in
such a tight loop.
Bob-
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Jeremy Parr
Sent: Friday, December 18, 2009 10:34 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti Bullet2HP
Trango uses SMA connectors for their external
...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Jeremy Parr
Sent: Friday, December 18, 2009 10:34 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti Bullet2HP
Trango uses SMA connectors for their external antennas, but with
LMR240, rather than whatever it is that UBNT uses
...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Jeremy Parr
Sent: Friday, December 18, 2009 10:34 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti Bullet2HP
Trango uses SMA connectors for their external antennas, but with
LMR240, rather than whatever it is that UBNT
You got it, pal!
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Jeremy Parr
Sent: Friday, December 18, 2009 11:07 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti Bullet2HP
No, but they could have put the connectors
I just configured a Bullet2 that thinks its a Picostation2! See attached.
WTH?
Bullet2.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
We have seen similar craziness with Ubiquiti stuff. Do you think it is the
wrong firmware load in this case?
Mark
On 12/18/09 5:29 PM, RickG rgunder...@gmail.com wrote:
I just configured a Bullet2 that thinks its a Picostation2! See attached.
WTH?
[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of RickG
Sent: Friday, December 18, 2009 5:30 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] Ubiquiti Bullet2
I just configured a Bullet2 that thinks its a Picostation2! See attached.
WTH
List
Subject: [WISPA] Ubiquiti Bullet2
I just configured a Bullet2 that thinks its a Picostation2! See attached.
WTH?
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org
, December 18, 2009 7:16 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti Bullet2
Yes, I did flash is with 3.5 for Bullet2 but no help. Therefore, I'm
guessing the Pico ID on the main page must come from the board itself? Now I
wonder if a Pico board will fit into a Bullet? Another strange thing
-
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of RickG
Sent: Friday, December 18, 2009 7:16 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti Bullet2
Yes, I did flash is with 3.5 for Bullet2 but no help. Therefore, I'm
guessing
Yes, we are seeing problems with Bullet2HPs as well. It seems Ubiquiti is
having quality problems mainly on the RF side. Frustrating and expensive.
Mark
On 12/16/09 11:41 PM, RickG rgunder...@gmail.com wrote:
Anyone having issues with flaky Bullet2HP units? The last batch I got wont
connect
Rick,
I read something about guys complaining about high rates of failure with
the connectors on the latest batch 10/22/2009 or something.
Regards
Michael Baird
Anyone having issues with flaky Bullet2HP units? The last batch I got wont
connect to my StarOS/WRAP's. Actually, I discovered they
, December 16, 2009 4:39 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti PTMP Antenna Selection
Then again there is that part about a 120* sector and the thinking that
each cpe is in fact acting like a ptp system, since the ap only talks to
one cpe at a time.
Just to throw another log on the fire.
The 120
, December 17, 2009 3:05 PM
To: spie...@avolve.net; WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti PTMP Antenna Selection
We covered that pretty well at the FCC one day. There are very specific
rules you have to follow to avoid the 3 for one rule. I can be done, just
not easily.
marlon
-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of RickG
Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 1:38 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti units
Doh! Thats it! I misread the settings for burst on the Advanced Page.
Ubiquiti actually mixed
I'll double-check the connectors and let you know.
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 8:49 AM, Michael Baird m...@tc3net.com wrote:
Rick,
I read something about guys complaining about high rates of failure with
the connectors on the latest batch 10/22/2009 or something.
Regards
Michael Baird
Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
--
From: os10ru...@gmail.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 8:53 PM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti PTMP Antenna Selection
Professionally? Specifically a holder
Anyone have the Ubiquiti Nanostation NSM5 in stock?
Matt
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
WISPA Wireless List:
: [WISPA] Ubiquiti Nanostation NSM5
Anyone have the Ubiquiti Nanostation NSM5 in stock?
Matt
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org
-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Matt Jenkins
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 2:05 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti PTMP Antenna Selection
According to Ubiquiti themselves and the FCC:
This equipment is required to be professionally
] On
Behalf Of Robert West
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 5:57 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti Nanostation NSM5
You can check with CTI, I talked to them Monday and they had a few but had
to buy 4 or 5 to get them.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti Nanostation NSM5
Last weeks shipment is all gone of the NSM5's but another container is
following closely behind hopefully should have it in next week.
/ Eje
WISP-Router, Inc.
Follow us on twitter.com/wisprouter
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun
] On
Behalf Of Scott Piehn
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 7:51 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti Nanostation NSM5
Any idea if you have antennas on that shipment, the 16-120s in particular
Scott Piehn
- Original Message
will go.
/ Eje
WISP-Router, Inc.
Follow us on twitter.com/wisprouter
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]
On
Behalf Of Scott Piehn
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 7:51 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti
...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of RickG
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 11:44 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] Ubiquiti units
Speaking of Ubiquiti units. Another issue I'm having is that the bandwidth
shaping does not seem to work. Actually, it kinda works. It allows the
connection to burst
Yep, you're right. I've had mine set too high as well.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of RickG
Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 1:38 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti units
Doh! Thats it! I
According to Ubiquiti themselves and the FCC:
This equipment is required to be professionally installed
The device has been designed to operate with the antennas listed below
and having a maximum gain of 30dBi. Antennas not included in this list
or having a gain greater than 30dBi are strictly
, December 15, 2009 2:05 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti PTMP Antenna Selection
According to Ubiquiti themselves and the FCC:
This equipment is required to be professionally installed
The device has been designed to operate with the antennas listed below
and having a maximum gain
Is that saying any antenna with less than 30dBi gain is within the
rules? Have they relaxed the rules on certification? Just curious.
At 12:04 PM 12/15/2009, Matt wrote:
According to Ubiquiti themselves and the FCC:
This equipment is required to be professionally installed
The device has
Broadband
- Original Message -
From: Mike m...@aweiowa.com
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 1:33 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti PTMP Antenna Selection
Is that saying any antenna with less than 30dBi gain is within the
rules? Have they relaxed
Wireless Broadband Corp.
787.273.4143
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Matt Jenkins
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 2:05 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti PTMP Antenna Selection
According
: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Tom DeReggi
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 3:05 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti PTMP Antenna Selection
Have they relaxed the rules on certification?
No they have not.
Most likely Ubiquiti has
Professionally? Specifically a holder of which FCC license?
On Dec 15, 2009, at 1:04 PM, Matt Jenkins wrote:
According to Ubiquiti themselves and the FCC:
This equipment is required to be professionally installed
The device has been designed to operate with the antennas listed below
and
General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti PTMP Antenna Selection
Professionally? Specifically a holder of which FCC license?
On Dec 15, 2009, at 1:04 PM, Matt Jenkins wrote:
According to Ubiquiti themselves and the FCC
: [WISPA] Ubiquiti PTMP Antenna Selection
I don't believe there is an official answer. I believe professional
simply means someone that knows their rear from a hole in the ground.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
Looking for input on which antennas to use
Was mentioned briefly on one of the lists that using a 16-120 instead of a
19-120 would give better coverage, We have 7 or so 19-120's deployed and they
just seem to be very particular. seems about 60 degree wide, and 2 mile out
sweet spot.
I need a 2Ghz bridge from one building to another, about 10 yards. Can I
use two nanostation loco 2 radio to do this? I am unfamiliar with the
ubiquity radios... Is there something better I should use? I want cheap
but more importantly I want to forget its there (reliable). Speed is not
...@brevardwireless.com
Subject: [WISPA] Ubiquiti NanoStation Loco2 (can i use 2 for bridge?)
To: wireless@wispa.org
Date: Monday, October 26, 2009, 9:23 PM
I need a 2Ghz bridge from one building to another, about 10 yards. Can I
use two nanostation loco 2 radio to do this? I am unfamiliar
you will need to use WDS to make a true bridge. Works fine. I would go with a
5ghz radio, if for no other reason then that 99% of 'war drivers' are using 2ghz
radios. You could drop to 5mhz channels and get away from that for a while but
5/10 mhz channels are coming to war drivers. Next reason
You could probably do that with one radio in WDS mode if I understand
you correctly.
On 10/26/09, Scott Carullo sc...@brevardwireless.com wrote:
I need a 2Ghz bridge from one building to another, about 10 yards. Can I
use two nanostation loco 2 radio to do this? I am unfamiliar with the
Loco2 or EOC-1650 if it need to be outdoor units. ECB3220 for if indoor unit is
all needed.
/Eje
--Original Message--
From: Scott Carullo
Sender: wireless-boun...@wispa.org
To: wireless@wispa.org
ReplyTo: sc...@brevardwireless.com
ReplyTo: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] Ubiquiti
10:22 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti CPEs - SuperAG
10mhz channel, 24mbit air rate, 9.6mbit UDP, 9.3 TCP from MT to MT via
MT-BS5-BS5-MT. This is a 15 mile link. It should move more data but I am
CPU
limited at the far end with a RB133C. UBNT AP-CPE test says 15mbit. Looks
like
the BS5
http://www.unwiredwest.com
- Original Message -
From: ralph ralphli...@bsrg.org
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2009 11:36 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti CPEs - SuperAG
I know that with DDWRT, you have to pay for the license and you
Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2009 9:07 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti CPEs - SuperAG
Mmmm. My Bullet 5's have ff/comp settings. I wonder if that is a mistake?
Mark Nash wrote:
According to Ubiquiti, these DO support ff comp:
Nanostation 5
Nanostation Loco 5
Bullet 2 HP
Picostation 2
General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2009 8:37 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti CPEs - SuperAG
I havent seen that but I've only got a few StarOS CPE units out there.
What version are you running? I'm still on V2 for Customer APs. Just
started upgrading to V3 for Backhauls
Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2009 9:07 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti CPEs - SuperAG
Mmmm. My Bullet 5's have ff/comp settings. I wonder if that is a mistake?
Mark Nash wrote:
According to Ubiquiti, these DO support ff comp:
Nanostation 5
Nanostation Loco 5
Bullet 2 HP
Picostation 2 HP
The difference between them, as per a conversation on the support forum, is
actually the chipset in use in the device. Bullet 2's and Nano's apparently
simply lack the hardware capability.
On Wed, 2 Sep 2009 09:42:54 -0700, Mark Nash wrote
It appears that only SOME of the Ubiquiti
ralphli...@bsrg.org
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2009 11:36 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti CPEs - SuperAG
I know that with DDWRT, you have to pay for the license and you get a key.
Not sure about OpenWRT.
I don't recall any current UBNT
' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2009 11:36 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti CPEs - SuperAG
I know that with DDWRT, you have to pay for the license and you get a key.
Not sure about OpenWRT.
I don't recall any current UBNT I have used that did not support ff and
comp
, September 02, 2009 11:36 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti CPEs - SuperAG
I know that with DDWRT, you have to pay for the license and you get a key.
Not sure about OpenWRT.
I don't recall any current UBNT I have used that did not support ff and
comp. I have used most, except for the newest
It appears that only SOME of the Ubiquiti products enable compression fast
frames, some don't. Is this accurate? Any success stories using the WRT
firmware on these products?
It seems that the hardware is capable, just hasn't been enabled in the firmware
unless you purchase the higher end,
I believe the processor is different between something like a NanoStation 5
(no SuperAG) and PowerStation 5 (Super AG). I could be wrong, but that's
how I remember it.
We have absolutely no problems with the UBNT equipment. Install it, and
forget it.
Jayson
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 10:42 AM,
Suite E
Eugene, OR 97401
541-998-
541-998-5599 fax
http://www.unwiredwest.com
- Original Message -
From: Jayson Baker jay...@spectrasurf.com
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2009 10:05 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti CPEs - SuperAG
I believe
...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Mark Nash
Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2009 12:43 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] Ubiquiti CPEs - SuperAG
It appears that only SOME of the Ubiquiti products enable compression fast
frames, some don't. Is this accurate? Any
541-998-
541-998-5599 fax
http://www.unwiredwest.com
- Original Message -
From: ralph ralphli...@bsrg.org
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2009 11:36 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti CPEs - SuperAG
I know that with DDWRT, you have to pay
Suite E
Eugene, OR 97401
541-998-
541-998-5599 fax
http://www.unwiredwest.com
- Original Message -
From: ralph ralphli...@bsrg.org
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2009 11:36 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti CPEs - SuperAG
I know
If you are in the US, you can look up the FCC ID to see what frequencies
are legal.
-Hal
On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 22:44 -0700, Tim Kerns wrote:
I just received a couple to begin testing (more like playing with) and I'm
not sure of the Freq. it covers.
The selections are :
5180 to 5320 in
Would you mind sharing the FCC id?
UBNT claims it is different than the regular bullet, but doesn't share
it, and I don't see it on the FCC oet website search.
If it's the same as the bullet, you'll only be able to use the 5745 and
up freq band.
On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 10:44:40PM -0700, Tim
They are supposed to explain the extra features in a press release this
weekend.
From the forums it appears they are going to impliment optional polling
on their BulletM series w/cpe's to follow, other differences would be
the single stream 802.11n, and a much beefier CPU for more users per
Of Tim Kerns
Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 10:45 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] Ubiquiti Bullet 5M
I just received a couple to begin testing (more like playing with) and
I'm
not sure of the Freq. it covers.
The selections are :
5180 to 5320 in 20 meg increments.
5745 to 5805 in 20
Hal
Did you received my email about the second FCC I'd of 3.65 gear in
your wiki ?
Sent from my Motorola Startac...
On Aug 6, 2009, at 8:17 AM, Harold Bledsoe hbled...@deliberant.net
wrote:
If you are in the US, you can look up the FCC ID to see what
frequencies
are legal.
-Hal
optional polling
This will be real nice. I wonder if the will do it for all the NS and PS series?
Scottie
-- Original Message --
From: Michael Baird m...@tc3net.com
Reply-To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2009 09:34:35 -0400
Yes, they are being very quiet about it, supposed to announce it during
the weekend officially, as it hasn't been released yet. They are
planning to offer Canopy type functionality at Ubiquity prices. They
said no PS though, so I suspect they have something else in mind to
replace that.
What do you mean by Canopy type functionality?
On 8/6/09, Michael Baird m...@tc3net.com wrote:
Yes, they are being very quiet about it, supposed to announce it during
the weekend officially, as it hasn't been released yet. They are
planning to offer Canopy type functionality at Ubiquity
Hi,
Unless they are doing something in hardware, they will NOT be able to
duplicate Canopy polling in software. It just can't be done. Mikrotik
has tried (and come very close), but there is only so much you can do
in software.
Travis
Microserv
Michael Baird wrote:
Yes, they are being
Having Ubiquiti gear with Mikrotik-like software polling would be really nice.
Hope UBNT is hearing... :-)
Rubens
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 11:40 PM, Travis Johnsont...@ida.net wrote:
Hi,
Unless they are doing something in hardware, they will NOT be able to
duplicate Canopy polling in
Canopy uses a timing feature. Much like polling except their's goes a step
further with GPS sync. I have always advocated that one day, one of these
cheap mfg providers would get this right in their equipment, and then Moto
would not be the sh*t no more. If Ubiquity gets this right, they will
the case for Canopy more
difficult though.
Daniel White
3-dB Networks
http://www.3dbnetworks.com
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Scottie Arnett
Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 9:47 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA
I just received a couple to begin testing (more like playing with) and I'm
not sure of the Freq. it covers.
The selections are :
5180 to 5320 in 20 meg increments.
5745 to 5805 in 20 meg increments
but it also has:
5500 to 5680 in 20 meg increments.
Is this unlicensed spectrum? I thought
[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Chuck Profito
Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2009 9:19 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti Bullet5-HP
Robert, I would be more concerned about how many packets they can process,
especially on a backhaul.
One or two low use subs, ok
--
From: Chuck Profito cprof...@cv-access.com
Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2009 8:19 PM
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti Bullet5-HP
Robert, I would be more concerned about how many packets they can
process,
especially
I just received an announcement from UBNT so it sounds like the new
Bullets are here and better than ever.
I'm helping a friend improve a tiny local WISP here in the sleepy
Amazonian frontier town of Puerto Ayacucho Venezuela. He's not a tech
at all and was really in need of some guidance.
: Tuesday, July 21, 2009 9:19 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti Bullet5-HP
Robert, I would be more concerned about how many packets they can process,
especially on a backhaul.
One or two low use subs, ok, 60 or 70 sub back haul, wouldn't chance it. We
use them for sub units
Let us know how it goes... we have about 80 MT ptp links and love them
(from 1/4 mile to 73 miles). We have never had a problem with ACK
timing, small or large packet issues, etc.
I would like to know throughput using only a 20mhz channel, too.
Travis
Microserv
Robert West wrote:
Has anyone
Has anyone got their hands on the 1 watt Bullet5-HP yet? Is it all hype?
I'm tempted to buy a couple at 89 bucks per, that is if anyone had some in
stock. I have 2 backhauls to install in the next couple of weeks and
normally go with a Mikrotik board with a XR5 card. If the specs are right,
I
We are doing close to 70meg TCP with MTs. All depends on the links..
* ---
Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
WISPA Board Member - wispa.org http://www.wispa.org/
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik WISP Support Services
It isn't available yet.
Regards
Michael Baird
Has anyone got their hands on the 1 watt Bullet5-HP yet? Is it all hype?
I'm tempted to buy a couple at 89 bucks per, that is if anyone had some in
stock. I have 2 backhauls to install in the next couple of weeks and
normally go with a Mikrotik
[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Robert West
Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2009 2:22 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: [WISPA] Ubiquiti Bullet5-HP
Has anyone got their hands on the 1 watt Bullet5-HP yet? Is it all hype?
I'm tempted to buy a couple at 89 bucks per, that is if anyone
List
Subject: [WISPA] Ubiquiti Pico Station 2
Sent: Mar 2, 2009 14:05
Where can I buy these? I have seen some stuff from Ubiquiti that they
are shipping but I can't seem to find anybody that carries them.
Anybody have any info?
Thanks,
_
/-\ ndrew
Where can I buy these? I have seen some stuff from Ubiquiti that they
are shipping but I can't seem to find anybody that carries them.
Anybody have any info?
Thanks,
_
/-\ ndrew
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
Isnt a 40mhz channel in 3.65ghz against the rules?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mark Nash
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 4:03 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65
I really can't remember about throughput
- Original Message -
From: Jeff Booher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2008 8:34 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65
Isnt a 40mhz channel in 3.65ghz against the rules?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto
--
From: Mark Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2008 10:37 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65
Yes, but my message wasn't clear. When I said
We have a link that sits at -50 and its max on a 40MHz channel
Mark,
Just getting this far, are there any experiences you would care to share?
Thanks,
Message: 24
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 15:34:02 -0800
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 15:34:02 -0800
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=iso-8859-1;
reply-type=original
Although I got my license
Using StarOS, we have tested them with 3.5GHz antennas. They got what we
would expect them to get with respect to SNR, with a slight loss due to the
3.5GHz antennas.
Two issues...
1. We purchased some of the original XR3's, but then they came out with the
new version XR3 - 3.7 which had
.
- Original Message -
From: Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 3:50 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65
Using StarOS, we have tested them with 3.5GHz antennas. They got what we
would expect them to get with respect to SNR
-
From: Joel White [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 1:34 PM
Subject: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65
Mark,
Just getting this far, are there any experiences you would care to share?
Thanks,
Message: 24
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 15:34:02 -0800
From: [EMAIL
I believe Mark in... Oregon has done so.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
--
From: Joel White [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 9:38 PM
To: wireless@wispa.org
Subject: [WISPA] Ubiquiti
@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 7:21 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65
I believe Mark in... Oregon has done so.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
--
From: Joel White [EMAIL PROTECTED
Anyone out there using the Ubiquiti 3.65 legally registered with the FCC?
Any ups or downs or knowledge you care to share?
TIA
Best Regards,
Joel
NexGenAccess Inc.
www.nexgenaccess.com
740-513-4122
NexGenAccess Inc. http://www.nexgenaccess.com
Joel White wrote:
Anyone out there using the Ubiquiti 3.65 legally registered with the FCC?
Any ups or downs or knowledge you care to share?
I would love to get an answer to this as well.
WISPA Wants You!
I'm putting stuff up the first of the week next week. I'll post results.
insert witty tagline here
- Original Message -
From: Joel White [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 7:38 PM
Subject: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65
PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 7:41 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65
Joel White wrote:
Anyone out there using the Ubiquiti 3.65 legally registered with the FCC?
Any ups or downs or knowledge you care to share?
I would love to get
Judging by the comments on the list it sounds like a few members have
managed to reach the inner sanctum of Ubiquiti with regard to 3650 Mhz
support, specifically their XR3 card. I'd sure appreciate hearing whom
you've managed to reach over there. I like others have had no luck
getting my
Does anybody have a nanostation2 or a powerstation2 in stock - or a
used one lying around?
Just trying to buy one to test ranges in the real world. Apparently
they are backordered everywhere?
Thanks,
Japhy
WISPA
We have PS2-17D in stock at $155.
Jim
314-565-6863
Japhy Bartlett wrote:
Does anybody have a nanostation2 or a powerstation2 in stock - or a
used one lying around?
Just trying to buy one to test ranges in the real world. Apparently
they are backordered everywhere?
Thanks,
Japhy
I just got a 5 pack at Streakwave for $139. PS2
Jim Patient wrote:
We have PS2-17D in stock at $155.
Jim
314-565-6863
Japhy Bartlett wrote:
Does anybody have a nanostation2 or a powerstation2 in stock - or a
used one lying around?
Just trying to buy one to test ranges in the
Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Drew Lentz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2008 2:00 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti NanoStations
Ping me off list and I will see if I can take care of you all
, 2008 1:46 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] Ubiquiti NanoStations
There was a really cool product release a couple of days ago regarding a
new product by Ubiquiti called the NanoStation. I just received my first
2 and am going to run them through the ringer.
I will have them
601 - 700 of 739 matches
Mail list logo
