page foo.cgi?page=x wouldn't that page also be simply the offline page?
What exactly is the scenario in some more detail?
(Note that with history.pushState() you can set the URI of the current
page so the fragment identifier bookmarking argument is no longer very
relevant.)
--
Anne van
/scripting context change.
You seem to have missed what I pointed out earlier:
http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#pushstate This allows
applications to make distinct URIs while keeping all the other benefits.
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
http://www.opera.com/
that is not available for some reason
* Database that is full
I think it should also be a bit more clear on how the user agent
constructs the SQL statement.
Cheers,
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
http://www.opera.com/
level 2 supports sending ByteArray. So you could do
something like the following maybe:
xhr.send(file.bytes)
Although if HTML5 gains a native File object I suppose support for that
could be added as well if there's any benefit.
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
http
Quoting Rikkert Koppes [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[...] A
disabled control can still match this pseudo-class; the states are
orthogonal.
I believe the term orthogonal is incorrect here.
:read-write is orthogonal to :disabled. That's correct.
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://www.opera.com
for Infinity -Infinity and NaN for all of those. I don't have a
strong opinion on it either way, although I would prefer it to be decided
quickly so we have some time to propagate the changes in time for Opera
9.5.
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
http://www.opera.com/
On Tue, 19 Dec 2006 17:18:48 +0100, Anne van Kesteren [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The draft should probably be more explicit about:
input type=radio name=A form=form1
input type=radio name=A form=form1 form2 checked
input type=radio name=A form=form2
Assuming form1 and form2 both exist
for the browser to layer something div-equivalent over the
media elements supporting captioning and pipe the HTML captions into it
(with caution, imagine a caption itself recursively embedding a video).
I think the cue points feature is designed to do that.
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl
platforms there's not much storage space available and knowing
whether or not there's some space left is useful. So you can decide to
only store the critical data for instance.
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
http://www.opera.com/
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
http://www.opera.com/
nicer at some point.
Cheers,
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
http://www.opera.com/
that that have an explicit null though. Who do other
people think?
There at least some feedback from the developer community that they'd like
to see optional arguments:
http://www.dustindiaz.com/dom-interfaces-suck/
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
http://www.opera.com/
of the reasons it's simply gets clipped instead of
scaled. (And clipping is a feature too, keep that in mind.)
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
http://www.opera.com/
The way newlines are handled for textarea maxlength should also apply to
textarea pattern to keep things consistent. That is, lines are CRLF
delimited.
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
http://www.opera.com/
certainly need
not duplicate it for noreferrer. There must be some end to this
self-humiliation.
I think it's way better to stay consistent. Especially as the feature
affects the Referer (sic) header.
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
http://www.opera.com/
, there are people working on solving this
issue: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2007May/0030.html
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
http://www.opera.com/
Notwithstanding what I consider misuse of br in that example, I would
encourage people to use hCard to mark up a name instead of us introducing
an element for the purpose.
How would you mark that up instead? address (currently) doesn't allow
block-level descendents.
--
Anne van Kesteren
http
on this:
http://dev.w3.org/csswg/cssom-view/
Discussion should take place on [EMAIL PROTECTED] The draft will be
published as a W3C First Public Working Draft soonish, though this may be
after new year given the holidays and such.
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
http
On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 18:13:38 +0100, Christian Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
What do you think of this?
I think that globalStorage and sessionStorage obviate the need for cookies.
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
http://www.opera.com/
with
everyone where you can restrict that with Access Control. Especially for
authenticated services this might be problematic.
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
http://www.opera.com/
for an unsafe
HTMLCanvasElement.
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
http://www.opera.com/
that it is a bit vague, but do you have any specific suggestions
as to what it should say exactly? I'm not sure what to write.
http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/2007-June/011799.html
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
http://www.opera.com/
files)?
HTML 5 defines processing of HTML5, XHTML5, and documents created using
DOM methods. Only the latter two can contain elements from other
namespaces at this point.
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
http://www.opera.com/
and ImageData.width and .height
return 4 you know there's a factor two scaling happening between canvas
pixels and device pixels. What the factor is between canvas pixels and CSS
pixels isn't really relevant (and easy to determine).
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
http://www.opera.com/
displays:
canvas height=1000 width=1000 style=height:100px;width:100px
(Might be a bit much.)
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
http://www.opera.com/
, but
will there be read-only attributes for the width, height and position
for controls?
There are readonly attributes to get the height and width of the video.
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
http://www.opera.com/
-To. Provisionally registering headers is pretty simple and when HTML5
finally becomes a W3C Recommendation we can move them to the permanent
registry.
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
http://www.opera.com/
van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
http://www.opera.com/
Why not give the object a constructor? I think that's cleaner. Also, Opera
already supports that :-)
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
http://www.opera.com/
On Sun, 03 Feb 2008 12:20:54 +0100, Oliver Hunt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 3, 2008, at 2:38 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
Why not give the object a constructor? I think that's cleaner. Also,
Opera already supports that :-)
The biggest problem is that you would have to define
On Fri, 08 Feb 2008 18:24:58 +0100, Brady Eidson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As far as the unload handler question, what are the semantics for XHR?
I think the user leaving the page is the same as aborting the download.
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
http://www.opera.com/
On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 10:21:34 +0100, Ian Hickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 3 Feb 2008, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
Why not give the object a constructor? I think that's cleaner. Also,
Opera already supports that :-)
The relationship between the height and width arguments and the height
On Sat, 09 Feb 2008 22:06:39 +0100, Alexey Proskuryakov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Feb 9, 2008, at 12:58 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
As far as the unload handler question, what are the semantics for XHR?
I think the user leaving the page is the same as aborting the download.
I've seen
On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 22:52:33 +0100, Ian Hickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 3 Feb 2008, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
The moment people start using getImageData() as storage mechanism
(which they will if browsers do not fix their data: image origin stuff)
you'll have a problem
So you want
described
in terms of equivalence. That is,
e.reply(message)
is equivalent to
e.source.postMessage(message, e.origin)
except that the latter won't work anymore when reply() is added.
Kind regards,
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
http://www.opera.com/
reply is invoked on that
event object it creates an event that again has the same UUID. Both
parties can have multiple conversations that way by checking the UUID of
the message.
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
http://www.opera.com/
no new risk here.
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
http://www.opera.com/
.../) on the same nesting level from an empty into a start tag.
Actually, we can't. /br is a br start tag because of legacy.
I don't see why l is so compelling by the way.
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
http://www.opera.com/
the object and interface a different name doesn't really help.
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
http://www.opera.com/
[... global attribute for links ...]
We have a FAQ entry on this -- quite common -- request:
http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/FAQ#Does_HTML5_support_href_on_any_element_like_XHTML_2.0.3F
Hope that helps!
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
http://www.opera.com/
already have
sections in the page for several steps, but only one of those sections
is currently relevant. The rest is marked irrelevant until the user
completes some action.
This is a totally different case from the one you seem to be worried about.
--
Anne van Kesteren
http
resource however if
the base URI changed since the initial load.
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
http://www.opera.com/
for Firefox 3 not to fix its behavior (which
is fine by me, the restriction on moving nodes doesn't make much sense).
I'd expect it to be used with XMLHttpRequest for instance.
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
http://www.opera.com/
think
we're fine either way though.
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
http://www.opera.com/
use plaintext, you'll have a
parse error at EOF. Is this intended?
Yes:
http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/2007-January/009113.html
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
http://www.opera.com/
extensions to the input
type=file control and canvas. (The extensions basically give you access
to the file contents.) They will have to write the processing script
themselves.
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
http://www.opera.com/
with camcorders, to be clear, given that animation
in HTML has come up elsewhere.)
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
http://www.opera.com/
there's
considerable overlap between the two communities they're not the same
thing.
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
http://www.opera.com/
synthesized event
dispatching is synchronous. I don't think postMessage() should be
different.
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
http://www.opera.com/
On Sat, 05 Apr 2008 00:03:58 +0200, Aaron Boodman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 2:39 PM, Anne van Kesteren [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
It doesn't make sense to change this given that all synthesized event
dispatching is synchronous. I don't think postMessage() should
in the specification.
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
http://www.opera.com/
synchronous was more a side effect of
the moving process than something intentional.)
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
http://www.opera.com/
search and replace through JavaScript files and CSS files not suffice?
Alternatively, you could use getComputedStyle() to get the color values
from your CSS file.
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
http://www.opera.com/
/daltonize/
As far as that goes I don't think you should classify canvas any
different from a scripted img.
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
http://www.opera.com/
setItem() is called with a null value.
2 - Specify setItem(key, null) to have the exact same effects as
removeItem(key).
I prefer #2. Thoughts?
Euhm, setItem() takes two strings. Therefore I'd expect null, undefined,
etc. to be stringified.
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
http
On Fri, 11 Apr 2008 02:03:45 +0200, Ian Hickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 7 Nov 2006, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
The definition of downloading a resource must be clear that even if the
resource does not need to be downloaded (because it has been cached or
something) the load event still
obstacles to this exist?
The Web.
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
http://www.opera.com/
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 22:01:49 +0200, William F Hammond
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anne van Kesteren [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The Web.
Really!?!
Yes, see for instance:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2007Aug/1248.html
It's time for user agents to stop supporting bogus
community. '
Is that really so?
That's the current proposal. I personally think a W3C Recommendation
backing it should be enough as well.
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
http://www.opera.com/
for:
http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-background/#the-background-origin
?
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
http://www.opera.com/
100x100px wide regardless of the border size, but the content
size would shrink and expand.
Oh, you want 'box-sizing':
http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/CR-css3-ui-20040511/#box-sizing
(This property has several UA implementations already. Some with a prefix
only, admittedly.)
--
Anne van Kesteren
http
a * as
argument? I would prefer we keep that part of the API as is.
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
http://www.opera.com/
implementations do differ.
I think it would make sense for Firefox and Opera (and Safari) to align
with Internet Explorer and ignore the tabindex attribute when it has an
invalid value specified.
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
http://www.opera.com/
,
setItem(foo, null);
Is this correct?
If so, the spec is fine as-is, and removeItem() is the only way to
remove an individual item.
This was what I was suggesting, yes.
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
http://www.opera.com/
) that would imply a body element for instance.
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
http://www.opera.com/
think we should allow this for cases as demonstrated by this
site:
http://noorderlicht.vpro.nl/
(Disclaimer: I have worked on that site three years ago.)
(I agree that a global href= attribute would not be very feasible given
all the other attributes a has.)
--
Anne van Kesteren
http
a
as being phrasing content only. The only issue I see if this were
added, is whether it would be better to have the ismap attribute of
img only work with a or to have it work with the new element as well.
The a element can already do this and it would be backwards compatible.
--
Anne van Kesteren
.
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
http://www.opera.com/
that, if we don't make it clear what the idea is that might end up
happening in practice here and there.
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
http://www.opera.com/
specify it on font-size),
it's different from the traditional em unit in that respect.
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
http://www.opera.com/
with
your suggested replacement rule? I'd expect that to not work.
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
http://www.opera.com/
in a particular browser
while we can still make the handling something sane we can all agree on.
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
http://www.opera.com/
represent nothing.
What does this mean? Black is customary for video, but leaving the
region transparent (thus falling back to css background color) is
another option. Which is better?
Maybe a default style sheet entry like
video { background-color:#000 }
--
Anne van Kesteren
http
.
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
http://www.opera.com/
div style='inherit: nothing'/div
That would be CSS. I suggest you subscribe to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing
list and give your feedback there.
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
http://www.opera.com/
= and seamless= we already have for
sandboxing. This attribute, doc=, would take a string of markup where
you would only need to escape the quotation character used (so either ' or
). The fallback for legacy user agents would be the src= attribute.
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl
is that needed? The elements provide a way to link to multiple codecs
of which the user agent will then make a choice.
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
http://www.opera.com/
On Mon, 23 Jun 2008 09:34:27 +0200, Frode Børli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
I'd suggest looking into the work the W3C has been doing on this for the
past two years:
http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/XMLHttpRequest-2/
http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/access-control/
--
Anne van Kesteren
http
that do not check this header?
It's not strictly required, but highly recommended. Older Web applications
wouldn't opt-in and would therefore be as vulnerable as they are today.
Anyway, this is the wrong list to debate that specification. You want
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Anne van Kesteren
http
http://www.w3.org/html/wg/html5/ has some usage of same-origin while it
seems that the intention is for it to be all same origin. I'd prefer if
it was all same origin (apart from tokens, of course) as that's what
I/I'll use in XLMHttpRequest et al.
--
Anne van Kesteren
http
http://www.w3.org/html/wg/html5/#url says that URL is always associated
with a Document. What does that mean for the second argument of
postMessage? Or for the value of Websocket-Origin?
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
http://www.opera.com/
be delayed slightly because Web Forms
2.0 is not integrated yet, but that might happen soon.)
Kind regards,
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
http://www.opera.com/
, there's a lot of clients
out there without an Enter key.
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
http://www.opera.com/
tested this but it might very well be that if you dispatch a
custom bubbling event named scroll the onscroll attribute of an ancestor
element, of the element on which you dispatch it, might very well trigger.)
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
http://www.opera.com/
actually played with it so far.)
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
http://www.opera.com/
/div
The specification states that only certain elements are interactive
content, not everything that's focusable.
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
http://www.opera.com/
think the URL argument is the best part of this feature. I don't
want to lose it!
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
http://www.opera.com/
. It may not be ideal, but it fits with the existing spec.
Actually, data- attributes are not intended for this purpose.
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
http://www.opera.com/
related work (I have searched, without success)? Or does
scope=ROWGROUP cover that?
rowgroup does indeed cover that scenario.
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
http://www.opera.com/
(people being able to do
their own thing, unified data model, etc), though I agree with others that
the complexity (lengthy URIs, qname/curie cruft) is an issue. Especially
given the copy paste authors you want to enable this for, down the road.
--
Anne van Kesteren
http
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 23:55:07 +0200, Ben Adida [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anne van Kesteren wrote:
FWIW, when considering language complexity, just considering whether it
impacts user agents seems naïve. Eg, it impacts people reading the
specification, people writing documentation, people writing
On Fri, 29 Aug 2008 07:08:37 +0200, Manu Sporny
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anne van Kesteren wrote:
The idea and premise of RDF is sort of attractive (people being able to
do their own thing, unified data model, etc), though I agree with others
that the complexity (lengthy URIs, ***qname
place in the
stream.
Why shouldn’t that throw a WRONG_DOCUMENT_ERR?
Because browsers knowingly violate the DOM and we now plan on updating the
DOM specification to match the arguably more sane behavior of not throwing
(and simply modifying ownerDocument).
--
Anne van Kesteren
http
. (gsnedders is working on a tool that does the same, is
completely open, and open source.)
The output is then the two links you showed above.
(Nobody mentioned the specifics so I thought I'd give another reply to
this e-mail.)
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
http
based on Web APIs
(e.g., XMLHttpRequest, form, etc.).
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
http://www.opera.com/
On Thu, 25 Sep 2008 11:07:54 +0200, Julian Reschke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Anne van Kesteren wrote:
...
What's true is that you can't require existing HTTP/1.1 clients to
send it with every POST request (did anybody seriously suggest that?).
The suggestion was for POST requests the browser
On Thu, 25 Sep 2008 11:16:06 +0200, Julian Reschke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
So what's the spec defining Origin? I thought it was XmlHttpRequest(2)?
Access Control for Cross-Site Requests.
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
http://www.opera.com/
On Thu, 25 Sep 2008 11:28:21 +0200, Julian Reschke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Anne van Kesteren wrote:
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-message-headers/current/index.html
So, is there a case where IANA registration was attempted and expert
review did *not* happen?
This e-mail from
On Thu, 25 Sep 2008 12:04:46 +0200, Julian Reschke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Anne van Kesteren wrote:
This e-mail from January 27 never got a reply:
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-message-headers/current/msg00085.html
Several changes to the specification have since
someone else, but we don't remember who
it was.)
Probably somewhere on the public-webapps or public-webapi list in context
of cross-domain XMLHttpRequest. Anyway, this wouldn't work for login based
on HTTP authentication or based on IP address or something.
--
Anne van Kesteren
http
401 - 500 of 1655 matches
Mail list logo