Re: [Vo]:If 2 heat engines are placed in series their efficiency is lower, and the second law breaks according to Carnot if that can occur!

2024-05-10 Thread Jonathan Berry
n average by 10. > Thus initial total COP = 5 + 25/20! > > Also the cooling does only count if you can use it. Normally in winter you > must heat. The optimal solution would be to combine the fridge with a heat > pump but a good fridge today uses only 300W/day > > > > J.W. &

Re: [Vo]:If 2 heat engines are placed in series their efficiency is lower, and the second law breaks according to Carnot if that can occur!

2024-05-09 Thread Jonathan Berry
solar panels." Well there is also a picowatt LED that makes the air colder and emits more light energy than electrical energy put into it. On Fri, 10 May 2024 at 13:49, Jonathan Berry wrote: > Not sure why but this isn't forming into proper paragraphs... > > > *"Youtube physics

Re: [Vo]:If 2 heat engines are placed in series their efficiency is lower, and the second law breaks according to Carnot if that can occur!

2024-05-09 Thread Jonathan Berry
her > like thermo (Peltier-) elements. > > > Heatpumps are reverse Carnot engines and have a much higher COP in respect > to heat gained but *not to current gained!!!* > > Even more interesting are quantum level processes in nano particles where > one could achieve the

[Vo]:If 2 heat engines are placed in series their efficiency is lower, and the second law breaks according to Carnot if that can occur!

2024-05-09 Thread Jonathan Berry
After 200 years (1824) the second law of thermodynamics is disproven. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carnot%27s_theorem_(thermodynamics) Simply Carnot argues that if the efficiency of a reversible heat engine was variable based on how it is made or the gases etc, then the second law of

Re: [Vo]:Polished: Re: Special Relativity (SR) .vs Aether

2023-11-11 Thread Jonathan Berry
Discussing about physics needs years long reflection about what physical > constants mean and how these interrelate and are measured. > A constant is an obsession and assumption that it will continue under all conditions. In the case of Light speed it is an illogical assumption if we apply what

Re: [Vo]:Polished: Re: Special Relativity (SR) .vs Aether

2023-11-11 Thread Jonathan Berry
ontradicts what > astronomers teach. > > Harry > > On Sat, Nov 11, 2023 at 4:03 PM Jonathan Berry < > jonathanberry3...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I didn't say it can be infinite, I just said the 2 way speed only has to >> average to C. >> Now, I guess it could be in

Re: [Vo]:Polished: Re: Special Relativity (SR) .vs Aether

2023-11-11 Thread Jonathan Berry
> On Wed, Nov 8, 2023 at 3:28 AM Jonathan Berry > wrote: > >> If you ask most people, most physicists, and most LLM's (Large Language >> Models) if the one way speed of light is constant they all will say it is >> and that it is part of Special Relativity (SR). >> If

[Vo]:Re: Polished: Re: Special Relativity (SR) .vs Aether

2023-11-09 Thread Jonathan Berry
A few updates... First because the Michelson Morley claim seemed plausible but not totally conclusive, I wasn't doing the math myself and math isn't my thing so I farmed that out to AI's that kept on having different ideas so to be sure I had to really drill down and figure out the best most pure

Re: [Vo]:Polished: Re: Special Relativity (SR) .vs Aether

2023-11-09 Thread Jonathan Berry
lished: Re: Special Relativity (SR) .vs Aether > > One-way and two-way speed of light would be a modern interpretation being > imposed onto what Einstein was saying in 1905. > > > i.e. translating what Einstein was saying in 1905 from a modern > perspective. > > as o

Re: [Vo]:Polished: Re: Special Relativity (SR) .vs Aether

2023-11-09 Thread Jonathan Berry
t;one way" part. But will check out what the translation issue is, thanks. On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 at 23:13, ROGER ANDERTON wrote: > but it is > > > > -- Original Message -- > From: "Jonathan Berry" > To: vortex-l@eskimo.com > Sent: Thursday, 9 Nov,

Re: [Vo]:Polished: Re: Special Relativity (SR) .vs Aether

2023-11-08 Thread Jonathan Berry
se on him what he should > have meant using those terms. > > > > -- Original Message -- > From: "Jonathan Berry" > To: vortex-l@eskimo.com; evg...@groups.io; aethericscien...@groups.io > Sent: Wednesday, 8 Nov, 23 At 08:28 > Subject: [Vo]:Polished: Re: Spe

[Vo]:Polished: Re: Special Relativity (SR) .vs Aether

2023-11-08 Thread Jonathan Berry
If you ask most people, most physicists, and most LLM's (Large Language Models) if the one way speed of light is constant they all will say it is and that it is part of Special Relativity (SR). If you ask most, "how can that be", they will answer the contraction of space and dilation of time, but

[Vo]:Special Relativity (SR) .vs Aether

2023-11-07 Thread Jonathan Berry
formations but the Michelson Morley type interferometer experiments only tell us how easily Scientists can be bamboozled! I hope I have made this easy to understand and conclusive, feedback appreciated Jonathan Berry

[Vo]:Re: Antigravity with a ring of capacitors

2023-09-06 Thread Jonathan Berry
ter, paper, sellotape and some scissors and 20-30 mins to do what amount to a childs exercise I'll send you 2 templates for 2 designs, they are also great stacked. On Thu, 7 Sept 2023 at 14:18, Jonathan Berry wrote: > BTW, just curious about things with a high dielectric constant as these > have

[Vo]:Re: Antigravity with a ring of capacitors

2023-09-06 Thread Jonathan Berry
found that certain numbers manifest a lot of aetheric energy when surrounded by a number of "edged" that relate to that number in some way. Jonathan On Thu, 7 Sept 2023 at 12:45, Jonathan Berry wrote: > I have presented this to some degree here years ago but time for an

[Vo]:Antigravity with a ring of capacitors

2023-09-06 Thread Jonathan Berry
I have presented this to some degree here years ago but time for another crack at it. When I was in bed this morning I thought of this list, actually in that state I was able to think, I believe of a few extra cases that currently I can't put my finger on, they would belong in the middle of the

[Vo]:Conservation of energy

2023-08-27 Thread Jonathan Berry
This will be a short and easy one, essentially there are two ways to look at the law of conservation of energy that seem identical but have important differences. Let's assume for the moment that energy cannot be (in a net sense) created or destroyed. So then energy can either be said to be

Re: [Vo]:The First Room-Temperature Ambient-Pressure Superconductor

2023-08-27 Thread Jonathan Berry
ew-form-of-superconductivity >> >> On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 8:31 PM Jonathan Berry < >> jonathanberry3...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Maybe, look at how both cases of levitation had one end up and one end >>> down. >>> >>> This suggests on

Re: [Vo]:The First Room-Temperature Ambient-Pressure Superconductor

2023-08-18 Thread Jonathan Berry
Maybe, look at how both cases of levitation had one end up and one end down. This suggests one of 2 things, they either made a ferromagnetic material not a superconductor. OR, they made a superconductor that is only superconductive at one end. So a tiny bit of contamination only occurred at

Re: [Vo]:The Fate of Dr. Ning Li

2023-08-03 Thread Jonathan Berry
One design of Grebenikov's echo's a discovery I have made. The "Paper comb" which is paper folded into a zig-zag pattern, well I have found that the general type of phenomena which Grebenikov, Kozyrev, and in truth most everything with extraordinary claims is based on which is something in the

Re: [Vo]:EVOs, Hutchison, and ancient megalithic tech

2023-07-10 Thread Jonathan Berry
I saw a good summary on related Kozyrev mirrors. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a9hwXoCrEUs In my experiments any spiral where the number of turns is in the form of n minus a fraction of n, so 2 minus 1/2 = 1.5 turns The next is 3 minus a 3rd (2.666 turns) and so on produces a strong effect.

Re: [Vo]:OFF TOPIC Open access ChatGPT

2022-12-11 Thread Jonathan Berry
I asked GPT chat to write a short sci-fi story, interesting result: In the year 2045, humanity had reached the peak of its technological advancement. The world was a utopia, with endless resources and a limitless supply of clean energy. But with great power came great temptation, and soon a group

[Vo]:(Think Hutchison Effect) What if I said that with KW, MW or GW of EM correctly applied radiation I could affect something in space...

2022-10-31 Thread Jonathan Berry
Would you think (assuming there was potentially something to be affected in the first place) that sounded plausible that enough EM energy given correct application that some effect could be developed? I think most would agree that EM energy affecting something in the background of space is

Re: [Vo]:Arguments for an "Aether"

2022-10-19 Thread Jonathan Berry
um is real, experimentally verified frame dragging confirms it, everything does. And again, Special Relativity has no mechanism to make the speed of light C in all frames and so it cannot possibly be, there is no mechanism proposed to do so. On Wed, 19 Oct 2022 at 09:38, Jonathan Berry wrote: > To

Re: [Vo]:Arguments for an "Aether"

2022-10-18 Thread Jonathan Berry
%7C01%7CChrisZell%40wetmtv.com%7C721c9a2f8cc747bc92a208dab08e48e2%7C9e5488e2e83844f6886cc7608242767e%7C0%7C0%7C638016422431994269%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C=V4CtpJadrYF0P5LujylOqmG%2BFbgVJswobXvNgbVTk%2Bk%3D=0> >

Re: [Vo]:Arguments for an "Aether"

2022-10-17 Thread Jonathan Berry
ight support the physical model of space and hence > the concept of an anther. > > > > Bob Cook > > > > Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for > Windows > > > > *From: *Jonathan Berry > *Sent: *Tuesday, October 11,

Re: [Vo]:Arguments for an "Aether"

2022-10-11 Thread Jonathan Berry
articles. > > All non circular orbits have two extremes what explains the shift in > min/max energy. > > Hence no ether or other fantasy needed. > > J.W. > > > On 11.10.2022 11:01, Jonathan Berry wrote: > > I would like to hear any counter points to these argument

[Vo]:Arguments for an "Aether"

2022-10-11 Thread Jonathan Berry
I would like to hear any counter points to these arguments. Firstly the Aether I am talking about IS NOT NECESSARILY the Luminiferous Aether/Ether considered disproven, though some arguments will go in that direction also. Hence the "Aether" in question could be Quantum fields theory, virtual

Re: [Vo]:Max Planck quote

2022-08-30 Thread Jonathan Berry
ere you feeling? > > > > A very tiny interaction with earth’s magnetic field? Or something else > that (AFAIK) isn’t covered by existing theory? > > > > *From:* Jonathan Berry > *Sent:* Monday, August 29, 2022 3:18 PM > *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com > *Subject:* Re:

Re: [Vo]:Max Planck quote

2022-08-29 Thread Jonathan Berry
lso the movie planet of the monkeys). > > So before we discuss about the fiction of a big bang we have 10% more > important problems to solve. > > > > Help to save the planet.E.g. by supporting Russ George and his OPR work. > Or by supporting our cold fusion work

Re: [Vo]:Max Planck quote

2022-08-29 Thread Jonathan Berry
Consider if there was no consciousness, matter and stars and life, but no consciousness, it is beyond comprehension, If something isn't seen by consciousness, does it really exist? Quantum physics often suggests it doesn't! After all we know that it's not just the photon, but also the electron

Re: [Vo]:Very low power levels are worth TONS of money

2022-08-02 Thread Jonathan Berry
in agreement, but it seems *sound* to me. On Tue, 2 Aug 2022 at 23:20, Jonathan Berry wrote: > Wrist watches of course don't need such frequent replacement, but > more-over there are both kinetic and solar solutions. > Solar seems to have won out because it can be charged from an intens

Re: [Vo]:Very low power levels are worth TONS of money

2022-08-02 Thread Jonathan Berry
Wrist watches of course don't need such frequent replacement, but more-over there are both kinetic and solar solutions. Solar seems to have won out because it can be charged from an intense light source quickly and because you don't need to wear it for it to be provided with energy. They (at

Re: [Vo]:Test

2022-07-14 Thread Jonathan Berry
Real, the car accelerates to a greater speed, and the end point is below the starting point. On Fri, 8 Jul 2022 at 19:02, Frank Grimer <88.fr...@gmail.com> wrote: > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jlSv_IlXmBg > > Two cars. > > Green low road car arrives first. > > Real or Fake. > > Please

Re: [Vo]:What would it take?

2022-04-12 Thread Jonathan Berry
Interesting idea. And while I don't think there are many things that could be introduced as a toy (Otis T. Carr's patent aside) ... Or maybe a perpetual motion toy, albeit if that was cheap enough to be for kids it would be a toy adults would want even more (executive toys). I think that images

[Vo]:What would it take?

2022-04-12 Thread Jonathan Berry
What would it take for a breakthrough in science? When I run through the scenarios it is pretty depressing! There are people who move manifest "Chi" type energy either with their body or with technology (pyramids, orgone accumulators, orgonite). This cannot be discounted by science, but it can

Re: [Vo]:Scientific Papers sign of desperation among Big pharma

2021-09-11 Thread Jonathan Berry
Maybe this is why they aretrying to discourage use of Ivermectin?! guardia Send PM Status Bronze Member (Offline) Joined: Jul 26 2009 Posts: 60 >From Dr Kory: Ivermectin dosing increase Interesting, thanks for the summary! Antiviral drug resistance is a thing, so if we’ve got this virus adapting

Re: [Vo]:Scientific Papers sign of desperation among Big pharma

2021-09-10 Thread Jonathan Berry
Robin, were you trying to imply they wouldn't allow for there to be an easy cheap cure, or were you arguing that maybe it was meant to be easily defeated? I think it is possible they wanted it easily defeated because even those who want to kill want to save themselves and others they need. On

Re: [Vo]:Scientific Papers sign of desperation among Big pharma

2021-09-10 Thread Jonathan Berry
Well think about it, they are going to be exposed to it too. They need an effective cheap safe antidote. There are a LOT of suppressed cures for Cancer, including guess what, Ivermectin! I have long studied repressed Cancer cures but never knew of Ivermectin. My point is is one of the biggest

Re: [Vo]:Scientific Papers sign of desperation among Big pharma

2021-09-10 Thread Jonathan Berry
as unvaccinated as the Vaccine doesn't stop replication in the nasal tract, it works deeper in the body) is quickly over. On Sat, 11 Sept 2021 at 06:35, Jed Rothwell wrote: > Jonathan Berry wrote: > > Jed, You point me to a study where it was tested this way suitably, I >> suspect it

Re: [Vo]:Scientific Papers sign of desperation among Big pharma

2021-09-10 Thread Jonathan Berry
Jed, You point me to a study where it was tested this way suitably, I suspect it will have been highly flawed if that was the result. I will make a post about Ivermectin a bit later. On Fri, 10 Sept 2021 at 14:04, Jed Rothwell wrote: > Jonathan Berry wrote: > > >> Bu

Re: [Vo]:Scientific Papers sign of desperation among Big pharma

2021-09-09 Thread Jonathan Berry
Oh Jed you really do just love the Pharma lies don't you. Nothing could be further from the truth. First off there have been no deaths ever from overdosing with it, a woman who took x100 times the recommended dosage was fine after 4 days in hospital. The negative effects from it are rare, mild

Re: [Vo]:A Super New Theory to Explain Superconductivity

2021-07-12 Thread Jonathan Berry
Berry connection? " This value computes a twisting of space where electrons travel." Hey, who's reading my mind? My work is based on the distorting effects of electron spins and other dynamics on the space where electrons travel/sit. And while I am still waiting on a propper breakthrough the

Re: [Vo]:How the Holmlid mechanism works

2021-03-06 Thread Jonathan Berry
How do these bubbles of space really differ from the concept of a dynamical space-fluidic medium? BTW my speculation based on some stuff Bob Greenyer has reported is that in a vacuum these EVO's exist but are empty and don't do anything till the moment hydrogen or other elements are let in. That

Re: [Vo]:Muons in the News

2021-01-29 Thread Jonathan Berry
Jones, are you aware of Bob Greenyer's work in the Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project youtube channel? Are you aware of his correlations and experiments regarding EVO's? I find his research encompassing so much, ball lightning, cold fusion and so much more to be both clearly true and in line

[Vo]:Re: Are you guys aware of the work of Bob Greenyer in the Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project?

2021-01-05 Thread Jonathan Berry
More: http://www.quantumheat.org/ http://remoteview.substack.com/ They have quite a lot of compelling content of Cold Fusion and Engineering the Vacuum (EVO's, Exotic Vacuum Objects, Ken Shoulders etc). Really pulled it all together. On Tue, 5 Jan 2021 at 23:52, Jonathan Berry wrote

[Vo]:Are you guys aware of the work of Bob Greenyer in the Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project?

2021-01-05 Thread Jonathan Berry
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCEy09JW5XAd95JmknU1JOeQ Many great videos!

Re: [Vo]:animation of emission theory

2020-12-09 Thread Jonathan Berry
It is worth nothing that nothing in Special Relativity, not length contraction, not time dilation, no combo of these can possibly explain the speed of light being the same in both directions regardless of velocity! Because while these things can affect the speed of light to keep it towards C

Re: [Vo]:animation of emission theory

2020-12-06 Thread Jonathan Berry
Okay, let's propose there is an Aether. It is worth noting that Lorentz Ether Theory was an Ether Theory before Einstein stole the idea. Einstein still believed there was an aether, and frame dragging shows there is a medium to space. And Michelson Morley did also. Also if the aether is

Re: [Vo]:Propellantless EM drive results

2020-09-24 Thread Jonathan Berry
, Jonathan Berry wrote: > I'd never heard of that either, but a moment of Googling bought up these > as the first 2 results: > > > https://physicsworld.com/a/erasing-data-could-keep-quantum-computers-cool/#:~:text=A%20classical%20computer%20generates%20heat,unknown%20information%20

Re: [Vo]:Propellantless EM drive results

2020-09-24 Thread Jonathan Berry
I'd never heard of that either, but a moment of Googling bought up these as the first 2 results: https://physicsworld.com/a/erasing-data-could-keep-quantum-computers-cool/#:~:text=A%20classical%20computer%20generates%20heat,unknown%20information%20in%20a%20system .

Re: [Vo]:Pandemics, Riots, but at least you don't need to be subjected to internet ads...

2020-06-15 Thread Jonathan Berry
Oh, I should clarify a few additional points :) Youtube was used as an example only, this works with m/any sites, and disables some paywalls too. Oh, and I just tried using this with an ip address website and it didn't work, so domains only. On Mon, 15 Jun 2020 at 21:59, Jonathan Berry wrote

[Vo]:Pandemics, Riots, but at least you don't need to be subjected to internet ads...

2020-06-15 Thread Jonathan Berry
Neat little trick I just learnt... Just add a dot at the of the TLD of a URL, so www.youtube.com becomes www.youtube.com. Ads might or might not be served but if you have an adblock you won't be asked to turn it off. This also works if there is a /whatever after, indeed it should be possible to

[Vo]:Interesting video of Corona Virus.

2020-04-28 Thread Jonathan Berry
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DtPwfihjyrY Also good: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/20/opinion/coronavirus-testing-pneumonia.html

Re: [Vo]:The Solution is in Your Bar?

2020-04-25 Thread Jonathan Berry
I've been eating carnivore recently, and it's been very good for me, but I wanted some chicken curry last night and curry spices is one of the few exceptions I will make for non-animal based foods. Anyway when I was eating the Tumeric heavy curry I began to cough up some phlegm I didn't know was

Re: [Vo]:The Solution is in Your Bar?

2020-04-25 Thread Jonathan Berry
https://www.reddit.com/r/medicine/comments/fmlitp/are_we_treating_covid19_the_wrong_way_a_deep_dive/ <https://www.reddit.com/r/medicine/comments/fmlitp/are_we_treating_covid19_the_wrong_way_a_deep_dive/?utm_source=share_medium=ios_app_name=iossmf> On Sun, 26 Apr 2020 at 11:58, Jonathan

Re: [Vo]:The Solution is in Your Bar?

2020-04-25 Thread Jonathan Berry
Hmmm, disinfecting the lungs, who would have thought of it :) Maybe those with TDS can at least take solace it's being inhaled not injected. On Sun, 26 Apr 2020 at 11:35, ChemE Stewart wrote: > https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.12444 > > >

Re: [Vo]:More on UVC & Covid

2020-04-24 Thread Jonathan Berry
This needs public pressure behind it! Makes a LOT more sense than shutting everything down, might take a little while to ramp up production but this should be top priority! Please, pass this on to people! On Sat, 25 Apr 2020 at 16:03, Ron Wormus wrote: > Source: >

Re: [Vo]:Everyone household should have one! Detect CV early!

2020-04-23 Thread Jonathan Berry
be a zinc ionophore even though there's no reason to suspect that it > might be. > > > > > > > > > On Thursday, April 23, 2020, 09:26:48 AM UTC, Jonathan Berry < > jonathanberry3...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > Here is a great article from a doctor on

[Vo]:Everyone household should have one! Detect CV early!

2020-04-23 Thread Jonathan Berry
marmalade?) and lemon skins (for Quinine). And maybe find the frequency of the virus and transmit it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mBL9pS6GMdA Regards, Jonathan Berry

Re: [Vo]:Solution to the Pandemic! And the next one...

2020-04-21 Thread Jonathan Berry
ong > term exposure to 254 nm can cause damage to the eyes and skin. As Jonathan > Berry points out 222 nm won't even penetrate the water film on your eyes. > > I still like my idea of a baseball cap with a small xenon chloride > excimer bulb attached to the underside of the bill.

Re: [Vo]:A contrarian thought experiment

2020-04-21 Thread Jonathan Berry
t in place! https://thewatchtowers.org/microsoft-owns-international-patent-060606-a-cryptocurrency-system-using-humans-who-have-been-chipped-as-the-miners/amp/ That's not a coincidence, that's a disclosure. On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 at 21:36, Jonathan Berry wrote: > Um, have you seen by any chance

Re: [Vo]:A contrarian thought experiment

2020-04-21 Thread Jonathan Berry
Um, have you seen by any chance the evidence that the Pandemic was planned, orchestrated? >From predictive programming at the previous Olympics ceremony (including Boris is a hospital bed), to a ton of weird "coincidences" all over the place, Fauci predicting it, funding a Wuhan lab... There is a

Re: [Vo]:Solution to the Pandemic! And the next one...

2020-04-20 Thread Jonathan Berry
corona > virus this year. This is just a guess on my part, probably more accurate > that the latest computer models. But we all just love to panic don't we? > > > > > > > > On Saturday, April 18, 2020, 11:10:48 PM UTC, Jonathan Berry < > jonathanberry3...@gmail.com> w

Re: [Vo]:Solution to the Pandemic! And the next one...

2020-04-18 Thread Jonathan Berry
ltage systems and unhealthy long term to biology at much of the UVA,UVB >> and UVC range >> >> >> >> Fortunately it only occurs when air is damp, pollution builds up on >> lines/insulators, insulators/lines are cracked/damaged, or bird >> crap...which is much of the time >

[Vo]:Solution to the Pandemic! And the next one...

2020-04-18 Thread Jonathan Berry
Solution, 222nm UVC light to sterilize the air, surfaces, skin, masks, clothing in supermarkets, on the street, everywhere! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2U4DAQ3kjRs

Re: [Vo]:Laissez les bon temps rouler -

2020-03-30 Thread Jonathan Berry
You just need to heat masks to 56C for an extended period (about an hour) to sterilize the mask, or hotter temperatures for longer, that isn't very hot. On Mon, 30 Mar 2020 at 20:56, Jim Dickenson wrote: > Hi, > > I also saw on NBC news that the University of Nebraska is using UV to > sanitize

[Vo]:This! Solution to the Corona virus, it's not rocket science!

2020-03-19 Thread Jonathan Berry
An Italian town tested all 3,300 residents, found 3% positive and 1.5% asymptomatic. After quarantining them and their contacts, it cut new COVID-19 cases to zero. https://www.ft.com/content/0dba7ea8-6713-11ea-800d-da70cff6e4d3 This virus *might* hurt male fertility, might damage the lungs and

Re: [Vo]:NIH-Antivirus compound via L-Lysine and Proline

2020-03-17 Thread Jonathan Berry
Another apparent solution I stumbled across (it was shared to me by a FB, but I uploaded it to YT): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WgN-yhxNkT4 Basically hot air as found in a hot desert, a Sauna for about 20 mins should kill the virus. On Wed, 18 Mar 2020 at 08:14, Jonathan Berry wrote

Re: [Vo]:NIH-Antivirus compound via L-Lysine and Proline

2020-03-17 Thread Jonathan Berry
Another possible contender... Here’s a promising candidate herb that prevents malaria and tuberculosis In the world of natural medicine, there are already powerful, well-known treatments against malaria that also happen to prevent tuberculosis, an aggressive infection of the respiratory tract.

Re: [Vo]:More on the WuFlu conspiracy theory

2020-03-09 Thread Jonathan Berry
-appears-to-keep-south-korea-death-rate-low > > > On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 2:22 PM Jonathan Berry wrote: > >> Who thinks the US WANTS the Coronavirus (Covid19 just sounds clunky) to >> get bad? >> >> Though Jed has spoken well about the baffling ignorance politici

Re: [Vo]:More on the WuFlu conspiracy theory

2020-03-05 Thread Jonathan Berry
Who thinks the US WANTS the Coronavirus (Covid19 just sounds clunky) to get bad? Though Jed has spoken well about the baffling ignorance politicians have with respect to science... Still, I have heard so many times about how the US makes faulty tests, isn't testing people, only a few states can

Re: [Vo]:Aetheric Science - Invitation to take part

2020-02-28 Thread Jonathan Berry
conditions/instructions), then details may not be > important. While my initial trial did not sense anything, I am sure that I > could "tune" my system to respond to the motion even without the image or > the screen (and even with the eyes closed). Is it worth the trouble to > d

Re: [Vo]:Aetheric Science - Invitation to take part

2020-02-27 Thread Jonathan Berry
. On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 2:41 PM Andrew Meulenberg wrote: > The experiment is inadequately specified (unless the goal is to see the > number of people who will respond). > > AM > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 5:53 PM Jonathan Berry wrote: > >> TLDR: Keep an open mind, open

Re: [Vo]:I will shut up about my aetheric images if at least 10 people try and take this poll

2020-02-27 Thread Jonathan Berry
minded camp. > > Hey! Lets see some picture of your asymmetrical coils. > > Yours, David Babcock > > On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 3:28 PM Jonathan Berry wrote: > >> Please excuse the coercive nature of this email... >> >> But, I believe this technology is of the utmo

Re: [Vo]:I will shut up about my aetheric images if at least 10 people try and take this poll

2020-02-26 Thread Jonathan Berry
might have been hard to know when it got to 10 votes total. On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 4:49 PM Jonathan Berry wrote: > Here is a very nice improvement for those who take the poll (not checked > yet to see if anyone has)... > https://ibb.co/gtw3t3F > > On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 11:30 A

Re: [Vo]:I will shut up about my aetheric images if at least 10 people try and take this poll

2020-02-26 Thread Jonathan Berry
Here is a very nice improvement for those who take the poll (not checked yet to see if anyone has)... https://ibb.co/gtw3t3F On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 11:30 AM Jonathan Berry wrote: > Also, if anyone thinks it would help, I will happily run a second poll > with two or more images, poten

Re: [Vo]:I will shut up about my aetheric images if at least 10 people try and take this poll

2020-02-26 Thread Jonathan Berry
On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 10:28 AM Jonathan Berry wrote: > Please excuse the coercive nature of this email... > > But, I believe this technology is of the utmost importance, I believe that > it needs more than one man working on/with it and I don't believe that > there is ano

Re: [Vo]:Aetheric Science - Invitation to take part

2020-02-26 Thread Jonathan Berry
AM Chris Zell wrote: > Sounds like Pavlita stuff. > > > > Build a pyramid-thing that lights an LED by itself ( if that can be done). > Or some other simple inexplicable toy. > > > > *From:* Jonathan Berry > *Sent:* Wednesday, February 26, 2020 4:09 PM > *To:* vo

[Vo]:I will shut up about my aetheric images if at least 10 people try and take this poll

2020-02-26 Thread Jonathan Berry
that option. Some actually just feel strangely draw to the images. Vote here: https://linkto.run/p/09RVMGHOImage here: https://ibb.co/z5DFr69 Further images here: https://www.quora.com/What-discovery-have-you-made-which-the-world-isnt-mentally-ready-for/answer/Jonathan-Berry-95 *The image

Re: [Vo]:Aetheric Science - Invitation to take part

2020-02-26 Thread Jonathan Berry
27, 2020 at 3:08 AM H LV wrote: > Institute of Noetic Sciences > > https://noetic.org/ > > https://noetic.org/science/ > > harry > > On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 4:56 PM Jonathan Berry wrote: > >> What a bunch of pretentious BS much of the art world is. >> >

Re: [Vo]:Aetheric Science - Invitation to take part

2020-02-25 Thread Jonathan Berry
What a bunch of pretentious BS much of the art world is. I guess however I could treat it as art... Or, I could make journals of these designs with strange writings and leave them places, they could become semi-famous on the internet (as has occurred in the past). Or, I could just present this

Re: [Vo]:Aetheric Science - Invitation to take part

2020-02-24 Thread Jonathan Berry
> No one is disagreeing with you. We're so open minded out brains sometimes > fall out. > > Cheers! > > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2020, 11:40 PM Jonathan Berry wrote: > >> Let me make another point. >> >> If I said I had an effect with high voltage, Tesla coils,

Re: [Vo]:Aetheric Science - Invitation to take part

2020-02-24 Thread Jonathan Berry
is isn't school, and there is no valid reason to be afraid small minded people. Screw the limits put on discussion by small minds, by normalcy, by convention, aren't we here to explore the outer fringes of what is possible and not play it safe? Rant over. For now, I await responses. Thanks, Jonathan Berry

Re: [Vo]:Aetheric Science - Invitation to take part

2020-02-24 Thread Jonathan Berry
nt to try a bunch of these, or read more, check out my Quora post here, scroll to the images in the middle and try it out: https://www.quora.com/What-discovery-have-you-made-which-the-world-isnt-mentally-ready-for/answer/Jonathan-Berry-95 Because science isn't meant to be a religion, or a high-sc

[Vo]:Aetheric Science - Invitation to take part

2020-02-24 Thread Jonathan Berry
support, this needs a pioneering spirit, so do you want to do something hugely positive for the world? Make a massive difference? As long as you have the desire to contribute to this, there should be a way for you to do so. I hope I see all of you on my list: https://groups.io/g/AethericScience

[Vo]:Test

2020-02-23 Thread Jonathan Berry
Previous email bounced.

Re: [Vo]:More on the WuFlu conspiracy theory

2020-02-18 Thread Jonathan Berry
l and YouTube and > the social networks are flooded with mostly positive info. > > Bottom line ... valid evidence or not... count me in (to start mega-dosing > with C), if the virus should spread to my county... which it probably will. > > > Jonathan Berry wrote: > > > The

Re: [Vo]:More on the WuFlu conspiracy theory

2020-02-18 Thread Jonathan Berry
The other side of this is that the severe cases with treatment can often be prevented from turning into fatalities. But, when this wipes out the ability to get any medical help, the death rate is going to go a lot closer to the rate of severe cases. And that is a much much higher percentage than

Re: [Vo]:More on the WuFlu conspiracy theory

2020-02-14 Thread Jonathan Berry
I would note that the fatality rate is going to depend on the level of health care available! So if things become overrun, the lethality rate double r more easily. On Sat, Feb 15, 2020 at 3:26 PM Jed Rothwell wrote: > > Terry Blanton wrote: > >> >> Those are quotes, not citations. > > > Quotes

Re: [Vo]:More on the WuFlu conspiracy theory

2020-02-14 Thread Jonathan Berry
COVID might be able to be caught more than once and be worse the second time! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MwJ5thwr4C8 Well that brings us the the practical methods of boosting the immune system. I used to get flu's lots, but now very very seldom every get anything and if I do it is more I

Re: [Vo]:More on the WuFlu conspiracy theory

2020-02-14 Thread Jonathan Berry
what the real risk is from that as that "experiment" is just beginning so to speak. On Sat, Feb 15, 2020 at 10:31 AM Jonathan Berry wrote: > > To have any idea about how the number of infected and dead compare to > the lethality of this Virus we need to know two things. >

Re: [Vo]:More on the WuFlu conspiracy theory

2020-02-14 Thread Jonathan Berry
To have any idea about how the number of infected and dead compare to the lethality of this Virus we need to know two things. The mean time it takes someone to die from the virus after it is recognized they have it... And when most of those healthcare workers were first recognized to be infected.

Re: [Vo]:[OT] Vipervirus Truth?

2020-02-12 Thread Jonathan Berry
A very good video on the subject: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HrqRAtViUZw Warning, vaccines might make it worse! On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 3:17 PM Terry Blanton wrote: > > > > On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 7:19 PM Jonathan Berry wrote: > > > > https://halturnerradiosh

Re: [Vo]:[OT] Vipervirus Truth?

2020-02-11 Thread Jonathan Berry
less that 10 times worse than than a bad flu? That also makes 2% seem inconceivable. On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 11:27 AM Jonathan Berry wrote: > > https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/10933910/china-accused-major-coronavirus-cover-up-chilling-satellite-pics/ > > You can see the SO2 level

Re: [Vo]:[OT] Vipervirus Truth?

2020-02-11 Thread Jonathan Berry
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/10933910/china-accused-major-coronavirus-cover-up-chilling-satellite-pics/ You can see the SO2 levels in the map... Ok, let's consider, I just read that 1% of people in the US are hospitalized with the flu.

Re: [Vo]:[OT] Vipervirus Truth?

2020-02-11 Thread Jonathan Berry
so while downplaying the lethality of the virus is clearly a poor idea, it is an understandable one, but then it is easy to explain a higher rate of death in pockets by blaming different mutations of the virus some which were more lethal. On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 7:21 AM Jed Rothwell wrote: >

Re: [Vo]:[OT] Vipervirus Truth?

2020-02-10 Thread Jonathan Berry
well). Along with the lockdown and arrests... Welding building shut... If the Virus isn't higher than 2-3% fatality, then I think they are probably using it as an excuse to kill off some of their population under the guise of a virus. On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 12:12 PM Jonathan Berry wrote

Re: [Vo]:[OT] Vipervirus Truth?

2020-02-10 Thread Jonathan Berry
Further support for the potential that it's worse than we know... https://www.ccn.com/coronavirus-death-smog-is-china-burning-thousands-of-infected-bodies/ Data has suggested a massive amount of sulfur dioxide is being released into the air. Sulfur concentration is especially high around Wuhan

Re: [Vo]:[OT] Vipervirus Truth?

2020-02-09 Thread Jonathan Berry
If it's just a slightly worse flu, these would be bizarre over-reactions from a Government that was initially very laidback. At any rate I wrote this last night and am sending the almost still up to date figures now: Infected: 37,553 nowish 30,000 2 days ago 20,000 5 days ago Despite the

  1   2   >