I know with our older Tranzeo's it was a common problem, since we switch
to MT, we haven't seen that problem, plus the features MT provides is
light years beyond any Tranzeo.
Bret
On 08/31/2010 12:05 AM, Mark Dueck wrote:
I've been having quite a bit of problems with Tranzeo radios not coming
I was referring to What would make one think that two radios, with
a 16dbi antennas would work well and stable on a 14 mile link using
allowable power in 5.X ghz or even 2.4 ghz ?
Thanks.
Faisal Imtiaz
Snappy Internet Telecom
On 8/31/2010 1:43 AM, Mark Dueck wrote:
I know.
I had
Does anyone have a good contact at Mediacomm they'd share with me? Thanks.
Friendly Regards,
Mike
Mike Gilchrist
Disruptive Technologist
Advanced Wireless Express
P.O. Box 255
Toledo, IA 52342
239.770.6203
m...@aweiowa.com
How old are they and what models may answer be the answer to why the lock up
when you change them. I've got one TR-5a that I know I should go to be able to
power cycle it if I make a change, and it's a few years old.
-- Original Message --
From: Mark
I am going to chime in here and say Look at RADWIN 2000c series. I have one
pair pushing 80+ MB FDX over 20 mile link.
They are more money than UBNT but allot less than Dragonwave and Moto.
http://www.radwin.com/Content.aspx?Page=radwin_2000_series
200 Mbps throughput (40 MHz Channel)
Native
I've personally seen someone doing about 98/20.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
On 8/30/2010 10:05 PM, RickG wrote:
UBNT is great for the price but a bit shy of 100Mbps:
Test Results
RX: 33.08 Mbps
TX: 33.77 Mbps
Total: 66.85 Mbps
On
I'm doing about 25 miles and haven't had a chance to tune the far end
antenna. I'm passing several megs. I have the modulation turned way
down until I have a chance to stabilize the link.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
On 8/30/2010 11:02 PM, Mark
We have asked, and were told that they don't see enough traffic coming
from our ASN. Is there someone else we can contact?
Regards,
Chuck
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 8:34 PM, Glenn Kelley gl...@hostmedic.com wrote:
I have helped a wisp get this with 700 customers and about 30mbps
I have helped
Christine Montalvo [cmonta...@mediacomcc.com]
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
On 8/31/2010 6:34 AM, Mike wrote:
Does anyone have a good contact at Mediacomm they'd share with me? Thanks.
Friendly Regards,
Mike
Mike Gilchrist
Disruptive
How much are you passing to them?
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
On 8/31/2010 7:18 AM, Chuck Hogg wrote:
We have asked, and were told that they don't see enough traffic coming
from our ASN. Is there someone else we can contact?
Regards,
Chuck
On 30 August 2010 12:07, Kurt Fankhauser k...@wavelinc.com wrote:
Whats the IP’s to block so my customers can’t use Netflix and Hulu.
So you are no longer going to be an Internet provider, and instead just be a
Hotmail and CNN.com provider?
On 31 August 2010 08:48, Gino Villarini g...@aeronetpr.com wrote:
Trango or SAF licensed 11 Ghz
Earl didn't get you? I figured you'd be swamped.
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
I have the EXACT same setup at 12 miles pushing a rock steady 52 at a -72
and 20mhz channel width. Been up since January. And it's not a perfect
link, skims the tops of trees all the way.
Bob-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Jason
I wouldn't use a Nano anything for a long link. The gain is minimal for a
link like that anyhow.
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Mark Dueck
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 12:18 AM
To: wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Suggestions
Depends on the equipment but the rule of thumb I always was told was to
power it up only long enough to disable the radio unless you are using
loads. If you don't load the radio and run it long enough, it will indeed
be damaged. I have various examples of that laying around from where uf/l
Lack of experience. We've all been there. Big learning curve, I've had
those moments in the beginning. That's when if something worked, it was
MAGIC! :)
Bob-
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Faisal Imtiaz
Sent:
I have found that happening most often on radio's that are daisy chained,
especially older ones. Luckily as most of our radio's are on the roof's of
members there is someone there to power cycle them, or a call to some one on
the other side of it to power cycle it through the on site power
I really don't know...we haven't tracked it.
Regards,
Chuck
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 8:32 AM, Mike Hammett wispawirel...@ics-il.netwrote:
How much are you passing to them?
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
On 8/31/2010 7:18 AM, Chuck Hogg
That confirms my feeling. I've noticed that there was a much higher
chance it would crash if there was a lot of traffic. Some of these
radios are fairly new and not daisy chained. I'll work towards
replacing all critical backhaul links to UBNT or MT.
On 08/31/2010 06:51 AM, Phil Curnutt
At 8/31/2010 09:00 AM, Robert West wrote:
Depends on the equipment but the rule of thumb I always was told was to
power it up only long enough to disable the radio unless you are using
loads. If you don't load the radio and run it long enough, it will indeed
be damaged. I have various examples
This is the final reminder that FCC Form 477 is due tomorrow. All broadband
service providers, (telecommunications, cable, and broadband over power line
providers) must report broadband services by census tract, type of
technology, and upload and download speeds on the FCC's Form 477. The Form
August 27, WINK 9 Fort Meyers - (Florida) 2 charged with stealing copper
wire from Collier County tower. Information sharing between law
enforcement agencies and detective work in Collier County, Florida, helped
lead to the arrests of two men - including a career criminal - on multiple
Emailed Akamai last night. Got a response back today saying we're pulling an
average of 19mbps from them, and do not meet the minimum requirement of 75mbps
required to qualify for the Accelerated Network Partner program.
--
Blake Covarrubias
On Aug 31, 2010, at 6:27 AM, Chuck Hogg wrote:
I
Emailed them this morning, I figure we will get a similar response.
Nick Olsen
Network Operations
(321) 205-1100 x106
From: Blake Covarrubias bl...@beamspeed.com
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 10:57 AM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject:
But that's close in. Throughput falls drastically as the distance goes up.
Even when the radio rates stay up, throughput falls. I have an 11 mile p2p
link in production now.
++
Neofast, Inc, Making internet easy
541-969-8200 509-386-4589
On 8/31/2010 11:44 AM, MDK wrote:
Even when the radio rates stay up, throughput falls.
Haven't seen that. There are some issues as such due to alignment,
firmware and Ack settings... that affect all links, medium range long
range.
To get to higher end of the throughput / over the air
Is this just to have their servers on your network or to BGP peer with
them?
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
On 8/31/2010 9:56 AM, Blake Covarrubias wrote:
Emailed Akamai last night. Got a response back today saying we're pulling an
average of
Some of you already know about this, but I would like to pipe up again
about a buy in opportunity on some new dark fiber construction from
Chicago to New York. Too much for any one WISP, but maybe those of you
along the I-80 corridor (it's actually on train track right of way)
would be
If anyone using Powercode has yet to do this or is working on this
today let me know. I have some instructions that will save you some
time.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 10:14 AM, Rick Harnish
I have 400+ Tranzeo CPQ's out and never have an issue with them not rebooting
after a change. However I would never use a Tranzeo for an AP. Mikrotik AP to
Tranzeo = stability and control. More info please: Models, Firmware, AP
connecting to.
(did you know there is a Tranzeo list on the
On 8/31/2010 11:58 AM, Mike Hammett wrote:
Some of you already know about this, but I would like to pipe up again
about a buy in opportunity on some new dark fiber construction from
Chicago to New York. Too much for any one WISP, but maybe those of you
along the I-80 corridor (it's actually
We are using Powercode...
- Original Message -
From: Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
To: memb...@wispa.org
Cc: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 9:32 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA Members] FCC Form 477 Due Sept. 1st
If anyone using Powercode has yet
I have the RB1000 and 1100s in production here as core routers (450G, 750G,
493AH's as tower-site routers, OSPF back to the core RB1x00s). Transitioning
all our customers to them (about half done). Been stable so far, aside from my
configuration screw-ups. Our only x86 device is running our
I second this. We had been using Belkin consumer UPS' because of their physical
dimensions, but we've been changing them out for APC 750 and 1500s with SNMP
where ever we reasonably can. Get ours new through Ingram Micro.
-Paul
On Aug 18, 2010, at 3:43 PM, Mark Nash wrote:
I usually buy APC
Its also relevent to mention that there are multiple Akamai Server configs.
A basic server config only stores some of the Internet content in its cache.
Much larger cache servers are needed, for more effective caching.
What volume is needed to get equivlent cache performance as Comcast Verizon?
Our TOS is written in such that we can regulate them if they are interfering
with other customers. Our problem isn't upstream bandwidth, but the wireless
network (in places). We need to use Trango 900s in places, hard to educate
people that their using netflix ruins the internet for X number of
WAIT...
Is it even legal to block IP addresses???
If it is.. why dont you just block the whole domain alias???
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 10:45 AM, Paul Gerstenberger pa...@hrec.coop wrote:
Our TOS is written in such that we can regulate them if they are interfering
with other customers. Our
Is it even legal to block IP addresses???
I don't think there are any laws on it at this point. It's like
ESPN's service - the default policy is to block but there is an accept
policy for those that pay.
If it is.. why dont you just block the whole domain alias???
Lots of overhead, lots of DNS
Mike, also see:
http://www.google.com/search?rlz=1C1SKPC_enUS342US342sourceid=chromeie=UTF-8q=site:twitter.com+mediacomm#num=100hl=enrlz=1C1SKPC_enUS342US342q=site%3Atwitter.com++%22mediacomcc%22aq=faqi=aql=oq=gs_rfai=pbx=1fp=728ef3750cf3a29c
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 5:20 AM, Mike Hammett
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 12:51, Robert Kim Wireless Internet Advisor
evdo.hs...@gmail.com wrote:
WAIT...
Is it even legal to block IP addresses???
Your network, your rules. Legally, you can probably block whatever you want.
Doing so without informing your users (customers, for ISPs) is
I can see it now...
@mediacomm hey i wuld liek 2do biz w u n im lookn for a good contct
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Robert Kim App and Facebook Marketing
evdo.hs...@gmail.com wrote:
Mike, also
At 8/31/2010 01:51 PM, Robert Kim wrote:
WAIT...
Is it even legal to block IP addresses???
If it is.. why dont you just block the whole domain alias???
Thankfully, there is no net neutrality rule preventing this.
ISPs always block IP addresses. Spammers' address blocks, and ISPs
who tolerate
It worked for me with DirecTV. :-p
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
On 8/31/2010 1:15 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
I can see it now...
@mediacomm hey i wuld liek 2do biz w u n im lookn for a good contct
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct:
Emailed 2 of the customers that were doing this. The one called back real
nice and apologized. Said their kid was letting the Netflix on the Nintendo
WII run while they were outside riding their bike! They said they will stop
it. 2nd customer never got back with me, their service has now been rate
We are finally starting to get some traction on the Classified Ads Page
http://www.wispa.org/?page_id=2297 . There are three postings in the last
24 hours. There is no cost to post on this page, image size must be below
150K.
Thanks,
Rick Harnish
Executive Director
WISPA
260-307-4000
Many radios can be damaged by transmitting with no load. You have to
look up each one. It's always safer to have either a dummy load or
antenna connected.
mc
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 12:43 AM, Mark Dueck m...@netking.bz wrote:
I know.
I had trazeo FDD radios that other guys had prepared
When I googled the issue some months back, I saw a post about blocking the IP
for the netflix DRM server. That would resolve most the issues by preventing
the DRM authentication, and as a result, the movie from streaming. But I
couldn't get it didn't work reliably. Maybe time to revisit that
OK, so should we be doing DNS redirecting.
Redirect hulu.com to allowvideo.com for $9.95 Shopping Cart item.
Alacart content?
Its no different than Microsoft Windows XP, being allowed to bundle
Iexplorer and MSN with WindowsOS, as long as they included signup links for
downloading and
Why not bandwidth shape them down to something reasonable? I find
1.1~1.2mbit for netflix and it looks fine. they will each 5mbit if you
let it. This keeps things pretty manageable here.b
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 12:15 PM, Tom DeReggi wirelessn...@rapiddsl.net wrote:
OK, so should we be doing DNS
I need some page layout help on the classified section. Anyone good with
WordPress and PHP give me a shout. I want the ads to show at the top of the
page instead of the bottom and thus far, the forum has been little help to
me.
Thanks,
Rick
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org
If you are using Tranzeo TR5a, 49a or AP6000 series radios running in
PtP mode on an all bridged network, they will lock up. Newer firmware
helps, but does not completely resolve this problem. I ran in to this
very problem recently while troubleshooting a client's network.
It may not be
As the distances go up, the longer it takes for the packet to be transmitted
from one point to another, and the round trip time grows, which reduces the
throughput.
My experience is, that it would be all but impossible to do two parallel
links in 5 ghz with UBNT stuff, as the antennas are not
On 08/31/2010 06:02 PM, MDK wrote:
As the distances go up, the longer it takes for the packet to be transmitted
from one point to another, and the round trip time grows, which reduces the
throughput.
That doesn't sound right to me...radio waves travel at the speed of
light. There is some
Good idea.
All my models fail. I simply can't charge enough to justify it. The
lack of spectrum is the limiter.
Jerry Richardson
Sent Mobile
On Aug 31, 2010, at 12:19 PM, Tom DeReggi
wirelessn...@rapiddsl.net wrote:
OK, so should we be doing DNS redirecting.
Redirect hulu.com to
Under 3mb causes alot of complaints due to repeated buffeting.
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 31, 2010, at 2:45 PM, Jeromie Reeves jree...@18-30chat.net wrote:
Why not bandwidth shape them down to something reasonable? I find
1.1~1.2mbit for netflix and it looks fine. they will each 5mbit if you
My customers that run 1Mb down use it and have no trouble?Excessive
bursting,then throttling will cause rebuffering after initial burst i have
found.
--- On Tue, 8/31/10, Jeremie Chism jchi...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Jeremie Chism jchi...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [WISPA] netflix/hulu IP's
To:
I beg to differ with this logic, applying to UBNT only... While
generically it is true about the separation... if your logic were true
about in-sufficient isolation... then we would not be able to operate a
full POP, where there are three Sector Panels and a 2ft Dish, all within
the same
I meant to say this comment referred to hulu not netflix
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 31, 2010, at 6:16 PM, Jason Bailey j284...@yahoo.com wrote:
My customers that run 1Mb down use it and have no trouble?Excessive
bursting,then throttling will cause rebuffering after initial burst i have
Just as an FYI folks,
After seeing this thread I sent it to the Tranzeo guys and they taking a
look at it. Please do, when you encounter issues such as these, report
them to your vendor (regardless of brand). Getting a record, finding
trends, etc. is the only way a vendor can uncover issues,
Gee, who'd think to ask the manufacturer.
Phil
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 8:25 PM, Patrick Leary ple...@apertonet.com wrote:
Just as an FYI folks,
After seeing this thread I sent it to the Tranzeo guys and they taking a
look at it. Please do, when you encounter issues such as these, report
Yea hulu is hungry. Netflix has a much better codec. I would love it
if WISPA could work some kind of deal with netflix so that we could
offer netflix for 'free' with a specific package. If they charge 8.99
I can see some kind of package deal along with one of the caching
server setups. With the
Yes. That is why we have ACK time settings in 802.11 radios.
Greg Ihnen wrote:
At near the speed of light is the distance of a 20~40 miles really a factor?
Greg
On Aug 31, 2010, at 5:32 PM, MDK wrote:
As the distances go up, the longer it takes for the packet to be transmitted
Thanks Patrick; I was thinking about doing that too.
On 08/31/2010 08:25 PM, Patrick Leary wrote:
Just as an FYI folks,
After seeing this thread I sent it to the Tranzeo guys and they taking a
look at it. Please do, when you encounter issues such as these, report
them to your vendor
Yeah, They got back to me today. Said over the last 30 days we have a 9Mb/s
avg. And 75mb/s is required.
Nick Olsen
Network Operations
(321) 205-1100 x106
From: Blake Covarrubias bl...@beamspeed.com
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 10:57 AM
To: WISPA
I have to agree that I've never seen this with the client radios. All
my radios are up-to-date firmware.
Will look into the Tranzeo list for next time.
On 08/31/2010 09:50 AM, Steve Barnes wrote:
I have 400+ Tranzeo CPQ's out and never have an issue with them not rebooting
after a change.
I think the big thing here is the way they do video. Hulu, has like 3 quality
settings. And you set them. Atleast with the desktop app, The flash on the
pages will try to autoselect. Netflix is much more in depth. It just picks what
works, With the ability to go WAY down on bitrate. When I had
Yup I bet it could. Ive seen 2 of them at the same time max out a 15mbit
pipe. That lasted about as long as it took to re-enable the bw queues.
Still a dozen or so and the eat the entire pipe and i knock em down a tad
more, but under 900kbit and it seams to choke up. After moving to Ubnt M
gear,
Yeah, Loop fee's are the killer. On-net bandwidth is cheap bandwidth. I've seen
cogent come down to $3 per megabit.
And I've heard of Hurricane electric going as low as 75 cents per megabit. Just
got to build out to them.
Nick Olsen
Network Operations
(321) 205-1100 x106
The prob;lem I ran into with building out to them is they want those loop
fees for entering the fiber huts + a break in fee. I have someone who says
he can get me into a place with out much if any fee, at $20/mbit. We will
see.
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 8:57 PM, Nick Olsen
E P I C !
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Fred Goldstein
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 9:43 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Suggestions for high bandwidth @ 25 miles.
At 8/31/2010 09:00 AM, Robert West
Sadly. My last UPS I built was from parts pulled outta the
dumpster behind the local defunct Gold Star Chili Store. Salvaged the EXIT
sign. 2 6v batteries and charging/switch board.
I live a strange life.
Bob-
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org
71 matches
Mail list logo
