Having pastored in the nations poorest city I would far from disagree with you.
Folks that should have never been able to have a home were given the ability to
obtain loans -
That is an understatement.
The government has done all it can to push the idea that if you rent - your a
failure
They
Jack, I actually had a biology professor who really believed in live and
let die. He didn't believe in sending foreign aid to those countries not
able to grow enough food to sustain themselves. He also subscribed heavily
to the Monroe Doctrine.
Mike
_
From:
1. Define overpopulation? I saw some numbers once that the entire
world's population could have a nice size house on a decent piece of
property in Texas...can't imagine the infrastructure requirements, but
whatever.
2. Political corruption is a reality in any system. It's the best argument
I love it that they had the FCC step in to stop the consumer protest and
declare...
to purposely try to disrupt or negatively impact a network with ill-intent
is irresponsible and presents a significant public safety concern.
Such BS. Isn't any large protest a potential safety concern?
I'm
Yeah I got a kick out of that article and to see the discussion re FCC and
net-neutrality and FCC probes in anticompetive behavior and application
prohibitations for the Iphone et all. Then to find out that this rebellion
was planned but FCC worked to stopped it.
Stay safe. Don't get out of bed.
Jack, The only companies that can do whatever they want to you whenever
they want to do it are the ones given a monopoly and power by guess who -
big government! So, where is the problem? Is it the companies or the
government?
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 4:01 PM, Jack Unger jun...@ask-wi.com wrote:
1. And God said Go and multiply.
2. Did I miss something? Nobody has said that where I can see.
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 12:48 AM, Jack Unger jun...@ask-wi.com wrote:
Just keep saying to yourself.
1. Overpopulation is good.
2 Political corruption does not exist.
Good luck and best wishes.
On Feb 5, 2010, at 9:02 AM, Jeff Broadwick wrote:
make campaigns post their contributions on the
internet.
That's already available if the donation is over $99.
Chuck
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
On Feb 5, 2010, at 10:34 AM, RickG wrote:
Jack, The only companies that can do whatever they want to you whenever
they want to do it are the ones given a monopoly and power by guess who -
big government! So, where is the problem? Is it the companies or the
government?
That statement
On Feb 5, 2010, at 11:04 AM, Chuck Bartosch wrote:
That statement completely ignores history. The tendency of any unconstrained
capitalist is to form a monopoly. Hell, *I'd* do it if I could ;-). And
unconstrained capitalism that achieves a monopoly rarely acts in its
customers own best
Yep, I agree with your statement (which was well put).
Chuck
On Feb 5, 2010, at 11:18 AM, Matt Liotta wrote:
On Feb 5, 2010, at 11:04 AM, Chuck Bartosch wrote:
That statement completely ignores history. The tendency of any unconstrained
capitalist is to form a monopoly. Hell, *I'd* do
Jeff Broadwick wrote:
1. Define overpopulation? I saw some numbers once that the entire
world's population could have a nice size house on a decent piece of
property in Texas...can't imagine the infrastructure requirements, but
whatever.
What was your number-cruncher smoking?
2.
Good points.
When I have to choose between guns (war) or butter (peace), I'll choose
the butter.
Robert West wrote:
Life, Liberty, Property.
Those were the basics that our government was formed to protect for us.
For the common defense.
It's now morphed from the government For the
Oh I agree wholeheartedly with the belief election reform is needed. A
taxpayer funded system with a set, and sensible budget would keep the well
funded from swaying the electorate and becoming beholding to special
interests.
Term limits for all congressional seats should be set at 6 years.
I would hope everyone would choose peace over war, but history has proven
since the beginning of time that peace is achieved through war.
Without a clearly defined Winner and Loser of war there will never be
peace.
Brad
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org
Your statement is true when there is NOT enough food, clothing or
shelter for everybody.
But when there IS enough food, clothing and shelter for everybody,
there is no need for war in order to achieve temporary "peace".
This is why overpopulation is so bad - it creates war and makes real
C'mon Jack, war is about trying to accumulate power, not get rid of excess
people.
Regards,
Jeff
Jeff Broadwick
ImageStream
800-813-5123 x106 (US/Can)
+1 574-935-8484 x106 (Int'l)
_
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Jack
C'mon Jeff. There is NO NEED to accumulate power if you don't have
excess people.
jack
Jeff Broadwick wrote:
C'mon Jack, war is about trying to accumulate power, not get rid of excess
people.
Regards,
Jeff
Jeff Broadwick
ImageStream
800-813-5123 x106 (US/Can)
+1 574-935-8484
Human nature?
Regards,
Jeff
Jeff Broadwick
ImageStream
800-813-5123 x106 (US/Can)
+1 574-935-8484 x106 (Int'l)
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Jack Unger
Sent: Friday, February 05, 2010 4:21 PM
To: WISPA
My nature is to be peaceful, my friend.
jack
Jeff Broadwick wrote:
Human nature?
Regards,
Jeff
Jeff Broadwick
ImageStream
800-813-5123 x106 (US/Can)
+1 574-935-8484 x106 (Int'l)
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]
Chuck, where did I say unrestrained? The rest of my post is questions. So,
I agree with your reply in as much as that nobody should be unrestrained. As
far as history, to what do you refer to?
-RickG
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 11:04 AM, Chuck Bartosch ch...@clarityconnect.comwrote:
On Feb 5, 2010,
The restraint is government. How do you restrain capitalism without the
restraint of laws, including those that restrain monopolies?
The implication of saying the only companies that have monopolies are the ones
that government gives monopolies to is that without government monopolies, and
I thought was WAS population control I'm confused now.
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Jack Unger
Sent: Friday, February 05, 2010 3:35 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Common Carrier or what: The FCC's role in
Chuck, In the past, I'd say 99% of our posts are in agreement so I suspect
we have the same thoughts here as well. I probably failed in not being more
clear due to lack of detail with my thoughts due to time constraints. The
context of my reply was in response to Jack's fear of big companies.
Then I fail your test. I dont want a monopoly. In th epast, I've worked for
both electric and phone companies and all it breeds is laziness and waste.
In competitive markets, I find the challenge invigorating. -RickG
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 11:18 AM, Matt Liotta mlio...@r337.com wrote:
On Feb
Hitler. Just to name one of many!
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 4:21 PM, Jack Unger jun...@ask-wi.com wrote:
C'mon Jeff. There is NO NEED to accumulate power if you don't have
excess people.
jack
Jeff Broadwick wrote:
C'mon Jack, war is about trying to accumulate power, not get rid of
excess
There's never a NEED to accumulate power... ever.But, the greed and lust
for more power is as old as politics itself.
--
From: Jack Unger jun...@ask-wi.com
Sent: Friday, February 05, 2010 1:21 PM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
As a very small,but growing operator I have been following this list for quite
some time.I rarely poke my nose in as I enjoy the VERY intelligent conversation
that this list generates.I sometimes have to read 80 or more messages when I
get through putting in 110% and picking up my Three kids
On Fri, 2010-02-05 at 22:26 -0500, RickG wrote:
Hitler. Just to name one of many!
Ok, folks...it's time to stop. We've reached the reference:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%27s_law
--
* Butch Evans *
I agree-I've worked for essential monopolies (like defense contractors). Or
maybe it's just big companies. In any case, the waste boggled my mind.
To be clear my natural tendency is to want to own a market. However, I also
recognize that you can't ever really do that, and if you do, no matter
No, you're not out of line. I've given up suggesting these topics get moved to
WISPA Chat. I usually try to refrain from weighing in myself ;-).
Chuck
On Feb 5, 2010, at 11:06 PM, jason bailey wrote:
As a very small,but growing operator I have been following this list for
quite some time.I
I trust that government will be able to keep up just fine. Do you
support the alternative of making government so small that you can drown
it in a bathtub?
Glenn Kelley wrote:
Title II of the Communications Act—the section that regulates
telecommunications common carriers is now being
What happens if the government states you cannot block any content and or do
traffic shaping ... ?
Understand - the talk was to the Free State Foundation - who is against
virtually any blocking or traffic shaping
This being said- even the plans you may offer may be out of the window on the
Glenn,
I think it's important not be be overly alarmist.
There is every reason to believe that Network Neutrality will allow and
encourage "reasonable network management" practices.
WISPA works responsibly with the FCC and with other governmental
agencies to be sure that they understand
No, but a whirlpool tub, yes.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
--
From: Jack Unger jun...@ask-wi.com
Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 9:39 AM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA]
YES
Jack Unger wrote:
I trust that government will be able to keep up just fine. Do you
support the alternative of making government so small that you can drown
it in a bathtub?
Glenn Kelley wrote:
Title II of the Communications Act—the section that regulates
telecommunications
So, now that government has been drowned, the huge banks, insurance
companies, telecoms can do whatever they want to you whenever they want
to do it.
BWh, haaa, h, haaa, hh
Frank Crawford wrote:
YES
Jack Unger wrote:
I trust that government will be able to
The fundamental difference that Jack fails to recognize is if a bank (or
organization other than the government) does treat you unfairly you have
recourse. If your own government treats you unfairly, you have little to no
recourse.
Yes, we can all only hope the majority of Americans will
Brad,
There is really only one way to get a smaller government without
throwing society into total disarray. That method is to have a smaller
country, in other words, a lower level of population. With an exploding
population there is just no way that I can see to get a smaller government.
If
Jack,
I completely disagree with the notion that America has to become smaller to
have a smaller less invasive government! It is a socialist mentality to
think that only government can grow America or help Americans.
America achieved its success by people utilizing their abilities to better
Jack, it remains very difficult to be civil, when you post this kind of
stuff.
Since the founding of the country until the 1960's, the federal government
rarely spent more than single digit percentaqes of everything we produce,
except in time of war.We as a nation prospered immensely
Brad,
You are misunderstanding or ignoring what I've been saying so let's try
it again.
When you have more people crowded into the same space your are going to
have more frequent and more complex problems, including more fighting
over the available amount of resources. Like it or not,
Sorry Mark,
I truly appreciate and enjoy responding to all appropriate and
responsible posts but your LONG HISTORY of troll behavior will FOREVER
elicit the same response from me.
I will not feed the troll. I will not feed the troll. I will not feed
the troll. I will not feed the troll. I
Wow Jack!
99% of the working people have lost or given up their power to govern their
own lives.
I believe that there are a small percent of people who knowingly or
unknowingly have turned their lives over to someone else, but to say that it
is 99% is just wrong.
Jeff
Regards,
Jeff
Jack, make that two trolls :)
With all due respect, isnt that exactly how liberals respond to conservative
claims - by demonizing them? Marks comments were spot on and I couldnt have
said them any better, so I'm resending them with my name on the end. I
respect your right to your viewpoint but I
Jack,
Your police analogy is flawed.
While it may take a larger police force to serve and insure the safety of a
larger population it does not take a larger government body with increased
invasion of those people's lives to govern effectively. A larger population
requires no more or
They'll keep up by slowing us down with regulation. They're good at such
activity.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Glenn Kelley
Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 9:55 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] Common
And me and my pack of highly trained Wispa Ninja warriors will be waiting
for them to thwart their plans of conquest!
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Jack Unger
Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 4:01 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re:
Good point Jeff ! :)
Jeff Broadwick wrote:
Wow Jack!
99% of the working people have lost or given up their power to govern their
own lives.
I believe that there are a small percent of people who knowingly or
unknowingly have turned their lives over to someone else, but to say that it
Ah, but what about the newly found free speech rights of corporations?
You aren't allowed to limit their speech (DOLLARS) now according to most
of the fine folks over at the supreme court.
Of course, OURS will then be drowned out by their deep pockets full of
speech
Bob-
Just keep saying to yourself.
1. Overpopulation is good.
2 Political corruption does not exist.
Good luck and best wishes. ;-)
jack
RickG wrote:
Jack, make that two trolls :)
With all due respect, isnt that exactly how liberals respond to conservative
claims - by demonizing
On the contrary Brad. Not all but a lot of what you just said I agree
with. You are obviously a sharp thinker and I absolutely respect that.
Thank you for taking the time to explain your thinking.
Best of luck.
Respectfully,
jack
Brad Belton wrote:
Jack,
Your
On the contrary Brad. Not all but a lot of what you just said I agree
with. You are obviously a sharp thinker and I absolutely respect that.
Thank you for taking the time to explain your thinking.
Best of luck.
Respectfully,
jack
Brad Belton wrote:
Jack,
Your
Thank God you're here!!
Can I please join the pack ??? :-[
Robert West wrote:
And me and my pack of highly trained Wispa Ninja warriors will be waiting
for them to thwart their plans of conquest!
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf
LOL makes me recall article I read earlier tonight.
http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-02-04/at-t-s-iphone-deal-swamps-networ
k-sparking-consumer-rebellion.html
/ Eje
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Robert West
Life, Liberty, Property.
Those were the basics that our government was formed to protect for us.
For the common defense.
It's now morphed from the government For the people into people For the
government. As long as there are greedy people and the what about mine?
thinkers, it won't get any
Brad,
People are losing their homes.many of
which never should have been afforded the privilege of home ownership if
it
were not for big government forcing lenders to lend to unqualified buyers.
You had me, until the above paragraph. That is a crock of ShXX.
Most housing foreclosures are
Yes. You shall be admitted to the Brave Order of the Wispa Ninja Warriors
and will be permitted to enjoy all the benefits of this association. This
includes, but is not limited to, being declared Right and Correct to any
one post of your choosing to the Wispa list per month.
We only ask that
58 matches
Mail list logo
