I like Huw Price's boldness in egging on the nay-sayers:
And I want to sound a note of caution for anyone who still feels confident
> that they can continue to ignore the field. If LENR is on the verge of a
> comeback, the reputation trap will turn inside out very, very quickly. No
> one wants to
If you believe slide 13 of the AP report, there was very little Zn in the fuel
to start with and even less after reaction. Ni amounted to 60 weight % to
start and Zn was reported to be .0135 %. There was not much Zn-64 in any case.
Bob Cook
From: Bob Higgins
Sent: Friday, March 25, 2016
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 9:14 PM, Bob Higgins
wrote:
> HOWEVER, if the Zn were present, you would also see peaks for stable 66Zn
> and 68Zn for which there would be no corresponding peaks of Ni. The amount
> of total Zn would be inferred from the amounts of the 66Zn
This is an interesting prospect. 64Ni and 64Zn are not separable by even
high resolution ICP-MS. HR-ICP-MS can have resolving powers up to about
10k, but separating 64Ni and 64Zn would require a resolving power of about
55k. It is also relatively difficult to separate Ni and Zn chemically.
Eric - Yes, this is situation is very puzzling, especially that it went
un-noticed in Russia.
One detail worth adding into the mix is that zinc is a Mills catalyst, and
one of the few with a lowest value (27.2 eV) Rydberg fit... meaning that it
is more accessible at low temperatures than nickel
> On Mar 25, 2016, at 8:33, "Jones Beene" wrote:
>
> However ... it should be noted that there is one other possibility to
> consider. Zinc-64 is the most common isotope of zinc, and it is slightly
> radioactive !
I like this suggestion a lot. As 64Zn comprises nearly half
Daniel Rocha wrote:
Jed, I don't see any sense in what you write. Alright, it has a US address.
> So what?
>
I am saying I do not know where this company is located. There is no
indication on the web site. No phone number or address at all. A Whois
inquiry for ecat.tech
Jed, I don't see any sense in what you write. Alright, it has a US address.
So what?
***
BTW, right now, I don't take Rossi or any of these guys saying they are
ready to release seriously. I think, deep down, I never had taken. It feels
like reading an online RPG being played.
Daniel Rocha wrote:
Last time I checked, USA jurisdiction did not encompass the whole world, at
> least officially, haha!
>
There is no indication where this company Ecat.tech is located. Except for
Roger Green's address. He has one in Australia and one in the U.S. So it
Last time I checked, USA jurisdiction did not encompass the whole world, at
least officially, haha!
Rossi is the man in the lead?
Unless Mills is lying, he is miles ahead of Rossi. If this is the case,
then all Mills has to do is walk up and claim his Nobel prize.
Craig
On 03/25/2016 09:40 AM, Ron Kita wrote:
Nice presentation..I almost missed it:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/03/mar-25-2016-difficult-delayed-dawning.html
actuallu it is also a discussion about friendly mythocide in LENR classic
and quite interesting Info
Things are moving a bit chaotically but this is it!
peter
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2016-03/caos-crd032416.php
This essay "Is the cold fusion egg about to hatch?" is worth a look too
https://aeon.co/opinions/is-the-cold-fusion-egg-about-to-hatch
The reason this thread was started was to try to explain Parkhomov's data of
4+% enrichment of 64Ni, which was depleted during the run, and consequently
- this isotope is the most likely candidate to provide the excess energy
which he sees.
The precise situation is that an element of 64 amu was
RKE = half the angular inertia times angular displacement / time, or half
MoI times freq^2.
MoI of a solid mass is simple, so we can easily and accurately derive the
samples' RKE as a function of acceleration / time (many smartphones have
60Hz or higher camera speeds and a laser tacho will thus
Fantastic demo, again...
However i feel the analogy of a ball trapped under a running tap seems to
adequately explain the situation - the relative angular velocities are high
enough that the angular direction is incidental to the fact that it's
simply a fast alternating field (the same principle
In trying to find out what the phenomenon is called – the one that Hamdi refers
to – the concept of “hysteresis drag” comes up - and the concept of a
“hysteresis drag cup output device” came up in a patent.
https://www.google.com/patents/US4885489
This would be relevant if the magnetic
Nice presentation..I almost missed it:
http://newenergytreasure.com/2016/03/18/race-to-commercialize-cold-fusion-is-afoot/
Ron Kita, Chiralex
Apperently an direct interaction causing counterwise rotation which not consume
energy conflict with COE. This is similar to a case of a motorcyle accelerate
on a freely rotating circular track causing the track rotate backward due to
Newton's 3rd law. Even the motorcyle does not accelerates
20 matches
Mail list logo