yes,
after collaboration with Kresenn, he is working with LENR Cars CTO (Antoine
Guillemin) for a replication under Fleishmann Memorial open replication
project...
If it succeed in a replicable toy experiment, it can convince.
I'm jusr afraid that it failed like Spawar replication kit... working
On Oct 3, 2012, at 6:22 AM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
I can't guess what effect the lenses would have, but I'm guessing it would be
minimal, since they only appear to cover a fraction of the total area.
Focusing the light with lenses will increase the efficiency of the PV-cell by
20 to 75
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 11:22 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
This makes no sense to me. It seems that at any given instant only some of the
cells are exposed to direct sunlight, the other half to indirect sunlight
(unless the sun is directly overhead). Therefore if anything, one would need
On 2012-10-03 08:50, Alain Sepeda wrote:
yes,
after collaboration with Kresenn, he is working with LENR Cars CTO
(Antoine Guillemin) for a replication under Fleishmann Memorial open
replication project...
Interesting; do you know more information or are you in contact with
Guillemin or
all I have is from the video of discussion of N Chauvin with a student on
you tube, and people commenting it.
2012/10/3 Akira Shirakawa shirakawa.ak...@gmail.com
On 2012-10-03 08:50, Alain Sepeda wrote:
yes,
after collaboration with Kresenn, he is working with LENR Cars CTO
(Antoine
At 09:02 AM 10/2/2012, Daniel Rocha wrote:
It doesn't rule out. They just find lower neutron production rates,
which are merely 200x smaller.
That's an error plus it's misleading. They find 300x smaller as a
rate, *using an optimistic value of the mass renormalization factor.*
Essentially,
At 09:57 AM 10/2/2012, fznidar...@aol.com wrote:
It has now been one year since Rossi's big demonstration. Products
were to come out at the end of last year, then in the Summer of
2012. Now its one year later and there is nothing. No products, no
independent tests by a reputable group.
I
-Original Message-
From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
Slow neutrons have high capture cross-sections, ultra-low-momentum
neutrons will simply have very high capture cross-sections. They
will be efficient at producing transmutations (neutron activation).
That appears to be incorrect, as a
I don't think this has been posted before. Pardon if it was.
The a link at the URL below leads to the Brillouin presentation (Slideshare)
which won them $20M second round funding.
http://nextbigfuture.com/2012/09/brillouin-energy-has-conditional.html
Because there is alot more to steal, and therefore great motivation to
steal it. They come here from all around the globe to try to get their hand on
this Countries wealth in one way or another. I mean, look what has slimed
it's way into the ill-faded White House.
Slide 17 shows their Power Plant Retrofit Model showing a 5-10 MW
power plant. Most coal-fired plants are at least 100 x that size.
I have increased the current in my setup to 200 milliamps. It has been
running at that current level for more than 12 hours now and no
anomalous heat has shown up yet.
-
Has anybody been able to replicate Chuck Sites results? I have not seen
any claims to that yet.
-
Paul
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 2:08 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Alan J Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
e) There are multiple reports of NiH generating excess energy (So Rossi
must be faking something real?)
That's the point I was trying to make when I noted there have been many
At 10:09 AM 10/2/2012, Daniel Rocha wrote:
I am actually surprised that they found a high neutron rate. I
thought they'd find nothing. Those are conventional nuclear
physicists, as you can see in their publication list.
Read the paper itself. They found that the W-L estimates were high by
a
How does one measure hard work?
How much harder does Bill Gates work in comparison to someone who
works two jobs at minimum wage?
Do you seriously he imagine he works 100 times harder if his income is
100 times greater?
Do you believe a man with backhoe works 100 times harder than a man with
At 10:27 AM 10/2/2012, Moab Moab wrote:
mainstream scientists reading LENR papers and replying to them ?
What happened, did LENR become noticeable overnight ?
No, it took something like fifteen years of steady decay of the
totally skeptical position, with accumulation of evidence and
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax a...@lomaxdesign.com wrote:
Time will tell. A lot of people are now working openly on NiH.
Yup. I think Rossi deserves a lot of the credit for that. Not all of it.
As far as I am concerned, Rossi has done no harm and plenty of good for
this field. He is a rascal at times
I had a lot of heat, whether it is anomalous or not, I don't know. I
think it is somehow resistance heating through the borax or chemistry with
creating boric acid. Just a speculation. I had heat 130F (I say it this
way because my thermometer was electroplated or something causing it to
register
The mention of the 10MW plant is a proof of concept on which some
additional funding is contingent. It does not appear to be a product
proposal.
Jeff
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
Slide 17 shows their Power Plant Retrofit Model showing a 5-10 MW
power
At 12:49 PM 10/2/2012, Alan J Fletcher wrote:
At 07:57 AM 10/2/2012, fznidar...@aol.com wrote:
It has now been one year since Rossi's big demonstration. Products
were to come out at the end of last year, then in the Summer of
2012. Now its one year later and there is nothing. No products,
Jack, can you make a voltage measurement across the electrode you have
connected to the positive supply terminal? Place your probe as close to the
electrode as possible without touching it on the side that is opposite to the
location of the negative connected electrode. The other probe is
I would think that a modest sized test facility would be an ideal way to
evaluate their device. Hopefully it can be scaled up in the near future if
operation within the power grid is the desired outcome.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Berkowitz pdx...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax a...@lomaxdesign.com wrote:
b. Safety certification can be obtained with a nonfunctional product.
Are you sure about that? I doubt it.
Rossi has successfully created the appearance of being a con artist. Some
of his defenders think that he is doing this deliberately,
My anode is a motor brush so its surface area is larger than that of the
nickel coin.
I have increased the current to 400 milliamps. With the active and
control beakers in series, the power supply is at 30 volts to drive that
current.
-
I was hoping to avoid the higher currents, which could
There is a meme out there about cycles of 23 years.
It is the so-called 23 Enigma and refers to the belief popularized by
Robert Anton Wilson and others that meaningful incidents and events are
connected to the number 23 (and alternatively by the rule of fives 2+3=5).
Some of this is found in
It seems like from the experiments I've run that if you want heat, put
enough borax in so that it settles to the bottom. Then put your electrodes
down into the borax powder in the bottom. Eventually, the borax powder
disappears leaving yellowish nearly transparent crystals on the electrodes
and
At 03:20 PM 10/3/2012, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax mailto:a...@lomaxdesign.coma...@lomaxdesign.com wrote:
b. Safety certification can be obtained with a nonfunctional product.
Are you sure about that? I doubt it.
Safety certification is according to codes that cover design. I
Still, I also have some stainless steel yarn (12 micron wire, 2x275
strands) and it would be fun to use a nickel cathode with the
stainless as an anode and see what it does to some LR-115 radiation
detectors.
I have done this with several solvents, potash, sodium hydroxide, and weak acid
In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Wed, 3 Oct 2012 07:28:25 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 11:22 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
This makes no sense to me. It seems that at any given instant only some of
the
cells are exposed to direct sunlight, the other half to indirect
The temperature the bath reaches depends upon the input power you deliver to
the system as well as any excess heat that may be generated by the electrodes
and the ability of your system to trap heat. If you are delivering 12 watts to
your device and getting a temperature rise of 60 F from
You have read what Ed Storms theories about how cracks are the source of
LENR activity, but you haven’t applied this lessen to your experiments.
In order to produce crack, the area were nuclear active sites are formed,
the metal used in the cathode needs to be pre-stressed enough to produce
these
Do you recall whether or not PF made cracks in their material? I have been
assuming that the high pressure of the hydrogen due to electrolysis would cause
the nickel - copper material to generate internal dislocations as the hydrogen
forces its way in. I understand that hydrogen makes metals
Steve Krivit has posted a note of about the Nov-14 upcoming event:
---
LENR Panel Session at American Nuclear Society National Meeting
On Wednesday, Nov. 14, from 8:30 a.m. to noon, the American Nuclear
Society will hold a panel
It's great to hear about this.
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 9:46 PM, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote:
LENRs are weak interactions and neutron-capture processes that occur in
nanometer- to micron-scale regions on surfaces in condensed matter at room
temperature. Although nuclear, LENRs are not based on
34 matches
Mail list logo
