interesting vision.
basic income is a liberal version of the basic public interest services :
basic education, transport, food, culture...
it can be criticized because nothing prevent you to use basic income to
gamble on horses or drink, instead of educating your kids or building your
just a link
http://davecline.posterous.com/the-implications-of-free-energy
some good ideas
2011/12/14 Zell, Chris chrisz...@wetmtv.com
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.netwrote:
http://www.heise.de/tp/**artikel/35/35803/1.htmlhttp://www.heise.de/tp/artikel/35/35803/1.html
English translation
http://translate.google.com/**translate?sl=detl=enjs=n**
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 5:50 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
The other tests cannot be faked as far as I know. No skeptic has come up
with a plausible method. After all this time, I do not think any skeptic
will come up with anything. At least, not with anything that can be
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 12:18 AM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
This experiment supports my contention that entanglement, a key mechanism
in the cold fusion process, can be broadcast from one entangled ensemble
to induce entanglement in another ensemble even at high temperatures.
My dear friends, please read:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com/2011/12/my-cold-fusion-history-iii.html
This is a very personal (I apologize!) and absolutely sincere writing.
In the previous part:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com/2011/05/my-cold-fusion-history-ii.html
the most tragic one, I
Axil Axil wrote:
I think I can safely say no one understands quantum mechanics, the
late physicist Richard Feynman once famously explained.
Does anyone know if and how entanglement effects are explained in
stochastic electrodynamics?
--
Berke Durak
Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.net wrote:
The other tests cannot be faked as far as I know. No skeptic has come up
with a plausible method.
Jed, your memory must be even worse than mine.
I mean it. Take your analysis here:
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/Rossi6Oct2011Review.pdf
Alain Sepeda alain.sep...@gmail.com wrote:
just a link
http://davecline.posterous.com/the-implications-of-free-energy
some good ideas
I disagree with one of the author's main points, which is:
Although it might seem that way on first ponder, unfortunately free energy
would fail to release
If they are going to allow visits, they should start by inviting Stremmenos.
- Jed
Jed,
You should read the report you cite again. He doesn't ignore that the reactor
remained at boiling temperatures for four hours. He takes it head-on. Go
straight to pages 8 and 9.
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 09:31:17 -0500
Subject: Re: [Vo]:E-cat article by Haiko Leitz
From:
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 8:31 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
You ignore the central fact about this test which is that the reactor
remained at boiling temperatures for four hours with no input power.
Big deal. It weighs 100 kg. Ten kg is enough to stay at boiling for 40
hours,
Robert Leguillon robert.leguil...@hotmail.com wrote:
You should read the report you cite again. He doesn't ignore that the
reactor remained at boiling temperatures for four hours. He takes it
head-on. Go straight to pages 8 and 9.
I saw that. That is an attempt to explain the Tout
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 9:21 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
1. Stored energy can only cause the temperature to decline monotonically,
very rapidly at first (Newton's law of cooling). Yet this heat increased
during the event.
Not true. If the inside is hotter than the outside,
Found this:
http://au.ibtimes.com/articles/267375/20111215/cold-fusion-impact-rossi-s-e-cat.htm
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
The fact that it remained hot is all the proof you need.
I don't get it. If there was no nuclear reaction and all of the energy came
from thermal storage, then in deed the device will stay hot for a long time.
However if all the heat came from a nuclear reaction, I'd expect it to cool
down
On Dec 15, 2011, at 5:31 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.net wrote:
The other tests cannot be faked as far as I know. No skeptic has
come up with a plausible method.
Jed, your memory must be even worse than mine.
I mean it. Take your analysis here:
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 6:55 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
If they are going to allow visits, they should start by
inviting Stremmenos.
LOL!
Meanwhile, Rossi continues to enrich the English language. His latest
contribution is cinfudential. I assume it has something to do with Elmer
Fudd but I am not sure what.
Andrea Rossi
December 14th, 2011 at 6:02 PM
Dear Paolo Accomazzi:
I will publish the theory when I will have the
Dear Mary,
it is not elegant to pick such minor things.Do not forget what has told
Buffon about Style.
The letters u, i and o are adjacent on QWERTY
so this is a natural typo. I do similar things when in hurry, my cataract
is of great help.
Please focus on the essentials.
Peter
On Thu, Dec 15,
Andrea Rossi
December 15th, 2011 at 2:46 AM
Dear Aussie Guy:
To make 1 thermal MWh/h of energy you will need 160 kWh/h (thermal or
electric). This system will yield 300-330 kWh/h of electric energy. This,
with the best available conversion system we got so far. In sustained
mode this can be
Obviously, you just buy three 1MW reactors, and feed the output of the first to
the inputs of the other two. Voila! COP=4
Simply buy 15 E-Cats, feed 1 into 2, into 4, into 8 and you'll have a COP of
16.
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 09:39:17 -0800
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
From: a...@well.com
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 9:39 AM, Alan J Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
I haven't run the numbers, but that seems marginally economical to me. Of
course, you still get COP 4 of (lower grade) heat out of it, so as a mixed
system it may be OK.
**
** (lenr.qumbu.com -- analyzing the
Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.net wrote:
Your choice of my paper as an example is diversionary because (1) it only
deals with one test . . .
I have dealt with the other tests, separately, as have others. Some of them
are also definitive. The last one was not!
and (2) it assumes a
A couple of articles on my daily scan :
A Crowd Funding Approach to E-Cat
Testing
http://www.e-catworld.com/2011/12/1499/
...
One idea that has been brought up on this site recently that might serve
to break the deadlock is that interested people might purchase a 1 MW
plant through a
Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote:
Meanwhile, Rossi continues to enrich the English language. His latest
contribution is cinfudential.
It is a typo for crying out loud. Don't be such a pill. Rossi's English is
probably better than your Italian, so do not criticize.
As Peter said, this is
Or, if Rossi's claims of taming the wild cat really have merit, it's much more
simple.
If it needs 160 kw electrical input, feed 160 kw of the 300-330 output, and
have a 140 to 170 kW generator with no electrical input. COP = infinity. And a
TRUE self-sustaining device exists.
From:
This is unbearably cute.
Baby Seal Enters House, Sleeps On Couch (PHOTOS)
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/12/14/baby-seal-house-couch_n_1146980.html
- Jed
Spending a million bucks for this is crazy. The machine will be obsolete in
six months. Unless you have a need for 1 MW of heat, it will be useless.
If you have $1 million burning a hole in your pocket, give it to me that I
will have this thing replicated in no time. People such as Miley could
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 10:08 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.comwrote:
Spending a million bucks for this is crazy. The machine will be obsolete
in six months. Unless you have a need for 1 MW of heat, it will be useless.
If you have $1 million burning a hole in your pocket, give it to me
Am 14.12.2011 21:05, schrieb Mary Yugo:
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 11:38 AM, Charly Sistovaris
charlysi...@gmail.comwrote:
That's in Athens, not Xanthi which is a town in the North.
You often bring up good arguments, but the bickering is a tiresome.
I simply copied the information given by
I'd be dead without spell checker.
I suspect I'm not alone on that.
I wonder if MY is taking lessons from Mr. Krivit.
Regards
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com
www.zazzle.com/orionworks
On 2011-12-15 19:08, Jed Rothwell wrote:
If you have $1 million burning a hole in your pocket, give it to me that
I will have this thing replicated in no time. People such as Miley could
replicate most of it in a short time if they had ~$50,000 in funding. Or
$5,000.
Would he really be able
It was joke-- pls. lighten up!
Am 15.12.2011 19:12, schrieb Peter Heckert:
Am 14.12.2011 21:05, schrieb Mary Yugo:
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 11:38 AM, Charly Sistovaris
charlysi...@gmail.comwrote:
That's in Athens, not Xanthi which is a town in the North.
You often bring up good arguments, but the bickering is a tiresome.
I
Stored heat can only emerge. It cannot stay hot. It has cool monotonically,
according to Newton's law:
You're burning the last point I held for Rossi (which was that I wondered
whether scientists could be fooled so easily - apparently they can). Newton's
law would not be violated, of course.
On Dec 15, 2011, at 6:21 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Robert Leguillon robert.leguil...@hotmail.com wrote:
You should read the report you cite again. He doesn't ignore that
the reactor remained at boiling temperatures for four hours. He
takes it head-on. Go straight to pages 8 and 9.
I
At 10:14 AM 12/15/2011, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
Would he really be able to replicate sustained kW-level excess heat
(of course, with watt-level input) with just $50,000 in funding or
so? Serious question.
Without the secret Magic Unicorn dust? Probably not.
At 10:32 AM 12/15/2011, Peter Heckert wrote:
The mechanism is constructed in such a way that any hard x-rays
so far, so good ...
or external gamma measurements are detected and it will trigger.
How can you detect an EXTERNAL gamma measurement?
Or do you mean that an attempt to probe the
Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote:
I can't believe that Miley can't get $5K or even $100K of funds a year.
That's chump change for any large company.
Well, he and I have been beating the bushes trying to get funding. Nothing
yet. If you know a company with that kind of chump change, please
Am 15.12.2011 19:50, schrieb Alan J Fletcher:
At 10:32 AM 12/15/2011, Peter Heckert wrote:
The mechanism is constructed in such a way that any hard x-rays
so far, so good ...
or external gamma measurements are detected and it will trigger.
How can you detect an EXTERNAL gamma measurement?
I think DKG will have a Hyperion for a demo very soon. Take a few
barrels of water, a watch, thermometer and run it with power going
through a 3A fuse.
Heat a barrel of water in an hour, or a whole pool in a couple of days.
If DKG does it right, they'll have a number of scientists and
reporters on
At 10:45 AM 12/15/2011, Horace Heffner wrote:
Just to be clear, no one is talking about
heating the outside box metal envelope. My
focus is entirely the inside box, the 30 cm x 30
cm x 30 cm inside box, the insides of which no
one has seen. It is easy to place a thermal
mass inside this
Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.net wrote:
3. The data shows that the reactor cools in ~40 min. when the power is
cut. That is the actual, measured limit of stored heat with this system, at
these temperatures and inputs.
That is merely a measure of the stored heat and thermal
A pretty counter-intuitive phenomenon.
So were super-conductivity and lasing.
I believe both emission and absorption of radiation can be strongly
enhanced in a volume of entangled (coherent) particles - even when it's
spatial extent is greater than the radiation wave-length.
See:
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 11:08 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.comwrote:
As for the rest of your comments . . . I am not the only one who disagrees
with you. So do all of the knowledgeable people I asked to review your
paper. I suggest you ask one of them for a critique.
Does he know who
Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote:
Does he know who these knowledgeable people are? Do we?
Cold fusion researchers who know a lot about calorimetry. The usual
suspects.
Horace is well acquainted with them, and generally held in high regard, I
believe.
- Jed
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.comwrote:
Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote:
Does he know who these knowledgeable people are? Do we?
Cold fusion researchers who know a lot about calorimetry. The usual
suspects.
Horace is well acquainted with them, and
On Dec 15, 2011, at 8:49 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.net wrote:
Your choice of my paper as an example is diversionary because (1)
it only deals with one test . . .
I have dealt with the other tests, separately, as have others. Some
of them are also
Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote:
So these people support your views about the impossibility of storing
enough heat during the warmup period in the large Ottoman E-cat of
October 6 to account for the results?
It would be more correct to say I support their views, or we arrived at the
In his Dec 01 (?) What's New, Bob Park
speaks in his usual style about cold fusion
see- LET ME COUNT THE WAYS: PSEUDOSCIENCE
IS AN ENORMOUS FIELD
CF is on the first place!
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
I have bowed out of this discussion, but let me clarify this point:
Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.net wrote:
Oh come now. I have dealt with fraud by pointing that Yugo's claims of
stage magic is not falsifiable.
Uhhh how does that differ from just ignoring it?
It is a problem
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 12:10 PM, Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com wrote:
In his Dec 01 (?) What's New, Bob Park
speaks in his usual style about cold fusion
see- LET ME COUNT THE WAYS: PSEUDOSCIENCE
IS AN ENORMOUS FIELD
CF is on the first place!
You must be on his mailing list. The
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.comwrote:
It is a problem of logic, as I explained to Yugo. An assertion that cannot
be tested or falsified cannot be debated. I cannot dispute it. Or agree
with it, for that matter. It is meaningless.
You keep saying that but
no link yet, sorry but this is the relevant text:
3. LET ME COUNT THE WAYS: PSEUDOSCIENCE IS AN ENORMOUS FIELD
There are, I think, many more of them than there are of us. Let me mention
just a few of the more notorious: Stanley Pons and Martin Fleishman, who
gave us Cold Fusion in 1989, are the
At 11:08 AM 12/15/2011, Alan J Fletcher wrote:
I need to add phase-change salts
(and possibly even ceramic bricks) to my fakes paper. Can you give me /
point me to a likely candidate?
http://www.seas.upenn.edu/~meam502/project/reviewexample2.pdf
(2007)
Very few with a melting-point above 100C
Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote:
It is a problem of logic, as I explained to Yugo. An assertion that cannot
be tested or falsified cannot be debated. I cannot dispute it. Or agree
with it, for that matter. It is meaningless.
You keep saying that but other people and I keep pointing out
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 12:42 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.comwrote:
I am talking about YOUR STATEMENT, taken in isolation, strictly from a
logical point of view. I am NOT TALKING ABOUT what Rossi can or cannot do.
Apart from everything else, why on earth would you want to do that?
Thanks for posting the actual paragraph, Peter.
3. LET ME COUNT THE WAYS: PSEUDOSCIENCE IS AN ENORMOUS FIELD
There are, I think, many more of them than there are of us. Let me mention
just a few of the more notorious: Stanley Pons and Martin Fleishman, who
gave us Cold Fusion in 1989, are
Does anyone know if and how entanglement effects are explained in
stochastic electrodynamics?
--
See:
Second entanglement and (re)Born wave functions in Stochastic
Electrodynamics
http://nonloco-physics.0catch.com/aip05.pdf
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 9:06 AM, Berke Durak berke.du...@gmail.com
Hi,
my thesis is that matter sucks up energy and this is the reason for gravity.
I dont know in which frequency range this happens, but I think matter
sucks up zeropoint energy and converts it to matter.
There was a similar theory that was discussed by Clerk Maxwell and
Boltzmann and others.
On 11-12-15 03:52 PM, Mary Yugo wrote:
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 12:42 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
mailto:jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
I am talking about YOUR STATEMENT, taken in isolation, strictly
from a logical point of view. I am NOT TALKING ABOUT what Rossi
can
The whole thing is related to pseudoscience and ignorance, and it's all
relevant. Here it is:
1. HACKS: SHODDY PRESS COVERAGE OF SCIENCE.
The Leveson Inquiry into the standards and ethics of the UK press, headed
by Lord Justice Brian Leveson, was prompted by the News of the World phone-
hacking
OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson svj.orionwo...@gmail.com wrote:
Does anyone seriously question the possibility that Park
remains unaware of Rossi, Defkalion, and the rest of the eCat gang?
Seriously?
It hasn't been in the mass media much. I don't anyone who has discussed
this with Park . . .
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Most confirmed skeptics refuse to read anything.
It's not refusal. It's that they are not interested. Most skeptics are
satisfied that if the grandiose claims were real, simple and obvious
demonstrations would not only
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 1:47 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
If he attacks cold fusion I do not think he would hold back from attacking
Rossi. Everyone I know thinks they are the same phenomenon.
Guess you don't know me! I think there might possibly be something to cold
Stephen A. Lawrence sa...@pobox.com wrote:
The problem with Jed's point is that it's vulnerable to a reductio ad
absurdum. Specifically, it leads to a rather obvious logical conclusion,
which goes something like this: If you can't think of a specific way this
scientist's work could have
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 11:49 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.comwrote:
Oh come now. I have dealt with fraud by pointing that Yugo's claims of
stage magic is not falsifiable.
I don't know who you think is convinced by that. Of course it's
falsifiable. Just run the experiment long enough
Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote:
Mary Yugo also says she has read no papers.
No longer the case. I slogged through a couple, was not impressed by
their clarity and robustness and stopped reading them.
If you find McKubre, Miles or Storms difficult to read then you are not
very good at
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 1:08 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
The power between 150 and 250 shown in the cooling loop is more or less
stable, meaning the thing has reached the terminal temperature. It has
achieved a balance between input and output.
It's stable because it's
by the way the COP=6 is first conservative, but the need is not of
electricity but of heat...
of course today he use electricity because it is easy to control. in fact
it seems that hyperion, and maybe soon e-cat will self sustain quite long.
also as said here, if you can produce electricity,
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 12:45 PM, Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.netwrote:
Rossi's tests and explanations are full of holes and self contradictions,
impossibilities. It is Rossi's tests and explanations that matter. All
the blather from the peanut gallery is irrelevant, except possibly
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 1:08 PM, Alan J Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
I need to add phase-change salts (and possibly even ceramic bricks) to my
fakes paper. Can you give me / point me to a likely candidate?
You might also consider reversible metal-hydride reactions.
paying for a demo could be proposed, but since if true it will be done next
year, that would just for impatient fan.
about cash, don't forget the escrowed cash...
but once you have the machine, the best would be to find a good usage.
who knows someone needing 1MW thermal ?
vegetable farmer,
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Other than Talbot Chubb every researcher I have discussed this with
believes most of the claims.
Not many on record though. It will be interesting if the ecat comes to
nothing, to see how they will rationalize their
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 2:12 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
It is a problem of logic, as I explained to Yugo. An assertion that cannot
be tested or falsified cannot be debated. I cannot dispute it. Or agree
with it, for that matter. It is meaningless.
This sounds like the
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Alan J Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
At 11:08 AM 12/15/2011, Alan J Fletcher wrote:
I need to add phase-change salts (and possibly even ceramic bricks) to my
fakes paper. Can you give me / point me to a likely candidate?
When you feed the output back into the input and there is additional
power to supply energy to an external load, then the COP is infinite as
also occurs in a Fossil or Nuclear plant which also have infinite COPs
if you exclude the energy obtained from the fuel. So claiming a LENR
generator has
Aussie Guy E-Cat aussieguy.e...@gmail.com wrote:
For the E-Cat or any other LENR generator to make inroads into the global
energy generation market, the LCOE per kWh of delivered energy must be
lower than from any other comparable energy sources or there is simply no
market for it.
Yup.
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
I am saying that as a rule of logic, all assertions much be falsifiable,
Resorting to misunderstood rules is the refuge of people who have no good
arguments left. Falsifiability just means it should be possible to
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Aussie Guy E-Cat aussieguy.e...@gmail.com wrote:
For the E-Cat or any other LENR generator to make inroads into the global
energy generation market, the LCOE per kWh of delivered energy must be
lower than from any
Jed,
Peter can correct me if I error on this point but I believe he has
repeatedly attempted to contact Dr. Park specifically in regard to the
Rossi saga. Numerous times. I believe Peter as posted the fact that
Park has never responded to any of his repeated inquiries.
I'm sure others have
That is why I'm not fussed about why it works as long as it works and
the LCOE fits my target market. When either Leonardo or DGT announce
their Ac kWh devices, with prices, then we can determine into which
markets these devices can and can not be sold. For any new energy
generation
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 2:08 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
If you can't think of a specific way this EXPERIMENTAL scientist's work
could have jumped the tracks, then you have no basis to challenge the
conclusions.
I can't think of any way (much less a specific way) that
Peter, your thoughts about matter sucking ZPE and accruing mass may be
extremely important. Your theory is a fascinatingly possible explanation for
how the Earth has grown to its present size.
If I brought you a box of broken glass, then assembled it into a perfect
sphere, with no leftover
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 4:08 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
If you can't think of a specific way this EXPERIMENTAL scientist's work
could have jumped the tracks, then you have no basis to challenge the
conclusions.
First of all, there are many specific ways suggested to
Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't understand any of that in the slightest.
Then I suggest you read Christensen and some other books about business.
Some of these ideas are complicated. You have to do your homework.
The device as it is supposed to be would immediately and
It's not relevant, because his criticism is against innumeracy, which applies
to such delusions as astrology and homeopathy, but not cold fusion, where the
most serious advocates are scientists, who certainly know their differential
equations.
Why would anyone mention cold fusion in 2011, and
Are there any examples of pathological science persisting 20 years without
being properly debunked? Are there any examples of new science remaining on the
fringe for 20 years before being finally accepted into the mainstream?
On 11-12-15 06:11 PM, Joshua Cude wrote:
Falsifiability just means it should be possible to conceive of an
experimental result that would contradict the assertion. It's intended
to avoid religious claims in a scientific arena.
It actually has much broader applications than just that. Hang
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 5:35 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Then I suggest you read Christensen and some other books about business.
Some of these ideas are complicated. You have to do your homework.
An amazing new revolutionary technology promising to replace fossil
fuels...
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 5:37 PM, Charles Hope
lookslikeiwasri...@gmail.comwrote:
It's not relevant, because his criticism is against innumeracy, which
applies to such delusions as astrology and homeopathy, but not cold fusion,
where the most serious advocates are scientists, who certainly know
Apparently you don't understand LCOE (Levelized Cost Of Energy)? May I
suggest you do some googling. ALL of the ways we generate energy have an
infinite COP if you take away the energy content of the fuel that you
need to supply to the generator. With some generators such as wind,
solar,
On 11-12-15 06:19 PM, Mary Yugo wrote:
I don't understand any of that in the slightest. The device as it is
supposed to be would immediately and without any changes be an
excellent heat source. ...
But this is very silly conjecture. If the device worked, which is
very doubtful at this
On 15 December 2011 15:21, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
1. Stored energy can only cause the temperature to decline monotonically,
very rapidly at first (Newton's law of cooling). Yet this heat increased
during the event.
It is easy to create a system in which heat transfer is
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 5:50 PM, Charles Hope
lookslikeiwasri...@gmail.comwrote:
Are there any examples of pathological science persisting 20 years without
being properly debunked? Are there any examples of new science remaining on
the fringe for 20 years before being finally accepted into the
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technetium
*
Technetium* ([image: play]
/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:IPA_for_English
t
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:IPA_for_English#Keyɛhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:IPA_for_English#Key
k
Interesting read:
http://www.climatespectator.com.au/commentary/why-big-energy-wants-kill-lret
Now imagine what would happen with a LENR generator with a LCOE below coal.
There is an example that is interesting.
Gravitational wave detection.
As a practical field was created more than 40 years ago and no detection
has been done yet.
The theoretical prediction of gravitational waves by Einstein happened
about 90 years ago. He claimed it was an interesting theoretical
On 16 December 2011 02:47, Joshua Cude joshua.c...@gmail.com wrote:
Contrary to popular argument, science actually celebrates novelty and
revolution, and scientists are not afraid of disruptive experiments; they
crave them. Fame, glory, funding, and adoration come to those who make
1 - 100 of 128 matches
Mail list logo
