant transmutation result was reported: 2-1. The Cold Fusion Phenomenon in Hydrogen Graphites In this paper, we took up experimental data sets of nuclear transmutation and excess heat in discharge and

Re: [Vo]: NOT = NOT off topic, 2.188 = 2*1.094

2011-12-22 Thread Horace Heffner
The tag NOT is very misleading or confusing. Perhaps nOT is more useful? Or maybe something like TECH: is more descriptive. Future searches on TECH: should be more useful than searches on TECH. Non-technical debates, i.e. ones about fraud or no fraud, fake or not fake, political, legal or

Re: [Vo]:Mathematical modeling versus a blacksmith

2011-12-22 Thread Jed Rothwell
Giovanni Santostasi wrote: Rossi doesn't mean Smith. It is translated sometime by Google as Smith because Smith is such common name in the anglophone world and Rossi is an extremely common (if not the most common) Italian last names. Rossi means red one, probably the ancestors of this family

Re: [Vo]:Mathematical modeling versus a blacksmith

2011-12-22 Thread Jed Rothwell
Mary Yugo wrote: Rossi is not dumping a preheated steel mass into a bucket of water. He's insulating it very carefully and trickling water through it at a very modest rate. I've always been struck at the low and hesitant flow from his pumps. Click... click..click.. And the

Re: [Vo]:NOT: CFRL News No. 77, carbon in the news

2011-12-22 Thread Daniel Rocha
I found a nice linke there: http://www.geocities.jp/hjrfq930/Papers/paperr/paperr.html Including a paper about the 3 laws of CF. 2011/12/22 Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.net See:

Re: [Vo]:Mathematical modeling versus a blacksmith

2011-12-22 Thread OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
Jed sez: Wow! That gives us an interesting look at how Google translation works. The computer picks a word that is functionally similar. One that has similar uses, distribution or frequency. Or maybe it is a database error. The word roth also means red, in Middle English. Hence the

Re: [Vo]: Cosmic Trigger?

2011-12-22 Thread Axil Axil
Cosmic ray background is random but essentially a continuous condition on the time scale of nuclear active site generation. Both the Rossi and Piantelli reactors are subject to run away burn up conditions when the temperature of the hydrogen and nickel rises above a critical temperature. The

Re: [Vo]:Krivit goes Berserk against Cold Fusion research to promote WL theory.

2011-12-22 Thread Jed Rothwell
Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote: The background to this story is that Mitchell lSwartz does not approve of Jed Rothwell and Ed Storms content policy for the LENR library. He may have said that, but we do not have a content policy. They have said they prefer to include papers in the

RE: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:NOT: CFRL News No. 77, carbon in the news

2011-12-22 Thread Roarty, Francis X
Daniel, Yes I noted the 2nd paper as well regarding the law of magic numbers and forwarded it to Jones Beene which I believe he has been promoting for years. Fran From: Daniel Rocha [mailto:danieldi...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2011 3:46 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject:

RE: [Vo]:A Consolidated List of Defkalion's Claims

2011-12-22 Thread Robert Leguillon
I completely and utterly agree that Rossi and Defkalion could not have both been telling the truth. So, now for assumptions that may or may not be accurate, based entirely on opinion, supposition, wild speculation, and a little bit of a gut feeling: It is possible that Defkalion was

[Vo]:POLITICAL What is the best way to advocate?

2011-12-22 Thread Ruby
I was seriously bummed out to hear the Navy researchers being forced to stop their work due to too much publicity. My question to Vortex members is this: What is the best way to advocate for clean energy from this reaction, which we choose to call cold fusion? This past year, Cold Fusion

Re: [Vo]:Krivit goes Berserk against Cold Fusion research to promote WL theory.

2011-12-22 Thread Jed Rothwell
I wrote: We have uploaded papers attacking the field, by leading skeptics such as Steve Jones. . . . We have also uploaded a large number of papers that I personally think have no scientific merit. They range from really bad to nonsense. I do not wish to reopen a quarrel with Swartz.

Re: [Vo]: NOT = NOT off topic, 2.188 = 2*1.094

2011-12-22 Thread mixent
In reply to Horace Heffner's message of Wed, 21 Dec 2011 22:30:49 -0900: Hi Horace, You probably did. I also pointed it out to Frank himself a couple of years back. The calculation of the electron speed is nothing new. It's also in the Hydrino calculations on my web site. However I still haven't

Re: [Vo]:POLITICAL What is the best way to advocate?

2011-12-22 Thread Jed Rothwell
Ruby r...@hush.com wrote: I was seriously bummed out to hear the Navy researchers being forced to stop their work due to too much publicity. My question to Vortex members is this: What is the best way to advocate for clean energy from this reaction, which we choose to call cold fusion?

Re: [Vo]: NOT = NOT off topic, 2.188 = 2*1.094

2011-12-22 Thread Jones Beene
Yes, it is nothing new - Mills did this in 1990 rather emphatically - and even then it was not new, but Robin - you seem to be downplaying your own contribution. Does not a 'screw-like' motion mesh with a Lissajous? or are you backing off of that? Seems like there is a connection, but maybe

Re: [Vo]:POLITICAL What is the best way to advocate?

2011-12-22 Thread Jed Rothwell
Regarding the comments about SPAWAR here: http://newenergytimes.com/v2/sr/Swartz/Mitchell-Swartz-Cold-Fusion-Researcher.shtml As far as I know, Krivit had no role in the demise of the project. No one has complained about him, or mentioned him. The Fox News report was the straw the broke the

Re: [Vo]:[OT] Happy Solstice

2011-12-22 Thread Man on Bridges
Hi, On 21-12-2011 19:27, Terry Blanton wrote: Or, you could take advantage of the endtimes and have some fun: http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/L/LT_MEXICO_APOCALYPSE_2012?SITE=APSECTION=HOMETEMPLATE=DEFAULTCTIME=2011-12-20-15-15-48 There won't be any endtimes, this is a (purposely

Re: [Vo]:A Consolidated List of Defkalion's Claims

2011-12-22 Thread Jed Rothwell
Robert Leguillon robert.leguil...@hotmail.com wrote: My confidence level would be much lower if they were not producing near-term timetables. Me too. I like the fact they are making near-term timetables and I also like the fact that they keep missing those timetables. I'm not joking. A real

Re: [Vo]:A competent observer's assessment of Defkalion : factory location

2011-12-22 Thread Alan J Fletcher
At 08:25 PM 12/20/2011, Giovanni Santostasi wrote: AND HERE IT IS ! Go on the left of the academy and you see a symbol of a factory. If you translate from Greek this what you get: Former Factory Atmatzidis Defkalion says no : http://www.defkalion-energy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=4983#p4983

[Vo]:Some clarifications from Defkalion.

2011-12-22 Thread Jed Rothwell
See: http://www.defkalion-energy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=4982#p4982 Government testing still in progress. Apparently it is way late. As I said, that is not surprising. Some details such as the factory acquisition had to be scrapped because the building was too close to a kindergarten. - Jed

Re: [Vo]: Cosmic Trigger?

2011-12-22 Thread David Roberson
Horace, does your theory mentioned below demonstrate the increased reaction rate that appears as the temperature increases within the device core material? Is it capable of operation at the relatively low temperatures expected within the ECAT type of devices? Any idea about the energy

Re: [Vo]: Cosmic Trigger?

2011-12-22 Thread David Roberson
I was reading the Wikipedia about copper isotopes. All of them seem to take an extremely long time before they decay into nickel so I was wondering about the statement about the reaction happening far faster than melting or moving of the large atoms. What type of reactions do you think are

Re: [Vo]: NOT = NOT off topic, 2.188 = 2*1.094

2011-12-22 Thread fznidarsic
Yes, I believe the electron moves with a screw like motion too. Niels Bohr described the velocity of the ground state orbit with Planck's constant. It goes back a way. My velocity is 1/2 of that, and it came from observations of cold fusion experiments. That perplexed me for years. I have

Re: [Vo]: NOT = NOT off topic, 2.188 = 2*1.094

2011-12-22 Thread fznidarsic
The radius I get is 1.409 fermis is also 1/2 of the classical radius of the electron. I believe that it is the crush radius of the electron. Multiply twice the radius times the Compton frequency and the ground state velocity of hydrogen pops out. I now believe that all of this, no bounce,

Re: [Vo]: Cosmic Trigger?

2011-12-22 Thread David Roberson
You description of nuclear active sites reminds me of the operation of a laser. If the excited atoms such as copper due to a reaction between nickel and a proton maintain the excess energy for a long time(many seconds according to wikipedia), maybe it can be stimulated by the proper trigger

Re: [Vo]: Cosmic Trigger?

2011-12-22 Thread David Roberson
I agree with you that the details probably contain what we desire if we can read them properly. It is apparent that heat is one of the major factors involved in the reaction rate and we must understand why this is so. I have requested on many occasions for Rossi or Defkalion to release a

Re: [Vo]:Mathematical modeling versus a blacksmith

2011-12-22 Thread Joshua Cude
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.comwrote: Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote: Am I to assume you examined the mathematical modeling and resulting curves in the links I provided and have analyzed and rejected them for some good reason? Yes. I have seen

Re: [Vo]:Mathematical modeling versus a blacksmith

2011-12-22 Thread Joshua Cude
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote: It does not matter what rate you add the heat. The flow rate of the water is unimportant. It might be stopped altogether. It takes a certain amount of energy to keep the surface of the reactor at 80°C for four hours.

Re: [Vo]:A Consolidated List of Defkalion's Claims

2011-12-22 Thread Joshua Cude
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote: If they had set a timetable back in June and they had met it on time I would suspect they are fake. It never goes smoothly. I was amazed that Rossi managed to pull off his 1 MW demo. I am pretty sure it was real. The

Re: [Vo]:Mathematical modeling versus a blacksmith

2011-12-22 Thread Colin Hercus
Hi Jed, Google have published some details of their algorithm and that's pretty much how it works. If they want to do say English/Italian translation they find a lot of text (books, menus etc.) that exist in both languages and then they analyse the text counting words by frequency. This gives

Re: [Vo]:Mathematical modeling versus a blacksmith

2011-12-22 Thread Jed Rothwell
Colin Hercus colinher...@gmail.com wrote: Google have published some details of their algorithm and that's pretty much how it works. Yup. I read some of their papers. It works surprisingly well. I guess Rossi = Smith can be considered a mistranslation. Then again, maybe this should be

Re: [Vo]:POLITICAL What is the best way to advocate?

2011-12-22 Thread Harry Veeder
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Ruby r...@hush.com wrote: The public needs to be informed so that we will have the capacity to demand this technology, and not let it be derailed again.  What do you think is the best way to do this? Seek out mainstream journalists and explain to them why this

RE: [Vo]:POLITICAL What is the best way to advocate?

2011-12-22 Thread Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint
Best: Persuade Rossi to sell (or rent) you a single e-Cat ASAP. I'll contribute $ to that effort. Then have competent engineers instrument it and do a proper test. If done properly, and it's a successful test, you won't have any problems with advocacy. -m From: Ruby

Re: [Vo]:Mathematical modeling versus a blacksmith

2011-12-22 Thread Harry Veeder
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 8:03 PM, Colin Hercus colinher...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jed, Google have published some details of their algorithm and that's pretty much how it works. If they want to do say English/Italian translation they find a lot of text (books, menus etc.) that exist in both

Re: [Vo]:Krivit goes Berserk against Cold Fusion research to promote WL theory.

2011-12-22 Thread Harry Veeder
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote: Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote: The background to this story is that Mitchell lSwartz does not approve of Jed Rothwell and Ed Storms content policy for the LENR library. He may have said that, but we do not

Re: [Vo]:Krivit goes Berserk against Cold Fusion research to promote WL theory.

2011-12-22 Thread Rich Murray
This detailed, specific critical list of many seemingly arbitrary data alterations in documents by Michael McKubre about a specific series of runs, that have been at times been cited as strong evidence for a predicted correlation of output heat with fusion of deuterium into helium within palladium

[Vo]:Dr Takaaki Musha- Field Propulsion- Gravity Shielding Book

2011-12-22 Thread Ron Kita
Greetings Vortex-L, Dr Takaaki Musha, former electrogravitics researcher with Honda RD and now with the MoD, Ministry of Defense- Japan has a Field Propulsion- Gravity Shielding book: http://www.benthamscience.com/ebooks/9781608052707/index.htm Respectfully, Ron Kita, Chiralex

Re: [Vo]: NOT = NOT off topic, 2.188 = 2*1.094

2011-12-22 Thread mixent
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Thu, 22 Dec 2011 13:44:10 -0800 (PST): Hi Jones, [snip] Yes, it is nothing new - Mills did this in 1990 rather emphatically - and even then it was not new, but Robin - you seem to be downplaying your own contribution. Does not a 'screw-like' motion mesh

Re: [Vo]:POLITICAL What is the best way to advocate?

2011-12-22 Thread Mary Yugo
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 6:06 PM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint zeropo...@charter.net wrote: Best: Persuade Rossi to sell (or rent) you a single e-Cat ASAP. I’ll contribute $ to that effort. Then have competent engineers instrument it and do a proper test. If done properly, and it’s a

Re: [Vo]:POLITICAL What is the best way to advocate?

2011-12-22 Thread Terry Blanton
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 10:47 PM, Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote: You're more likely to be able to purchase an invisible unicorn than a single e-cat to test. Do I get my choice of colors? T

Re: [Vo]:POLITICAL What is the best way to advocate?

2011-12-22 Thread Harry Veeder
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 11:40 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 10:47 PM, Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote: You're more likely to be able to purchase an invisible unicorn than a single e-cat to test. Do I get my choice of colors? T Tinker Bell can see

Re: [Vo]: NOT = NOT off topic, 2.188 = 2*1.094

2011-12-22 Thread fznidarsic
That's I problem I have also. I have found that the angular velocity of the electron equals the speed of sound in the nucleus during quantum transition. I am not really sure what the angular velocity of the electron is. Its a weak point in my arguments. I think it is somehow connected with

Re: [Vo]:Dr Takaaki Musha- Field Propulsion- Gravity Shielding Book

2011-12-22 Thread Dr Josef Karthauser
On 23 Dec 2011, at 03:13, Ron Kita wrote: Greetings Vortex-L, Dr Takaaki Musha, former electrogravitics researcher with Honda RD and now with the MoD, Ministry of Defense- Japan has a Field Propulsion- Gravity Shielding book: http://www.benthamscience.com/ebooks/9781608052707/index.htm