Re: [Vo]:Have Cavitation Energy Systems stumbled on a novelformofLENR?

You are right about the testing, particularly the state of the steam that is generated and we hope that should be rectified soon. There are a couple of indications that strongly suggest that the steam is pretty dry.  If you look at stills from the slow motion system, when the steam initially

Re: [Vo]:Fuel injectors, cavitation, and efficiency

It is certainly recognised that cavitation is an important factor when injecting diesel into the engine and the injectors are designed with this in mind.  The normal assumption is that it helps air/fuel mixing but there may well be more to it than that. I think the arguments that there are

RE: [Vo]:This work could be supportive of Holmlid

Nigel— You mentioned the effect of salt in the cavitation tests. Could you identify the source. Bob Cook From: JonesBeene Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2017 7:31 AM To: Vortex List Subject: [Vo]:This work could be supportive of Holmlid

[Vo]:Re: ordered a nickel plating rod

Nickel plating with vinegar solution. Applies a black coating. Who knows what that is. Maybe black nickel is good for cold fusion. Trying salt next. Frank

RE: [Vo]:Have Cavitation Energy Systems stumbled on a novel form ofLENR?

Brian- I do not know of the Mayer person you mention? I guess he could be part of the hot fusion bunch, however—lots of scam artists there. Bob Cook Sent from Mail for Windows 10 From: Che Sent: Tuesday,

RE: [Vo]:This work could be supportive of Holmlid

From: bobcook39...@hotmail.com You mentioned the effect of salt in the cavitation tests. Could you identify the source. -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VUH5WuUmJ2k=youtu.be=158 It looks like two threads are conflated. The salt test could support Holmlid however, if

RE: [Vo]:Have Cavitation Energy Systems stumbled on a novel form of LENR?

Nigel— I read your paper twice and have the following comments: 1. As Jones points out, hiding .511Mev EM radiation from electron/positron reactions is not likely IMHO. Therefore I doubt it occurs during CES. 2. The model which includes high kinetic energy products is also hard to

RE: [Vo]:Have Cavitation Energy Systems stumbled on a novel form of LENR?

Sent from Mail for Windows 10 From: Axil Axil Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2017 4:50 PM To: vortex-l Subject: Re: [Vo]:Have Cavitation Energy Systems stumbled on a novel form of LENR? The

Re: [Vo]:Have Cavitation Energy Systems stumbled on a novel form of LENR?

Bob Thanks for your thoughts.   I must admit that a mechanism based on coherence has long been a favoured hypothesis of mine.  It is not a complete coincidence that the company I have formed as a vehicle for this is called 'Coherent Water Systems'.  I have known John Swain for many years,

[Vo]:Re: ordered a nickel plating rod

A salt solution is better. It forms a metallic plating with a nickel anode. It is bit to matte side but it is OK. Frank

RE: [Vo]:Have Cavitation Energy Systems stumbled on a novel form ofLENR?

Unfortunately this leaves you blind to scams by experts Rossi, Papp, Mills and Mayer. I'm not sure that Papp and Meyer were complete scams. Papp in particular, seemed to have something. The Feynman incident suggests to me that there was something real about his claims. Beyond that, I've

Re: [Vo]:Have Cavitation Energy Systems stumbled on a novel form ofLENR?

Bob I imagine that would be Stanley Meyer. or was that a comment on the misspelling? Nigel On 29/09/2017 17:13, bobcook39...@hotmail.com wrote: Brian- I do not know of the Mayer person you mention? I guess he could be part of the hot fusion bunch, however—lots of scam artists there.

Re: [Vo]:Have Cavitation Energy Systems stumbled on a novel form ofLENR?

Thank you for introducing me to Boscovich.  I had not encountered him before, but clearly should have. Nigel On 29/09/2017 21:23, ROGER ANDERTON wrote: from my studies of physics history, what "they" (educators of physics) do is dumb down the history when teach to physics students; so "they"

Re: [Vo]:Have Cavitation Energy Systems stumbled on a novel form ofLENR?

For a 100 year history of LENR including Moray and Papp, see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C_0mMpfrsf8 On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 2:00 PM, Chris Zell wrote: > > > Unfortunately this leaves you blind to scams by experts Rossi, Papp, Mills > and Mayer. > > I’m not sure that

Re: [Vo]:Have Cavitation Energy Systems stumbled on a novel form ofLENR?

missed out unified field theory presented in 1758 >From Boscovich's theory to modern quantum theory: Prof Dragoslav Stoiljkovic | | | | || | | | || >From Boscovich's theory to modern quantum theory: Prof Dragoslav Stoilj... "From Boscovich's theory to modern

Re: [Vo]:This work could be supportive of Holmlid

In My new thread: "Is Science finally barking up the LENR tree?" Gold nanoparticles behave just like Holmlid's Ultra dense hydrogen. It is possible that any metallic nanoparticle can produce the same results that Holmlid's is seeing in UDH. In other works, all metallic nanoparticles might behave

Re: [Vo]:Have Cavitation Energy Systems stumbled on a novel form of LENR?

In reply to bobcook39...@hotmail.com's message of Fri, 29 Sep 2017 14:53:03 +: Hi, [snip] >Nigel— > >I read your paper twice and have the following comments: > > > 1. As Jones points out, hiding .511Mev EM radiation from electron/positron > reactions is not likely IMHO. Therefore I doubt

Re: [Vo]:Have Cavitation Energy Systems stumbled on a novel form of LENR?

In this new post: "Is Science finally barking up the LENR tree?", gold nanoparticles behave just like Holmlid's Ultra dense hydrogen. See https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/thread/5377-is-science-finally-barking-up-the-lenr-tree/?postID=71698#post71698 It is possible that any metallic

Re: [Vo]:Have Cavitation Energy Systems stumbled on a novel form ofLENR?

from my studies of physics history, what "they" (educators of physics) do is dumb down the history when teach to physics students; so "they" miss out teaching that unified field theory presented in 1758 by Boscovich, because not part of the curriculum that are told to teach so miss it out;

RE: [Vo]:Have Cavitation Energy Systems stumbled on a novel form ofLENR?

Nigel— I assumed Mayer was the correct name of an “expert” scam person Ahern identified. I also thought about the possibility of a “conspiracy” among the hot fusion family. not unlike the nuclear family in Japan responsible for the crummy reactor designs and large financial rewards,

RE: [Vo]:Have Cavitation Energy Systems stumbled on a novelformofLENR?

From: bobcook39...@hotmail.com Jones- I though the miracle was wine-to-pee not wine-to-water. Bob, LOL, I just performed that miracle and plan to repeat it several more times today… TGIF

Re: [Vo]:Have Cavitation Energy Systems stumbled on a novel form ofLENR?

Hi Nigel Thanks. Physics education has been dumbed down and there now needs to be a revolution in Science/Physics to get things back on track. My latest talk at: Boscovich Unified field theory and Atomism given by Roger Anderton 28 aug 2017 | | | | || | | | ||

RE: [Vo]:Have Cavitation Energy Systems stumbled on a novel formofLENR?

Jones- I though the miracle was wine-to-pee not wine-to-water. Bob Sent from Mail for Windows 10 From: JonesBeene Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2017 7:54 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject:

RE: [Vo]:Have Cavitation Energy Systems stumbled on a novel form ofLENR?

Chris Zell wrote: Papp in particular, seemed to have something.  The Feynman incident suggests to me that there was something real about his claims. It is frustrating to me why intelligent observers continue to think that the Feynman incident (tragedy) points to something real in alternative