Hi Michael,
The development site will remain online at
www.libreofficeaustralia.com however it is likely that I will make the
site read only until we determine the path forward for this
development.
So... The question is, where to now for the Drupal development?
I think the main problem
Hi, I'd like to participate into the Spanish community, some time ago
someone gave me an address where to register but registration on website is
no longer available. So, which is the procedure?
regards
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Escuelas Libres :: Porque la educación
Dear Charles,
Subject: RE : RE: [libreoffice-website] [Drupal] The road ahead and missed
opportunities
From: charles.sch...@documentfoundation.org
To: website@libreoffice.org
Dear Narayan,
I would advise you read the minutes of the latest steerinh committee.
Thanks,
Charles.
Le Tue, 18 Jan 2011 12:16:08 +0100,
Karl-Heinz Gödderz libreoff...@gukk-online.de a écrit :
Narayan Aras schrieb:
Dear Charles,
Dear Narayan,
I would advise you read the minutes of the latest steerinh
committee.
Thanks,
Charles.
snip
The statement from
Charles,
Logically, I haven't seen any discussion at the mail list that can lead to
this conclusion.
Oh there were discussions on several mailing lists about that.
And so were the discussions about the official status of the Drupal site as a
long-term solution.
Also, we identified
Hi, :-)
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 18:40, Florian Effenberger
flo...@documentfoundation.org wrote:
+1 from my side
Christian Lohmaier wrote on 2011-01-18 04.11:
So I have to say: sorry for the inconvenience, but I won't roll it out
on the live site without some nimimal testing.
OK, sure. In
Hi Charles,
Else we would have left OOo because of a dictatorial behavior of
Oracle, to get that behavior from the SC.
(Out of the frying pan into the fire?)
I don't see it that way. It's perhaps misleading to call a dictatorial
behavior anything that does not suit your vision.
On 1/18/11 12:26 PM, Narayan Aras wrote:
Then I volunteered to collect the stakeholders requirements.
The 23 roles were identified on this very mail list.
I have seen mentions of these 23 roles many times, but I have not seen
a list where they are described in detail. It looks like they have
Hi guys,
So - this thread turned amusing, before I could even get to it. Perhaps
one of our problems is a workload, and hence response time mismatch
between people.
On Fri, 2011-01-14 at 22:55 +0100, Christoph Noack wrote:
great suggestion. It seems it pays off to bore you with all this
Hi David, Ivan co.
So, first - I think it is worth saying that conflict is normal; -and-
it is particularly normal in teams that are just changed / formed. A
so-called Forming / Storming / Norming / Performing phase change :-)
it would be nice to skip stage two, and three - and jump to
Thanks Charles
2011/1/18 Charles-H. Schulz charles.sch...@documentfoundation.org
Daniel,
there is this website: http://es.libreoffice.org
and these mailing lists:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Local_Mailing_Lists#Spanish
Welcome,
--
Charles-H. Schulz
Membre du Comité exécutif
The
On 2011-01-17 7:24 PM, David Nelson wrote:
Michael is very interested in doing stuff with Drupal. Like Michael,
I personally prefer forums as a support channel for the English NL
community. Drupal originally evolved from forum software, so it is
naturally very strong in that area. Perhaps
Narayan,
Le Tue, 18 Jan 2011 17:34:53 +0530,
Narayan Aras narayana...@hotmail.com a écrit :
Hi Charles,
Else we would have left OOo because of a dictatorial behavior of
Oracle, to get that behavior from the SC.
(Out of the frying pan into the fire?)
I don't see it that
Hi *,
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Daniel A. Rodriguez
daniel.armando.rodrig...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, I'd like to participate into the Spanish community, some time ago
someone gave me an address where to register but registration on website is
no longer available. So, which is the
2011/1/18 Christian Lohmaier
lohmaier+ooofut...@googlemail.comlohmaier%2booofut...@googlemail.com
Hi *,
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Daniel A. Rodriguez
daniel.armando.rodrig...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, I'd like to participate into the Spanish community, some time ago
someone gave me an
Hi Daniel, *,
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Daniel A. Rodriguez
daniel.armando.rodrig...@gmail.com wrote:
https://www.libreoffice.org/ForumMemberProfile/register
That link is for forum registration, I meant cms access registration
Yes - the forum is used for cms access registration. (only
Hi Narayan, Michael :-)
If you read the various SC meeting minutes objectively, there was
never any firm commitment to going over to Drupal. It was, in fact, an
openness to re-consider the issue at a later date, and to evaluate a
working site alongside specific statements and proof of the
Hi Narayan, Michael :-)
If you read the various SC meeting minutes objectively, there was
never any firm commitment to going over to Drupal. It was, in fact, an
openness to re-consider the issue at a later date, and to evaluate a
working site alongside specific statements and proof of the
On 2011-01-18 7:13 AM, Italo Vignoli wrote:
I think that the main fault of everyone in this specific domain of the
web site (including SC members) was to overlook the web site problem and
leave it unmanaged.
I agree, although I would say *especially* the SC members... this is a
*management*
On 1/18/11 5:20 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
And no, they - meaning the SC - absolutely cannot claim ignorance,
Michael was discussing their progress on the lists for a long time.
Someone from the SC should have taken him aside as soon as they saw what
was happening.
I am a SC member, and I have
On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 11:20 -0500, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2011-01-18 7:13 AM, Italo Vignoli wrote:
I think that the main fault of everyone in this specific domain of the
web site (including SC members) was to overlook the web site problem and
leave it unmanaged.
I agree, although I
2011/1/18 Erich Christian erich_...@irq.at
Hi Daniel,
Am 18.01.2011 14:52, schrieb Daniel A. Rodriguez:
2011/1/18 Christian Lohmaier
Yes - the forum is used for cms access registration. (only this part
of the forum is used)
Ok, I've registered but cannot acces to /admin interface.
On 2011-01-18 12:01 PM, Italo Vignoli wrote:
On 1/18/11 5:20 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
And no, they - meaning the SC - absolutely cannot claim ignorance,
Michael was discussing their progress on the lists for a long
time. Someone from the SC should have taken him aside as soon as
they saw
On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 18:01 +0100, Italo Vignoli wrote:
On 1/18/11 5:20 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
And no, they - meaning the SC - absolutely cannot claim ignorance,
Michael was discussing their progress on the lists for a long time.
Someone from the SC should have taken him aside as soon
Hi,
Am 18.01.2011 17:20, schrieb Charles Marcus:
And no, they - meaning the SC - absolutely cannot claim ignorance,
Michael was discussing their progress on the lists for a long time.
Maybe not members of the SC, but there are people that have been
answering on the mailing lists from the very
Am 18.01.2011 19:40, schrieb Stefan Weigel:
Hi,
Am 18.01.2011 17:20, schrieb Charles Marcus:
And no, they - meaning the SC - absolutely cannot claim ignorance,
Michael was discussing their progress on the lists for a long time.
Maybe not members of the SC, but there are people that have
On 11-01-17 02:32 PM, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
2011/1/17 Fabián Rodríguez magic...@member.fsf.org
Greetings,
This is last week's report on activity for the Ask LibreOffice QA
site at Shapado.
I'll get future reports in English. Here's the translation:
4 questions were created
8 answers
On 2011-01-18 1:40 PM, Stefan Weigel wrote:
Am 18.01.2011 17:20, schrieb Charles Marcus:
And no, they - meaning the SC - absolutely cannot claim ignorance,
Michael was discussing their progress on the lists for a long
time.
Maybe not members of the SC, but there are people that have been
Hi Drew!
Am Dienstag, den 18.01.2011, 12:16 -0500 schrieb drew:
And no, they - meaning the SC - absolutely cannot claim ignorance,
Michael was discussing their progress on the lists for a long time.
Someone from the SC should have taken him aside as soon as they saw
what was happening.
Italo Vignoli wrote:
I have seen mentions of these 23 roles many times, but I have not seen
a list where they are described in detail. It looks like they have been
developed without even asking the SC members - or the group of the
founders - if this was the right approach.
Since nobody
Hi Charles,
Charles Marcus wrote (18-01-11 17:20)
[...]
The first thing I would like to see is an *apology* to Michael and the
others for allowing them to *waste so much of their time* on a project
the SC was never going to endorse in the first place.
Since truth is always
A
Hi Andrea,
Am 18.01.2011 20:20, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
Italo Vignoli wrote:
I have seen mentions of these 23 roles many times, but I have not seen
a list where they are described in detail. It looks like they have been
developed without even asking the SC members - or the group of the
Hi David, Ivan, Christian,
on the website new-features-and fixes [1] there are missing images.
There are only some notes about screenshots.
If you know this yet just let the email drop away.
Grüße
k-j
[1] http://www.libreoffice.org/download/new-features-and-fixes/
--
Unsubscribe
Hi Klaus, :-)
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 05:22, klaus-jürgen weghorn ol
o...@sophia-louise.de wrote:
Hi David, Ivan, Christian,
on the website new-features-and fixes [1] there are missing images. There
are only some notes about screenshots.
If you know this yet just let the email drop away.
On 14/01/2011 Sophie Gautier wrote:
a small amount of Go-oo
features have been incorporated for now. More will come later, once
our users base is consolidated.
Really? I expected most of the Go-OO features had made their way into
LibreOffice, or at least http://planet.go-oo.org/ made me think
Hello everyone,
I've read several comments about the SC shunning away from its
responsibilities.
I think it would be fair to remember that the SC is a group of people (who are
not perfect) who had the guts to break away from Oracle. They had the guts to
leave a project they had been
Hi Charles, *,
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 7:21 PM, Charles Marcus
cmar...@media-brokers.com wrote:
On 2011-01-15 4:41 AM, Alexander Thurgood wrote:
I would sincerely hope that this would not disappear in the near future,
it would in my humble opinion, be a great shame to lose all that work.
Hi Andrea, *,
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 8:20 PM, Andrea Pescetti
pesce...@openoffice.org wrote:
Italo Vignoli wrote:
[...]
Since nobody provides the link (the one Klaus-Jürgen sent was not
working for me... a problem at mail-archive.com, perhaps?),
Could be a bug - I'll investigate and forward
On 2011-01-18 5:57 PM, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
And this attitude/point of view towards it surely was one of the
reasons for the SC to be so drastic about its statement.
You must not force people into a single infrastructure. There is no
need to force everything into drupal. I hardly see
On 01/18/2011 11:57 PM, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
But then again: Drupal is not dead at all - it should just be clear
that the primary focus must be the site that is public for the user.
I have read many threads in the website mailing list, and I must say
that I have found many areas where
On 01/19/2011 12:11 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
Seriously? You don't see the benefit of having fully integrated support
backend, such that someone can choose to use the forums, or email lists,
or newsgroups, and everyone sees the same 'content'?
Yes, seriously.
In Italy, there are mailing
Hi Florian, all,
Florian Effenberger schrieb:
Hello,
on the steering-discuss list, we currently discuss about
@libreoffice.org e-mail addresses for community members. Just focusing
on the technical issues for this mail:
I would like to have those e-mail forwarders handled by a separate mail
Hi *,
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 12:27 AM, Bernhard Dippold
bernh...@familie-dippold.at wrote:
I would like to have those e-mail forwarders handled by a separate mail
server, independent from the mailing list server. However, we have a few
listes directly @libreoffice.org, which makes things
Hi Christoph,
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 5:57 PM, Christoph Noack christ...@dogmatux.com wrote:
It's not very common; most sites have drop-down menus that
don't show sub-menus when sub-pages are loaded
Correct, but I bet the mature ones do have a breadcrumb navigation or
something similar. So
Hi *,
It's too much detail to answer everything, thus I focus on the techy
stuff only :-)
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 1:15 PM, Michael Meeks michael.me...@novell.com wrote:
On Fri, 2011-01-14 at 22:55 +0100, Christoph Noack wrote:
[...]
Ultimately I think you're going to have jumpy tabs if
Hi David,
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 12:25 PM, David Nelson comme...@traduction.biz wrote:
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 18:40, Florian Effenberger
flo...@documentfoundation.org wrote:
Christian Lohmaier wrote on 2011-01-18 04.11:
So I have to say: sorry for the inconvenience, but I won't roll it out
Hi Italo:
Le 2011-01-18 18:25, Italo Vignoli a écrit :
On 01/19/2011 12:11 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
Seriously? You don't see the benefit of having fully integrated support
backend, such that someone can choose to use the forums, or email lists,
or newsgroups, and everyone sees the same
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 6:32 AM, charles.h.schulz
charles.h.sch...@gmail.com wrote:
I've read several comments about the SC shunning away from its
responsibilities.
I think it would be fair to remember that the SC is a group of people (who
are not perfect) who had the guts to break away
Hi everyone:
Unfortunately, I am also going to add my name as one who is also going
to take a break from the LibreOffice project. As I had made my position
clear about my participation on the Drupal team and the conflicting
messages that were passed on from the SC, I am quite disheartened at
On 11-01-18 06:48 PM, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
[...]
so why not be consistent with the archives and use
l...@www.libreoffice.org (with archives already at
http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/l10n/
ciao
Christian
I thought the convention was to use lists.domain.org ??
Just sayin'
--
50 matches
Mail list logo
