Piantelli needs to produce a plasma and he is using energetic particles to
do that. This radioactive material will be bad for home use of his reactor.
Papp used the same method to increase electron numbers in the Papp engine.
Or he could just be covering this base to stop the competition from
I understand you will not read my Blog. Sorry for it but it happens.
The greatest part of Humanity does not read it and the consequences
are visible.
However because I see you are an electrical engineer (as my very best US
friend Mike Carrell), I want to ask you a favor. A young reader friend
Are you friggin serious? You're asking me to watch a 1 hour 20 minute
video over the connection I've got?
If you're a chemical engineer then simply explain how various LENR
experiments simply CANNOT be explained by chemical energy. Duhh.
GWTP
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 11:10 PM, Peter Gluck
started by Erich von Daniken.
***You mean this same Erich von Daniken who finished his work first as a
hotel manager and then in PRISON??? What are you pushing here on Vortex?
from wikipedia:
The ideas put forth in his books are largely rejected by scientists and
academics, who categorize his
The first impression counts, the first 3 minutes. It is simple, you like
the stuff you watch it and.. vice-versa.
Who has accused LENR to be chemical energy? I have told everything I know
on my blog re LENR but also re problem solving, modes of thinking etc. Ask
on the target exactly and i will
NASA Telescope Observes Signal That Can’t Be Explained By Known Physics
BY BRANDON RUSSELL | AUGUST 2, 2014
http://www.technobuffalo.com/2014/08/02/nasa-telescope-observes-signal-that-cant-be-explained-by-known-physics/
NASA researchers have stumbled upon a signal in the Perseus Cluster—one of
Folks, I consider the Suncell technology to be a big threat to my plans. So,
I want to get to the bottom of this. The primary goal is to verify the energy
balance. Then to assess how quickly Mills can roll this out into the
Marketplace.
I am thinking of hiring a full time Physics Graduate
The straightforward solution is to speak with Randy Mills.
You can have a great pleasant surprise. He has a Lab
a great team and 23 years of experience in this area created
by himself..
Peter
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 2:06 PM, Jojo Iznart jojoiznar...@gmail.com wrote:
Folks, I consider the
I think this citation supports my relativistic interpretation of Casimir
effect: http://physics.iupui.edu/sites/default/files/physics/Rego-poster.pdf
My interpretation http://www.byzipp.com/cas4.png
Someone is bound to post this, but I'm dying to know so I'll pose the
question: what is the cosmological spectral line predicted by Mills'
theory? Anything close to 3.56 KeV?
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 4:02 AM, H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
NASA Telescope Observes Signal That Can’t Be
Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com wrote:
Right, Kevin! The definition of SWOT is clearly given in the first paragraph
of the paper- have you read it?
It wasn't clearly given. It was sort-of spelled out in a confusing manner.
I was trained as a technical writer many decades ago. One of the
The definition was given, perhaps not clearly. SWOT gives 5.8 million hits
on Google- it is an important concept at least for technology and
management.
What Rossi does is a technology project; this is the my second SWOT paper
on my blog; I am not seeking popularity or trying to impose my
Peter, it might be helpful if you define every term when it is first used in
your document. LENR(Low Energy Nuclear Reaction) as example.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com
To: VORTEX vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wed, Aug 6, 2014 12:03 am
Subject: Re:
From: Steve High
Someone is bound to post this, but I'm dying to know so I'll pose the question:
what is the cosmological spectral line predicted by Mills' theory? Anything
close to 3.56 KeV?
http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l%40eskimo.com/msg95266.html
Interesting point Eric. These emissions might also act as high energy triggers.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wed, Aug 6, 2014 1:55 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:2-New LENR Patent Applications via Alain Coetmeur
I
Thanks, I will do so - can you suggest an acronym that goes
well with LENR?
Peter
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 6:52 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
Peter, it might be helpful if you define every term when it is first used
in your document. LENR(Low Energy Nuclear Reaction) as example.
From: Peter Gluck
… can you suggest an acronym that goes well with LENR?
Yes. If and when Mizuno’s experiment is replicated, and if it is as reliable
and robust as it was presented to be, then it will have marked a turning
point (or tipping point)
Peter, thanks for helping some of us out that have to spend a lot of time
looking at the acronyms to decode them as we read. I find on occasion that far
too much effort is used for this purpose than the writer saves himself. The
reason you write is for others to read what you have written,
LENR is a misnomer. The concept that this reaction is one of low energy is
mostly not accurate. This sort of inaccuracy has lead to much
counter-reactions from the orthodox scientific community over many
years. The name should be changed to its final form...Magnetically Induced
Nuclear Reactions
SWOT:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SWOT_analysis
--
Daniel Rocha - RJ
danieldi...@gmail.com
David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
Peter, it might be helpful if you define every term when it is first used
in your document. LENR (Low Energy Nuclear Reaction) as example.
But in this case, in this forum, you would not spell out that particular
acronym. Because everyone here knows it.
Dear Jones,
I have to congratulate you for the synthesis/review you have created
about Mizuno's new work, Very wise.
Mizuno has found a new way- it deserves full attention. not only a new
acronym but a new name- and a new forum.
it is difficult to predict its future, however...
Peter
On Wed,
Kevin,
well know who Daniken is 9Tow years older than me and still alive)
The guy from the video Billy Black says similar things but well.
You have to listen a few minutes tp it, if you will get an opinion.
Peter
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 9:51 AM, Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.com wrote:
2 years
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 9:41 PM, Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com wrote:
Kevin,
well know who Daniken is 9Tow years older than me and still alive)
The guy from the video Billy Black says similar things but well.
You have to listen a few minutes tp it, if you will get an opinion.
OK. Kevin, you obviously know more about physics than about
management/leadership. We had a talk about my subject not long ago. It did
not go very well. I will take my chances in an area I am poorly prepared.
Reason I try is because I am confused. I haave some friends who told me
that state of
Peter,
I am new to science and LENR but Ii am certainly familiar with SWOT. I did
read your blog and considered a comment but thought that perhaps it is hard
for people to spee the impact of other , not science fact, so I decided it
was not worth it. Seems I was right. I think one need to start
Lennart,
Thanks. Please read the VUCA paper, it is actually a leadership acronym.
I have noticed SOD, really not bad- however see my problrm solving Rule:
15. NOT the enhancement of human strengths but the limitation of human
weaknesses is more useful for efficient problem solving.
Negative
*The whole discussion about different theories is way too adament in my
opinion. It seems like if evry theory is having problems to be accepted by
a wide group of scientists.*
Whenever there is a mystery in science, many theories are proposed to
explain that mystery. Take for an example dark
Axil--
I disagree that the reaction is totally nuclear, although nuclei are involved.
Orbital spin and both electron and photon spin are probably involved in the
energy redistribution. I agree it is magnetically induced. I consider spin
coupling is involved and the release of energy
I do agree with you to some extent. Although my experienceis that as soon
as the negative part has made its job you need to shift to the positive
counterpart.
I am not detail oriented per se, although I need to give you some opinion
about rule 15. In addition my English migh catch up with me.
I
Sounds too much like MISERY Bob. That is the current state of world affairs.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Bob Cook frobertc...@hotmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wed, Aug 6, 2014 3:50 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:New SWOT analysis of the E-cat
Axil--
I disagree that
I understand that and I agree with you Axil. Although I think it would
benefit to bring forward the similarities rather than what is impossible as
it does not comply with what I myself think. If one already have all the
answers, then it is meaningless to argue about what is wrong in others
ideas.
The one clue that I believes tells the tale is the zero spin property of
the NUCLEUS that can energy into weak to intermediate strength reactions.
Rossi states he uses NI62 and Ni64, DGT says Ni61 does not work, nitrogen
which has non zero spin is a vigorous LENR poison.
The reason why zero
That's my take. The mainstream press calls it fraud without a scrap of
evidence as far as I know. See:
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/06/business/Yoshiki-Sasai-an-author-of-discredited-stem-cell-study-is-found-dead.html
Why do Scientists Commit Fraud
The one clue that I believes tells the tale is the zero spin property of
the NUCLEUS that can energy into weak to intermediate strength reactions.
Should read,,,
The one clue that I believe tells the tale is the zero spin property of the
various types of nuclei that either work or don't work in
I believe that the PF effect is caused by arc discharge and cavitation.
The PdD fusion theories are all totally and uniformly wrong. Such an
revolutionary idea cannot even be considered as serious because of all the
investments in ego that these current invalid PdD theories involve. This
rejection
Well I have spent a lively afternoon communicating with Randell Mills via
his youtube channel in between seeing patients. My thought was that if he
had made a specific prediction of a 3.5 KeV emission signature PRIOR to the
release of that figure by Bulbul et al, that would be a remarkable
as my dear lobbyist said, working in academic research prepared hear for
politician backstab...
if it finally works, i would call for prison, one more.
the entrepreneur forgive, not the citizen
2014-08-06 22:30 GMT+02:00 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com:
That's my take. The mainstream press
From: Steve High
If you scroll to page 221 you will see the same language as in the first
document, but there is no 3.48 prediction, unless that is embedded in the
numbers that are presented… So has he hit it out of the park or not? I am not
skilled enough to be able to tell.
IMO…
Hi Lennart,
you wrote : However, if we cannot involve other disciplines LENR cannot be
solved. Business reasons and leadership issues are among things that is part of
the solution
May you explain what you think/mean?
Thank you.
Michel.
Le Mercredi 6 août 2014 22h10, Lennart Thornros
You should also check out the quadrupole and octopole moments. The nucleus
can also bounces in more complicated ways and emit RF.
2014-08-06 17:29 GMT-03:00 Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com:
The reason why zero spins work and non zero spins don't in LENR is that
NMR active (non zero spin) nuclei
Just in case this was missed, I believe this is R. Mills explanation:
http://www.blacklightpower.com/wp-content/uploads/pdf/Chapter-5_3.5_keV_feature.pdf
Would love to see comments about it... pro or con.
Regards,
Steven Vincent Johnson
svjart.orionworks.com
zazzle.com/orionworks
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 3:58 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Good article.
You have to watch the PBS documentary on Kurzweil.
Part nut case, part genius.
Falling in love with your OS is one thing; but, Musk thinks AI is
potentially more dangerous than Nukes:
Maybe hydrinos exist in gas clouds as part of the LENR process.
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 9:09 PM, Orionworks - Steven Vincent Johnson
orionwo...@charter.net wrote:
Just in case this was missed, I believe this is R. Mills explanation:
All reasoning is wrong, except for the last equation, which is correct, by
coincidence. The last case is the case for the relativistic electron,
without spin (so, it's not really an electron). This equation is ignored in
all text books, but the solution is OK, in quantum mechanics. You don't
need
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 2:41 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
In fact, as should be apparent to Mills the radiation seen in several
remote galaxies comes from such a great distance that it must be strongly
red-shifted, by the time we get it - but RM proposes a value that is LESS
than
From: Terry Blanton
….Musk thinks AI is potentially more dangerous than Nukes:
http://mashable.com/2014/08/03/elon-musk-artificial-intelligence/
with comments by Kurzweil.
“Dangerous to whom” is the deeper question.
If you believe in a soul of some kind, independent of biology
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 11:42 AM, Lennart Thornros lenn...@thornros.com
wrote:
OK. Kevin, you obviously know more about physics than about
management/leadership.
***Oh Lennart, you obviously know little about either.
We had a talk about my subject not long ago. It did not go very well.
Kevin, it is not worth a comment. You are just judgemental. Inhave not
asked you to have an opinion about my capacity, still you think you can
make judgements. Sorry, keep to the subject not to any personal vendetta. I
admit my shortcomings in science although I am from the beginning an
engineer
Lennart, if you don't want an alligator to snap at you, then stop throwing
rocks at him. Even preschoolers know the wisdom of this.
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 10:27 PM, Lennart Thornros lenn...@thornros.com
wrote:
Kevin, it is not worth a comment. You are just judgemental. Inhave not
asked you
50 matches
Mail list logo
