On Thu, 15 Jun 2006 13:24:38 +0430, Gwyn Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
OK, I've reset the spam-traps again - If you want to stay out of them
then:
a) Don't use Offline Explorer. [1]
b) Don't use Opera. [2]
More...
[1] When I have some spare time, I'll try have a go with some
Hey Les,
For me code is like pictures, they speek for themselves.
Sorry, I probably was not clear enough about this: I totally agree with
that.
Actually, for me, looking at the code most of the time helps more than
any technichal explanation.
However, if I read a book on Wicket (or any other
Dunno. It's web. What I'd do is that I'd let datepicker be and change
the modal window content to page instead of panel. There are also other
poblems with panel (hiding inputs in explorer), so for now I'd stick
with page.
-Matej
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
On 9/13/06, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL
Hey Igor,
Although I disagree about the 'real life' (that's what you have the
design for: to avoid the constant architecture change), you are right
that in a book it is a valid approach.
However, I very much dislike it unless you clearly state in the
beginning that you are gonna do it in a messy
What other types of components would you like to see? How would you all like to see the data stored?Would you like te see a relatively simple database or a content repository like the one described in the JSR-170?
Ted RickOn 9/14/06, Nick Heudecker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One project we did
the point i was trying to make is that the progression itself can be an important part of the learning - its the journey not the destination stuff.compare the code you write now to the code you wrote two years ago. i bet the one you write now is a lot more efficient and much cleaner. now imagine
Okay, understood. And you are right, there hopefullt (and luckily,
looking back at my code from former days :) always is a progress and you
learn (baby-)step by (baby-)step.
However, I think that I chose to read a book in order to skip a few of
these steps. Basically, I am trying to learn from
On the other hand, showing the newbie how to write the (possiblycomplex) program without anonymous classes and then have him refactor
the whole thing later to use anonymous classes he will not understandwhen to use and when not to use anonymous classes and he would have togo through the whole code
Is there any good reason - for the user, not for the developpers;-) not
to be JSR-170 compliant ? It would normally be possible to use an
existing repository for start. After all Wicket seems to be much more
usefull to developp the client application than the repository itself.
Pierre-Yves
Che,
One thing I have learned is that you learn much more from your errors
than from your successes. The reason is that when you make an error, you
have to figure why it didn't work and how to fix it. When you have
success, you already know the reason: it's just because you are very
good at
except that i wouldnt consider a few printed pages of code a
complex example, but thats just me :)
Well, some of the examples are actually quite complex - if you are new
in Wicket. There are loads of IConverters and stuff that need to
register each other (chained) with the main application. It
Hey Pierre-Yves,
I absolutely agree with you!
But then you actually have to say Not like this! when you do point out an
error in your book.
I don't know if you have read this book, but in quite a few places the author
shows you one (absolutely valid) way of doing something, then another one
On 9/15/06, Ted Roeloffzen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What other types of components would you like to see?
How would you all like to see the data stored?
Would you like te see a relatively simple database or a content repository
like the one described in the JSR-170?
From what I read, using
I'm out of the country today, so can't do anything right now, but did
you read my point (b), as your comment suggests you didn't?
/Gwyn
On 15/09/06, ali [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 15 Jun 2006 13:24:38 +0430, Gwyn Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
OK, I've reset the spam-traps again - If
Hello!
Sorry for may be a silly question, but I am a newbie in Wicket.
Now I am studying it and came to studying AJAX components.
I have a following message in Firefox JS Console when I try to use
AutocompleteTextField with just copy/paste from examples.
Error: wicketThrottler is not defined
make sure your servlet mapping ends with /*so /something/* not just /something or /something/-IgorOn 9/15/06, Arseny
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Hello!Sorry for may be a silly question, but I am a newbie in Wicket.
Now I am studying it and came to studying AJAX components.I have a following message
can we get a quickstart please?-IgorOn 9/15/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Hello,I have the problem whereI have to display a form that haslist of panels
where every panel has a bunch of form components. It looks like if my panelhas only labels and I use a Loop component everythig
I did and I did see the fragment example, but in my case I am dealing with
the subclasses of the panel class being attached to the item element of the
list. If the panel has lables only it works, but in case I put there a
textfield it dies. Does it mean I should not be using Loop to loop over
Okay, this is how it is in current svn.
For 1.x, hashCode is used to generate id.
For 2.0, getClassRelativePath() is used, as the place in component
hierarchy is already known in constructor. hope it helps.
-Matej
samyem wrote:
Thanks. That was helpful, but it seems to be more difficult than
loop generally shouldnt be used because you will run into problems with losing state when validation fails, but that does not cause an exception.to avoid the state loss issue use a listview with setReuseItems(true) called on it.
if you want help with this i think you need to recreate the problem
That worked. THank you
Gennadiy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by:
The fix should be in SVN. But there is a bug in 1.2 now that prevents
rendering datepicker in ajax response, so I wouldn't recommend updating
right now.
In the meanwhile you can try to disable ajax debug, it should help.
( getAjaxSettings().setAjaxDebugModeEnabled(false) ).
-Matej
Iuly
I tried to put a Panel with a Form inside a model window. The form is
displayes very well but I notice some strange behavior. So my
questionis: are modal windows designed to work with forms and are my
problems related to the early state of wicket 2.0 or were modal windows
never ment to contain all
I need a place where i can initialize a page, get data from the database and set the models of my components. I assume I'm going to need the data before i set the models. I know some components constructors require models to be passed in and can not be set later. The problem with doing this work
On 9/15/06, Scott Lusebrink [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I need a place where i can initialize a page, get data from the database and
set the models of my components. I assume I'm going to need the data before
i set the models.
The models and the actual data they link to are different things.
Why would you even create the page while you're actually linking toit? E.g, when you do (
2.0 code):because he wants to link to a page, the obvious component is PageLink and it takes a Page instance in its contructor - so its the most obvious way to link to a page for a noob. you guys keep
because he wants to link to a page, the obvious component is PageLink and it
takes a Page instance in its contructor - so its the most obvious way to
link to a page for a noob.
Erm. Maybe. I didn't get that from his email.
you guys keep outvoting me on removing that
constructor, but its
On Fri, 15 Sep 2006 15:31:49 +0430, Gwyn Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
you read my point (b), as your comment suggests you didn't?
/Gwyn
On 15/09/06, ali [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 15 Jun 2006 13:24:38 +0430, Gwyn Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
OK, I've reset the spam-traps again
28 matches
Mail list logo
