>From Abd:
...
> "aleklett" is a true skeptic, and is to be
> congratulated. He's very clearly stated the
> matter. If this isn't a fraud, something is
> going on that existing theory does not explain.
> Isn't that fascinating?
Not only is it fascinating, in my view, it's the whole ball of wax.
Title: "E-Cat Cold fusion device independently validated producing
800% more energy than input"
Thursday, May 19, 2011 by: Neev M. Arnell
http://www.naturalnews.com/032455_cold_fusion_E-Cat.html
Mostly harmless.
Regards
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com
www.zazzle.com/orionworks
>From Axil
> Ø These planar clusters have six-fold symmetry and contain 7, 19, 37, 61,
> or 91 hydrogen atoms. These numbers are the so called magic numbers for
> closed-pack clusters.
But 91 isn't prime. Or am I missing something vital here.
Regards
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com
w
I didn't immediately know what made mersenne primes so special so I
went over to wiki for a qwik upload:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mersenne_primes
Pretty simple algorithm. I was nevertheless surprised to discover that
the Wiki article on this particular subject appears have multiple
issues, i.
See:
Ampenergo Amps Up Rossi's Energy Catalyzer in America
http://pesn.com/2011/05/17/9501827_Ampenergo_Amps_Up_Rossis_Energy_Catalyzer_in_America/
Seems to me that it took Peswiki a tad longer than I would have
expected to report their take on recent Rossi events. Usually they are
pretty quick.
As of 4:25 PM Monday Morning (Central Standard Time) googling
"Ampenergo" is now beginning to point me to links that seem more
relevant, such as:
E-Cat World
Getting Ready for the Rossi Energy Catalyzer - A Low Energy Nuclear Reactor
http://www.e-catworld.com/tag/ampenergo/
May 16 2011
Interview
FWIW:
As of Monday morning googling "Ampenegro" does not bring up any relevant links.
The link to the State of Ohio certificate is interesting, however.
Perhaps even promising.
See:
http://www.nyteknik.se/incoming/article3179056.ece/BINARY/Ampenergo+Certificate+of+Organization--.pdf
Regards
Ste
Regarding:
http://www.nyteknik.se/nyheter/energi_miljo/energi/article3179019.ece
Excerpts:
> Do you have any doubt that this doesn’t work in the end?
>
> Cassarino: We did three demonstrations here in the US, and
> these were non public. We did have a group of scientists
> here that understood e
>From Peter:
...
> I think it is outrigth logical fallacy to compare
> Mills' hyperchemistry to Rossi's nuclear jiu-jitsu.
Why not? The fact that both processes appear to use nickel powder,
hydrogen, a mystery catalyst, and heat certainly suggests there may
very well exist linkage.
> Mills has
Terry,
Thanks for the SPRAIN update. Very informative.
As a matter of public disclosure: Years ago I performed thousands of
Finite Element Method Magnetic (FEMM) computer simulations on various
PM configurations for a start-up company which at the time was
actively exploring the matter. (This was
Ah Finally!
Ladies and Gentlemen! Time for this evening's main attraction! We have
two different POVs dueling for supremacy. This evening's fight theme:
Would a self-running Rossi demonstration device be taken seriously by
the world, or would a 1 Megawatt thermal plant suffice.
In one corner we h
My personal interpretation of a possible Rossi "maybe" response:
"Around the end of the summer season I do a lot of Hot Air Ballooning.
My mind is elsewhere. Maybe I'll get two stations completed by
October...or by November - maybe not."
Regards
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com
www.zazzl
Hoyt, when I use Google email hitting return causes vort destined
email to be sent to your personal email address, not to the Vort list
server. You might want to adjust that.
What I meant to send to the Vort Collective:
- Hide quoted text -
>From Jed:
Hoyt, when I use Google email hitting return causes vort destined
email to be addressed to your personal email, not to the Vort list
server. You might want to adjust that.
What I meant to send to the Vort Collective:
>From Jed:
...
> If that is the
>From Jed:
> However, I do not think that errors in theory will
> invalidate a patent of this nature.
I don't know enough about patents to pass judgment on such matters.
Nevertheless, I'm worried that publishing such such errors in the
patent will hamper Rossi's progress.
I assume there exists m
As Robin points out.
(From the Rossi Patent)
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/RossiAmethodandaa.pdf
>[0037] For clearly understanding the following detailed
>discussion of the apparatus, it is necessary to at first consider
>that for allowing nickel to be transformed into stable copper,
>it is neces
>From Craig:
> I've got a question that I believe you could help me with:
>
> I understand that the coulomb barrier is the point at which the Strong
> Force will become dominant, and overcome the natural repulsion of two
> nuclei as they are moved closer together. But can neutrons penetrate the
>
>From Jones:
...
> Let me make it clear that there is no proof that they are planning a better
> GWE scam, and there is no proof that they are legitimate either. The intent
> of this post goes to the old Chinese(?) proverb "fool me once, shame on you,
> fool me twice shame on me"
This is just m
Joshua,
In one of my original posts I stated the fact that, in my opinion,
Rossi's current e-Cat configurations are probably not configured in
such a manner as to generate steam that is much above 100 C. I don't
think the water once it's transformed into steam has a chance to hang
around long enou
Jed sez:
...
> ...In other words, we may need a few hundred thousand reverse oil wells.
> All the energy we got out of burning oil and coal we may need to put into
> undoing the results and burying the fuel.
Heh!
... which x'plains how the current supply of underground fossil fuels
came into ex
>From Joshua:
...
> Eventually, in a few years Rossi will simply fade away
> like Patterson from the 90s, and the CF community will
> make excuses like his stock of lucky catalyst ran out
> and he found he was unable to make more, and you will
> refuse to admit you were wrong.
Thank you for shar
>From Axil:
...
> Pumping the waste heat underground may be a solution, but would add
> substantially to the cost of a Cat-E installation.
Speculating a bit more on this topic...
It seems to me that waste heat could eventually turn into a global
environmental problem. Assuming e-Cat technology
>From Joshua:
> In other words, you've got nothin' but vague,
> unsupported insults.
In my view, it doesn't matter if my vague unsupported insults (which I
freely admit were done at your expense) are correct or not.
You seem to believe that you have Rossi's occasionally troubling heat
measuremen
>From Jed:
> 3. Use many more toll roads, with electronic toll collection rather than
> toll gates, so that traffic does not have to slow down or stop. This has
> been proposed in Georgia to replace some of the High Occupancy
> Vehicle (HOV) lanes.
They already have set up a lot of fast lane toll
Let me add my two cents:
If Rossi's e-Cat reactor core can regularly sustain temperatures of
500c or higher, water that is in contact with the reactor core's
surface FOR LONG ENOUGH PERIODS will most certainly exceed
temperatures 100.1 C, and by quite a large margin.
However, the tick would be to
Makes me wunder if applying heat is really all that necessary. ...Or
perhaps raw external heat is only necessary at first, as Rossi seems
to indicate.
The speculated implication is that it's actually the amount of
electron packing going on that is a crucial element in sustaining the
reaction.
Per
>From Terry,
>> Of more concern to me: Wouldn't your speculation possibly result in a
>> very dangerous electrical problem for any human who attempted to
>> handle the e-cats? I'm thinking the electrical flow would would not be
>> insulated. Or have I misunderstood something crucial here.
>
> Well
>From Terry,
...
> I think Rossi has one extra trick up his sleeve. I could never figure
> out the electrical wiring for the "heaters" and why he needed the band
> heater in addition to the auxiliary heater in the end pipe. It now
> occurs to me that he is flowing current between these two "hea
>From Jones:
...
> ... hey ... come to think of it ... you don't think that the
> deuterium tank seen at one time in Rossi's setup was indicating
> that he could be harvesting the ash ? nah...
>
> The excuse given at the time was to quench the reaction, but
> think about it, do you quench fire w
>From MoB:
>> But, did I hear David from Defkalion say it right, that they are aiming at
>> producing 300.000 units per year?
>>
> Oeps, that should read 300,000 (three hundred thousand)
Not by certain European standards. ;-)
Regards
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com
www.zazzle.com/orion
Alan sez:
>> > Is it too much to ask for ONE TEST in which EVERYTHING is done
>> > correctly:
>> Yes,
>
>
>
> Sorry, I thought vortex was a scientific list, not a religious one.
>
>
>
Hi Alan,
Jed has already posted a few suggestions on the matter of getting what
you think you deserve in life.
Alan sez:
> Is it too much to ask for ONE TEST in which EVERYTHING is done correctly:
Yes,
Get over it.
Regards
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com
www.zazzle.com/orionworks
Good work-in-progress compilation Jones. Thanks for "volunteering".
It's astonishing to me to see the number of different theories being
explored. Some obviously have at present garnered more respect than
others. But who really knows at present what combination of the above
(or perhaps none at all
Jed, Craig, & Terry sez:
>>> England also has a wide range of dialects for such a small geographic
>>> area. Some areas were remarkably isolated well into the 20th century.
>>> A book about dialects that I read years ago said that in 1943, a
>>> linguist found an old guy in a village in southern
Regarding the latest on-going spat between Jed & Jones
...
Jed recently sed:
> ... I suggest you [Jones] treat this more like a scientific discussion and
> less like a legal proceedings, what with "the best available evidence" ...
It's my understanding that Mr. Beene was at one time a lawyer.
Jones sez:
...
> My working hypothesis as of May 3, is that spillover
> hydrogen is formed catalytically, at a threshold temperature
> and collects in Nickel nanopores, gaining thermal energy
> from an unknown source at very close to the Curie point of
> the nickel. It is that simple. The reactio
Hi Jones,
>> Yeah, yeah, we know what the nuclear fizicists will say on
>> the matter.
>>
>> What do they know. ;-)
> Well that's it, isn't it ... what do the experts know? Of
> course, one can throw all of nuclear physics out the door,
> but why?
I'm certainly not arguing that we throw present
>From Terry:
> On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 9:47 AM, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
> wrote:
>
>> Why not?
>
> You probably recall a test that was done on implants and some material
> which "fell through the roof" in Ufology. That test was an isotope
>
Correct me if I have misunderstood the most important relevant facts
being debated here, but I believe Jones is making a strong claim that
the percentages of isotopes allegedly found distributed throughout the
copper found within one of Rossi's used e-cats clearly indicates that
the "Rossi-effect"
Axil,
I like your systematic break down of the process.
I sure don't know WTF is going on! ;-)
I luv a good mystery.
Regards
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com
www.zazzle.com/orionworks
>From Robin:
>>(Water parks - turn them into
>>establishments that are open all year!), roads & sidewalks,
>
> Please don't advocate stupid wastes of energy. Current known
> World Nickel reserves (140 million tons) are only going to last us 100
> years *at our current rate of use*. If we start was
> Your typical locomotive engine is around 1 MW.
It might be wise to skip the generation of electricity in the first
wave of Rossi e-cat sales. Focus on the KISS principal. Simply focus
on the economic advantages of cheap heat! Rossi-powered 1 MW furnaces
might do very well if the goal is to show
Michele sez:
> Rossi's previous life, when he was the "taxi driver"?
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4e9CkhBb18E
>
> ;-)
Oh dear! I can't help it... I just gotta blurt out something blatantly OT here!
According to one of my zany new age sources (Meaning the following is
a totally unscientif
Terry sez:
> Anonymous Iraqi General: "We need to make the Americans think we have
> WMD so they will come over and get rid of Sodamninsane."
Heh... there might be some truth to that premise. ;-)
Actually, the most intelligent conclusion I heard about that whole
fiasco was that Saddam strategic
>From Terry
> Focardi:
>
> "The gamma rays were not there because we were able to eliminate them
> by putting the lead. In the experiments we carried out with the
> engineer Rossi gamma were always there, but they were so little
> intense than the natural radioactivity, which with small thicknesse
>From Jed:
>> On February 5, 2003, Colin Powell made one of the most
>> colossal technical mistakes in modern history. He delivered
>> a speech making various claims about WMD intelligence in
>> Iraq. He later called this "the lowest point in my life."
>
> I got that wrong. It wasn't Powell who sa
Pretty decent article:
http://motherjones.com/politics/2011/03/denial-science-chris-mooney
Excerpt:
> In other words, when we think we're reasoning, we may instead be
> rationalizing. Or to use an analogy offered by University of Virginia
> psychologist Jonathan Haidt: We may think we're being s
>From Mark:
...
> ... and one can start by simply scanning all the
> comment sections of websites where a CF story ran, and summarize
> each skeptic's question or statement, and counter it with the facts. Keep
> it short and sweet, with links to references... the list of Rossi's 'c
>From Alan,
>> I'll fix it on Monday ... UNLESS, of course, there's a new report to
>> evaluate!
>
> http://lenr.qumbu.com/fake_rossi_ecat_frames_v323.php
> http://lenr.qumbu.com
>
> Updated -- with PDF file. (why would anyone want to print out the 60+ pages
> ???)
Works! Thanks! Sometimes a P
Jones sez:
...
> OTOH - we keep getting back to the problem of NRC approval,
> or even UL approval. With proved particle detection and
> real fusion, then we are back to being years away from
> having the device approved in the USA.
Adding more to the goose chase, let us not forget the fact that
>From Ron Wormus:
...
> If I read Mill's 5th force experiment correctly he is stating that
> he has shown that gravitational mass & inertial mass are not
> equivalent which supports Brightsen.
...and there goes Einstein's Theory of Relativity - melting into a
puddle of goo. Oh, what a world!
Re
Potential sign of the times?
http://www.foxbusiness.com/personal-finance/2011/04/15/home-insurance-living-grid/
In their article I think foxbusiness is completely missing the real
ramifications of what is coming down the pipeline. Nevertheless, and
IMHO, home insurance with "off the grid coverage
My own personal assessment:
CF? HF? Something else??? Who knows.
After reading the article several times I still don't know WTF they
are talking about.
Regards
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com
www.zazzle.com/orionworks
Regarding Alan's site:
http://lenr.qumbu.com/fake_rossi_ecat_frames_v322.php
I noticed the "Printable PDF version" link appears to be broken. Any
chance of fixing that?
Regards
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com
www.zazzle.com/orionworks
My Gmail reader didn't notice any odd visual spacing problems with
Beene's text. Nor does my MS Outlook 2007 reader.
But yes, Alan's site is a valuable contribution to the cause. Thanks, Alan!
Re gar ds
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com
www.zazzle.com/orionworks
http://www.theprovince.com/news/Cold+fusion+Burnaby+brink+clean+nuclear+energy/4660666/story.html
http://tinyurl.com/3n8c7j2
Excerpts:
> When I phoned the company to request an interview, Michael Delage,
> their vice-president of business development, politely declined, offering
> the apologetic
>From Akira
>> From Steven V Johnson:
>>
>> The exterior copper pipe lining/jacket which encases
>> the external reactor "torus" wall might assist in the
>> transfer of reactor heat to the adjacent flowing water.
>> If the reactor "torus" had been built entirely outside of
>> the copper tubing hol
>From Jed:
>> You mean, the cell is a torus? With the cooling water flowing through the
>> middle?
>
> The problem with that would be: Why bother putting the copper shell around
> the steel cell? If it is a torus, you can dispense with the copper shell,
> and put the heater directly on the outside
>From Jed:
> You mean, the cell is a torus? With the cooling water flowing
> through the middle?
Yes.
> I believe that is what Ed Storms may have concluded. (I don't
> speak for him.) I thought there might be a problem getting the
> powder into a torus, because you can't access the bottom, but
The configuration might not be strange at all.
One possible explanation:
My take is that Rossi's e-kitten reactor "cell" might NOTbe positioned
within the center of the copper pipe. The reactor "cell" might
actually have been engineered in the shape of cylinder, or a ring that
fits snugly adjacen
>From Albedo:
> Finally, spectral data to look at! I can show this to some of the ten-pound
> heads I work with - one of whom is well-recognized in the neutron detection
> field...if I can get him to take this seriously. If I could get the actual
> data, I have several state of the art tools I c
>From Jones:
> http://www.slideshare.net/lewisglarsen/lattice-energy-llcnickelseed-lenr-networksapril-20-2011
>
> Impressive presentation! But is it built on a foundation of sand?
>
> Boy, these guys must have a high quality PR firm, staffed with
> multi-media whizzes at work 24/7… but are they tr
>From Jones:
...
> We cannot assume honesty from a man like Rossi who
> is seldom honest.
>
> Not to mention – this demo was Rossi’s tribute event
> to Focardi – maybe a kind of pre-eulogy.
>
> Rossi had every incentive to fudge the results, to make
> it look better than it was, or in case someth
Jones sez
...
> ...all of this nonsense is explained by Rothwell picking
> out an irrelevant detail in a long thread, and ignoring
> everything else - in order to cover his trail in case the
> Swedish testing does conform to my prediction.
Defense Team: Your honor, I object! The prosecution is d
>From gotjosh:
> Its really entertaining and all, but do you two really have to
> pollute every single thread with this stuff? are you twin brothers
> from a former life who just bicker constantly as a way of
> showing love?
Adding to Terry's "Kommentary" Jones and Rothwell have been known to
spa
> http://www.peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:Andrea_A._Rossi_Cold_Fusion_Generator:Rossi's_Hints
To everyone who worked on creating this Wiki Rossi Hints directory.
THANKS A BUNCH!
I would think it should be fairly easy to update it.
Regards
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com
www.zazzle.c
>From Jed:
...
> ... I believe the
> reaction works best at around 600°C and it conks out above that.
Can someone clarify the following: What is the internal temperature
the reactor cell has to reach in order to initiate the Rossi reaction?
I thought the reaction takes over when the tempe
Jones Beene recently stated:
> Of all Rossi’s problems, the patent situation seems to
> be the most grim if he can get through this year and the
> October demo. Don’t forget that in addition to Mills IP,
> we know that Mitchell Swartz and several others in Japan,
> Italy, India and elsewhere have
>From Jones,
>> From Rothwell:
>> I don't bet. I debate technical issues based on experimental
>> evidence, not crackpot theories that predict water heaters
>> don't work. If you will not give us a plausible reason why
>> this calorimetry might be wrong by a factor of 1000 then you
>> lose this de
On a more serious note, someone who may have achieved some street
creed with Rossi might want to pop this interesting heat transfer
question to Ross at his blog. It might be interesting to see how Rossi
responds. Could be highly revealing.
Peter Gluck, comes to mind as the "volunteer" for his dang
Jones sez:
...
> Wow - I realize that this Rossi device could be the most
> important development in Energy for some extended time ...
> hmmm, the Neolithic age comes to mind, according to
> Randy :) ... but this may be the first time in Vortician-land
> for having a "play-by-play" and ongoing c
>From Jed:
...
> The tankless heater is Niagara brand 12 kW electrically fired unit
> that belongs to a friend of mine. See:
> http://www.tanklesswaterheater.com/faq.php
> It produces 5 gallons a minute, which is about one-third the flow
> rate of the Feb. 10 Rossi machine test.
> I asked my fr
>From Jones:
...
> 3) However, it is occasionally possible to shoot protons at each other with
> the right speed and quark positions so that they latch on to each other -
> held in place by the Strong Force.
Without one of the protons converting into a neutron? I thought that
was impossible.
R
Horace sez:
...
> As to Rossi, his quality control rested with the only person with the skills
> to produce his nickel catalyst mix, an old man in his 80's working away on
> an old machine. My imagination sees this happening in a poorly lit room
> somewhere in a decaying rustic European buildin
Robin, Harry,
Just to clarify some of my ramblings...
My use of the term "alchemy" was an oversimplified reference to the
desire to transmute common elements into valuable elements... i.e. the
desire to "transmute" lead into gold. The point I was trying to imply
is that the old-world "alchemical"
>From Mark:
> Rossi: No radioactivity has been found in the residual metals, it is true,
> but the day after the stop of the operation. In any case you are right, if
> 59-Cu is formed from 58-Ni we should have the couples of 511 keV at 180° and
> we never found them, while we found keV in the rang
>From Stephen:
...
>> http://www.toysteam.net/wid15final.wmv
>>
>> Great stuff!
>>
>> Rossi should get a 4 kW steam engine for his next demo.
>
> Hey, if he does that, he can close the loop, and get rid of the external
> power supply for the heater!
...
Oh, the irony of it all!
Granted, to pro
Some of us may still remember that classic video add where Ella
Fitzgerald sings a hearty tune. It's a spontaneous ditty which ends
with the shattering of a crystal glass as Ella belts out a final high
note. The commercial subsequently proceeds to play back a Memorex tape
recording of Fitzgerald's
Jones sez:
...
> In effect, he [Rossi] has trumped Mills at his own game.
Agreed, except for the caveat that if Mills' can get his CIHT process
off the ground BLP might still have a fighting chance.
It might eventually turn into a practical evaluation of determining
whether in Rossi's "low-tech
>From Peter Gluck:
...
> I don't uinderstend exactly your idea with the prper pressure- they add
> hydrogen, this is adsorbed in part, you cannot add exactly a dosis of
> hydrogen- but surely there is a "best practices" type protocol here.
My apologies, Peter.
Let me try to clarify my previous
>> Looks like a super conservative xenophobic anti communist right-wing
>> tea party web site has taken notice of Rossi's work - briefly that is.
>
> You, er, visit these web pages frequently?
I got all my shots before I left. I never drink the water either. ;-)
Regards
Steven Vincent Johnson
ww
Looks like a super conservative xenophobic anti communist right-wing
tea party web site has taken notice of Rossi's work - briefly that is.
Scroll down to the eleventh paragraph:
http://americandaily.com/index.php/article/4861
Seems to me that if such groups are at least aware of the event, and
Culturally speaking, Rossi's eCat (eKittin) technology reminds me of a
very popular science fiction genre known as "Steam Punk." Steam Punk
has its origins that can be traced back many decades. Curiously,
within recent history, the genre has become a thriving sub-culture
within the science fiction
>From Harry:
> How does it [This Island Earth] compare to "Forbidden Planet?"
Similar caliber. However, FP is a notch better, IMHO!
"Monsters from the ID!"
Regards
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com
www.zazzle.com/orionworks
http://www.wildbunny.co.uk/blog/2011/04/06/physics-engines-for-dummies/
Good primer. Reveals computer algorithms used.
Have fun messing around with interactive animated white balls!
The interactive chaotic pendulum engine near the end of the article is
my favorite. Teaches you a'lot about chaoti
Regarding Terry recent breakthrough...
OMG!
The resemblance is uncanny!
"This Island Earth" was a great SF flick for its time.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0047577/
http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.funwithfilms.com/images/this-island-earth1.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.funwithfilms.co
Jones sez:
...
> Wow, gotta luv that the Rossi apparatus does work - apparently - but doesn't
> it
> just scream "cheap"? Off the rack at K-Mart cheap...
Heh! It will probably result in an extra month of delays over at DoE
getting their s**t in gear... particularly if they deem to look at the
l
>From Akira
> On 2011-04-06 18:58, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson wrote:
>
> I'm quite sure Focardi told that he doesn't know the composition (nor he
> wants to know - he added). By catalyzer I mean the unknown compound which
> enhances the nickel-hydrogen reaction.
>From Akira,
...
> - Focardi doesn't know the exact composition of the catalyser used in the
> reactor (in addition to nickel powder) or what it does exactly but he
> suspects that it's a chemical compound promoting nickel's adsorption of
> hydrogen in atomic form rather than molecular.
Maybe so
>From Jones
> From: Terry Blanton
>
>> If the reactor vessel is stainless steel, is the Cu migrating through
> the walls of the vessel to contaminate the Ni?
>
> That is probably net necessary. It looks to me like a copper pipe, for heat
> transfer, may go into the reactor itself. Plus, if I am no
Stephen,
Urgent Addendum:
Just to be clear on this point, my speculation was pertaining to
whether you were now suspicious of the HEAT measurements. In truth I
must admit the fact that you seem to be questioning the isotopic
shifts, not the actual HEAT measurements. My apologies if I have
misinte
>From Stephen
...
> It's more likely that Levi is in on the gag than that
> transmutation from nickel to copper produced "natural"
> isotope ratios in the ash. The former merely requires
> the assumption that a few humans are acting unusually
> stupid (which happens frequently). The latter requ
>From Jones:
> The mundane reason for the appearance of iron an[d] copper
> is electromigration.
Seems like a reasonable conclusion to draw.
I must apologize for not being sufficiently clear as to what I was
really questioning: What is generating the massive amount of heat? I
gather the responsi
Interesting speculation, Jones.
I never read Stolper's book. Nevertheless, I remember his scrappy
posts from the old Yahoo Hydrino group, particularly as he incessantly
went after Zimmerman.
Does Stolper's book reveal any kind of useful detail as to what kind
of additional "catalysts" might have
>From Harry
> How can 30% of nickel in Rossi’s reactor be transmuted into copper?
> http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=473
>
> The Lone Proton...masked marvel.
"Hi Ho! Hydrino!"
(Sorry, Silver. You're still my favorite horse.)
Regards
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com
www.zazz
>From Jed:
...
> If he can secure intellectual
> property with a patent, he is worth every euro of the money Defkalion plans
> to pay him. I assume the investors at Defkalion know a thing or two about
> patents, and they have reason to believe he can get one.
...which brings up the ques
>From Peter,
> I have also found this, have not the slightest idea if hydrogen is present
> or not. I will try to find out the documents in the original languages- I
> have a long experience in collaboration with Russian and Ukrainian
> inventors- YUSMAR, INTERENERGORESURS etc.
> If there is hydr
> Somewhat similar to Rossi. See:
> http://pesn.com/2011/03/30/9501800_Zirconium_Flavored_Cold_Fusion_from_Poland/
As Spock would say: "Fascinating."
This would tend to lend credence to speculation that what has been
described as the "lenr-canr" process, as revealed/implied by Rossi,
Mills, and n
Jed sez:
...
> Really, there isn't much more we can ask for.
Well, I was thinking about that.
Maybe when Rossi starts marketing the E-Cat in the United States he
should trademark and then rename his energy catalyzer "Mr. Fusion" (I
bet Mr. Spielberg wouldn't mind sharing his trademark one bit!)
>From Jed:
> A well-known skeptic shown up in this discussion. See:
>
> http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=484427&page=5
> He is intellectually dishonest. He described experiment 1 as follows:
...
> He also demands an "independent" test. That was an independent test.
> Levi had no con
501 - 600 of 968 matches
Mail list logo
