RE: [WISPA] Packet Aggregation

2005-11-27 Thread Paul Hendry
So does anyone use any packet aggregation software to help keep a good throughput across there wireless network? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Hendry Sent: 14 November 2005 23:06 To: 'WISPA General List' Subject: [WIS

RE: [WISPA] Jim Patient - hehehe

2005-11-26 Thread Paul Hendry
What's wrong with his foot wear? I have a pair my self ;) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mac Dearman Sent: 26 November 2005 18:08 To: WISPA General List; Jim Patient; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [WISPA] Jim Patient - hehehe I just ran

RE: [WISPA] Ethernet Error

2005-11-23 Thread Paul Hendry
Because of the amount of errors and one way transmission I would guess there is a duplex mismatch. Try hard setting both ends of the link to 10mb half duplex to begin with. If this works try hard setting both ends to 100mb full-duplex.   Cheers,   P.   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [WISPA] MP Technology

2005-11-21 Thread Paul Hendry
is to valuable to waste). Tom DeReggi RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband - Original Message - From: "Paul Hendry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'WISPA General List'" Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 6:19 PM Subject: [WISPA] MP Technol

[WISPA] MP Technology

2005-11-18 Thread Paul Hendry
Ola everyone, Does anyone use any of the 5.8GHz multi polarized antennas from WiFi Plus (http://www.wifi-plus.com/pages/2/index.htm)? I saw these a while ago but never really paid much attention however I'm now wondering how these would compare with the Orthogon offerings when combined wit

RE: [WISPA] How to keep track of appointments

2005-11-16 Thread Paul Hendry
Hi Dan, Was the outlook plugin the only reason you went for Tiger over Sugar? When we set ours up I compared the 2 and Suger looked more customizable and also looked like it might integrate with Asterisk sooner than Tiger. Cheers, P. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [m

RE: [WISPA] How to keep track of appointments

2005-11-15 Thread Paul Hendry
I use to do this but kept falling of the ladder as the same string was attached to both my finger and toe ;) Grab a spare PC and build a standard FreeBSD box then stick SugarCRM on it (it's not that hard to do as I've managed it ;). Once it's set-up you can admin it from Windows via the HTML login

RE: [WISPA] Insurance / Service Plan Offerings

2005-11-15 Thread Paul Hendry
Wow, you all replace a lot of kit. What are the main reasons for the CPE's dying? Isn't there something you can do to improve the install of the units to help prevent these failures? We have only been offering services for a year but so far haven't had to replace a single CPE. We build the CPE's i

RE: [WISPA] Packet Aggregation

2005-11-14 Thread Paul Hendry
sh President OnlyInternet Broadband & Wireless, Inc. 260-827-2482 Office 260-307-4000 Cell 260-918-4340 VoIP www.oibw.net [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Hendry Sent: Monday, November 14, 2005 7:02 PM To: [EMAIL P

RE: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532

2005-11-14 Thread Paul Hendry
iginal Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Hendry Sent: Monday, November 14, 2005 2:08 PM To: 'WISPA General List' Subject: RE: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532 Just as a rough guide, would it be likely that you could get half the rated throughp

RE: [WISPA] Packet Aggregation

2005-11-14 Thread Paul Hendry
In my experience, the guys at MikroTik are quite responsive to user requests. Have you asked them about this? -- Blair Davis West Michigan Wireless, ISP 269-686-8648 Paul Hendry wrote: >Because a lot of traffic crossing our network is in packets smaller than >1500 bytes I have been p

[WISPA] Packet Aggregation

2005-11-14 Thread Paul Hendry
Because a lot of traffic crossing our network is in packets smaller than 1500 bytes I have been playing with Mikrotik's M3P to aggregate the smaller packets together. Throughput wise this seems to work very well and we see a big improvement on the amount of data we can pass over our wireless backha

RE: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532

2005-11-14 Thread Paul Hendry
Just as a rough guide, would it be likely that you could get half the rated throughput on the Orthogon units over 2k through very lite trees? The problem I have is that I haven't been able to complete a site survey but have been told that they had a link during last winter which dropped once leaves

RE: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532

2005-11-13 Thread Paul Hendry
L PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Hendry Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2005 4:35 PM To: 'WISPA General List' Subject: RE: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532 Hey Gino, Are you using the Spectra's in a NLOS environment? If so, what sort of obstructions are there and what kind of thro

RE: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532

2005-11-13 Thread Paul Hendry
What about NLOS (trees and buildings) @ 3km with a max EIRP of 33db (as that’s what we are stuck with in the UK L) or 28km with good LOS/Fresnel clearance with max EIRP of 33db?   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dylan Oliver Sent: 13 November 2005 21

RE: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532

2005-11-13 Thread Paul Hendry
Hey Gino, Are you using the Spectra's in a NLOS environment? If so, what sort of obstructions are there and what kind of throughput can you get? Looking to get a pair for a link but a bit expensive if they can't deliver. Cheers, P. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mai

[WISPA] Mikrotik VoIP

2005-11-10 Thread Paul Hendry
Ola,       Looking to deploy 2 Mikrotik routers to connect 2 offices using EoIP and would also like to use the routers as VoIP to PSTN gateways. Does anyone have advice on what are the best cards to use with Mikrotik for FXS (to connect telephones and faxes) and FXO (to connect

RE: [WISPA] Fwd: [LARTC] Open Source Project "Q*Box" Launched

2005-11-04 Thread Paul Hendry
Hmm, interesting. Is it only for the WRAP platform? L7 will kill that throughput on a WRAP. I guess all it needs is a modified version of Madwifi and we have another StarOS/Mikrotik/IkarusOS platform ;)   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dylan Oliver

RE: [WISPA] Tracking Signal / Noise / Resends / Etc.

2005-11-03 Thread Paul Hendry
StarOS isn't great for SNMP but Starutil works really well for various stuff. We have been using it to graph with MRTG the signal levels for individual clients and backhaul links as well as throughput. Cheers, P. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Beh

RE: [WISPA] Tracking Signal / Noise / Resends / Etc.

2005-11-03 Thread Paul Hendry
For StarOS we use MRTG and Starutil. You should be able to graph anything that Starutil can provide. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Scrivner Sent: 03 November 2005 17:33 To: wireless@wispa.org Subject: [WISPA] Tracking Signal / Noise

[WISPA] 5GHz interference

2005-10-29 Thread Paul Hendry
Hi guys and gals, Just seeing if anyone has any advise when mounting more than 1 antenna in the same frequency range on a tower. We have just installed a 5.8GHz 120” vert sector at about 47m. Already on the same side of the tower @ 42m is a 2 foot vert dish also running 5.8GHz. Both

RE: [WISPA] 5GHz interference

2005-10-28 Thread Paul Hendry
00:09 To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] 5GHz interference Paul Hendry wrote: > Hi guys and gals, > > > > Just seeing if anyone has any advise when mounting more than 1 > antenna in the same frequency range on a tower. We have just installed a > 5.8GHz

RE: [WISPA] 5GHz interference

2005-10-28 Thread Paul Hendry
something else? Lonnie On 10/28/05, Paul Hendry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi guys and gals, > > > >Just seeing if anyone has any advise when mounting more than 1 > antenna in the same frequency range on a tower. We have just installed a > 5.8GHz 120" vert s

RE: [WISPA] Real-world RouterOS tuning (or, Atheros/RB532 redux)

2005-10-28 Thread Paul Hendry
I have seen a similar thing. If you do a speed test using RouterOS built-in test try changing the packet size to 200-300. As far as I can tell, this is a truer representation of normal internet traffic and does drop the throughput considerably. M3P is a good way around this as it will aggregate al

[WISPA] 5GHz interference

2005-10-28 Thread Paul Hendry
Hi guys and gals, Just seeing if anyone has any advise when mounting more than 1 antenna in the same frequency range on a tower. We have just installed a 5.8GHz 120” vert sector at about 47m. Already on the same side of the tower @ 42m is a 2 foot vert dish also running 5.8GHz. Both

RE: [WISPA] Ubiquiti Networks Reveals Prototype 902-928MHzMini-PCICard

2005-10-23 Thread Paul Hendry
?? I knew Atheros had a 1900MHz chipset but didn't think they had a 900MHz product. Do you know where the details are for this chipset? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Smith Sent: 22 October 2005 22:25 To: WISPA General List Subject: R

RE: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532

2005-10-20 Thread Paul Hendry
:29 To: 'WISPA General List' Subject: RE: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532 Paul, Was this turbo mode or standard? Thanks Dan > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > Of Paul Hendry > Sent: Thursday, October 20, 200

RE: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532

2005-10-20 Thread Paul Hendry
Also just noticed that the TCP test results as well as not taking into account the TCP acknowledgements it also doesn't include the TCP header and IP header. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Hendry Sent: 20 October 2005 13:

RE: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532

2005-10-20 Thread Paul Hendry
o the real throughput is a little higher. The StarVX's report throughput of around 37-39mbps in both rx and tx. Many thanks, P. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Hendry Sent: 20 October 2005 09:32 To: 'WISPA General List'

RE: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532

2005-10-20 Thread Paul Hendry
-- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David E. Smith Sent: 20 October 2005 04:34 To: WISPA General List Subject: RE: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532 Paul Hendry wrote: > Managed to scavenge a P4 system together for testing purposes. Hey, as long as you're doublin

RE: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532

2005-10-19 Thread Paul Hendry
] On Behalf Of Paul Hendry Sent: 13 October 2005 21:08 To: 'WISPA General List' Subject: RE: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532 Just a little update. We thought we'd see what we could get through a couple of these 2 port WAR boards in ideal conditions (rssi -25) with turbo enabl

RE: [WISPA] Licensed Microwave

2005-10-19 Thread Paul Hendry
sing rules (and spectrum policy in general) vary by country   -Charles   --- CWLab Technology Architects http://www.cwlab.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Hendry Sent: Tues

[WISPA] Licensed Microwave

2005-10-18 Thread Paul Hendry
Ola,   Does anyone have a recommendation on a good microwave solution to provide about 100mbps full-duplex over 30km? If so, does anyone have some 2nd hand kit for sale ;)   Cheers,   P.   This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use

RE: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532

2005-10-13 Thread Paul Hendry
t sure how this compares with any testing others have done on other systems but thought I should post the results. Cheers, P. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Hendry Sent: 11 October 2005 16:09 To: 'WISPA General List' Subject: RE: [

RE: [WISPA] Problem LAN

2005-10-12 Thread Paul Hendry
What IP address do you have when connected at the office and is there a reverse path through the local network back to that address? If so, are you natting that address at you router / internet gateway? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ron W

RE: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532

2005-10-11 Thread Paul Hendry
Indeed. And finding a clear 5 or 10Mhz is a lot easier than finding a clear 20Mhz. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of George Sent: 11 October 2005 15:56 To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532 Paul Hendry

RE: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532

2005-10-11 Thread Paul Hendry
Tom, You say that "connection tracking" is on. I advised you to turn this of (i.e untick all the boxes in the connection tracking sub menu). To give an example, we have a 28km link with WRAP's/CM9's/5.8GHz at each end. Signal sits at around -71 (qual 24) and we hard set the rate on both en

RE: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532

2005-10-10 Thread Paul Hendry
I would imagine that it's the WRAP's CPU which should be visable at the bottom of the screen. If you disable all connection tracking (option 8 under the advanced tab) you should get around 20mbps on the speed tests. Cheers, P. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PRO

RE: [WISPA] Faxes

2005-10-03 Thread Paul Hendry
Don't suppose you have made that T.38 implementation open source have you? ;) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Liotta Sent: 03 October 2005 18:46 To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Faxes Good luck finding real-time fax support

[WISPA] Pics Of Wifi

2005-10-02 Thread Paul Hendry
Ola,       In the process of re-designing the corporate website and was wondering if anyone had any wifi related photo’s (towers, building with kit on, people using laptops in the middle of a field, engineer on a tower, etc.) they had taken that they would mind us using.   Many

RE: [WISPA] Mikrotik Quick questions 2

2005-09-29 Thread Paul Hendry
Or with StarOS you need to run a VDS tunnel over your wireless link then bridge the Ethernet to the VDS interface. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Smith Sent: 29 September 2005 03:31 To: WISPA General List Subject: RE: [WISPA] Mikrotik

RE: [WISPA] Some VOIP Experimenting

2005-09-27 Thread Paul Hendry
Hi Matt, We are using Asterisk too and it does seem to be very feature rich. When you where testing did you notice a difference between the voice quality of GSM and G729? Also, is your Asterisk server peering with your provider using IAX2 and G711? To optimize your StarOS AP I gues

RE: [WISPA] 3' and larger 5.8Ghz dishes

2005-09-14 Thread Paul Hendry
We have a few 2” Radiowaves dishes. They work great but are a little expensive. Tessco.com have them ;)   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Reed Sent: 14 September 2005 19:56 To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3' and larger 5.8Ghz dishes

[WISPA] RE: [WISP] For those of you having trouble deciding if this is right for you....

2005-08-18 Thread Paul Hendry
If you get a dry pair from your office to a customer site via the local exchange is there any reason you couldn't use ADSL2+ or VDSL equipment on a dry pair? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181 Sent: 17 August 2

<    1   2   3