In
regs 164.520 it states "No later than the date of the first service delivery, including service
delivered electronically, to such
individual after the compliance date for
the covered health care
provider; So it is a combo of the
two of them. Receive NPP and sign acknowledgement no lat
Monday, March 31, 2003 6:57
AM
To: WEDI SNIP
Privacy Workgroup List
Subject: RE: NPP and phone
calls---HELP !
I am addressing a similar
question with a client physician. For example -- if a patient calls in for a
renewal of a prescription this would be classified as the first treatment after
A
EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2003 9:23
PMTo: WEDI SNIP Privacy Workgroup ListSubject: RE: NPP
and phone calls---HELP !
Yes, that is the way we are interpreting the regs also (see the
December 4th question about this if your manager does not believe it)
Now if you are tracking you
Yes, that is the way we are interpreting the regs also (see the December
4th question about this if your manager does not believe it) Now if you
are tracking your NPP, if they have already received it, they do not need it
again.
This is a very wicket with us, and we are hoping that since
Title: RE: NPP in the waiting room
On the phone call with OCR, there were several comments made that the NPP did not have to be displayed so that all pages were laid out and could be seen. Someone commented that they planned to have all of the pages laid out and framed so that they would all
Craig,
At the HHS/OCR conference in Atlanta, the head of OCR stated that it was not enough to
hang the NPP on the wall. He stated that there is a wealth of information, including
contact numbers, in a NPP and that patients should have the opportunity to "take it
home and read it."
Jean Acevedo
I believe that in the conference call Wednesday, an OCR rep stated that
there is no requirement as to how a provider posts the NPP, only that the
provider "post the notice in a clear and prominent location where it is
reasonable to expect individuals seeking service from the covered health
care pro
Unfortunately, I joined late, but I was informed that someone had commented
on HIPAA wallpaper in the CMS conference call earlier this week. It
seemed(from what I heard second hand) that it would be appropriate to use
notebooks or some sort of "contained" version of the NPP. Those who heard
speci
ce on the
information it contains. Thank you."
- Original Message -
From:
Bentz-Miller,
Judith
To: 'Doug Webb'
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 02:03
PM
Subject: RE: NPP and Disclosure
Doug,
What about releasing the incorrect information? Faxing the wrong
Gregory,
Your client is wrong. Accounting for Every disclosure if
definately not required by the Privacy or Security regs. Most transactions
involving the Treatment of Patients and obtaining Payment are explicitly
excluded from the need to report them (in very great detail as to what is
ex
información
privilegiada, confidencial y exenta de acceso bajo la ley aplicable. Si
usted ha recibido esta comunicación por error, por favor no lo distribuya.
Favor notificar al remitente del E-Mail a la dirección mostrada y elimine el
mensaje original. Gracias.
-----Original Message-
From: C
nglish lanaguages.
Charles H. Thulin
Ekman, Bohrer & Thulin, P.S.
220 West Mercer Street, Suite 400
Seattle, WA 98119
(206) 282-8221
-Original Message-
From: Christiansen, John (SEA) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 2:43 PM
To: WEDI SNIP Privacy Workgroup List
S
-Original Message-From: Keith Tularaksa
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent:
Tuesday, March 18, 2003 1:26 PMTo: WEDI SNIP Privacy Workgroup
ListSubject: RE: NPP type size?I'm sorry to beat this one to
death, but is there a citation for California stating that the font size has to
be 12 p
ality and Compliance Coordinator
Catawba County Health Department
828-695-5847
-Original Message-
From: Christiansen, John (SEA) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 5:43 PM
To: WEDI SNIP Privacy Workgroup List
Subject: RE: NPP in Other Languages
Folks -
The "plai
Ermer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 1:53 PM
To: WEDI SNIP Privacy Workgroup List
Subject: Re: NPP in Other Languages
It strikes me as an attorney who represents ERISA governed health plans
that the NPP can be considered a material modification to the health
plan under th
It strikes me as an attorney who represents ERISA governed health plans
that the NPP can be considered a material modification to the health
plan under the U.S. Labor Department's (DOL) rules. DOL, in contrast to
HHS, has very specific rules on distributing a summary plan description
or a summary o
ailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 11:29 AM
To: WEDI SNIP Privacy Workgroup List
Subject: RE: NPP type size?
This question was asked recently, and the answer was that in California the
type size must be 12 pt.
Also:
>From the final Privacy Regulation Preamble:
This message is intended only for certain recipients and may be privileged
or confidential. If you have received it in error,
please notify us and delete it without making or retaining a copy.
THIS IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE. PLEASE CONSULT YOUR OWN COUNSEL.
While HIPAA may not require the NPP or othe
As are we. We have a part-time professional translator on staff who
is/will be translating all of our HIPAA-related patient correspondence
for us.
Beth
Line, Phyllis wrote:
We are translating our notice into Spanish.
-Original Message-
From: Kathy Findley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
He
Title: RE: NPP in Other Languages
We are translating our notice into Spanish.
-Original Message-
From: Kathy Findley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 1:08 PM
To: WEDI SNIP Privacy Workgroup List
Subject: NPP in Other Languages
Hello All!
I don't b
Title: Message
In the compliance tool I have developed, I am
offering not just the Notice in Spanish but the other important "patient"
documents as well--the Authorization, Requests for Restrictions/Confidential
Communications/Access/Amendment forms and the letters to patients denying
access
We are currently having it interpreted into Russian, Somali and Spanish.
-Original Message-
From: Kathy Findley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 2:08 PM
To: WEDI SNIP Privacy Workgroup List
Subject: NPP in Other Languages
Hello All!
I don't belive it's required acco
ed it a little bit bigger.
-Original Message-
From: Patricia Conroe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 1:06 PM
To: WEDI SNIP Privacy Workgroup List
Subject: RE: NPP type size?
I can't cite the documentation specifically, but I have been informed by
other coworkers t
DI SNIP Privacy Workgroup List
Subject: RE: NPP type size?
I second the motion. All in favor say Aye (please
don't reply, just kidding)
-Original Message-
From: Ellen Rubin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 1:46 PM
To: WEDI SNIP Privacy Workgr
I second the motion. All in favor say Aye (please
don't reply, just kidding)
-Original Message-
From: Ellen Rubin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 1:46 PM
To: WEDI SNIP Privacy Workgroup List
Subject: Re: NPP type size?
When this
eply email.
- Original Message -
From: "William J. Kammerer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WEDI SNIP Privacy Workgroup List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 8:32 AM
Subject: Re: NPP type size?
> You can't prove a negative - I don't
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 1:29 PM
To: WEDI SNIP Privacy Workgroup List
Subject: RE: NPP type size?
This question was asked recently, and the answer was that in California the
type size must be 12 pt.
Also:
>From the final Privacy Regulation Preamble:
"Plain Language
PAA-AS Communications Office
Wellmark, Inc.
phone: 515.248.5588
fax: 515.245.4620
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Sherry Neuman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 10:55 AM
To: WEDI SNIP Privacy Workgroup List
Subject:RE: NPP type size?
Please
ize the notice across
covered entities" (emphases added)
-Original Message-
From: Musser, Marilyn J [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 10:16 AM
To: Sherry Neuman; WEDI SNIP Privacy Workgroup List
Subject: RE: NPP type size?
Hi- the body type for our NOPP
: Sherry Neuman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 10:55 AM
To: WEDI SNIP Privacy Workgroup List
Subject:RE: NPP type size?
Please reply to all.
-Original Message-
From: Beth Cole [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 7:23 AM
To: WEDI
Please reply to all.
-Original Message-
From: Beth Cole [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 7:23 AM
To: WEDI SNIP Privacy Workgroup List
Subject: NPP type size?
I've seen several references on various mailing lists to something said
at one of the OCR regional conf
You can't prove a negative - I don't believe the Privacy Rule mandates
any particular font size.
9 point is really the smallest human-readable size. 12 point is the
standard at which most folks feel comfortable. 10 point is the absolute
minimum to be taken seriously, though it touches on the prefe
Traci,
only providers are required to make a good faith effort to obtain a written
acknowledgement.
Donald L. Ribelin
HIPAA Project Manager
Firsthealth of the Carolinas
(910) 215-2668
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original
Message-
From: Traci Winter
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Se
Health plans are NOT required to get
acknowledgement that you understand the NPP - only providers have to
exert a good faith effort to get acknowledgement in writing that you have seen
and understand their privacy practices. Health plans just have to make it
available.
Karen H. Whit
Life insurance does not fall under the HIPAA administrative
simplification standards. However, a life insurance company is licensed
to issue health insurance coverage, which is subject to those standards.
I am sure that the Guardian sent the NPP related to its health or dental
coverages, not its li
There are very different NPP requirements
for a health plan and a health care provider. While a health care
provider has a requirement to obtain a written acknowledgment of receipt, a
health care plan does not. I refer to Provision of Notice of Privacy
Practices - § 164.520(c) below:
HH
Title: Message
Health Plans are not
required to get your acknowledgment signature. They only need to provide
you with a copy of the NPP. See page 109 of the OCR HIPAA Privacy
Guidance.
Dennis Hare
Quality Assurance Spec./Privacy
Officer
Central Missouri Regional Center
(573) 882-9835
Does the life insurance company fall under a health plan? I believe health plans do
not need to get the acknowledgment signed, they just need to show they mailed it to
everyone. Has anyone else heard that?
>>> "Traci Winter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 03/07/03 02:19PM >>>
Interesting occurrence just
No acknowledgment of receipt of the NPP is
required for plans - only providers.
-Original Message-From: Langer, Judi
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003
3:10 PMTo: WEDI SNIP Privacy Workgroup ListSubject: RE:
NPP
Are you sure it is a HIPAA Privacy
: Friday, March 07, 2003
3:10 PMTo: WEDI SNIP Privacy Workgroup ListSubject: RE:
NPP
Are you sure it is a HIPAA Privacy
Notice? Since it is from a life insurance company, it might be a Gramm
Leach Bliley (financial) Privacy Notice.
GLB implements a whole different set of
Are you sure it is a HIPAA Privacy
Notice? Since it is from a life insurance company, it might be a Gramm
Leach Bliley (financial) Privacy Notice.
GLB implements a whole different set of
state laws that insurers and others must follow. No acknowledgement of the
GLB Privacy Notice is requ
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, February
14, 2003 2:29 PMTo: WEDI SNIP Privacy Workgroup
ListSubject: RE: NPP and accounting for disclosures - was Medicare
audits: op erations?
I
agree with you and what I stated below your response is not inconsistent with
the preamble. I sti
WEDI SNIP Privacy Workgroup List
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 09:28:17 -0900
Subject: RE: NPP and accounting for disclosures - was Medicare audits: op
erations?
> Read 45 164.502 uses and disclosures of protected health information:
> general rules:
>
> (i) &q
nt: Friday, February
14, 2003 12:28 PMTo: WEDI SNIP Privacy Workgroup
ListSubject: RE: NPP and accounting for disclosures - was Medicare
audits: op erations?
Read 45 164.502 uses and disclosures of protected health
information: general rules:(i) "Standard: Uses and disclosures
consist
]
Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 11:10 AMTo: Halterman,
Anita; WEDI SNIP Privacy Workgroup ListSubject: RE: NPP and
accounting for disclosures - was Medicare audits: op
erations?
Anita, I do not agree with your interpretation. You are required
to provide the notice, yes. You are allowed disc
.
Karen WilliamsonLead System Project ManagerEl Paso
County Dept. of Health and Environment, CO719 575-8468
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, February 14,
2003 12:41 PMTo: WEDI SNIP Privacy Workgroup
ListSubject: RE: NPP and
Title: Message
I might be wrong, but I concur. I’ve
not read anything that makes me believe that releases required by law are
treatment; payment or designated operations. Therefore, I think these releases
must be accounted for.
Here is a related tangent…while a
patient release might no
Anita
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 14,
2003 10:41 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: NPP and accounting for
disclosures - was Medicare audits: op erations?
Do
you have HHS commentary that states if
DI SNIP Privacy Workgroup
ListSubject: RE: NPP and accounting for disclosures - was Medicare
audits: op erations?
I
agree with you and what I stated below your response is not inconsistent with
the preamble. I still believe that a disclosure allowed by law if it
is addressed in your no
d the person you make
disclosures for whatever purpose you listed in your notice.
Anita
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 14,
2003 10:22 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: NPP and accounting for
disclosures
information and
for what purposes takes precedence.
-Original Message-From: Halterman, Anita
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, February
14, 2003 1:28 PMTo: WEDI SNIP Privacy Workgroup
ListSubject: RE: NPP and accounting for disclosures - was Medicare
audits: op erations?
Title: Message
Read 45 164.502 uses and disclosures of protected health
information: general rules:(i) "Standard: Uses and disclosures
consistent with notice. A covered entity that is required by 164.520 [the
section addressing the notice of privacy practices] to have a notice may not use or
From: Doug Webb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 12:12 PM
To: WEDI SNIP Privacy Workgroup List
Subject: Re: NPP and accounting for disclosures - was Medicare audits:
op erations?
Molly, Cindi:
Where I was coming from is that if I made such a disclosure, I would want
in reliance on the information it contains. Thank you."
- Original Message -
From: "Shek, Molly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WEDI SNIP Privacy Workgroup List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 09:57 AM
Subject: RE: NPP and accounting for dis
-Original Message-
From: Doug Webb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 8:47 AM
To: WEDI SNIP Privacy Workgroup List
Subject: Re: NPP and accounting for disclosures - was Medicare audits:
operations?
Noel,
Quite so.
As you said, quite a few emails seem to overlook that
oordinator
Catawba County Health Department
828-695-5847
-Original Message-
From: Doug Webb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 9:47 AM
To: WEDI SNIP Privacy Workgroup List
Subject: Re: NPP and accounting for disclosures - was Medicare audits:
operations?
Noel,
Qui
I think the rule very specific that you CAN'T do this... you are not allowed
to say something is allowed in your NPP that is not allowed elsewhere in the
rule... my interpretation anyway
-Original Message-
From: Noel Chang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 1:20
Noel,
Quite so.
As you said, quite a few emails seem to overlook that the Authorization to do a
certian disclosure and the actual disclosure are two separate actions and need to be
addressed independantly.
Don't forget that the acknowledgment of receipt of your NPP is not an Authorization
for
sage-From: Ribelin, Donald
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003
7:25 AMTo: WEDI SNIP Privacy Workgroup ListCc:
Dillehunt, DavidSubject: RE: NPP the short
form???
My
understanding of the Privacy Rule's requirements re: the NPP are as
My
understanding of the Privacy Rule’s requirements re: the NPP are as
follows.
Each patient
must be provided a copy of the “entire” NPP upon their first contact after
4/13/2003
We
must post our NPP on line if we have a web-page
We
must attempt to obtain written a
for healthcare
www.hipaasurvival.com
- Original Message -
From: "Doug Turpin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WEDI SNIP Privacy Workgroup List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "WEDI SNIP Privacy Workgroup List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 7:58
roup List
Subject: RE: NPP revisions
Can anyone verify that health plans do not require obtaining an
acknowledgement for NPP? Only
tthew
Rosenblum" To: "WEDI SNIP Privacy Workgroup
List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Yes, it is not necessary.
You only have to obtain written acknowledgment of an individual's receipt of
your NPP one time (on the first service delivery after the compliance date).
After that, if you subsequently revise your NPP you only need to post the
revised notice in your facility, and make
r no lo
distribuya. Favor notificar al remitente del E-Mail a la dirección mostrada y
elimine el mensaje original. Gracias.
-Original Message-
From: Noel, Linda A.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003
3:15 PM
To: WEDI SNIP
Privacy Workgroup List
Subject: RE:
nesday, January 29, 2003 3:15 PM
To: WEDI SNIP Privacy Workgroup List
Subject: RE: NPP revisions
Expense.
Linda Noel
Corporate Privacy Officer
Corporate Compliance
Orlando Regional Healthcare
321-843-8693
-Original Message-
From: Traci Winter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wed
Expense.
Linda Noel Corporate
Privacy Officer Corporate
Compliance Orlando Regional
Healthcare 321-843-8693
-Original Message-From: Traci Winter
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 2:27
PMTo: WEDI SNIP Privacy Workgroup ListSubject: NPP
revisions
long run may actually be lest costly.
-Original Message-
From: Ribelin, Donald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 8:11 AM
To: WEDI SNIP Privacy Workgroup List
Subject: RE: NPP and illiterate population
Yes William I do believe that some will read my company'
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 12:59 PM
To: WEDI SNIP Privacy Workgroup List
Subject: Re: NPP and recurrent patients
The obligations of health care providers (there are different ones for
health
plans) to distribute your NPP if you revise it after initially disitributing
Noel, that is also my understanding.
-Original Message-
From: Noel Chang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 12:59 PM
To: WEDI SNIP Privacy Workgroup List
Subject: Re: NPP and recurrent patients
The obligations of health care providers (there are different ones for
---
From: "Kelli Knuckles" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WEDI SNIP Privacy Workgroup List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Mon, 27 Jan 2003 10:15:36 -0700
Subject: Re: NPP and recurrent patients
> Traci-
>
> You only have to provide your patients with the NPP onc
t
first service delivery. See 45 CFR 164.502(c)(2)."
Hope this helps
Dan Kelsey
Practice Advisor
Indiana State Medical Association
-Original Message-
From: Kelli Knuckles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 12:16 PM
To: WEDI SNIP Privacy Workgroup List
Subject: R
The NPP is given to patients one time only
unless there is a change. If there is a revision to the NPP then ring
patients are to given a copy of the revised NPP upon their next visit. It
is up to the CE to track who has received the NPP and when.
Linda Noel Corporate
Privacy Officer Corp
Tracy, you must provide the NPP at first contact (with
some exceptions) or upon future request (for example after the NPP has been
modified.) There is no requirement to provide it at every visit. You
only need to make a good faith effort to obtain acknowledgement at that first
contact issu
Traci-
You only have to provide your patients with the NPP once. You need to
somehow track that you have provided the patient with a copy. One thing
to keep in mind, however, is that if you change or update your NPP new
copies need to be provided to your patients. At least that's my
understandi
I work at an agency that provides Community Mental Health Services to.
These services are for individuals with limited assets, experience chronic
mental health problems and are often either illiterate or have compromised
cognitive abilities. Because of their lack of resources, 90% of the time
we
Title: RE: NPP and illiterate population
Sorry, but I've got to agree with William. Very few people are going to read these things. And even out of the list Donald gave, only the "some patients" will probably fall into the illiterate category. I'd say, unless your
Braille?
William J. Kammerer
Novannet, LLC.
Columbus, US-OH 43221-3859
+1 (614) 487-0320
- Original Message -
From: "Ribelin, Donald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WEDI SNIP Privacy Workgroup List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, 27 January, 2003 08:11 AM
atient"
Donald L. Ribelin
HIPAA Project Manager
Firsthealth of the Carolinas
(910) 215-2668
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: William J. Kammerer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 6:25 PM
To: WEDI SNIP Privacy Workgroup List
Subject
legal advice or a binding signature.
> -Original Message-
> From: William J. Kammerer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 4:25 PM
> To: WEDI SNIP Privacy Workgroup List
> Subject: Re: NPP and illiterate population
>
>
> Why agonize over it?
Tracy, the NCHICA Privacy and Security Officers Workgroup
developed a survey on the NPP provision process. Early results indicate that
most hospitals will be providing
their paper NPP's in English and Spanish.
Many (almost all so far) also plan on providing an audio version in both
langu
you’re use of this information must always be reviewed and approved by
your own attorney prior to use, application, or implementation.
-Original Message-From: Jennifer Peters
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, January 24,
2003 5:49 PMTo: WEDI SNIP Privacy Workgroup ListSubje
Good point.
-Original Message-
From: William J. Kammerer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 6:25 PM
To: WEDI SNIP Privacy Workgroup List
Subject: Re: NPP and illiterate population
Why agonize over it? Do you really believe anyone is going to read these
things? I&#
Privacy Workgroup List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, 24 January, 2003 05:49 PM
Subject: RE: NPP and illiterate population
How is everyone handling a situation where a patient is literate, but
unable to comprehend the NPP?
-Original Message-
From: Bentz-Miller, Judith [mailto:
: RE: NPP
and illiterate population
We will be RECORDING it as a voice mail
message (our system handles over 12 minutes!) and having an extension, with
access on both the local line and 800 line. We are
also having a privacy (800 number) hotline set up and both numbers will be
We will be RECORDING it as a voice mail
message (our system handles over 12 minutes!) and having an extension, with
access on both the local line and 800 line. We are also
having a privacy (800 number) hotline set up and both numbers will be listed on
business cards. Business cards will
Workgroup List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Steven Klepzig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Thomas Papin"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Diann Rice" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Eleanor Walker"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 4:20 PM
S
kgroup List
> Subject: Re: NPP and home & community-based waiver programs
>
> Our agency has received an outside legal opinion that we are a covered
> entity.
>
> One of the main reasons is that our agency administers Medicaid Waiver
> programs along with our other pr
88 matches
Mail list logo
