Message -
From: James Bowery
To: vortex-l
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2014 1:40 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:BLP picks up another 11 M from investors
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 12:33 AM, Jojo Iznart jojoiznar...@gmail.com wrote:
I understand what you mean, but my system scales
The problem is their immersion in a social milieu that neutralizes their
ability to think.
***A very interesting and wise observation. Have you considered some sort
of crowdsourcing?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crowdsourcing
On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 2:56 PM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:BLP picks up another 11 M from investors
As far as I can see there is nothing _but_ dumb money out there. Let me
define what I mean:
I know of at least one technology that has, since 2009, been waiting on
nothing more than about $10M dollars to reduce civilization's
, 2014 12:25 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:BLP picks up another 11 M from investors
http://jimbowery.blogspot.com/2014/05/greenhouses-are-not-next-green.html
On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 9:22 PM, Jojo Iznart jojoiznar...@gmail.com wrote:
James, Please elaborate on this technology
*Sent:* Sunday, August 17, 2014 3:34 AM
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:BLP picks up another 11 M from investors
As far as I can see there is nothing _but_ dumb money out there. Let
me define what I mean:
I know of at least one technology that has, since 2009, been waiting on
nothing more than about
vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Sent:* Monday, August 18, 2014 12:25 AM
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:BLP picks up another 11 M from investors
http://jimbowery.blogspot.com/2014/05/greenhouses-are-not-next-green.html
On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 9:22 PM, Jojo Iznart jojoiznar...@gmail.com
wrote:
James, Please
On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 2:18 PM, Lennart Thornros lenn...@thornros.com
wrote:
James,
Thanks for the details of the bio project.
I think the ideas has been around for awhile
No it hasn't.
Algae cultivation has been a pipedream for a long time if that is what you
are talking about.
What has
On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 2:18 PM, Lennart Thornros lenn...@thornros.com
wrote:
Specific problems are that it is not a ten million dollar test to get
there. I think you talk billions.
Not for the algae cultivation system. Its $10M. Period. End of
discussion.
The $10M is for a production
On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 2:18 PM, Lennart Thornros lenn...@thornros.com
wrote:
supply. However, the investment is enormous measured by what any risk
taker can provide (try Bill Gates).
Oh good grief. Do you even know who you're talking to?
Not only do I have 2 separate routes through which
Yes, it has been a pipe dream. I think it still is because of reasons I
gave.
Best Regards ,
Lennart Thornros
www.StrategicLeadershipSac.com
lenn...@thornros.com
+1 916 436 1899
202 Granite Park Court, Lincoln CA 95648
“Productivity is never an accident. It is always the result of a commitment
You're confused.
The photobioreactor technology is not the same as the atoll technology.
The photobioreactor technology requires $10M.
There is no good excuse to have confused these two.
On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 3:45 PM, Lennart Thornros lenn...@thornros.com
wrote:
Yes, it has been a pipe
To be clear, the atoll technology requires a breakthrough in energy
production. Once that breakthrough occurs it will naturally incorporate
the Algasol PBR technology which does NOT require a breakthrough of any
kind -- indeed it is a technology, the lack of financing for which, indicts
the
OK we agree that the RD is done.
I think you can produce a system for ten million dollars.
Then you say you have letter of intent so I certainly do not see the
problem. It should be rather easy to get the funding.
I still believe it is hard to start this with baby steps and arrive at the
vision.
To take risk in one step, which I tried to show is required, you need a
very big investment. In addition such an investment is contrary to most
laws regulating business. Yes, there is rules for ships but they hardly
work for atolls. I mentioned Gate as an example of one of the few who has
personal
I just read the article you provided. In there the vision was the atolls.
If that just was there as a filler than I misunderstood the article, sorry
for that. Although I sink the sender is responsible for the message not the
reciever.
Best Regards ,
Lennart Thornros
The Alga6 photobioreactor from Algasol, LLC brings the cost per insolated
area below that for open ponds while yielding areal productivity at an
annualized rate exceeding 35g/m^2/day using natural algae strains in high
insolation *desert* areas
On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 4:01 PM, Lennart Thornros lenn...@thornros.com
wrote:
OK we agree that the RD is done.
I think you can produce a system for ten million dollars.
Then you say you have letter of intent so I certainly do not see the
problem. It should be rather easy to get the funding.
But are you related to Kevin Bacon?
On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 4:34 PM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 2:18 PM, Lennart Thornros lenn...@thornros.com
wrote:
supply. However, the investment is enormous measured by what any risk
taker can provide (try Bill
Yeah the failure of civilization _is_ a laughing matter, isn't it?
On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 4:28 PM, ChemE Stewart cheme...@gmail.com wrote:
But are you related to Kevin Bacon?
On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 4:34 PM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 2:18 PM, Lennart
I think you jump to conclusions about others without seeing there motives.
I understand there are brain dead investors. There are also very smart
dittos.
I suspect you are missing an important factor in your presentation.
Problems mostly emanate near ourselves. You know the old biblical talk
about
When I spoke of your mature advice, it was in the context of your
confusion. Your advice was confused -- not mature.
You are welcome to your suspicions.
I am speaking from ground truth.
There are lots of highly motivated very smart people with lots of money out
there. The problem isn't the
There are people losing the key while opening the front door but look for
it under the street lamp as it is brighter there.
James I have not accused you about not telling the truth. As all of us, the
truth is what we believe to be true. The hardest place to find flaws is
within oneself.
I know
It certainly is my fault that I have not put my disabled and dependent wife
in a nursing home, gone and kidnapped the Bill Gates' children, cut their
fingers off one at a time, sending them to him until he listens.
I have many such faults.
On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 5:19 PM, Lennart Thornros
:)
Best Regards ,
Lennart Thornros
www.StrategicLeadershipSac.com
lenn...@thornros.com
+1 916 436 1899
202 Granite Park Court, Lincoln CA 95648
“Productivity is never an accident. It is always the result of a commitment
to excellence, intelligent planning, and focused effort.” PJM
On Sun, Aug
doing a lousy job of looking for it. Please send links or info my way.
Jojo
- Original Message -
From: James Bowery
To: vortex-l
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2014 2:26 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:BLP picks up another 11 M from investors
1) Areal CAPEX is lower than open ponds
- Original Message -
*From:* James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com
*To:* vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Sent:* Monday, August 18, 2014 2:26 AM
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:BLP picks up another 11 M from investors
1) Areal CAPEX is lower than open ponds. Specific OPEX, including
energy, is well
@eskimo.com
*Sent:* Monday, August 18, 2014 2:26 AM
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:BLP picks up another 11 M from investors
1) Areal CAPEX is lower than open ponds. Specific OPEX, including
energy, is well below that required for competition with crude oil.
2) No. The initial installations compete with open
-
*From:* James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com
*To:* vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Sent:* Monday, August 18, 2014 2:26 AM
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:BLP picks up another 11 M from investors
1) Areal CAPEX is lower than open ponds. Specific OPEX, including
energy, is well below that required
, 2014 10:39 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:BLP picks up another 11 M from investors
Here's the presentation from the European Algae Biomass 2013
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/28447217/Algae%20Platform%2024-25%20april%202013-2.pdf
I defy you to find comparably detailed information about
existing wave pump might provide synergy.
Jojo
- Original Message -
From: James Bowery
To: vortex-l
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2014 10:39 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:BLP picks up another 11 M from investors
Here's the presentation from the European Algae Biomass 2013
https
will look at it later.
Jojo
- Original Message -
*From:* James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com
*To:* vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Sent:* Monday, August 18, 2014 10:39 AM
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:BLP picks up another 11 M from investors
Here's the presentation from the European Algae
On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 10:42 PM, Jojo Iznart jojoiznar...@gmail.com
wrote:
For instance, might it be possible to integrate the PBRs into my pump
floaters. This would significantly increase value and reduce CAPEX.
I believe you will find in the vortex-l archives my comment on precisely
the
On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 10:42 PM, Jojo Iznart jojoiznar...@gmail.com
wrote:
One specific question. On the slides, there is provision for C02
injection into the photobioreactor. What is the source of this CO2, just
atmospheric extraction or sea water extraction?
CO2 is presumed available
On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 10:16 PM, Jojo Iznart jojoiznar...@gmail.com
wrote:
No need to be snippy my friend,
You were the one who challenged the presentation of information as being
inadequate and since billions have been blown on algae cultivation
technologies and none of them is as
Subject: Re: [Vo]:BLP picks up another 11 M from investors
Wave technology scales with length, not area.
On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 10:16 PM, Jojo Iznart jojoiznar...@gmail.com wrote:
No need to be snippy my friend, I just want detailed information for an
initial go no go decision
the waves are so this technology would be incompatible with my needs.
Jojo
- Original Message -
From: James Bowery
To: vortex-l
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2014 12:54 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:BLP picks up another 11 M from investors
On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 10:16 PM, Jojo
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 12:33 AM, Jojo Iznart jojoiznar...@gmail.com
wrote:
I understand what you mean, but my system scales with area. It can
capture sea state and swell state energy, not just swell energy like some
wave systems.
So, if the PBRs require low sea state, I guess it won't be
On Thursday, August 14, 2014 6:43 PM, Jojo Iznart jojoiznar...@gmail.com
wrote:
Why would you assume that the investors would have done lousy due diligence?
I never assume lousy due diligence. But it is fair to wonder how much diligence
they did do.
It's indisputable that there is 'dumb
As far as I can see there is nothing _but_ dumb money out there. Let me
define what I mean:
I know of at least one technology that has, since 2009, been waiting on
nothing more than about $10M dollars to reduce civilization's ecological
footprint by at least a factor of 2 while increasing
Although I agree with your general premise that things do not add up with
BLP - a reasonable explanation for owning this facility - and it being on
the market now could be fairly mundane.
IIRC Mills bought a large aerospace facility maybe a decade ago, for pennies
on the dollar (probably it was
On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 4:35 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Although I agree with your general premise that things do not add up with
BLP - a reasonable explanation for owning this facility - and it being on
the market now could be fairly mundane.
Google maps shows this to be the
In reply to James Bowery's message of Sat, 16 Aug 2014 14:34:24 -0500:
Hi,
Indeed. Humans are very risk averse. They are willing to invest large sums in
things they are tried and true, even if the promised return is only low, but
very unwilling to invest in something completely new, even if the
Its worse than that. I've seen Exxon blow $600M on a competing technology
that had far less to offer under anything resembling due diligence. The US
government has blown billions on the Tokamak over a period of decades
despite the founders of the program denouncing it. Then there is the Space
Vortex James and mixent.
I think you are right in one regard. We are in a rent seeking society. Why?
The reason is that we have indoctrinated ourselves to rely on stats,
computers and academic wisdom. That is a problem my grand children's
children will have to deal with. Credit score is important
-
From: James Bowery
To: Analog Fan
Cc: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, August 17, 2014 3:34 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:BLP picks up another 11 M from investors
As far as I can see there is nothing _but_ dumb money out there. Let me
define what I mean:
I know of at least one technology
DGT and Rossi are honest in that they both have little or no idea of what
is going on in LENR. BLP has their science all worked out, and all that is
required is more money for engineering. I say that BLP has even less of a
feel for what they are doing than the rest of their competitors.
I all
From Axil
DGT and Rossi are honest in that they both have little or no idea
of what is going on in LENR. BLP has their science all worked out,
and all that is required is more money for engineering. I say that
BLP has even less of a feel for what they are doing than the rest
of their
with risks. Let's give BLP some
time
and credit shall we?
Jojo
From: Analog Fan analogit...@yahoo.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2014 8:08 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:BLP picks up another 11 M from investors
Raising another $11m is an impressive milestone for BLP
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 10:04 PM, Bob Cook frobertc...@hotmail.com wrote:
As you can tell from my questions and comments I have a hard time
understanding how an electron can become in effect heavier in an atom
because of its circulation around a point with no evidence about the
stability of
An electron becomes heavier when it is localized( bound ) by a defect in
the lattice like a hole or a bump. This is called Anderson localization.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anderson_localization
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 1:04 AM, Bob Cook frobertc...@hotmail.com wrote:
Eric--
What is the
as modifications to the intersection rate between our physical plane
and virtual particle passing thru that plane.
Fran
From: Bob Cook [mailto:frobertc...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2014 1:04 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:BLP picks up another 11 M from investors
that plane.
Fran
From: Bob Cook [mailto:frobertc...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2014 1:04 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:BLP picks up another 11 M from investors
Eric--
What is the frame of reference that the electron is relativistic in? Does
In reply to Eric Walker's message of Wed, 13 Aug 2014 20:16:43 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 3:05 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
However neither exist when an electron is freed from an atom, hence free
electrons have no spin, and thus spin is not an intrinsic property of the
In reply to Eric Walker's message of Wed, 13 Aug 2014 20:13:49 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 2:48 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
Why wouldn't the extra energy be lost again when the electron eventually
returns
to a higher orbital? (Since it would have to escape the strong force
Raising another $11m is an impressive milestone for BLP. But we've seen this
before - every few years BLP makes big claims, puts on a demo, does a press
release, raises money and then vanishes for a few years until more money is
needed. I do wonder how much due diligence these investors did?
with risks. Let's give BLP some time
and credit shall we?
Jojo
From: Analog Fan analogit...@yahoo.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2014 8:08 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:BLP picks up another 11 M from investors
Raising another $11m is an impressive milestone for BLP. But we've seen
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 1:42 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
A metal is an environment where lots of charged bodies are closely packed
together. I don't think an electron in such an environment can be truly
seen as
free. I.e. perhaps electrons in the conduction band actually migrate from
one
some
time
and credit shall we?
Jojo
From: Analog Fan analogit...@yahoo.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2014 8:08 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:BLP picks up another 11 M from investors
Raising another $11m is an impressive milestone for BLP. But we've seen
this before
Should have added this.
In the Naudts paper often quoted by Fran Roarty, the author shows that one
can make a good argument in favor of a deep fractional ground state: which
we can call f/H (the hydrino-state is trademarked) using only the standard
theory of relativistic quantum mechanics. Mills
Jones, Do you have a reference for Naudts' paper? It would be interesting
to get Yeong Kim's take on this. Some time ago, he published a paper
refuting the existence of any stable f/H state.
Eigenvectors, in a linear system, are a complete basis for
expansion/description of any driven solution
From: Bob Higgins
Do you have a reference for Naudts' paper?
http://arxiv.org/pdf/physics/0507193v2.pdf
It would be interesting to get Yeong Kim's take on this. Some time ago, he
published a paper refuting the existence of any stable f/H state.
It would also be interesting to get
From: Bob Higgins
However, my understanding (and my differential equations study is many years
old) is that with the addition of special relativity effects, the system is no
longer linear. Thus, the eigenstates can no longer be used as a complete
orthogonal basis for the general solution.
How does Mills know that what he is seeing in his experiments are
electrons. They might be muons that obit at very low orbitals.
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
*From:* Bob Higgins
However, my understanding (and my differential equations study is
Does this mean my aliens farting through a wormhole theory is off the
table?
On Wednesday, August 13, 2014, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
*From:* Bob Higgins
However, my understanding (and my differential equations study is many
years old) is that with the addition of special
Yes, I know about this, but this is only for the deep state, and also this
state seam to be attributed to the use of essentially the wave operator
that in part is included in klein gordon and mills theory. I have also seen
papers that have looked at what happens when the proton is model as
a non
*Of course, that same lack of QM expertise could be said about most of the
regular posters on this forum (myself for sure – but there could be a
lurker or two who is highly qualified, perhaps yourself) but the difference
is that we did not take in $120 million over the years, based on a series
of
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Wed, 13 Aug 2014 07:11:56 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
Should have added this.
In the Naudts paper often quoted by Fran Roarty, the author shows that one
can make a good argument in favor of a deep fractional ground state: which
we can call f/H (the hydrino-state is
Where does the spin of the electron come from?
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 5:13 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Wed, 13 Aug 2014 07:11:56 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
Should have added this.
In the Naudts paper often quoted by Fran Roarty, the author shows that one
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Wed, 13 Aug 2014 11:02:22 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
However, this deep orbital is only a few Fermi in distance from the nucleus.
The electron is relativistic and heavy when it gets there. Coincidentally, the
strong force it is 137 times stronger than
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Wed, 13 Aug 2014 17:35:46 -0400:
Hi,
Where does the spin of the electron come from?
Two different forms of angular momentum. Think of an elliptical orbital. The
motion of the electron around the perimeter represents the spin, (s quantum
number), rotary motion
That's a pretty good theory, Jones. It upholds many aspects of
Occham's Razor. No ZPE, not too much of Mills where he goes off into
the weeds, coincidental dark matter 3.7keV gain.
Now, if we align up these electrons in such a way that they interact
with others like themselves in a 1D chain,
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 6:05 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
However neither exist when an electron is freed from an atom, hence free
electrons have no spin, and thus spin is not an intrinsic property of the
electron.
Further, if the orbital electron gives up all spin momentum, it might not
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 2:48 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
Why wouldn't the extra energy be lost again when the electron eventually
returns
to a higher orbital? (Since it would have to escape the strong force
again.)
Electrons don't feel the strong force. (Although are affected by Coulomb
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 3:48 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
Further, if the orbital electron gives up all spin momentum, it might not
be freed but cease to exist entirely!
Then we have a charge conservation problem on our hands.
Eric
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 3:05 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
However neither exist when an electron is freed from an atom, hence free
electrons have no spin, and thus spin is not an intrinsic property of the
electron. Prove me wrong! (please!) ;)
If we say that the s quantum number (aka
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 7:11 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
BTW – it has been mentioned here before, that one way to overcome some of
the objections to f/H is to view the reduced ground state as transitory,
with a short but nontrivial lifetime, and with inherent asymmetry between
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
However, this deep [f/H] orbital is only a few Fermi in distance from the
nucleus. The electron is relativistic and heavy when it gets there.
It's interesting to note that the nuclear radius is not all that special
with
Eric--
What is the frame of reference that the electron is relativistic in? Does such
a hypothesis consider that the rotation of the pertinent frame of reference is
nill. What would be the effect of a spinning frame circulating in the same
direction as the electron’s circulation? Would
I do not know whether they are fraudulent because I'm not a police
detective and I do not have the power of subpoena. They seem suspicious. I
would not do business with them.
***Isn't that a bit sideways, considering that you DID do business with
them and they went out of their way not to pay you?
Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.com wrote:
I do not know whether they are fraudulent because I'm not a police
detective and I do not have the power of subpoena. They seem suspicious. I
would not do business with them.
***Isn't that a bit sideways, considering that you DID do business with
There are bad mistakes or possibly wrong interpretation. But, I already
summarized, people did not seem to care.
2014-08-12 11:10 GMT-03:00 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com:
Assuming Gamberale's report is accurate, I would say that rises to the
level of criminal fraud. I assume it is
-
From: Daniel Rocha
To: John Milstone
Sent: Saturday, August 09, 2014 11:38 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:BLP picks up another 11 M from investors
I don't have anything to ask. When I wrote I don't make heads or tails of
their theory, it's not because I cannot understand because it is too hard or I
Jojo Iznart jojoiznar...@gmail.com wrote:
Why is it that a company like BLP, with a published theory . . . a
permanent headquarters and a published schedule and timeline - gets kicked
around like frauds
Anyone can have a theory. A theory plus $23.25 will get you 36 Hershey Bars
at
From Daniel,
Their theory doesn't make sense, not even as a classical approximation.
I cannot make heads or tails of anything there. For example, any wave
function, time independent, must be a standing wave. If it is a
fraction, and you want to enforce this, it will be a sum of many
I don't have anything to ask. When I wrote I don't make heads or tails of
their theory, it's not because I cannot understand because it is too hard
or I missing something in the mumbo jumbo. In fact, what I mean is an
euphemism for their theory being not even wrong. What they do is worse than
WL
Auburn University BLP Replication:
http://beforeitsnews.com/energy/2014/08/blacklight-power-gets-2-more-validations-more-information-2454992.html
Follow the links from the first sentence of the article.
--On Saturday, August 09, 2014 12:38 PM -0300 Daniel Rocha
danieldi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 9, 2014 at 8:09 AM, Orionworks - Steven Vincent Johnson
orionwo...@charter.net wrote:
... I get really tired hearing about all the mathematical and/or
experimental evidence complaints coming out of Vortex-L about what someone
perceives as a critical and/or fatal flaw concerning
Their theory doesn't make sense, not even as a classical approximation. I
cannot make heads or tails of anything there. For example, any wave
function, time independent, must be a standing wave. If it is a fraction,
and
you want to enforce this, it will be a sum of many waves, possibly
I would say that BLP does at least one thing right.
Even if the whole estabished society of physisists are opposing LENR and
the government is following their lead, there is investment money available.
In other words take a better theory and a better demo an money is no longer
an issue.
I hope he
From Daniel
I am really impressed. He didn't even try to run a half assed demo!
He just made some tack tack. And it was so crude that the electrodes
were very oxidized in just a few seconds.
Many prototypes are the result of scrounging around for whatever you can get
your hands on
The difference it is that as long as the transistor worked, no matter how
short the time, it could work at least as a proof of concept.
That thing BLP showed should work for a few hours to show that there is
extra heat. Getting peaks from UV to short X-Rays, and even some nuclear
reactions, is
BLP demonstrates the value of having a long standing theory to back its
research. Something is better than nothing.
On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 5:38 PM, Lennart Thornros lenn...@thornros.com
wrote:
I would say that BLP does at least one thing right.
Even if the whole estabished society of
Their theory doesn't make sense, not even as a classical approximation. I
cannot make heads or tails of anything there. For example, any wave
function, time independent, must be a standing wave. If it is a fraction,
and you want to enforce this, it will be a sum of many waves, possibly
infinite.
From: Orionworks - Steven Vincent Johnson
* Randy posted the following statement:
On July 31, 2014, BlackLight Power closed
on $11 M in private equity financing that was oversubscribed by $1 M.
Yup, pretty clear that the last
Jones sez:
...
RIP. SunCell. we hardly knew ya'
Don't divide the bear before it's been kilt. ;-)
Regards,
Steven Vincent Johnson
svjart.orionworks.com
zazzle.com/orionworks
I am really impressed. He didn't even try to run a half assed demo! He just
made some tack tack. And it was so crude that the electrodes were very
oxidized in just a few seconds.
--
Daniel Rocha - RJ
danieldi...@gmail.com
96 matches
Mail list logo
