Do any of you use caching to save on bandwidth consumption?
Blair Davis wrote:
The other point is, that with a good mix of residential and business
customers, and a little creative thinking, one can match their usage
patterns to minimize ones peak bandwidth requirements while still
This will get harder as 4Q07 approaches and ATT rolls out it's $10 DSL
and $19.95 Naked DSL - as per merger concessions. There will be a ton of
disqualifiers. However, this will effectively put many Residential ISPs
in the NFL cities out of business.
I don't understand the race to the
, January 25, 2007 8:18 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Advanced Bandwidth Management
This will get harder as 4Q07 approaches and ATT rolls out it's $10 DSL
and $19.95 Naked DSL - as per merger concessions. There will be a ton of
disqualifiers. However, this will effectively put many Residential ISPs
]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 2:21 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Advanced Bandwidth Management
We sell mainly to residential users and to some small businesses.
We are quite rural, and my cost for a T-1 is $450 per month. My pending
fiber hookup is $1100 per
I do. I run a squid cache (that way filtering comes easy too). I get a
hit rate of 40% (40% of requested items come from the cache), and this
accounts for 20% of the bandwidth (the 40% are usually small graphics,
etc). So I stretch my bandwidth by about 20%.
Jason
Peter R. wrote:
Do any
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 12:44 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Advanced Bandwidth Management
On Jan 24, 2007, at 8:25 PM, Rich Comroe wrote:
Thanks much. I love it when you talk technical! Sorry, couldn't
help it...
No really, the devil is always in the details
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Advanced Bandwidth Management
On Jan 24, 2007, at 8:25 PM, Rich Comroe wrote:
Thanks much. I love it when you talk technical! Sorry, couldn't
help it...
No really, the devil is always in the details in these things.
This is just the detail I was looking
(any Trango users who could possibly comment?).
Rich
From: Ryan Langseth
To: WISPA General List
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 12:44 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Advanced Bandwidth Management
On Jan 24, 2007, at 8:25 PM, Rich Comroe wrote:
Thanks much. I love it when you talk
the inbound bw anyway. So it now looks prudent to me to
have BOTH bw management built into the radios, AND at the head-end.
Rich
- Original Message -
From: Jason
To: WISPA General List
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 2:31 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Advanced Bandwidth Management
, AND at the head-end.
Rich
- Original Message -
From: Jason
To: WISPA General List
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 2:31 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Advanced Bandwidth Management
From what I understand, there are many types of qdisc (HTB, CBQ, Prio,
on and on) that you can
They aren't saying 10MB for $10.
They are saying DSL for $10 -- most likely DSL Lite.
It will probably be felt my the dial-up providers like NetZero, since
the price is used to add subs.
New subs added is the metric that Wall St. is watching.
SBC learned that at $10 they can convert dial-up
Mikrotik can do this.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jason
Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 11:27 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] Advanced Bandwidth Management
List,
Several times in the last few weeks the topic of
anyway. So it now looks prudent to me to have BOTH bw
management built into the radios, AND at the head-end.
Rich
- Original Message -
From: Jason
To: WISPA General List
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 2:31 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Advanced Bandwidth Management
From
Here is a link that does a decent job describing the Mikrotik
implementation using burst-limit, burst-threshold and max-limit. Scroll
down to the section labeled Burst (second to last section).
http://www.mikrotik.org.pl/jakto.php?g=13PHPSESSID=5193496d65073e909b1f130b2e234135
Sam Tetherow
Have you thought about selling the customer a pipe that works for any
and all traffic at the speed the customer signed up for as opposed to
deciding for the customer?
-Matt
Jason wrote:
List,
Several times in the last few weeks the topic of bandwidth
management has been discussed, but I
I believe what you would be looking for is something like a
NetEqualizer. This device works to equalize all your traffic to make
sure one user is not using up all the pipe. It works by tracking active
connections by IP address, if it finds a user hogging the bandwidth it
puts a delay on
grin...read my mind.
Brad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Matt Liotta
Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 11:49 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Advanced Bandwidth Management
Have you thought about selling the customer
We haven't used them but they do have an impressive client list, here's the
link
http://netequalizer.com/indexgoo.php
Chuck Profito
209-988-7388
CV-ACCESS, INC
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Providing High Speed Broadband
to Rural Central California
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm with you jason - the subject of bandwidth management is an important
one, and the fact is that new applications (crapplications?!) are
appearing all the time which are pushing the business model into a tight
spot. We have competing forces - on the one hand, we purchase expensive
dedicated
On Wed, 24 Jan 2007, Matt Liotta wrote:
Have you thought about selling the customer a pipe that works for
any and all traffic at the speed the customer signed up for as
opposed to deciding for the customer?
When your head dips below the cloud cover, you will realize that not
everyone has
to a high
erlang per user, or equivalently described as a low oversubscription rate).
regards,
Rich
- Original Message -
From: Matt Liotta
To: WISPA General List
Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 11:49 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Advanced Bandwidth Management
Have you thought
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Advanced Bandwidth Management
Have you thought about selling the customer a pipe that works for any
and all traffic at the speed the customer signed up for as opposed to
deciding for the customer?
-Matt
Jason wrote:
List,
Several times in the last few
General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Advanced Bandwidth Management
Fascinating. I only spoke of leaky bucket because that's practically a match
to what Jason originally described to the list (and I happen to know of radios
that have this algorithm internally programmed -- happens to be Canopy). But I
List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Advanced Bandwidth Management
Matt,
What an asinine comment! You sound like you ought to be giving
bandwidth
away with the pride and carefree attitude that you portrayed with such
indignant comment. If the truth was known you aren't any different than
anyone else
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of J. Vogel
Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 3:12 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Advanced Bandwidth Management
I would suspect that the customer (as is the case in much of the world,
not necessarily
Butch,
That's not correct. About 5 years ago, we were paying $1,500 per T1 and
selling T1 speed wireless for $250 per month. Seven to eight years ago
we were paying $3,000 per T1 and selling wireless T1 for $250 per month.
This is the entire ISP business model.
Travis
Microserv
Butch Evans
OR, we could stop playing the Cable Co. and Telco games with their up
to 3meg and up to 7meg connections for $34.95 and just start selling
what they get.
We started selling 512k, 1meg, 1.5meg and 2meg connections (up and down,
guaranteed speed 24x7) about 3 years ago. It was the best thing we
On Wed, 24 Jan 2007, Travis Johnson wrote:
That's not correct. About 5 years ago, we were paying $1,500 per T1
and selling T1 speed wireless for $250 per month. Seven to eight
years ago we were paying $3,000 per T1 and selling wireless T1 for
$250 per month. This is the entire ISP business
will share what bw
management algorithms they may have built-in.
thanks again,
Rich
- Original Message -
From: Patrick Leary
To: WISPA General List
Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 6:23 PM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Advanced Bandwidth Management
Rich,
--- Here is the detail from
That is exactly the issue I have. The system I need this for is an
extremely rural retirement community, satellite-connected WISP
with 1meg down 128k up and 266megs total per day limit (8gig
spread over 30 days). Just one all night P2P session will cause
the upstream provider to cut the
On Jan 24, 2007, at 8:25 PM, Rich Comroe wrote:
Thanks much. I love it when you talk technical! Sorry, couldn't
help it...
No really, the devil is always in the details in these things.
This is just the detail I was looking for. After I digest I hope I
may send questions your way
31 matches
Mail list logo
