RE: [Vo]:CR39

ch could easily be true.) The "original message" quoted below was not from me. Rather, it was something I quoted at the start of my post. -Original Message- From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax AFAIK fast neutrons are detected by the fact that they occasionally break a C12 nucleus into 3 al

Re: [Vo]:CR39

At 04:30 PM 10/8/2012, mix...@bigpond.com wrote: In reply to Abd ul-Rahman Lomax's message of Sun, 07 Oct 2012 23:56:54 -0500: Hi, [snip] >These materials are not sensitive to "energetic photons," i.e., gamma rays. Gammas are absorbed by all solid matter to some extent, during which process ene

Re: [Vo]:CR39

At 04:25 PM 10/8/2012, mix...@bigpond.com wrote: In reply to Abd ul-Rahman Lomax's message of Mon, 08 Oct 2012 00:22:22 -0500: Hi, [snip] >At 03:55 PM 10/7/2012, mix...@bigpond.com wrote: >>While what you say is true, a track created by a single proton is not >>necessarily indicative of neutrons

Re: [Vo]:CR39

At 03:55 PM 10/7/2012, mix...@bigpond.com wrote: While what you say is true, a track created by a single proton is not necessarily indicative of neutrons, as the track could be caused by any reaction producing a proton, or any charged particle for that matter. However the triple track created

RE: [Vo]:CR39

At 09:32 AM 10/7/2012, Jones Beene wrote: Robin The cross-section for alpha emission from carbon is way too small for the explanation you suggest. Apparently not. Triple tracks are not common, though. If you are not familiar with it, you should read the SPAWAR publications, including the Pam

Re: [Vo]:CR39

At 05:07 PM 10/6/2012, mix...@bigpond.com wrote: AFAIK fast neutrons are detected by the fact that they occasionally break a C12 nucleus into 3 alpha particles. It is the three alpha particles that produce three cone shaped tracks in the CR39, with a common origin. Note that only charged partic

Re: [Vo]:CR39

At 04:50 PM 10/6/2012, Jed Rothwell wrote: CR39 is very hard to use. It is not for dummies or beginners. That's the take home lesson I learned after listening to 2 days of discussion on CR32 by experts. CR39 is difficult to *interpret*. It's also a pain to etch. As normally used, CR39 is thic

Re: [Vo]: Experimental Results with Nickel and Sodium Carbonate

At 01:37 AM 10/6/2012, Eric Walker wrote: On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 9:28 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <<mailto:a...@lomaxdesign.com>a...@lomaxdesign.com> wrote: In an AC situation, there would be alternate production of hydrogen and oxygen at the same electrode. So one would expec

Re: [Vo]: Experimental Results with Nickel and Sodium Carbonate

At 09:04 PM 10/4/2012, Chuck Sites wrote: Wow, what a great batch of articles. The borax article in www,sparkbangbuzz.com just blew my mind. I did notice the weird electrical capacitance, but I dismissed that as a Battery effect of electrolysis, the positive ion b

Re: [Vo]:October is here

At 03:20 PM 10/3/2012, Jed Rothwell wrote: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <<mailto:a...@lomaxdesign.com>a...@lomaxdesign.com> wrote: b. Safety certification can be obtained with a nonfunctional product. Are you sure about that? I doubt it. "Safety certification" is according to c

Re: [Vo]:October is here

At 12:49 PM 10/2/2012, Alan J Fletcher wrote: At 07:57 AM 10/2/2012, fznidar...@aol.com wrote: It has now been one year since Rossi's big demonstration. Products were to come out at the end of last year, then in the Summer of 2012. Now its one year later and there is nothing. No products, n

Re: [Vo]:WLT Disproof

At 10:27 AM 10/2/2012, Moab Moab wrote: mainstream scientists reading LENR papers and replying to them ? What happened, did LENR become noticeable overnight ? No, it took something like fifteen years of steady decay of the totally skeptical position, with accumulation of evidence and underst

Re: [Vo]:WLT Disproof

At 10:09 AM 10/2/2012, Daniel Rocha wrote: I am actually surprised that they found a high neutron rate. I thought they'd find nothing. Those are conventional nuclear physicists, as you can see in their publication list. Read the paper itself. They found that the W-L estimates were high by a

Re: [Vo]:October is here

At 09:57 AM 10/2/2012, fznidar...@aol.com wrote: It has now been one year since Rossi's big demonstration. Products were to come out at the end of last year, then in the Summer of 2012. Now its one year later and there is nothing. No products, no independent tests by a reputable group. I p

Re: [Vo]:WLT Disproof

At 09:02 AM 10/2/2012, Daniel Rocha wrote: It doesn't rule out. They just find lower neutron production rates, which are merely 200x smaller. That's an error plus it's misleading. They find 300x smaller as a rate, *using an optimistic value of the mass renormalization factor.* Essentially, th

Re: [Vo]:Alan's Sites Effect Experiment

At 07:33 PM 9/27/2012, Alan J Fletcher wrote: Radiation detectors : ordered I ordered a 5-pack. I'll send 1 each to the first two vorticians who ask What kind of radiation detectors?

Re: [Vo]:Martian Pyramid

Does anyone know where LORENHEYER lives? Could they check on him? He might be ill, because of the drastic personality change being shown. I did look back at his contributions to this list. His "pyramids are really just natural odd or rare rock formations" is totally out of character. The first

Re: [Vo]:Free Energy for All Mankind (Almost)

At 08:57 PM 9/26/2012, Terry Blanton wrote: H,L & S http://i.imgur.com/X7d8m.png :-) Well, I did think, immediately, on seeing the announcement web site, that this was a total trolling. However, Mr. Hardcastle has been around since at least 2008, with his Maxwell's Demons. If he's trollin

Re: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Good Alloy for Celani type reaction costs 5 cents : Chuck Sites

s of predicting outcomes. That, in fact, is the whole purpose of "meaning." Besides fun, of course. At 09:06 AM 9/27/2012, Guenter Wildgruber wrote: Abd Ul, Von: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax Maybe it's space aliens. I'm kinda liking that explanation. I can move it around and expl

Re: [Vo]:Godes patent application - apparent confusion over anode vs. cathode

At 11:54 PM 9/26/2012, Jeff Berkowitz wrote: I'm looking at the Godes/Brillouin patent application: http://www.google.com/patents/US20110122984?hl=en In figure 3C, the circuit diagram of the drive circuitry, there are effectively three "output

Re: [Vo]:Martian Pyramid

At 08:07 AM 9/27/2012, fznidar...@aol.com wrote: Yes finally! Its: Proof of the either vortex! Proof that the hydrino is real! and it proves the validity of the Larson Widom theory! Finally someone recognizes truth when they see it. CF believers claim that the pyramid power is produced by nuc

Re: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Good Alloy for Celani type reaction costs 5 cents : Chuck Sites

At 05:06 PM 9/26/2012, Jed Rothwell wrote: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <<mailto:a...@lomaxdesign.com>a...@lomaxdesign.com> wrote: See, almost immediately, after the announcement, a huge number of groups started to attempt replication. People often say this, but I do not see much evidenc

Re: [Vo]:Anomalous heat beyond chemistry proves that cold fusion is nuclear

At 05:53 PM 9/26/2012, Jed Rothwell wrote: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote: Fleischmann and I disagree, for reasons I believe Lomax is familiar with. Please don't recruit Fleischmann to your own personal cause. It is more the other way around. I'm not disagreeing with Fleisch

Re: [Vo]:Martian Pyramid

At 07:02 PM 9/26/2012, Harry Veeder wrote: Tiny pyramid discovered on Mars... http://www.theweathernetwork.com/news/storm_watch_stories3&stormfile=Curiosity_discovers_martian_pyrmaid_21_09_2012 therefore Martians are tiny. Pseudoskeptic! It's obvious from the photo that the pyramid is an act

Re: [Vo]:Free Energy for All Mankind (Almost)

At 10:23 AM 9/26/2012, lorenhe...@aol.com wrote: Initially, upon reading the statement below of Quenco's "Quantum Energy Converter", I can't help but think how promising this technology is. No kidding? Hey, I have a technology, I'll announce it soon, that will transform human society. People

Re: [Vo]:Anomalous heat beyond chemistry proves that cold fusion is nuclear

At 09:50 AM 9/26/2012, Jed Rothwell wrote: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <<mailto:a...@lomaxdesign.com>a...@lomaxdesign.com> keeps saying thing like this, which I find a little tiresome: Okay, an anomaly. Very important point: anomaly does not equal cold fusion. It means something unexp

Re: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Good Alloy for Celani type reaction costs 5 cents : Chuck Sites

At 09:48 PM 9/25/2012, Eric Walker wrote: On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 6:16 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <<mailto:a...@lomaxdesign.com>a...@lomaxdesign.com> wrote: None of what has been written recently in this thread addresses calorimetry or any evidence of nuclear reactions, I want

Re: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Good Alloy for Celani type reaction costs 5 cents : Chuck Sites

At 10:15 PM 9/24/2012, Eric Walker wrote: If a reproducible lo-fi protocol could be worked out, someone could write to Nathan Lewis and say, "we took a look at your objections in 1989 to the calorimetry and think we might have found a way around some of the difficulties ..." None of what

Re: [Vo]:Godes/McKubre 100% reproducability

At 03:43 PM 9/25/2012, Jed Rothwell wrote: Having David Kidwell to say anything unequivocally positive about cold fusion is the fourth miracle of cold fusion. The three previous miracles, brought to you by Huizenga, pale in comparison. The Coulomb barrier is nothing compared to the Kidwell Atti

Re: [Vo]:Godes/McKubre 100% reproducability

At 03:02 PM 9/25/2012, Jed Rothwell wrote: Alan J Fletcher <a...@well.com> wrote: The NRL recently repeated the Arata experiment several hundred times in a row with automated equipment, completely degassing the samples between runs. It worked every time. So I do not see w

Re: [Vo]:Dardik's amazing 2008 paper

At 01:55 PM 9/25/2012, Jed Rothwell wrote: I wrote: They have moved from Israel to U. Missouri. Correction. Someone just told me they are back in Israel. That was fast. Indeed. And expensive, if this is true and total. What happened?

Re: [Vo]:Good Alloy for Celani type reaction costs 5 cents : Chuck Sites

I don't want to frighten people away from trying things. Playing with electrochemistry can be a way to learn about it, and to start to get a sense for what has happened in the field. Chuck's experiences with things getting gunked up, for example. CF anodes (the electrode connected to the posit

RE: [Vo]:Good Alloy for Celani type reaction costs 5 cents : Chuck Sites

At 04:47 PM 9/24/2012, Arnaud Kodeck wrote: You have made an interresting experiment worth to try to repeat. Teslaalset and Dave are on it seems. Chuch, did you try with another salt than Borax and succeed on excess heat as you had with Borax ? Is Borax a key element ? The experimental work

Re: [Vo]:Save the Balloon! - effect on nuclear decay of the chemical environment

At 03:38 PM 9/24/2012, Jed Rothwell wrote: I wrote: I think there is evidence that cold fusion can increase the reaction rate of some conventional reactions. See Reifenschweiler. Well, no. That isn't "cold fusion." It's LENR. That is, there are nuclear reactions that are known where the ch

Re: [Vo]:Save the Balloon!

At 08:23 AM 9/24/2012, Terry Blanton wrote: If Dr. Storms is right, we might produce helium from hydrogen in his cracks. Well, not "if he is right," the conclusion Storms presents that PdD cold fusion generates helium is not speculative, it's solid and deserves, at this point, to be conside

Re: [Vo]:Good Alloy for Celani type reaction costs 5 cents : Chuck Sites

At 08:29 PM 9/23/2012, Eric Walker wrote: On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 6:00 PM, David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com> wrote: At the moment my hydrogen loading system is taking 1 amp at about 20 volts. Â The voltage reading varies greatly depending upon the spacing between

Re: [Vo]:Rossi: Neutrons? : COP200, Linearity

At 07:53 PM 9/23/2012, Jed Rothwell wrote: David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com> wrote: Do you consider this an out of control cold fusion device? It certainly has that appearance to me. Of course it was out of control. However, as far as I know, when the runaway re

Re: [Vo]:Rossi: Neutrons? : COP200, Linearity

At 03:55 PM 9/23/2012, Jed Rothwell wrote: David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com> wrote: Do you recall an event mentioned by F&P where the device burned it way through a table or floor? That as the "cube" I referred to. I listed it in my book. There are no photos or

Re: [Vo]:Good Alloy for Celani type reaction costs 5 cents : Chuck Sites

At 06:14 PM 9/21/2012, Jeff Berkowitz wrote: I got email on the from a lurker about this too. Agree. In an electrolytic cell, the cathode is the one connected to the negative terminal of the power supply, and this is the business end for H2. Yes, the cathode is supplied with negative voltage.

Re: [Vo]:Mark LeClair presents his thesis and supporting evidence

else reported such a result (except maybe LeClair's partner, Lebid, who is strangely silent). Really, almost everything we "know" about the LeClair effect comes from LeClair, and it's incoherent. 2012/9/21 Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <<mailto:a...@lomaxdesign.com>a...@l

Re: [Vo]:Mark LeClair presents his thesis and supporting evidence

Mark LeClair has a fantastic story to tell. It should be recognized that very little of this story has been confirmed, yet some of it should be rather easy to confirm. I haven't listened to the show, but did review the slides. What I can tell, clearly, is that LeClair is theorizing way beyon

Re: [Vo]:free energy rap

At 04:27 AM 9/17/2012, Nigel Dyer wrote: From my personal experience the problem is not so much a conspiracy as people, such as scientists in universities who do know something about this stuff, having read about this in the past, decided from the evidence then that there was nothing in it, and

Re: [Vo]:LENR Cold Fusion website- Investing in LENR Cold Fusion

At 12:50 AM 9/17/2012, Alan Fletcher wrote: It's also interesting that he's down-playing the applications of the eCat -- he's already said that its use in cars is decades away, and aircraft, never (despite NASA/Boeing penciling it in on a 15-year time frame). That study has been given way too

Re: [Vo]:New Wired UK article

At 12:39 AM 9/17/2012, Eric Walker wrote: On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <<mailto:a...@lomaxdesign.com>a...@lomaxdesign.com> wrote: You can play with ideas all you want. The information in the subject article from Defkalion is primitive, it's hard to te

Re: [Vo]:New Wired UK article

concerning the mysterious appearance of hydrogen, helium and neon in vacuum tubes. The matter never has been resolved." <http://www.levity.com/alchemy/nelson2_6.html>http://www.levity.com/alchemy/nelson2_6.html Jeff On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 9:15 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <&

Re: [Vo]:New Wired UK article

ubject: Re: [Vo]:New Wired UK article > To me 250 electron volts of energy in the form of electron projectiles > is incredibly small. The neutron generators that can be had all > operate with something like 100 keV which is fairly close to 1000 > times larger, and they use deuterons as

Re: [Vo]:New Wired UK article

At 08:26 PM 9/16/2012, Terry Blanton wrote: On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 9:04 PM, Jeff Berkowitz wrote: > That comment is a bit over my line. I think Abd's position is appropriate at > this point in time. Well, Jeff, I guess my emotions have gotten the better of me. How long have you been seekin

Re: [Vo]:New Wired UK article

At 07:58 PM 9/16/2012, Terry Blanton wrote: On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 9:15 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote: > It's simply the order in which the technician picked up and tested the > samples. The exact test method isn't given. From what Defkalion has said, > apparently, t

Re: [Vo]:New Wired UK article

At 04:29 PM 9/16/2012, Terry Blanton wrote: [quoting Defkalion at http://www.defkalion-energy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=1290] "XRF devises (sic), such the ones we use, label the measurements automatically per day, maintaining a sequential number. We perform such analysis in batches having

Re: [Vo]:no evidence yet of safety certificate.

At 10:54 AM 9/16/2012, Jed Rothwell wrote: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <<mailto:a...@lomaxdesign.com>a...@lomaxdesign.com> wrote: TheNextFuture, 5RR. I predict a block any day for TheNextFuture. This is an SPA, likely the sock of a banned user. New users don't file AfDs in thei

Re: [Vo]:New Wired UK article

At 04:14 PM 9/16/2012, mix...@bigpond.com wrote: In reply to Abd ul-Rahman Lomax's message of Sat, 15 Sep 2012 16:19:26 -0500: Hi, [snip] >1. They appear to be different samples. It is not stated that they >are the same reaction material, before and after. The analysis >numbers are "07/18/12 #25

Re: [Vo]:New Wired UK article

Okay, these are analysis numbers, not sample numbers, per se. This is not good control, by the way, but that's a different question. Samples should be labelled and then correlated with analysis. Now, what we know is that the two samples were analyzed on the same day. How long was this experim

Re: [Vo]:Don't waste your time trying to edit the E-Cat Article

At 10:27 PM 9/15/2012, Kelley Trezise wrote: So, here is my vote on the matter: Keep no merge This article has been taken over by a very small cadre of people opposed to even the mention of the Energy Catalyzer, Cold Fusion, LENR, LANR, etc. It is a stain on the reputation of WP that a small

Re: [Vo]:Don't waste your time trying to edit the E-Cat Article

At 10:27 PM 9/15/2012, Kelley Trezise wrote: So, here is my vote on the matter: Keep no merge This article has been taken over by a very small cadre of people opposed to even the mention of the Energy Catalyzer, Cold Fusion, LENR, LANR, etc. It is a stain on the reputation of WP that a small

Re: [Vo]:Stable, long lasting ~100 W cold fusion reactions have been demonstrated

At 09:25 PM 9/15/2012, Jed Rothwell wrote: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <<mailto:a...@lomaxdesign.com>a...@lomaxdesign.com> wrote: They didn't necessarily create it, "keep it stable." Perhaps it *stayed* stable. There is, practically speaking, a huge difference. You are w

Re: [Vo]:New Wired UK article

At 06:41 PM 9/15/2012, David Roberson wrote: I would be surprised if no one has done extensive research into these transmutations. By now, they must have some idea as to how this happens or they lack curiosity. If this has been swept under the table over the years it makes one wonder how many

RE: [Vo]:New Wired UK article

At 12:26 PM 9/15/2012, Jones Beene wrote: Terry, The caveat of this is that it is mundane: all electrical discharges produce transmutation over time. That is the nature of QM tunneling. You can take any old triode from an old TV set - and apply the same type of XRF testing to the plates, and fi

Re: [Vo]:Stable, long lasting ~100 W cold fusion reactions have been demonstrated

At 10:12 AM 9/15/2012, Jed Rothwell wrote: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <<mailto:a...@lomaxdesign.com>a...@lomaxdesign.com> wrote: If high energy density can be reliably created and sustained for substantial periods, it is then intrinsically scalable, and it could be that. It has been s

Re: [Vo]:New Wired UK article

At 02:14 PM 9/15/2012, Eric Walker wrote: On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 10:40 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: The nuclear reaction reflected in this ash description seems to be a mix of complex fusion and fission nuclear reactions. Such a mix of reactions might

Re: [Vo]:no evidence yet of safety certificate.

At 05:03 AM 9/15/2012, Sverre Haslund wrote: Hmm.. my edit about SGS certificate has held for 10 minutes. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_Catalyzer#Commercial_plans Sverre Haslund Eek. Page history shows revert warring

Re: [Vo]:New Wired UK article

At 12:40 AM 9/15/2012, Axil Axil wrote: We don't know whether NiH results are actually LENR, because we don't know what the ash is and therefore we don't know what the reaction is. Abd ul-Rahman Lomax and Jed Rothwell be advised that Defkalion has provided us with a comprehens

Re: [Vo]:An interesting video from PESN - LENR related

At 08:09 PM 9/14/2012, Jed Rothwell wrote: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <<mailto:a...@lomaxdesign.com>a...@lomaxdesign.com> wrote: Problem is, the "massive amounts of energy" haven't been confirmed, if by "massive" we mean "commercial level," which is th

Re: [Vo]:no evidence yet of safety certificate.

At 05:33 PM 9/14/2012, Alan J Fletcher wrote: At 04:18 PM 9/14/2012, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote: Well, very funny, Jed. However, Mr. Fletcher is essentially clueless as to what would be acceptable as a source for Wikipedia. I looked about and didn't see where he was "threa

Re: [Vo]:An interesting video from PESN - LENR related

At 10:53 AM 9/13/2012, Akira Shirakawa wrote: See http://QuantumHeat.org for updates on the Celani cold fusion replication kit project Nicolas is spearheading. One of the reasons that this whole affair has dragged out so long is that both sides are crazy. The physics community is crazy becau

Re: [Vo]:no evidence yet of safety certificate.

At 04:48 PM 9/13/2012, Jed Rothwell wrote: Alan J Fletcher <a...@well.com> wrote: Thanks to AK for the correct link (which I'd already fixed on the wiki -- though even my comments in talk have been "collapsed" -- and I'm being threatened with arbitration.) 'Dat's how i

Re: [Vo]:New Wired UK article

At 12:26 PM 9/14/2012, Alan J Fletcher wrote: Cold fusion: smoke and mirrors, or raising a head of steam? http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2012-09/14/cold-fusion With friends like this, who needs enemies? The article does, at least, pay some attention to developments, but: 1. NiH reacti

Re: [Vo]:Wikipedia E-Cat article for deletion

At 10:04 PM 9/9/2012, Jouni Valkonen wrote: On 10 September 2012 02:52, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote: You do not need to satisfy people. You need to report the replicated, peer-reviewed facts of the matter. Science is not a popularity contest. Th

Re: [Vo]:Wikipedia E-Cat article for deletion

At 06:01 PM 9/9/2012, Jouni Valkonen wrote: What comes to cold fusion, there are no established scientific point of view, therefore it is impossible to write a good Wikipedia article on cold fusion that would satisfy everyone. Actually, there is. The claim Jouni makes is one that misunderst

Re: [Vo]:Wikipedia E-Cat article for deletion

At 06:52 PM 9/9/2012, Jed Rothwell wrote: Jouni Valkonen <jounivalko...@gmail.com> wrote: What comes to cold fusion, there are no established scientific point of view . . . Yes, there is. It is the set of facts in the peer-reviewed literature published in ma

Re: [Vo]:Wikipedia E-Cat article for deletion

At 01:39 PM 9/9/2012, Alan Fletcher wrote: > From: "Kelley Trezise" > Please consider going to the article, read it and vote on its > truswothiness, objectivity, etc. at the bottom of the page. The "talk" page isn't the place to vote. If it comes up for a formal request for deletion then a ne

Re: [Vo]:Compressed spring - what happens to the stored energy at different temperatures?

At 08:16 PM 9/6/2012, Harry Veeder wrote: If a spring is compressed by a force at room temperature, the spring will return to its original length once the force is removed. In the language of CoE the compressed spring is said to "store" the energy of the work done by the force. Now compress the

Re: [Vo]:a rather tragic joke

At 03:10 PM 9/6/2012, Terry Blanton wrote: Gee, Peter, it brought a tear to my eye since it reminded me of how I treat my people. That guy was a great man! He was. Peter, you were lucky to know him, and it looks like he gave you a gift beyond price. My professional career and my life follow

RE: [Vo]:Brillouin Energy patent granted in China

At 09:44 AM 9/6/2012, Jones Beene wrote: From: Teslaalset ­ What kind of invention cannot be patented in China? [snip] (6) substances obtained by means of nuclear transformation. Looks like the Chinese, in granting the patent, have determined that Ni-H is not

Re: [Vo]:Perpetual motion machine

At 11:46 PM 9/5/2012, mix...@bigpond.com wrote: In reply to Jouni Valkonen's message of Wed, 5 Sep 2012 20:27:51 +0300: Hi, [snip] I'm not sure whether or not it represents stored energy, but if you multiply the MGO of a magnet by it's volume, you get a number of Joules (it's not much BTW).

Re: [Vo]:ILENRS-12 papers and slides added

At 01:43 PM 9/5/2012, Jed Rothwell wrote: Some of these presentations are a little . . . odd. Such as: http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/PopaSimilLroadmaptof.pdf OMG Regarding this one: ht

Re: [Vo]:All energy releases cause a mass deficit

At 01:26 PM 9/5/2012, Jed Rothwell wrote: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <<mailto:a...@lomaxdesign.com>a...@lomaxdesign.com> wrote: We know of one exception to the conservation of energy, which involves the interchangeability of mass and energy. So the ultimate principle is conservation of

Re: [Vo]:Perpetual motion machine

Conservation of energy is a strong theory, so widely confirmed that questioning it must occur at the fringes, i.e., energy is not necessarily conserved locally under quantum conditions, but these variations average out so that it remains conserved at the macroscopic level. Absent evidence othe

Re: [Vo]:RSH in Electric Fields

At 12:03 PM 9/3/2012, Jeff Berkowitz wrote: I don't know how Kim at Purdue is regarded in this group, but aside from his theoretical work, his ICCF-17 paper proposes three experiments along these lines. They are: (a) Determine the velocity distribution of deuterons in metals, which he states "i

Re: [Vo]:RSH in Electric Fields

At 12:03 PM 9/3/2012, Jeff Berkowitz wrote: I don't know how Kim at Purdue is regarded in this group, but aside from his theoretical work, his ICCF-17 paper proposes three experiments along these lines. They are: (a) Determine the velocity distribution of deuterons in metals, which he states

Re: [Vo]:The Northwest Passage

At 11:29 PM 9/2/2012, Axil Axil wrote: http://www.canada.com/technology/Ship+historic+crossing+signals+extent+Arctic+melt/7176411/story.html Canadians are romantically inspired by all those

Re: [Vo]:a new interview with Defkalion

We don't know what it is. When we do, maybe "resonant fusion?" "proton absorption?" BEC fusion" Sent from my iPhone On Aug 31, 2012, at 11:00 PM, Jeff Berkowitz wrote: It's a question with many nuances. I generally agree with Jed about the realities and the regulatory issues. Yet at the

Re: [Vo]:a new interview with Defkalion

At 02:49 PM 8/31/2012, Jed Rothwell wrote: The physics establishment is not going to throw away the definitions of chemistry versus nuclear physics, and accept unconditionally that there is such a thing as "chemical transmutation," and that we should not worry about the effects of that mysteri

Re: [Vo]:Curiouser and curiouser

At 01:15 PM 8/26/2012, James Bowery wrote: Speaking as someone who ran the software development for automated inspection of ordnance at SAIC: You always want to characterize your sensors to the greatest degree that resources permit. In this case, where you've just spent billions to get the s

Re: [Vo]:McKubre in New Scientist

At 12:23 PM 8/26/2012, Jed Rothwell wrote: See: http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg21528797.100-can-cold-fusion-research-survive-pioneers-death.html I cannot get the full article, because

Re: [Vo]:Sterling Alan Accuses Dan Glover of PTP Licensing of Interstate Fraud?

At 10:54 AM 8/26/2012, Jed Rothwell wrote: James Bowery <jabow...@gmail.com> wrote: My question has been deleted from PESN. No answer to the question is evident. I assume you mean the question you posted here was what you asked on PESN. They deleted it?!? That's te

Re: [Vo]:Curiouser and curiouser

At 11:10 PM 8/23/2012, mix...@bigpond.com wrote: In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Wed, 22 Aug 2012 21:15:15 -0400: Hi, [snip] >Dead moving pixies? > >http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2192008/Are-Martian- overlords---just-dead-pixels-camera-Images-beamed-Curiosity-lead-talk-U

Re: [Vo]:Giovanni Caproni compared to Rossi

At 01:24 PM 8/23/2012, Jed Rothwell wrote: In my opinion we should not even consider using cold fusion for commercial or practical purposes before we are ABSOLUTELY CERTAIN it can be fully controlled, and it does not produce dangerous radiation. Not at start up, not in an accident, not ever. U

Re: [Vo]:Re: Existence of 1,200C E-Cat Test Report Confirmed

At 09:52 AM 8/23/2012, James Bowery wrote: While the Capronismo is humorous (did they envision ground effect?) the comparison really isn't fair. Rossi's 1MW heat plant is low complexity and makes a lot of sense from the standpoint of industrial learning curve: Base it on a standard unit of r

Re: [Vo]:Re: Existence of 1,200C E-Cat Test Report Confirmed

At 09:39 AM 8/23/2012, Andre Blum wrote: Rossi's attempt to scale up did not fail, too. We don't know that. Generally, in his post, Mr. Blum made a number of statements, as if they were fact, that are not from independent sources. Like the claim that the 1 MW E-cat is "industrially certified

Re: [Vo]:Re: Existence of 1,200C E-Cat Test Report Confirmed

At 01:48 PM 8/23/2012, Terry Blanton wrote: On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 10:44 AM, Jones Beene wrote: > Ha! … LOL we have talked about this marvel before ­ and as being the perfect > “Rossi metaphor”. Looks reliable to me: 3 engines, 9 wings, 27 windows, seating 81, someone had a trinity fetish

Re: [Vo]:Giovanni Caproni compared to Rossi

At 01:39 PM 8/23/2012, ChemE Stewart wrote: I agree with Jed on safety. In the US these devices would need to pass ASME, NFPA, OSHA, UL certifications as well as NRC guidelines which I have no familiarity with but I am sure will apply based upon the preliminary results DGT is showing of tran

Re: [Vo]:Re: Existence of 1,200C E-Cat Test Report Confirmed

At 01:30 PM 8/23/2012, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson wrote: After a very thorough analysis of the status of CF reporting was summed up by Abd, he concludes with: > And we need reporters who will look more carefully. Any volunteers? I volunteer you. Great. Thanks. I accept, any idea about fund

Re: [Vo]:Re: Existence of 1,200C E-Cat Test Report Confirmed

At 09:08 AM 8/23/2012, Jed Rothwell wrote: Craig Brown wrote: First of all, I would be ecstatic if Rossi's eCat was proven, but the constant regurgitative reportage of "Rossi Says this, Rossi says that" being pumped out by certain reporters has me reaching for the vomit bag on an almost daily

Re: [Vo]:Miley, et al - 62M Neutrons within 5 minutes -- Fully reproducible

Found this post in my outbox, it wasn't sent. At 06:46 PM 8/17/2012, Axil Axil wrote: The production of neutrons may well be avoidable if the reaction is properly designed. As a model, Rossi has been purifying his reaction for more than a year. My guess is that the use of Deuterium is condu

Re: [Vo]:Dark Matter around the Sun

At 09:34 PM 8/21/2012, ChemE Stewart wrote: Now, read the Encyclopedia Brittanica and report back to me...We will reserve your temporary allotment of unused bandwidth while you are occupied and the mail servers cool down. Done. Whew! Now, what do you wish a report on?

Re: [Vo]:Stronghold argument and Feynman (was:Feynman on the Papp engine and explosion)

Call it the bioassay method of measuring reaction effects. The unit of exposure, the Papp. Lifetime exposure should be limited to a few millipapps. They would use mice for monitoring, but the animal rights people threatened to sue, so former Nature editors were retained. After all, they had

Re: [Vo]:Stronghold argument and Feynman (was:Feynman on the Papp engine and explosion)

At 09:23 PM 8/21/2012, mix...@bigpond.com wrote: Isn't there a balloon attached to the end of the popper? (Which would automatically function as a safety valve). No, if there really were a rapid increase in pressure, rapid enough, the balloon fitting would not pass the gas fast enough and th

RE: [Vo]:UFO found on mars by new lander?

At 07:47 PM 8/21/2012, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson wrote: Humans are very good a filling in the dots. I suspect the ability to interpret (and particularly to extrapolate) one’s immediate surroundings was probably a very good survival trait in which to pass on from generation to gener

Re: [Vo]:Dark Matter around the Sun

At 04:51 PM 8/21/2012, ChemE Stewart wrote: http://www.science20.com/news_articles/lots_dark_matter_near_sun_says_computer_model-92910 Waiting for Abd to confirm what this is or isn't... Okay, I looked.

Re: [Vo]:Dominguez ICCF17 abstract

At 03:57 PM 8/21/2012, Jed Rothwell wrote: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote: Eff the skeptics. My feelings exactly. Voice of America, I am today. Whether "5% success rate" is good news or bad news depends entirely on the details of those experiments. They ran 300 experiments.

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >