We just finished installing 3 Powerstation 5's and 2 Nanostation 5's on a
160 foot AM tower using an AC power choke fiber to the bottom. We put the
POE's and stuff at the top of the tower.
- Original Message -
From: Mike Hammett wispawirel...@ics-il.net
To: WISPA General List
Does anyone know if the TDMA slicing is configurable? Like 50/50 up/down,
or prioritized Voice/Video?
- Original Message -
From: e...@wisp-router.com
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 2:37 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] New UBNT M line, 802.11n without
Has anyone used the Engenius EAP-3660 (600mW / 4dbi Smoke Detector style AP) in
a hotel/motel environment? Any word on coverage, etc? Will they run open-mesh?
Thanks
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
It's been several years, but a 128 bit encrypted Citrix over 128 bit PPTP
VPN passed FCIC/NCIC audits several years ago, as well as Web based FCIC SSL
over 128 bit PPTP XP DUN to Mikrotik VPN is still passing audits via Sprint
Wireless (the regular civilian version, not the direct to T1 version
We're using a half array (3 NS2, 3 NS5's) to do 180 degree coverage of an
area, we get solid links 4 miles away. One link at 2.5 miles to a Mikrotik
board gets a -58 signal level. We use 10mhz channels in 5ghz and 20mhz in
2ghz. We don't have enough clients on it yet to really give a good
degrees?
Greg
On Jun 27, 2009, at 12:21 PM, Doug Ratcliffe wrote:
We're using a half array (3 NS2, 3 NS5's) to do 180 degree coverage
of an
area, we get solid links 4 miles away. One link at 2.5 miles to a
Mikrotik
board gets a -58 signal level. We use 10mhz channels in 5ghz and
20mhz
Clearwire would list coverage available and even if you called to cancel the
day after you took your modem home for poor service, they would send out a
tech, and even stick your modem in a plastic bag, hanging outside your
window 100 feet across your house just to say it works and you wouldn't
I don't know if Brevard Wireless is on this list, but they're all over that
county. brevardwireless.com
- Original Message -
From: Blair Davis
To: WISPA General List
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2009 4:50 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Service to Titusville, FL 32780
If you find
I know it's considered bad practice to do this, but I'm transitioning my
existing wireless network from DHCP/Static to PPPoE, and I was wondering if
there was a technical reason PPPoE DHCP can't co-exist on the same network.
Thanks
...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Brian Rohrbacher
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2009 9:46 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] POE up AM radio tower
Doug Ratcliffe wrote:
So now that the entire internet now has figured out which tower I'm
talking
about (including local competition
General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Saturday, January 03, 2009 7:09 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] POE up AM radio tower
* Doug Ratcliffe wrote, On 1/3/2009 7:33 PM:
The tower is a 4-leg self supporting tower, it was built a long time
ago,
built from what I've heard in the mid 1900's
- Original Message - From: Leon D. Zetekoff, NCE
wa4...@backwoodswireless.net
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Saturday, January 03, 2009 7:09 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] POE up AM radio tower
* Doug Ratcliffe wrote, On 1/3/2009 7:33 PM:
The tower is a 4-leg self supporting tower
We've had for many years access to a non-live AM radio tower (by non-live, the
antennas are mounted on the sides of the tower, insulated, look like long steel
cables). For a long time we ran AC to the top, into a small choke/transformer
(some little gizmo) that filtered the AM radio signal,
http://www.digital-loggers.com/lpc.html
It's more ports but starts at $109... Ours have worked perfect for us over
the years.
- Original Message -
From: Cliff Olle w...@eccentrixtechnologies.com
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Saturday, January 03, 2009 2:39 PM
result then see if that is good enough to meet your needs.
jack
Doug Ratcliffe wrote:
We've had for many years access to a non-live AM radio tower (by
non-live,
the antennas are mounted on the sides of the tower, insulated, look like
long steel cables). For a long time we ran AC to the top
feet to keep the
magnitude of the current low.
- Original Message -
From: Doug Ratcliffe do...@dwwfl.com
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Saturday, January 03, 2009 12:06 PM
Subject: [WISPA] POE up AM radio tower
We've had for many years access to a non-live AM radio
If the Doctor isn't encrypting medical-related data with SSL or VPN before
it leaves HIS network, he's violating the HIPAA guidelines. How often does
a doctor use a public wi-fi network to check on charts labs from the
hospital via a website? The SSL is what makes it compliant, now if you're
That brings Skypilot back as a viable solution for WISPs again...
- Original Message -
From: Gino Villarini g...@aeronetpr.com
To: motor...@wispa.org; WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2008 7:47 PM
Subject: [WISPA] TDD GPS Sync in Wifi chipsets ...
Big question is though, the guys using Redline Alvarion, is their monthly
ARPU much higher than the Canopy/Others?
- Original Message -
From: Chuck McCown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wireless@wispa.org
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2008 1:56 PM
Subject: [WISPA] Where is
Big question is though, the guys using Redline Alvarion, is their monthly
ARPU much higher than the Canopy/Others?
- Original Message -
From: Chuck McCown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wireless@wispa.org
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2008 1:56 PM
Subject: [WISPA] Where is
We're a computer store so we have zillions of those little threaded metal
standoffs used for computer motherboards. I believe Cyberguys sells them in
bulk as well, and we just buy the nuts for them from a local hardware store.
Just do a search for standoff.
Anyone seen a case where
Did this effect 2.9 also, or just 3.x? I still have a lot of 2.9 AP's out
there... Not really a complaint but I do have some network anomalies out
there that I'm wondering if this is the solution. Also, did this effect
standard 802.11 2.4 wifi or just Tranzeo/other CPE types?
- Original
I have SR2/5s that I've never replaced that are from the original batch,
installed outdoors, running at full power. I love the MMCX connector, and
static discharge/lightning, I had a case of a RB133 that fried from a nearby
lightning discharge that didn't damage the SR2.
All in all, very
I just sent my $5,000 wire transfer fee, just waiting for the $25 million
(some rich guy died with no heirs). Maybe it's because of the number of
scams coming from there, nobody is willing to chance running a wireless
deal.
I mean, seriously, in the IT business, would you even believe someone
I just sent my $5,000 wire transfer fee, just waiting for the $25 million
(some rich guy died with no heirs). Maybe it's because of the number of
scams coming from there, nobody is willing to chance running a wireless
deal.
I mean, seriously, in the IT business, would you even believe someone
Would OTARD apply in a scenario of a mesh AP/CPE antenna?
- Original Message -
From: Joe Fiero [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2008 12:12 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Tower site licensing problem
OTARD does not apply to any commercial
ClearWire managed to bridge the digital divide with Wimax in many places.
So whats the big deal with what this guys doing other than the free
investment advertisement? He's charging monthly for access, and you still
need a CPE to use it. So did Towerstream. If someone gave me 2.5 million
I noticed you're using a Battery Tender, is that enough to charge and run
all you're stuff? Their offices are about 20 miles from here, all the times
I've driven by there I've never thought about using that on a tower.
- Original Message -
From: Kurt Fankhauser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
So I guess you, as a WISP, must be operating solely on licensed frequencies?
- Original Message -
From: Rick Fletcher, W7RAF [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2008 8:13 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Court Injunction
If a wireless ISP
But when 802.11 became easy it invited all the people to use it who
thought that 10 watt amps were a good idea too. Doesn't the more amateur
HAM users invite those who are less experienced to just crank up the power
rather than look at the engineering of their systems? Isn't removing a
...?
You can't use ULS for earth stations. Earth stations are covered by
the international bureau as opposed to the wireless bureau.
-Matt
On Jul 27, 2008, at 6:52 PM, Doug Ratcliffe wrote:
I've read your blogs and have been keeping up with them. What I
can't seem
to find is the ULS
Has anyone gotten any headway on company negotiations in protected zones?
Almost all of the zones near me (105km is the closest to the SW, 146.7km
next closest to the South) and I have no desire to point coverage in that
direction - mainly north and northwest. But according to the FCC, I'd be
to broadcast 3650
from the top of a 10,000 foot mountain peak.
- Original Message -
From: Charles Wyble [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2008 6:20 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3650 FSS negotiations for protected areas...?
Doug Ratcliffe wrote:
Has
it the ability to
do that, you have an inexpensive hardware platform with $1 per AP
features.
- Original Message -
From: Charles Wyble [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, July 21, 2008 1:57 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] The nanostation thing
Doug Ratcliffe
My thoughts on this I've even mentied on the Mikrotik forum a while ago were
to have a 2 part system:
An outdoor wireless unit (like a Nanostation) that does nothing but act as a
raw wireless interface, that connects to a master station inside the tower
control room that is the intelligence,
The main argument is that they had a nice scalable open(able) platform when
they had the $49 Minis. They enticed everyone to get on board with a
pretty interface. Then they took the standard Mini and put advertising on
it, forcing you to either upgrade or stop using it. Now they are big, the
We've done a lot of condos. For free wifi, a 2.4 mesh network like
open-mesh covers most decent sized condos (~100 units) for less than a
grand. Then you can charge $5/unit, blow away the cable company and have
the thing paid back in 3 months.
We also install pay on demand which has had
?
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: Rogelio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Doug Ratcliffe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 3:14 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] MSOs investing
?
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: Rogelio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Doug Ratcliffe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 3:14 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] MSOs investing
Does that apply to part 15 modular approval as well for SR2/SR5/XR2/XR5?
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 12:33 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3650 XR3 locations (was: Rapid Link Launches WiMax)
I've been in
When we bought some 1W amps for export to a non-FCC country, Hyperlink made
us sign a military/export use only form and fax it back to them.
It was not just a buy online thing.
- Original Message -
From: Tom DeReggi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent:
We charge $60/month for a domain with 10 or less addresses. We use
Hmailserver with the built in antispam and it works very good, and is open
source and free, runs on Windows.
I do get some spam but the false negatives are so infrequent I don't check
my spambox anymore.
- Original
Did I notice on both of those boards, an FCC compliance and CE logo?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Friday, August 03, 2007 12:30 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] MT announces RB192 and RB333
The 192
But if you're running fiber anyways, isn't the labor cost per mile the same
with single fiber vs. say, 100 fibers in a single cable? Virtually
limitless, I would think.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Clint Ricker
Sent: Thursday, July
I'm thinking about deploying a Alvarion VL 4 system on one of my towers, and
I'd like to use the indoor chassis at the base. However, the tower is a
non-live (i.e. its got an insulated antenna from the tower) at 5000 watts.
I have AC power at the top but I'd like to use the IDU/ODU system that
, but used sheilded cat5..
On 7/6/07, Doug Ratcliffe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm thinking about deploying a Alvarion VL 4 system on one of my towers,
and
I'd like to use the indoor chassis at the base. However, the tower is a
non-live (i.e. its got an insulated antenna from the tower) at 5000
General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Alvarion VL on AM Tower
If you're in a pinch, Radio Shack part # 273-105 works.
Mouser and other part suppliers carry them as well for cheaper (not
sure on part #'s though, sorry).
Graham
On 7/6/07, Doug Ratcliffe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any info where to get one
just fine, as far as capabilty of a radio. The
VOIP engineering is up to you, on the router behind and in front of them.
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: Doug Ratcliffe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Trango VOIP
IAX2 trunking is your savior.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Doug Ratcliffe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2007 9:39 AM
Subject
Just a quick question to the list, is Trango 5800 series still a viable
option for providing data VOIP (IAX2) to customers? I know a few ISPs out
there who use it for that, but theres virtually no data at all on the
Trango site regarding it. I tried Canopy Adv. a few months back but was
the factory suggested maximum 26 simultaneous calls was a figure I was
happy with.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Forrest W Christian
Sent: Monday, July 02, 2007 2:32 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Trango VOIP
Doug
with VOIP. Are you using PPPoE?
-Eric
Forrest W Christian wrote:
Doug Ratcliffe wrote:
I tried Canopy Adv. a few months back but was
unhappy with the overall range quality (2.5 miles LOS w/ a
reflector, and
8 port ATA, the voice was choppy when I had all 8 calls going). Im
transmitting 1-3
I signed up for their free beta after reading this - and it works pretty
good. I set it to text message the voicemail, and it was accurate enough to
understand the voicemail. Except one little glitch, I said:
This is a test of callwave
And it thought I said:
This is a test is always
But
Broadband Wireless, Inc.
260-827-2482
Founding Member of WISPA
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Doug Ratcliffe
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2007 6:51 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Voicemail to Text/email
I signed up
I'm not going to get into an enormous amount of detail, but I know a
well-known licensed 2.5ghz NLOS provider, has a maximum NLOS range around
their towers of about 3-4 miles (with indoor units). That said, the
Sprint-Nextel spectrum is very unlikely to be available on independent
lease, and you
I think what we're going to need to see in the wireless industry, very soon,
is affordable medium range (1.5 miles or less) gigabit speed backhauls. I
feel that in an urban environment (city, etc) that we could build
SONET-style wireless gigabit rings around these areas. FSO / 60ghz type
We are in the process of deploying some services which are subject to
communication taxes (local, county, state, USF) by zip-code (and some
plus-4) that vary based on a state-supplied table. I don't care if it reads
the table, but rather I need to have a per-user or per-area tax-base setup
that I
It seems to me like having Ubiquiti certified with various WISP antennas
would be far cheaper than certifying each combination of Routerboard /
Wireless Card / Case / Antenna combination.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Forrest W.
11:52 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Question posed to the FCC
Doug Ratcliffe wrote:
It seems to me like having Ubiquiti certified with various WISP antennas
would be far cheaper than certifying each combination of Routerboard /
Wireless Card / Case / Antenna combination
I have suggested a FDD-style system like this on the MT forums before. My
thoughts were to have a full-protocol scheme like NStreme dual but tailored
for PTMP. HOWEVER, utilizing some bridge / mangle / filter tricks I have
done FDD schemes without NStreme-dual, making re-use and hidden node a
Is that really a necessary question, in determining whether this falls under
a DoC computer assembly or a dedicated wireless access point?
That's the question. It's a concept, in that having a declaration of
conformity certified computer with a certified wireless PCI/miniPCI card and
a
Still, Mikrotik could offer a FCC-only license code - or make all license
codes FCC only, and for no charge offer an additional world license
(included free with all non-US orders).
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Brad Belton
Sent: Monday,
I have successfully used a pair of SR2s, 9db 120 degree sectors on either
side of a middle hallway hotel (where it's narrow and long, with a hallway
in the middle), up to 8 stories tall from the parking lot and the pool deck.
For a longer hotel, say a 240 room, 7 story hotel (lower 2 floors, no
Wow. Do you have access to rooftops and/or light poles?
Mikrotik w/ mesh allows lots of flexibility in a power-only situation. I
use it all the time. You may need a big backhaul mesh arrangement.
Other options include Meraki Mesh, a good value @ only $99/outdoor,
$49/indoor, and a
But the base product, the computer does not start life as an intentional
radiator. So at what point does a FCC certified computer become an
intentional radiator as a whole?
When you add a wireless card? That would land Dell, HP and Compaq in a load
of trouble. But alas, is a FCC certified
I found the FCC document regarding the modular certifications. If Mikrotik
would submit (or someone submitted on their behalf, for them) their boards
and representative power supplies, for FCC testing, and passed (no
peripheral cards, they are SEPARATELY tested for FCC compliance by the
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Doug Ratcliffe
Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2007 8:58 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] MT Babble
I found the FCC document regarding the modular certifications. If Mikrotik
would submit (or someone submitted on their behalf, for them) their boards
Actually, they have implemented a CSMA/CA bypass on their new 3.0 beta
versions, using their NStreme Polling protocol.
GPS Sync has been very high up on their list, however, the issue at the
moment is that conventional serial GPS units lack the necessary timing
precision for anything other than
Reminder: 2.4 is about 50mhz too, and even though it's pretty trashed most
of us can still use it to some degree. Now think about 2.4 with 1% of the
garbage transmissions.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Friday, June
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
Behalf Of Doug Ratcliffe
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2007 1:09 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Re: [WISPA FCC] FCC 3650 band response today..
I just hope systems like Mikrotik w/ Ubiquiti SR3s/ XR3s(eventually)
can
be
made certified under 3650
This is not my original experience, but a presenter at the Mikrotik User
Meeting mentioned that a whole-building Motorola's powerline solution is
more expensive per unit than wiring Cat5. And both are more expensive than
say using a wireless mesh network. Both takes much less time to install
The press release I reposted mentions 2.9.xx and 3.0.
The following CALEA features will be included in the next version of both
RouterOS 2.9.XX and 3.X beta.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Butch Evans
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2007 2:53
For those who aren't on Mikrotik's mailing list:
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 11:46 AM
Subject: CALEA RouterOS Support and MUM
Eight days until the US MUM! There is still time to get a good deal on
flights and hotel
I'm working with a Quickbooks module developer on some new stuff, and doing
some brainstorming today, I wanted to get a feel for whether these modules
would be good for the (W)ISP industry if we developed them:
* Module for ISP-style QB recurring billing
* QB Customer payment web portal interface
I'm actually going to switch to this from my in-house billing system
(system defined very loosely). Thanks for posting this, it looks like a
winner to me. Hopefully someone will put up a Radius or Hotspot-based API
solution for this software (or I'll just write it :) ). Looks like you
could
Currently we do in-house email. We always have one problem or another with
our old IMail server ,plus dealing with a spam server and antivirus... We
have about 15 domains we currently host, about 150 users. Is it cost
effective to outsource something this small? Also on a similar note, does
I just wanted to mention about this. It's true, Routerboards are not FCC
certified. Neither are WRAP boards. But there are a lot of inexpensive,
fast combo boards that are FCC certified, that fit into nice 1U/2U short
rack cases that are also FCC certified, making an inexpensive, FCC modular
Probably gets anonymously injected into the media by the cell companies
trying to make muni-Wifi a worse alternative to paying $59 a month for
mobile data service...
- Original Message -
From: Ryan Langseth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Friday, April
Ok,
I can see several things in this ruling. It's of course referring to
consumer installed PCI/USB/miniPCI(we sell retail boxed laptop wireless
cards for consumer install). Well, these cards are certified SEPARATE from
the computer itself, so Netgear, Dlink, Linksys can have a wide range of
Mikrotik hasn't realized yet how much money they can make by implementing
CALEA 100% and charging $100-$200 extra for a CALEA specific capture
license...
- Original Message -
From: Jeromie Reeves [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2007
I'd say US 1, which runs from the end of Florida, to the border of Canada on
the East Coast. It's Main Street for most cities it goes through. US 1 in
Florida is at least 400 miles long...
- Original Message -
From: Travis Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List
Chase,
I'm glad to see we've got a Meraki rep out there that can answer questions.
Let me just start by saying, I think these things are awesome. Love the
dashboard.
I do have a question - the FCC approvals list modular certified, but what
radio chipset does it use so I can get more powerful
Agreed there. I moved a unit from one end of a house (clear path, but power
lines) to the other end, and lower (under the power lines) and seen a
dramatic increase even though the signal level was similar in both places.
- Original Message -
From: Marlon K. Schafer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
As far as Mikrotik goes, if any one/more/all MT vendor(s) in this country
paid an FCC lab to certify the boards/radios (can't the radios/antennas can
be modular certified by Ubiquiti/Senao?), could that work as a blanket
certification that MT could attach to their boards/radios, or does each
Then why doesn't Mikrotik GET their boards FCC certified? I know it's cheap
but if 1000 of us WISPs spend $5k each to certify it, vs MT spending $5k
once and charging an extra 5 bucks, I'd rather do that.
Annoying to say the least.
- Original Message -
From: Ralph [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
I've been looking over OpenCALEA - I can't really see any reason for a
NON-VOIP provider that it wouldn't do everything properly needed from a
Linux command prompt on a 700mhz old HP Presario, all for a cost of less
than $100 for a used computer. And when OpenCALEA is done, it will solve
99% of
Or - shape EVERYTHING. You don't want limits? You can easily set a burst
limit, not like a typical one, but using long averages and multiple shapes.
Like for instance:
10M burst, for 10 seconds, then 5M burst for 30 seconds, after that you take
it down to 1-2Mbps for say 30 more seconds. But
I'm sold. Anyone wanna buy me some? COMNET has nice pricing on CPE's, but
are there any discounts on the AU's? There's so many parts it seems between
the blade chassis and that, I don't even know what parts that I'd need to
order.
Also, I was concerned with the blade chassis that 200' of
This is scary:
Also Tuesday, Adelstein urged the FCC to adopt network neutrality rules
designed to prevent broadband providers from potentially blocking or
degrading competing content on their high-speed pipes.
-- Obviously people don't realize that WISPs, unlike conventional ILEC based
DSL and
I agree. I see it this way too. I can't see them forcing CALEA onto
hotspot operators like McDonalds, Starbucks, etc. Technically they're a
WISP too. I'll operate my service just like they do. What about muni-WIFI?
How does CALEA play into that?
If this goes the wrong way, I'm going to
down to individual towers...
Doug Ratcliffe wrote:
I agree. I see it this way too. I can't see them forcing CALEA onto
hotspot operators like McDonalds, Starbucks, etc. Technically they're a
WISP too. I'll operate my service just like they do. What about
muni-WIFI?
How does CALEA play
Press Ctrl-X to enter safe mode, and Ctrl-X to get out of safe mode.
Disconnects revert all settings after Ctrl-X...
- Original Message -
From: JNA [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2007 3:52 PM
Subject: [WISPA] MT Command line revert
92 matches
Mail list logo
