On Jan 16, 2015 2:49 AM, Max Semenik maxsem.w...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 10:38 PM, Bryan Davis bd...@wikimedia.org wrote:
One of the bigger questions I have about the potential shift to
requiring services is the fate of shared hosting deployments of
MediaWiki. What will
On Jan 9, 2015 3:24 PM, Rob Moen rm...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Currently our approach on social media is that Social media websites
aren't useful for spreading news and reaching out to potential users and
contributors. [1] I challenge this though. Is it really true? Twitter
has 254 million
Your current balance is 0.11 XPM.
Woo, a whole eighth of a cent (USD). Soon you'll be able to buy a little
pseudo-brass token, then a private floating island!
(Personally i think the tipping for commits is an interesting idea.
Although tiping for bugs would seem better as those are concrete
Not entirely. Unlike message copyright, the message used on thumb.php
(badtitletext) is not a raw html message. It is meant to be parsed and
displayed regularly. And always was. Except it was re-used for thumb.php,
and
forgotten to be parsed there. I won't go into details, but it's
== Security fixes in 1.24.1, 1.23.8, 1.22.15 and 1.19.23 ==
* (bug T76686) [SECURITY] thumb.php outputs wikitext message as raw HTML,
which could lead to xss. Permission to edit MediaWiki namespace is
required
to exploit this.
Really? That's stretching the definition of a security bug.
On Dec 9, 2014 1:35 PM, Eallan h.yi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all!
I am thinking about a new idea about a content tree extension of
web/desktop/computer Wiki. When I use mobile phone to access website of
Wikipedia, I can fold and unfold a content item of the content tree.
That's
very
There's actually a good bit of information that is available from the API
that isn't in the web UI (or isn't very visible there). For example,
history pages only display timestamps to the minute while the API gives
resolution to the second.
You can actually get up to the second resolution if
On 12/3/14, Giuseppe Lavagetto glavage...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Hi all,
it's been quite a journey since we started working on HHVM, and last
week (November 25th) HHVM was finally introduced to all users who didn't
opt-in to the beta feature.
Starting on monday, we started reinstalling all
On Dec 8, 2014 5:10 PM, svetlana svetl...@fastmail.com.au wrote:
In my view, if a Labs tool is a success, it should be written as a wiki
Extension and deployed to relevant wikis. What you're saying essentially
means that there is a need to make the wiki truly extensible without much
pain.
Thats
On 12/2/14, Ankita Shukla ankitashukla...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello!
I am an OPW Intern for round#09 and will be working on a spelling
dictionary project, the proposal of which is available here
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/User:Ankitashukla/Proposal.
Also, we'd be using this
Thanksgiving is only celebrated at this time in the US. Many of us dont
celebrate it.
That said downtime happens, and its a non-essential service during non
working hours. Well it may be frustrating, its not the end of the world. If
anyone is despretely looking for a bug to fix, they can ask on
On Nov 30, 2014 2:07 PM, Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijs...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hoi,
The argument about non-working hours is problematic. When the only thing
that counts are the working hours of staff in the USA you may be right. As
it is, WIkimedia Germany has staff working at other times and they
No. The Drafts extension (and any feature that puts hidden content on the
servers) was veto'ed years ago by Legal. We need to stop beating this dead
horse.
J.
Err, what? Quick don't tell legal about Special:UploadStash, or the
userjs- options api.
--
As a quick hack I made a little
== Preferences made easier ==
MediaWiki is known to be extremely flexible and customisable, but few
users use its full potential. In 1.24, we aim to make dozens obscure
preferences easily discoverable and obvious to use.
Umm, what does this mean? Were there code changes to make prefs more
On 11/26/14, Markus Glaser gla...@hallowelt.biz wrote:
Hello everyone,
I would like to announce the release of MediaWiki 1.23.7, 1.22.14 and
1.19.22. This is a regular security and maintenance release. Download links
are given at the end of this email.
== Security fixes ==
* (bugs 66776,
On Nov 13, 2014 11:43 AM, Derric Atzrott datzr...@alizeepathology.com
wrote:
Indeed - I am somewhat surprised by James's firm opposition.
I tend to agree with James on this one in that if the edit summaries
are to be modified then they need a revision history.
Typos in edit summary are
On Nov 13, 2014 12:45 PM, Nathan nawr...@gmail.com wrote:
I can see it being useful in two circumstances:
1) As part of the oversight right, in order to edit an edit summary
without
hiding the entire revision
2) A right of a user to edit their own edit summaries, if the edit summary
is
On 11/13/14, Chad innocentkil...@gmail.com wrote:
Please help me draft some guidelines for Phabricator repo callsigns.
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Phabricator/Callsign_naming_conventions
The subpage on naming our existing repos should be especially fun:
On Nov 12, 2014 9:44 AM, James Forrester jforres...@wikimedia.org wrote:
On 8 November 2014 22:01, Brian Wolff bawo...@gmail.com wrote:
Honestly i dont think anyone's even tried to improve the conflict
screen.
There's probably a lot of low hanging fruit on the usability of edit
conflicts
On Nov 9, 2014 5:39 AM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
On 9 November 2014 09:27, aude aude.w...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Nov 9, 2014 at 8:51 AM, Pine W wiki.p...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm curious, Risker: if you don't mind my asking, what about being
required
to supply a throwaway email
Honestly i dont think anyone's even tried to improve the conflict screen.
There's probably a lot of low hanging fruit on the usability of edit
conflicts which could be persued that have nothing to do with the hard,
real time editing solutions (as cool as those are).
If someone is intrested in
For some more background, when we proposed something like that to Chris
Steipp he was pretty iffy about it, and he's not wrong. At other sites
that
don't have a CAPTCHA on signup (like Facebook, Quora, others) they avoid a
spam problem in part because they require an email address and
On 11/7/14, Federico Leva (Nemo) nemow...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 on Tim. FancyCaptcha is worse than useless.
Nemo
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Literally an
On Nov 1, 2014 8:52 PM, Mark A. Hershberger m...@nichework.com wrote:
After some discussion in September, Quim created T480 in Phabricator[1].
Markus polished up the Security Release section of the Release
checklist[2] and we agreed to use it as the process for security
releases from now on.
If the old maintainer is still around, ask them if they are ok with you
taking over. ( just to avoid stepping on toes)
If they cant be reached, ask at
http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Gerrit/Project_ownership explaining why you
want to take over maintinance of the extension. Helps if you have pre
On 10/26/14, Ricordisamoa ricordisa...@openmailbox.org wrote:
There is the ImagePageFileHistoryLine
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:Hooks/ImagePageFileHistoryLine
hook already, but it is for data rows only.
Any help appreciated.
___
On 10/26/14, Ricordisamoa ricordisa...@openmailbox.org wrote:
Il 26/10/2014 20:45, Amir E. Aharoni ha scritto:
In the Hebrew Wikipedia there's a discussion about the Thanks feature,
which raises the following confusion among other things: Why does the
person who is sending the thank-you gets a
Terry wrote a piratey blog post about his departure here:
http://terrychay.com/article/fair-winds-and-godspeed-me-hearties.shtml
Oh wow.
If Terry is still reading this list, I want to take this opportunity
to wish him best of luck in whatever he has planned next.
--bawolff
Some more examples that might be useful in some form:
- Global variable or function should never be used
(This is probably the only really useful one, because removing global
functions/variables would result in better testable code.)
- PHP debug statements found
In maintenance scripts and
On 10/23/14, Dan Garry dga...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Pine,
Do you read the monthly engineering reports? They're useful to give you a
high-level insight into the engineering efforts going on at the Wikimedia
Foundation. For example, the September report is currently being written
here:
On 10/24/14, Daniel Friesen dan...@nadir-seen-fire.com wrote:
On 2014-10-23 7:55 PM, MZMcBride wrote:
Are there statistics about what versions of PHP exist in the wild among
MediaWiki users or users of other large PHP applications (Drupal,
WordPress, etc.)?
On Oct 19, 2014 11:52 AM, Rjd0060 rjd0060.w...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 10:44 AM, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:
And, even though it should go without saying, Bugzilla will need to
remain
online in a read-only format indefinitely post-migration.
Why would this be
On Oct 16, 2014 7:02 PM, E.C Okpo eco...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello, I am working on my application for the FOSS Outreach Program, but I
am having some trouble getting in contact with the mentor for my chose
project - Ori Livneh https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/User:Ori.livneh. I
have idled on IRC
On Oct 12, 2014 6:54 AM, Quim Gil q...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Hi Ankita,
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 11:06 PM, Ankita Shukla ankitashukla...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello everyone!
I am Ankita Shukla and am a Computer Science and Engineering student
pursuing
the junior year of Bachelor of
On Oct 12, 2014 10:13 AM, Divyanshi Kathuria divyanshikathu...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 09:54:03PM +0200, dan entous wrote:
this would be the best way to achieve what's needed. in any case, i
believe this is the general idea antoine is getting at.
Thank You so much for your
On 10/10/14, Patrick Earley pear...@wikimedia.org wrote:
*(cross-posted to wikimedia-l)*
Hello all,
For our second round of Individual Engagement Grant applications in 2014,
we have a great crop of ideas. Wikimedians have dropped by to offer
feedback, support, or expertise to some of the
On 10/7/14, James Forrester jforres...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Hello all,
It is my great pleasure to announce that Bartosz Dziewoński[0] has joined
the Wikimedia Foundation as a contractor in Features Engineering.
Bartosz has worked as a volunteer developer for several years, specialising
in
On Oct 7, 2014 10:03 PM, Dan Garry dga...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Jon,
Regarding editing specific templates, I'll echo Brion here. If a template
is causing difficulties for your work and you feel like you know enough to
fix it, then fix it! That's the wiki way. If you don't have the rights to
On Oct 7, 2014 10:03 PM, Dan Garry dga...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Jon,
Regarding editing specific templates, I'll echo Brion here. If a template
is causing difficulties for your work and you feel like you know enough to
fix it, then fix it! That's the wiki way. If you don't have the rights to
On 10/2/14, Kevin Wayne Williams kwwilli...@kwwilliams.com wrote:
Derric Atzrott schreef op 2014/09/30 6:08:
Hello everyone,
[snip]
There must be a way that we can allow users to work from Tor.
[snip more]
I think the first step is to work harder to block devices, not IP
addresses. One
On 10/2/14, Tyler Romeo tylerro...@gmail.com wrote:
Well you can also edit from port 80 (unless we deployed site-wide SSL
without me knowing).
Not to mention 198.35.26.96 and 2620:0:863:ed1a::1.
--bawolff
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
On Oct 1, 2014 10:55 AM, Risker risker...@gmail.com wrote:
This is something that has to be discussed *on the projects themselves*,
not on mailing lists that have (comparatively) very low participation by
active editors.
Unless people want to trial on mw.org (assuming there is dev buy in, not
On Oct 1, 2014 11:40 AM, Brad Jorsch (Anomie) bjor...@wikimedia.org
wrote:
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 10:29 AM, Brian Wolff bawo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Oct 1, 2014 10:55 AM, Risker risker...@gmail.com wrote:
This is something that has to be discussed *on the projects
themselves
I wish it was a contrived problem. However, this is the conceit by which
the edits are attributed for licensing purposes, and it's a non-trivial
matter. While I'm fully supportive of finding another way to do this, it
is a fundamental issue that would require fairly extensive
legal
On Oct 1, 2014 3:56 PM, Derric Atzrott datzr...@alizeepathology.com
wrote:
Another idea for a potential technical solution, this one provided
by the user Mirimir on the Tor mailing list. I thought this was
actually a pretty good idea.
Wikimedia could authenticate users with GnuPG keys. As
On 10/1/14, Markus Glaser gla...@hallowelt.biz wrote:
Hello everyone,
I would like to announce the release of MediaWiki 1.19.20, 1.22.12 and
1.23.5. This is a security release. Download links are given at the end of
this email.
== Security ==
* (bug 70672) SECURITY: OutputPage: Remove
On 9/30/14, Derric Atzrott datzr...@alizeepathology.com wrote:
Alright, this is a long email, and it acts to basically summarise all of the
discussions that have already happened on this topic. I'll be posting a
copy
of it to Mediawiki.org as well so that it will be easier to find out about
We need to transition away from a framework where IP addresses are our only
means to block problematic editors and towards a framework where we can do
so via other less intrusive means.
And use what instead? Identities based on proof of possession of a
phone numbers? Surety bonds paid in
On 9/30/14, Brion Vibber bvib...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Some folks in #wikimedia-parsoid are still real excited about the idea
though, so a couple more notes should people decide they like it anyway. :)
* Consider either a wikitext wrapper like {{#sig:Username}} (my preference)
or a markup tag
On 9/29/14, Roxana Necula necula.roxan...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
My name is Roxana and I am an engineering student at the Polytechnic
University of Bucharest, Romania.
I would like to be part of MediaWiki open-source community and participate
in the Outreach Program for Women round 9.
The
On 9/26/14, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
On 24 September 2014 23:28, Markus Glaser gla...@hallowelt.biz wrote:
Patch to previous version (1.19.18):
https://releases.wikimedia.org/mediawiki/1.19/mediawiki-1.19.19.patch.gz
So I downloaded and applied this. gunzipped it, got this:
On Sep 23, 2014 8:41 AM, Jack Phoenix j...@countervandalism.net wrote:
tl,dr: MediaWiki needs a more human-friendly interface for using videos in
wiki pages. https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Video significantly
improves the video experience in MediaWiki. The extension is not
On 9/23/14, Merlijn van Deen valhall...@arctus.nl wrote:
On 23 Sep 2014 02:34, Isarra Yos zhoris...@gmail.com wrote:
Apparently I spoke too soon - authentication fails with https too. So it
really is unusable.
Please note that the https password is *not* your normal wikitech password,
but
On 9/18/14, Daniel Friesen dan...@nadir-seen-fire.com wrote:
Every once in awhile I've found an idea for a service which would for
one reason or another need to know what releases of MediaWiki exist and
which ones are obsolete.
As far as I know, we don't have any sort of API or machine
On 9/12/14, Sumana Harihareswara suma...@wikimedia.org wrote:
I write this email with regret to let you know that I've decided to leave
the Wikimedia Foundation after nearly four years working here, and that my
last day will be 30 September.
I go into my reasoning and plans in this personal
On 9/14/14, Gergo Tisza gti...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Hi,
I would like to flag a large number of wiki pages based on whether their
HTML passes a certain test, so that failing pages can be easily listed and
counted. The flags should adapt when pages are created or modified. (The
specific use
On 8/29/14, Seb35 seb35wikipe...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Sometimes in LocalSettings.php or in extensions settings one want to do
simple computations on the namespaces or related to the Git branch in a
development environment. Unfortunately this is not (resp. no more) really
possible, because
On 8/29/14, Ori Livneh o...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Kevin Israel (User:PleaseStand) now has +2 in mediawiki/core, following a
successful nomination by MZMcBride[1]. Congratulations! :)
[1]:
https://www.mediawiki.org/w/index.php?title=Gerrit/Project_ownershipoldid=1072656
Note:
There is no i18n patch as there are no changes in translation.
Umm, why not? Surely there has been new translations in translatewiki since
the last release.
--bawolff
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
On 8/22/14, Stephan Gambke s7ep...@gmail.com wrote:
TL;DR: Please review [1]
I was asked to discuss the topic on the mailing list, so here goes.
Since some time Siebrand is making an effort to improve code quality by
making it phpcs-strict compliant [0]. This involves explicitly declaring
On 8/22/14, Tyler Romeo tylerro...@gmail.com wrote:
My opinion on this matter is that if you were using a variable prefixed with
“m”, which is clearly one of our conventions for declaring variables
private, you are asking for trouble. Just recently when the password hashing
API patch was
On 8/22/14, John phoenixoverr...@gmail.com wrote:
How feasible would it be to enable file access/linking to files on a given
filesystem without having to upload them?
Use case, I have a documentation system in /server/docs which I provide
access internally via a file share to all users.
On 8/14/14, Tyler Romeo tylerro...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everybody,
So we had a discussion about this a while ago, but just recently PHP let
out the final 5.3 release. [0] Back in the previous thread concerning PHP
5.3, there seemed to be general agreement toward upping our PHP minimum
On Aug 11, 2014 1:24 PM, Tim Landscheidt t...@tim-landscheidt.de wrote:
C. Scott Ananian canan...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Almost every WMF developer attended Wikimania this year, and there was
quite a lot of fruitful discussion and feedback given. Somewhat
surprisingly (to me, it was my
On Aug 11, 2014 7:58 AM, svetlana svetl...@fastmail.com.au wrote:
On Mon, 11 Aug 2014, at 19:56, Ricordisamoa wrote:
Why aren't they implementing a global repository for gadgets, modules,
templates which is (IMHO) what the community needs first?
THANK YOU! you are, alone, worth a whole
Now, having observed that not only user Eloquence (aka Erik Moeller)
himself engaged in the enforcement of superprotect right on de.wp
[1] but soon after a workaround was published a change was deployed
[2, 3] as counter measurement to block any possible interference can
no longer be
, if there is
someone interested in fixing it, etc. In this case it is very easy to fix,
and there is an entity contributing to mw who is extremely interested in it
being fixed. So it got fixed. But it would still probably have been fixed
if somebody else complained.
--bawolff
On 8/12/14, Brian Wolff bawo
PM, Brian Wolff bawo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Aug 11, 2014 2:34 PM, James HK jamesin.hongkon...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
[Putting purely the mw dev hat on]
I'm putting a hat on from pure observer point of view as neither a
member of de.wp nor wmf.
Note: that i consider my mw dev hat
On Aug 6, 2014 8:57 AM, svetlana svetl...@fastmail.com.au wrote:
On Wed, 6 Aug 2014, at 21:49, Andre Klapper wrote:
On Tue, 2014-08-05 at 22:05 -0700, Pine W wrote:
After reading this [1] I am wondering if Wikimedia should start taking
steps to reduce reliance on usernames and passwords.
on the
theme of one-time passwords that I think could bd explored.
Pine
On Aug 6, 2014 11:05 PM, Brian Wolff bawo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Aug 6, 2014 8:57 AM, svetlana svetl...@fastmail.com.au wrote:
On Wed, 6 Aug 2014, at 21:49, Andre Klapper wrote:
On Tue, 2014-08-05 at 22:05 -0700, Pine
I've long wondered about that. Are there really no browser based public key
based solutions? Are there any fundamental reasons why that is like that
other than that it never got implemented, or never became popular?
It seems like the right solution for the password problem.
-Martijn
I
Oh I have no problem with regular forced password changes, say quarterly or
so; I'm used to that in other contexts. But not a one-time password, which
will actually increase risk because people will choose keep me logged in
to avoid having to get a new password every time they want to log
but maybe browser and preferences
fingerprinting would be more effective anyway, since: tor.
Probably not as effective as straight up blocking tor as we do now? :P
(Although seriously - I would love if we didn't block tor like we do
now. However you can't abuse the site with tor when you can't
Yes that's correct. The Ubuntu package isn't officially supported.
This is more a historical thing than anything else, as a couple years
back one of the packages (I think it was redhat's) decided that moving
the skins directory (This was back before RL, so that included all the
css and JS) to a
On Jul 19, 2014 8:23 AM, Ricordisamoa ricordisa...@openmailbox.org
wrote:
How does MediaWiki decide when to show the mw_metadata table in file
description pages?
The imageinfo API lists 3 different metadata types: metadata,
commonmetadata and extmetadata.
While commons:File:Gaivota -
I imagine old names die hard. People still say mysql instead of mariadb.
Most of the varnish related code in mediawiki is still labelled squid. The
stuff related to libav in our video handling code calls it ffmpeg. Etc.
--bawolff
On Jul 18, 2014 1:01 AM, Pine W wiki.p...@gmail.com wrote:
OK,
On 7/18/14, Ricordisamoa ricordisa...@openmailbox.org wrote:
The CC BY-SA license, used on most WMF projects, requires /attribution/.
Attribution for edits made by unregistered/unlogged users is done by the
exclusive means of their IP address.
By clicking the 'Save' button, they agreed to
On 7/14/14, Quim Gil q...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Hi, GeoCrumbs is an extension deployed in Wikimedia servers:
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:GeoCrumbs
It has no official maintainers, what about unofficial ones? Any volunteers?
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Developers/Maintainers
I
On 7/9/14, Lars Aronsson l...@aronsson.se wrote:
On 07/08/2014 10:30 PM, Rachel Farrand wrote:
This year we are expecting a very large turnout at the London Hackathon.
Last I heard there were just under 400 people registered.
Are those 400 already contributors to the code base, or
does it
On 7/6/14, Faidon Liambotis fai...@wikimedia.org wrote:
On Sat, Jul 05, 2014 at 09:09:07PM -0700, Brion Vibber wrote:
That X-Range header was an experiment me and Faidon tried for the ogv.js
media player I've been prototyping (Flash fallback version) . We couldn't
get the extra header -- or
On 7/6/14, Brion Vibber bvib...@wikimedia.org wrote:
That X-Range header was an experiment me and Faidon tried for the ogv.js
media player I've been prototyping (Flash fallback version) . We couldn't
get the extra header -- or the regular Range header -- to work through the
varnish layer
Hi all.
Does anyone here know what the deal is with
upload.wikimedia.org/crossdomain.xml ? I couldn't find it anywhere in
the puppet repository. I was under the impression that it was so
cortado java applet could play video files. However its current value
is:
?xml version=1.0?
!DOCTYPE
On 6/30/14, Adam Wight awi...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Hi,
Fundraising would like the ability to snapshot or retrieve a CentralNotice
banner exactly as it was rendered at an earlier time, including the old
revisions of templates, which is tricky and AFAICT not supported by
MediaWiki-core.
Exact
On 6/29/14, Andre Klapper aklap...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, 2014-06-29 at 16:56 +0100, Thomas Mulhall wrote:
Hi could we discontinue support for internet explorer 6 and 7 because
jquery ui 1.11.0 drops support for internet explorer 6 and 7.
Could you elaborate how decisions made by
On 6/25/14, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:
MZMcBride wrote:
Current default:
---
$wgNamespacesWithSubpages = array(
NS_TALK = true,
NS_USER = true,
NS_USER_TALK = true,
NS_PROJECT = true,
NS_PROJECT_TALK = true,
NS_FILE_TALK = true,
NS_MEDIAWIKI = true,
On 6/26/14, Chris Steipp cste...@wikimedia.org wrote:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 5:49 PM, Alex Monk kren...@gmail.com wrote:
Chris, why don't we leave privacy policy compliance to the users posting
on
the bug? Wikimedia personal user data shouldn't be going to the security
product.
There are a
On Jun 24, 2014 9:05 PM, Risker risker...@gmail.com wrote:
On 24 June 2014 18:56, Ryan Kaldari rkald...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Nice work guys! One slight issue though. The user Selenium_user (as set
in
environment_variables) was just indefinitely blocked on en.wiki :(
Sorry to be a bit
If part of the plan for the growth team is to invite
anonymous editors to sign up, why not tailor some of those invitations
specifically to female anonymous editors? Then you could add a measure,
retention of female editors, to that particular growth project. The results
should be
On 6/19/14, Gergo Tisza gti...@wikimedia.org wrote:
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 6:27 AM, Bartosz Dziewoński matma@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm reasonably sure that the HTTP and HTTPS protocols are smart enough to
recognize cut off requests, and that any servers whatsoever are smart
enough to
On 6/18/14, Kristian Kankainen krist...@eki.ee wrote:
Hello!
I think, if one is clever enough, some categorization could be automated
allready.
Searching for pictures based on meta-data is called Concept Based Image
Retrieval, searching based on the machine vision recognized content of
the
Woo, being bold!
One thing I wonder, would it be good to specify some sort of format
for ct_params from the get go, like a json value, and document that
all callers should use this format?
--bawolff
On 6/18/14, Amir E. Aharoni amir.ahar...@mail.huji.ac.il wrote:
I didn't get any replies, so I
While having category intersection is definitely a huge plus now, for it to
work really well we need it to be traversing up and down. Does it do that
right now?
Especially because Commons has a policy against over categorisation (which
makes sense), and because we subcategorise so insanely
On 6/16/14, Gergo Tisza gti...@wikimedia.org wrote:
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 1:25 PM, Brian Wolff bawo...@gmail.com wrote:
So from what I understand, there's now been an amendment to WMF's
terms of use to require disclosure of paid contributions [1]. Its a
little unclear how this applies
So submissions are supposed to be public right? Currently there are 0
public submissions. Is there a backup plan if there are no proposals?
--bawolff
On Jun 12, 2014 3:48 PM, Greg Grossmeier g...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Reminder!
The deadline for RFP submissions is tomorrow June 13th (no
* User talk pages. Do we need multithread tree discussions in our user
talk
pages? No, we don't.
* Regular talk pages. In most cases a section gets 2-5 replies at most.
The
I think you mean on average. There are outliers here, and they aren't that
uncommon. That said i agree that in general
On Jun 10, 2014 1:10 PM, Jon Robson jdlrob...@gmail.com wrote:
The other mail seems to have gone on a huge tangent about the benefits
of Flow / what it can do. This is great but I feel like my original
question has gone unanswered so I am resurrecting it with a new e-mail
subject. I worry
On 6/6/14, Brad Jorsch (Anomie) bjor...@wikimedia.org wrote:
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 4:38 PM, Jon Robson jdlrob...@gmail.com wrote:
So I want to know:
* What are the blockers for doing this?
* Are there any use cases / killer features in LiquidThreads that are
not in Flow that need to be
On 6/6/14, Antoine Musso hashar+...@free.fr wrote:
Le 06/06/2014 20:17, Brian Wolff a écrit :
Personally I have yet to see a discussion system that surpasses (or
really even comes close) to standard talk page :::comment here.
syntax. Honestly it would make me happy if we just used
On Jun 1, 2014 2:45 AM, ENWP Pine deyntest...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I'm developing a presentation that's intended to introduce Wikimedia's
universe to other organizations that may have an interest in partnering
with us. I estimate the presentation in its full length to be about 1.5
hours,
Oh yay finally.
Ive been wishing we did that for literally years.
Thanks for making this happen.
--bawolff
On May 29, 2014 2:57 PM, Mark Holmquist mtrac...@member.fsf.org wrote:
Hi,
For the nth time, in #mediawiki, I've had someone ask how to be able to
mark a bug as resolved, or claim it,
301 - 400 of 667 matches
Mail list logo
