I'm gonna respectfully say that, from the inside, being told 'That not
one of our clients, don't worry about how long the repair lasts.' and
'Why should we bother to put a DSLAM out there? It's only gonna get
used up by them anyway.' and 'That pair of T1's is more than enough to
feed that
On 11/22/2014 5:02 AM, Blair Davis wrote:
I'm gonna respectfully say that, from the inside, being told 'That not
one of our clients, don't worry about how long the repair lasts.' and
'Why should we bother to put a DSLAM out there? It's only gonna get
used up by them anyway.' and 'That pair
So here's what sparked the question. I was trying to get some
point-counterpoint going on with a friend of mine and found some pretty
good arguments on each. This article made me think about it all a little
differently:
___
Wireless mailing list
So here's what sparked the question. I was trying to get some
point-counterpoint going on with a friend of mine and found some pretty
good arguments on each. This article made me think about it all a little
differently:
On 11/21/2014 5:47 PM, Drew Lentz wrote:
So here's what sparked the question. I was trying to get some
point-counterpoint going on with a friend of mine and found some
pretty good arguments on each. This article made me think about it all
a little differently:
Just and reasonable... Give me a break.
There is a reason the carriers let the POTS network decay... My wife,
before she died, spent 28 years with Michigan Bell... From before Judge
Greene, thru Ameritec and then SBC. She saw this from the inside.
Because they were forced to allow others
On 11/21/2014 7:39 PM, Blair Davis wrote:
Just and reasonable... Give me a break.
There is a reason the carriers let the POTS network decay... My wife,
before she died, spent 28 years with Michigan Bell... From before
Judge Greene, thru Ameritec and then SBC. She saw this from the inside.
- Original Message -
From: Eric Tykwinski eric-l...@truenet.com
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2014 7:10:11 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quick Question: Title II, for or against?
Fred,
It’s a little late, but damn, that was a good description
This is very informative, thanks Fred.
I guess the part that I'm still confused about is the whole content
neutrality/fastlane conversation, the only part general consumers care
about as the political base pushing for these changes has made it into
the single marketing pitch. I mean sure, at
: Re: [WISPA] Quick Question: Title II, for or against?
Fred,
It’s a little late, but damn, that was a good description of the problem.
I’m hoping and just hoping, that Wheeler understands exactly what the
problem
really is.
Everyone thinks Title II is a hammer both on the ILEC and the public
I put up a quick poll, results will be shared and are anonymous.
https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/3R6YTH9
I'm curious to see what the percentages are between those that support and
those that don't support the Title II argument. I've been trying to get a
good feel for who would and wouldn't like
, 2014 7:49:20 AM
Subject: [WISPA] Quick Question: Title II, for or against?
I put up a quick poll, results will be shared and are anonymous.
https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/3R6YTH9
I'm curious to see what the percentages are between those that support and
those that don't support the Title II
/intelligent-computing-solutionshttps://twitter.com/ICSIL
*From: *Drew Lentz d...@drewlentz.com
*To: *WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
*Sent: *Wednesday, November 19, 2014 7:49:20 AM
*Subject: *[WISPA] Quick Question: Title
@wispa.org
*Sent: *Wednesday, November 19, 2014 7:49:20 AM
*Subject: *[WISPA] Quick Question: Title II, for or against?
I put up a quick poll, results will be shared and are anonymous.
https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/3R6YTH9
I'm curious to see what the percentages are between those that support
Lentz d...@drewlentz.com mailto:d...@drewlentz.com
*To: *WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
mailto:wireless@wispa.org
*Sent: *Wednesday, November 19, 2014 7:49:20 AM
*Subject: *[WISPA] Quick Question: Title II, for or against?
I put up a quick poll, results will be shared
On 11/19/2014 8:49 AM, Drew Lentz wrote:
I put up a quick poll, results will be shared and are anonymous.
https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/3R6YTH9
I'm curious to see what the percentages are between those that support
and those that don't support the Title II argument. I've been trying
to
, November 19, 2014 7:49:20 AM
*Subject: *[WISPA] Quick Question: Title II, for or against?
I put up a quick poll, results will be shared and are anonymous.
https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/3R6YTH9
I'm curious to see what the percentages are between those that
support and those
--
*From: *Drew Lentz d...@drewlentz.com d...@drewlentz.com
*To: *WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org wireless@wispa.org
*Sent: *Wednesday, November 19, 2014 7:49:20 AM
*Subject: *[WISPA] Quick Question: Title II, for or against?
I put up a quick poll, results
*From: *Drew Lentz d...@drewlentz.com
mailto:d...@drewlentz.com
*To: *WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
mailto:wireless@wispa.org
*Sent: *Wednesday, November 19, 2014 7:49:20 AM
*Subject: *[WISPA] Quick Question: Title II
also title II regulations are why an OC3 at 150Mbps costs 100 times as much
as 150Mbps metro ethernet. Ethernet is unregulated, OC3 is part of the
whole terrified crap left over from MaBell etc. So even though both
services are delivered over the same medium (fiber) because of the
technology
Wow, that was well thought out. I'd say that's a pretty good assessment!
Kevin
- Original Message -
From: Fred Goldstein f...@interisle.net
To: wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2014 8:26 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quick Question: Title II, for or against?
On 11/19/2014 8
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quick Question: Title II, for or against?
On 11/19/2014 8:49 AM, Drew Lentz wrote:
I put up a quick poll, results will be shared and are anonymous.
https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/3R6YTH9
I'm curious to see what the percentages are between those that support
On 11/19/2014 4:22 PM, Sean Heskett wrote:
also title II regulations are why an OC3 at 150Mbps costs 100 times as
much as 150Mbps metro ethernet. Ethernet is unregulated, OC3 is part
of the whole terrified crap left over from MaBell etc. So even though
both services are delivered over the
The real problem is that consumers have only the CableCo and TelCo as
options for purchasing internet. The government instead of regulating
should encourage competition in the free market. WISPs are one such
competitor.
WISPs are prevented by laws of Electromagnetism and Communications to
...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Rubens Kuhl
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2014 7:40 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quick Question: Title II, for or against?
The real problem is that consumers have only the CableCo and TelCo as options
for purchasing
, November 19, 2014 8:55:28 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quick Question: Title II, for or against?
Title ll has a ton of regulations…some which could reasonably apply, but most
that have no bearing whatsoever or would be incredibly damaging to our
industry. The question…and the problem, is that we don’t
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2014 8:26 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quick Question: Title II, for or against?
On 11/19/2014 8:49 AM, Drew Lentz wrote:
I put up a quick poll, results will be shared and are anonymous.
https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/3R6YTH9
I'm curious to see what
, for or against?
Wow, that was well thought out. I'd say that's a pretty good assessment!
Kevin
- Original Message -
From: Fred Goldstein f...@interisle.net
To: wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2014 8:26 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quick Question: Title II
...@snappytelecom.net
- Original Message -
From: Eric Tykwinski eric-l...@truenet.com
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2014 7:10:11 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quick Question: Title II, for or against?
Fred,
It’s a little late, but damn, that was a good
29 matches
Mail list logo
