So does anyone use any packet aggregation software to help keep a good
throughput across there wireless network?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Paul Hendry
Sent: 14 November 2005 23:06
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: [WIS
What's wrong with his foot wear? I have a pair my self ;)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mac Dearman
Sent: 26 November 2005 18:08
To: WISPA General List; Jim Patient; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Jim Patient - hehehe
I just ran
Because of the amount of errors and one
way transmission I would guess there is a duplex mismatch. Try hard setting
both ends of the link to 10mb half duplex to begin with. If this works try hard
setting both ends to 100mb full-duplex.
Cheers,
P.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
is to valuable to waste).
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Hendry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'WISPA General List'"
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 6:19 PM
Subject: [WISPA] MP Technol
Ola everyone,
Does anyone use any of the 5.8GHz multi polarized antennas from WiFi
Plus (http://www.wifi-plus.com/pages/2/index.htm)? I saw these a while ago
but never really paid much attention however I'm now wondering how these
would compare with the Orthogon offerings when combined wit
Hi Dan,
Was the outlook plugin the only reason you went for Tiger over
Sugar? When we set ours up I compared the 2 and Suger looked more
customizable and also looked like it might integrate with Asterisk sooner
than Tiger.
Cheers,
P.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [m
I use to do this but kept falling of the ladder as the same string was
attached to both my finger and toe ;)
Grab a spare PC and build a standard FreeBSD box then stick SugarCRM on it
(it's not that hard to do as I've managed it ;). Once it's set-up you can
admin it from Windows via the HTML login
Wow, you all replace a lot of kit. What are the main reasons for the CPE's
dying? Isn't there something you can do to improve the install of the units
to help prevent these failures?
We have only been offering services for a year but so far haven't had to
replace a single CPE. We build the CPE's i
sh
President
OnlyInternet Broadband & Wireless, Inc.
260-827-2482 Office
260-307-4000 Cell
260-918-4340 VoIP
www.oibw.net
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Paul Hendry
Sent: Monday, November 14, 2005 7:02 PM
To: [EMAIL P
iginal Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Paul Hendry
Sent: Monday, November 14, 2005 2:08 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532
Just as a rough guide, would it be likely that you could get half the rated
throughp
In my experience, the guys at MikroTik are quite responsive to user
requests.
Have you asked them about this?
--
Blair Davis
West Michigan Wireless, ISP
269-686-8648
Paul Hendry wrote:
>Because a lot of traffic crossing our network is in packets smaller than
>1500 bytes I have been p
Because a lot of traffic crossing our network is in packets smaller than
1500 bytes I have been playing with Mikrotik's M3P to aggregate the smaller
packets together. Throughput wise this seems to work very well and we see a
big improvement on the amount of data we can pass over our wireless
backha
Just as a rough guide, would it be likely that you could get half the rated
throughput on the Orthogon units over 2k through very lite trees? The
problem I have is that I haven't been able to complete a site survey but
have been told that they had a link during last winter which dropped once
leaves
L PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Paul Hendry
Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2005 4:35 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532
Hey Gino,
Are you using the Spectra's in a NLOS environment? If so, what sort
of obstructions are there and what kind of thro
What about NLOS (trees and buildings) @ 3km
with a max EIRP of 33db (as that’s what we are stuck with in the UK L) or 28km with good
LOS/Fresnel clearance with max EIRP of 33db?
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dylan Oliver
Sent: 13 November 2005 21
Hey Gino,
Are you using the Spectra's in a NLOS environment? If so, what sort
of obstructions are there and what kind of throughput can you get? Looking
to get a pair for a link but a bit expensive if they can't deliver.
Cheers,
P.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mai
Ola,
Looking to deploy 2 Mikrotik
routers to connect 2 offices using EoIP and would also like to use the routers
as VoIP to PSTN gateways. Does anyone have advice on what are the best cards to
use with Mikrotik for FXS (to connect telephones and faxes) and FXO (to connect
Hmm, interesting. Is it only for the WRAP
platform? L7 will kill that throughput on a WRAP. I guess all it needs is a
modified version of Madwifi and we have another StarOS/Mikrotik/IkarusOS
platform ;)
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dylan Oliver
StarOS isn't great for SNMP but Starutil works really well for various
stuff. We have been using it to graph with MRTG the signal levels for
individual clients and backhaul links as well as throughput.
Cheers,
P.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Beh
For StarOS we use MRTG and Starutil. You should be able to graph anything
that Starutil can provide.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Scrivner
Sent: 03 November 2005 17:33
To: wireless@wispa.org
Subject: [WISPA] Tracking Signal / Noise
Hi guys and gals,
Just seeing if anyone has any advise when mounting more than 1
antenna in the same frequency range on a tower. We have just installed a
5.8GHz 120” vert sector at about 47m. Already on the same side of the tower
@ 42m is a 2 foot vert dish also running 5.8GHz. Both
00:09
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 5GHz interference
Paul Hendry wrote:
> Hi guys and gals,
>
>
>
> Just seeing if anyone has any advise when mounting more than 1
> antenna in the same frequency range on a tower. We have just installed a
> 5.8GHz
something else?
Lonnie
On 10/28/05, Paul Hendry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi guys and gals,
>
>
>
>Just seeing if anyone has any advise when mounting more than 1
> antenna in the same frequency range on a tower. We have just installed a
> 5.8GHz 120" vert s
I have seen a similar thing. If you do a speed test using RouterOS built-in
test try changing the packet size to 200-300. As far as I can tell, this is
a truer representation of normal internet traffic and does drop the
throughput considerably.
M3P is a good way around this as it will aggregate al
Hi guys and gals,
Just seeing if anyone has any advise when mounting more than 1
antenna in the same frequency range on a tower. We have just installed a
5.8GHz 120” vert sector at about 47m. Already on the same side of the tower
@ 42m is a 2 foot vert dish also running 5.8GHz. Both
?? I knew Atheros had a 1900MHz chipset but didn't think they had a 900MHz
product. Do you know where the details are for this chipset?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rick Smith
Sent: 22 October 2005 22:25
To: WISPA General List
Subject: R
:29
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532
Paul,
Was this turbo mode or standard?
Thanks
Dan
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf
> Of Paul Hendry
> Sent: Thursday, October 20, 200
Also just noticed that the TCP test results as well as not taking into
account the TCP acknowledgements it also doesn't include the TCP header and
IP header.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Paul Hendry
Sent: 20 October 2005 13:
o the real
throughput is a little higher. The StarVX's report throughput of around
37-39mbps in both rx and tx.
Many thanks,
P.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Paul Hendry
Sent: 20 October 2005 09:32
To: 'WISPA General List'
--
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of David E. Smith
Sent: 20 October 2005 04:34
To: WISPA General List
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532
Paul Hendry wrote:
> Managed to scavenge a P4 system together for testing purposes.
Hey, as long as you're doublin
] On
Behalf Of Paul Hendry
Sent: 13 October 2005 21:08
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532
Just a little update. We thought we'd see what we could get through a couple
of these 2 port WAR boards in ideal conditions (rssi -25) with turbo
enabl
sing rules (and spectrum
policy in general) vary by country
-Charles
---
CWLab
Technology Architects
http://www.cwlab.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Paul Hendry
Sent: Tues
Ola,
Does anyone have a recommendation on a good
microwave solution to provide about 100mbps full-duplex over 30km? If so, does
anyone have some 2nd hand kit for sale ;)
Cheers,
P.
This email and any files
transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use
t sure how this compares with any testing others have done on other
systems but thought I should post the results.
Cheers,
P.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Paul Hendry
Sent: 11 October 2005 16:09
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [
What IP address do you have when connected at the office and is there a
reverse path through the local network back to that address? If so, are you
natting that address at you router / internet gateway?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ron W
Indeed. And finding a clear 5 or 10Mhz is a lot easier than finding a clear
20Mhz.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of George
Sent: 11 October 2005 15:56
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532
Paul Hendry
Tom,
You say that "connection tracking" is on. I advised you to turn this
of (i.e untick all the boxes in the connection tracking sub menu). To give
an example, we have a 28km link with WRAP's/CM9's/5.8GHz at each end. Signal
sits at around -71 (qual 24) and we hard set the rate on both en
I would imagine that it's the WRAP's CPU which should be visable at the
bottom of the screen. If you disable all connection tracking (option 8 under
the advanced tab) you should get around 20mbps on the speed tests.
Cheers,
P.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PRO
Don't suppose you have made that T.38 implementation open source have you?
;)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Matt Liotta
Sent: 03 October 2005 18:46
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Faxes
Good luck finding real-time fax support
Ola,
In the process of re-designing
the corporate website and was wondering if anyone had any wifi related photo’s
(towers, building with kit on, people using laptops in the middle of a field,
engineer on a tower, etc.) they had taken that they would mind us using.
Many
Or with StarOS you need to run a VDS tunnel over your wireless link then
bridge the Ethernet to the VDS interface.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rick Smith
Sent: 29 September 2005 03:31
To: WISPA General List
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Mikrotik
Hi Matt,
We are using Asterisk too and it does seem to be very feature rich.
When you where testing did you notice a difference between the voice quality
of GSM and G729? Also, is your Asterisk server peering with your provider
using IAX2 and G711?
To optimize your StarOS AP I gues
We have a few 2” Radiowaves dishes.
They work great but are a little expensive. Tessco.com have them ;)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Scott Reed
Sent: 14 September 2005 19:56
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3' and larger
5.8Ghz dishes
If you get a dry pair from your office to a customer site via the local
exchange is there any reason you couldn't use ADSL2+ or VDSL equipment on a
dry pair?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181
Sent: 17 August 2
201 - 244 of 244 matches
Mail list logo
