I’ve had that happen too (the AP reboots and get the default name, almost as if
someone factory reset the AP!). I’m checking the backup S/W version now, to
see if that helps. It’s been the 702w’s that have done it, and occasionally a
3502i.
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent
on our 802.1x (eduroam) or
open captive portal SSIDs. We have Cisco WLCs against ISE.
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 2:30 PM, Danny Eaton <dannyea...@rice.edu
<mailto:dannyea...@rice.edu> > wrote:
I’m looking at the DHCP server for the DHCPDISCOVER conversation, and never se
: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
<WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
<mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU> > on behalf of Danny Eaton
<dannyea...@rice.edu <mailto:dannyea...@rice.edu> >
Sent: Monday, March 13, 2017 4:45:14 PM
To: WIRELESS-L
Strangely enough, I just got an email from our Cisco team, and here's what
was sent.
Recommendations for AireOS:
AireOS Release
Mobility Services Engine
Prime Infrastructure
Identity Services Engine
Most WLCs
8.0.140.0 (MR4)
8.0.140.0 (MR4)
3.1.5
2.1.0 (Patch 3)
For 5520/8540
on my phone.
Shayne
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
<mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU> ] On Behalf Of Danny Eaton
Sent: Monday, March 13, 2017 12:20 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
<mailto
So, I've got one client (1!) who is running Android 7.1.1 and no matter
which network (our 802.1X, eduroam, or even the "open" captive portal SSID)
the user tries to connect into, he gets authenticated (on eduroam and our
802.1X SSID), but we never see a DHCPDISCOVER from his phone; it passes
Bruce,
I've got 2 clusters (WiSM2-HA), with a mix of APs from 1142,
3502, 3702, 3802, and 702 model numbers. We're running 8.2.141.0 on both
clusters, with over 900 APs on each, and around 4500 clients on each as
well. We upgraded to 8.2.141.0 72 days ago, and have had no
I see so many IoT devices that are 2.4 only; as well as the students save $30
on the laptop buying it with just the 2.4 radio (but it’s 802.11n!) that many
of them come that way as well. We’re testing a “Rice Owls” (dual band) and a
“Rice Owls 5 GHz” (uhm, 5 GHz only, of course) in limited
That was my thinking – putting it in each residential college/dorm, graduate
apartments housing, etc.
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Oliver, Jeff
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2017 2:13 PM
To:
Cisco shop - WiSM2's in HA cluster (for now) with a range of APs from 1252,
1142, 3502, 702, 3702, 3802.
Rice Visitor - active captive portal
Rice Owls - 802.1X users (staff/student/faculty)
eduroam - for Rice users, or other university users
bcm-wifi - For Baylor College of Medicine users in
I disabled the session timeout on my WiSM-2’s. It was set to 2 hours, but was
apparently causing some clients to manually have to reconnect rather than
automatically. And it was suggested by a few other folks. Our DHCP lease time
is 2 hours on wireless, so the client will time out sooner or
it challenging to purchase microwaves, space
heaters, etc. Any advice?
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 09:45 Danny Eaton <dannyea...@rice.edu
<mailto:dannyea...@rice.edu> > wrote:
I’ve always said – and will continue to say – if it has a power cord, then it
should have an Ethernet cord,
I’ve always said – and will continue to say – if it has a power cord, then it
should have an Ethernet cord, too.
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Dan Lauing
Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2017 8:41 AM
Drive
Syracuse, New York 13244
t 315.443.3003 f 315.443.4325 e lhbad...@syr.edu w its.syr.edu SYRACUSE
UNIVERSITY syr.edu
-Original Message-
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Danny Eaton
Sent: Tuesday
I have been seeing this (primarily on Apple clients) since I upgraded to
8.2.121.0 in August. We never saw this on the previous version (8.0.121.0,
from May).
-Original Message-
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On
Weve got about 200 or so 702W deployed in various rooms. Weve had no
issues with them being damaged, disappearing, or being knocked off the
walls. They are mounted down low, even, around the same height as an
electrical outlet. So far, no one has complained of I dont feel so well,
etc. We
So, you’re using 160 Mhz channels? Or 80 Mhz? Or “best available”, if Cisco?
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Jeffrey D. Sessler
Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2016 2:40 PM
To:
I hope you get paid extra for that level of service, Lee.
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Lee H Badman
Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2016 10:32 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re:
Lee,
I've disabled them when asked, because in spots where I've
disabled them "wholesale", I invariably get a ticket (or more) that the AP
is offline, and wireless sucks, because there's no lights on the AP. I
enable the LED, and magically the wireless performance and coverage
While we're the same, I wish Cisco, Aruba, etc. would understand we cannot
just "upgrade" to the newest/latest code that is GA. Especially in
education, we have limited windows (I believe Lee said it) - spots during
the summer, over Christmas break, and Spring Break - due to our customer
(and
This leads me to ask - doesn't the Xbox and PS4 have wired ports? Why put all
that refresh rate traffic on wireless? Why not "strongly suggest" they connect
it to a wired port, leaving wireless for truly mobile devices (laptops, Macbook
Air, phones, pads, etc.)? If it has a permanent power
8.2.121.0
So far, after two weeks, no issues/problems. We’re running it for the same
reason, 3802’s…
I have had a few Macintosh reports that they “stop working”, but if they
disconnect and reconnect they’re fine. I’m digging into that, but nothing for
the majority of our users
We’ve got a pure open SSID – but with a captive portal AUP acceptance page.
Keeps some of the devices off that either don’t have a browser or can’t click
on “Accept”. It ends up in our visitor VRF, which we treat devices as if they
are at Starbucks, etc., so cannot reach private devices
We have the 5.5 Mbps, 6 Mbps, 9 Mbps, 12 Mbps, 18 Mbps, 24 Mbps, 36 Mbps, 48
Mbps, and 54 Mbps as supported; 11 Mbps as Mandatory, but 1 Mbps and 2 Mbps
as disabled.
We probably should disable the 5.5, 6, 9, and 11 Mbps, to really "eliminate"
them, but even with 1 and 2 disabled, we're not
Of Danny Eaton
Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2016 2:50 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
<mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco WLC code recommendations
We've been running HA-SSO on our WiSM-2's since we put them in in 2013.
We've had some issue
We've been running HA-SSO on our WiSM-2's since we put them in in 2013.
We've had some issues, all software bug related, over that time, in the
first few versions; however, the last few versions (since May of last year)
have been stable for us. I'm happy to talk off-list if you have any
We do not allow servers on the wireless network, guest or the 802.1X SSID's.
Our wireless is all IPv4 private addressing, with NAT, and our Juniper SRX
firewall does not allow inbound connections.
-Original Message-
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
For the record, my “40” failures includes for the past calendar year, and
includes ALL non-functioning APs. We have had very few (none that I can think
of but don’t want to exclude the possibility) of DOA’s.
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
Just as a help, here's our client distribution - none on B, but we do have a
few G, and lots of 2.4 N. We’ve disabled the lower 2.4G data rates (completely
disabled 1 Mbps, 2 Mbps, and 5.5, 6 and 9 as supported).
**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
Can we revisit this subject? It seems to have gotten a good number of
responses but the information is of limited use without other information to
go with it.
If folks will send me information on their wireless networks I will tabulate
it and send it back out to the list.
How about the
Rice University is a Cisco shop for access layer wired and wireless.
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Schuette, David
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2016 10:08 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject:
to put in their own. If you have a good 11n network, the typical 11ac
client won’t be able to generally tell the difference anyways.
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Danny Eaton
Sent: Friday, March 11
Part of the frustration is that end-user WiFi is adapted quicker than budgets
and hardware refresh can be done. (802.11AC laptops quicker than new APs can
be budgeted, bought, and physically deployed).
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
We run an “Open” SSID across the entire campus (Rice Visitor) – it’s a captive
portal, in a visitor VRF that has access to only on campus resources accessible
from AT, Comcast, Roadrunner, etc. It’s wired or wireless, but wireless does
NOT have a MAC address registration component at this
We're using AirMagnet Survey Pro as well.
-Original Message-
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Steve Fletty
Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2016 6:12 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re:
We currently use ap-BLDG-ROOM (and if its a Cisco 702W, we use
ap-BLDG-ROOM-702W). Room is the closest room if its in the hallway, if
its in a room then obvious. The building abbreviation is what we use for
the wired switch names as well (mud-230-a-1, Mudd Computer Lab, room 230,
Access,
All Cisco software releases are buggy... just depends on whether the bugs
affect your particular environment :)
Amen to that, and will say "All software is buggy".
We're running 8.0.110.11 now for the past year or so, with no ill effects; with
WiSM-2 HA clusters.
-Original
We’re running 8.0.110.11, and have been on it since May 14th. We had some odd
problems before with failovers, but it’s been rock solid stable since then – up
continuously. Two pairs of WiSM2 HA clusters, with 850-ish IPs each.
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group
We recommend anything that regularly uses an electrical outlet (TV, Xbox,
Apple TV) to use the wired port. In some cases (mainly residential
colleges, aka dorms), we're deploying the Cisco 702W APs, which have 4 1 Gb
ports on them. In others, we recommend a dual band 2.4 Ghz/5 Ghz radio for
ver when he's
trying to connect, but thought I'd reach out to y'all and see if anyone else
is seeing this issue.
Respectfully,
Danny Eaton
Snr. Network Architect
Networking, Telecommunications, & Operations
Ryan H Turner
Senior Network Engineer
The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
CB 1150 Chapel Hill, NC 27599
+1 919 445 0113 Office
+1 919 274 7926 Mobile
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Danny
That’s essentially what we do – we have our campus segmented with L3 MPLS VPN’s
(wired and wireless), one for staff, one for students and one for visitors.
This simplifies firewall exception policies into a centralized management area.
We have 8 /22’s on each HA pair for staff that belong to
Nothing like that here Lee, sorry.
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Lee H Badman
Sent: Monday, September 14, 2015 2:24 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] Sanity check-
I've seen them on 3502's, and 3702's. We're running WiSM-2 in HA with
8.0.110.11 code. Saw it on the previous code (7.6.130.0). We're upgrading
our access layer, so I just have been resetting the APs that show that, and
don't think I've seen them again.
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues
Just to turn this on it’s ear a bit...
Why not go back to an open network for student devices, with the same EULA as
they’d get be it at a Starbucks, McDonalds, hotel, or convention center? Why
are we (my self included) so hell bent on student devices connecting via
WPA-Ent and all the
I’m running 8.0.110.11 on WiSM-2 (in HA) for months now without an issue at
all.
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Cosgrove, John
Sent: Monday, August 31, 2015 10:22 AM
To:
Or cell phone tethering?
-Original Message-
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Lee H Badman
Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2015 10:26 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN]
One thing I’ve noticed in the LEED buildings we’ve recently built (2
dorms/colleges and a Physics building), is that the windows block the heat from
the sun, which reduces need for A/C, etc. The heat from the sun is just another
type of RF, basically. This has a side effect of blocking some,
supplicant for both and the connection method would not matter.
John
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Danny Eaton
Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2015 4:26 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [BULK] Re
to
being skeptical to the value of the wired 1X paradigm so far.
-Lee
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Danny Eaton
Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2015 1:27 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re
Is anyone doing any of these for wired, using 802.1X?
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of John Kaftan
Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2015 3:22 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN]
We are a Cisco WiSM2 wireless shop - 2 HA clusters with around 800 APs on
each. All private IP's (with 2 hour lease time), using NAT at the border
(Juniper SRX 5800). We have a total student population of around 6,000, and
a high water mark of around 9,500 devices on wireless at a given time.
A few years ago we looked into putting APs either on top, or just inside the
Code Blue phones with external antennas – the problem we had was that the APs,
with a NEMA rated box would be U-G-L-Y on top of the pole, and if inside the
pole with external antennas the temperature, humidity and
For emergencies why go wireless? There's just too much not under control in
my mind (RF, mainly). You've already got cable and power there, why not
stick with the wired solution?
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On
We came across a bug in 7.6.130.0 that was determined they were not going to
fix it in 7.6.130.23, but did fix it in 8.0.110.8.
7.6.130.23 fix for CSCus94968
8.0.110.8 fix for CSCus94968 and CSCur56103
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Danny Eaton
Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2015 10:42 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Should I upgrade to WLC Version 8 in May
We came across a bug
I’ve found a bug in 7.6.130.x code and Cisco fixed it (I’ve downloaded the
code, it’s 7.6.130.23) and it’s also fixed in 8.0.110.x (8.0.110.8).
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Lee H Badman
Sent:
We've got our Juniper SRX 5800 doing our NAT for all wireless, plus all
students and visitors (wired or wireless).
We send those logs (and the SRX is VERY CHATTY about NAT) to our Splunk server
for the tying together of date/time, public IP and private IP - in the event we
get a notice from
That’s been our answer to the AppleTV’s, etc. If it has a power cord/brick,
get an Ethernet cable.
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Ian McDonald
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2015 1:35 PM
To:
experiences?
Feel free to respond on, or off list.
Respectfully,
Danny Eaton
Snr. Network Architect
Networking, Telecommunications, Operations
Rice University, IT
Mudd Bldg, RM
Maybe a bit more advance notice on the list (if there was notice, I missed
it, that's for sure). I wanted to go last year, and couldn't because I
found out a week before. sniff
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On
to switch languages
unexpectedly
. Improves stability and security in Safari
OS X Yosemite 10.10.2 is available via Software Update.
Respectfully,
Danny Eaton
Snr. Network Architect
Networking, Telecommunications
We use our Palo Alto devices and block bittorrent on our visitor networks (MPLS
VRF), but not staff/faculty or student networks. If a staff or faculty member
or student gets identified as doing something untoward via bittorrent, their
access is disabled (wired, wireless or even VPN) and
We’re running 7.6.130.0 in HA in non-VSS 6503 Sup-720/3C chassis, and have come
across a bug. It’s documented, and we’re working with Cisco TAC on it. The
clients do not see anything (fortunately) but since we’re monitoring the
controllers themselves, we see the failover. The last update I
.
Respectfully,
Danny Eaton
Snr. Network Architect
Networking, Telecommunications, Operations
Rice University, IT
Mudd Bldg, RM #205
Jones College Associate
There's even wireless power.
http://www.pratt.duke.edu/news/superlens-extends-range-wireless-power-transfer
http://news.stanford.edu/news/2012/february/wireless-vehicle-charge-020112.html
div Original message /divdivFrom: Dorshimer, Michael
mrdorshi...@ship.edu
We’re at 20 Mhz for the 2.4 band, and 40 Mhz for the 5.2 band. (regardless of
the AP type, 1142, 1252, 3502 or 3702).
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Ashfield, Matt (NBCC)
Sent: Thursday, October
We saw a lot of the same. The ARP cache bug (since we run GLBP on the
gateways) has killed us too.
div Original message /divdivFrom: Jeffrey Sessler
j...@scrippscollege.edu /divdivDate:25/09/2014 16:40 (GMT-06:00)
/divdivTo: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
network.
From: Danny Eaton
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2014 7:25 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Reply To: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Apple devices dropping on WPA2-PSK and WPA2-Ent
SSIDs Aruba 6.3
We saw a lot of the same
Mark,
We have 3 campus wide broadcast SSID's. Rice Owls (802.1X for campus
users), eduroam (802.1X for any participating institution) and Rice Visitor
(open SSID with a captive portal with splash page for Acceptable Use
Policy). The Rice Owls and eduroam will put our local users into their
We keep telling folks if it has a power brick, and plugs into the wall, it
should use an Ethernet port and plug into the wall.
-Original Message-
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Dennis Xu
Sent:
Or at least I thought it was…
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Danny Eaton
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2014 9:38 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] WiSM-2 and 7.6.120.0
with crashes on 7.6.120.0, and
if so, did you upgrade? To 7.6.130.0, or 8.0.100.0? I'm running 8.0.100.0
in the lab, but light load. (which is what we did on 7.6.120.0 since May).
Thoughts? Opinions?
Respectfully,
Danny Eaton
Snr
Image removed by sender.
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 9:22 AM, Danny Eaton dannyea...@rice.edu wrote:
Early bird gets the worm but second mouse gets the cheese...
I'll put it in my lab.
Original message
From: Anders Nilsson
Date:18/08/2014 08:08 (GMT-06:00
at 9:22 AM, Danny Eaton dannyea...@rice.edu wrote:
Early bird gets the worm but second mouse gets the cheese...
I'll put it in my lab.
Original message
From: Anders Nilsson
Date:18/08/2014 08:08 (GMT-06:00)
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject
Early bird gets the worm but second mouse gets the cheese...
I'll put it in my lab.
div Original message /divdivFrom: Anders Nilsson
anders.nils...@adm.umu.se /divdivDate:18/08/2014 08:08 (GMT-06:00)
/divdivTo: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU /divdivSubject:
Ditto. Personal printers with wireless (turned on by default!) cause a LOT
of issues for our students.
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Thomas Carter
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2014 9:36 AM
To:
We’ve been running it for over a month. I’ve seen one primary issue with
cluster failover (Active controller failed), and have an active TAC case opened
on it. I just received 7.6.122.12 from TAC and will be putting it on my lab
test cluster today. The users have not seen any issues, because
7.5 actually got us AP and client SSO failover. 7.6 got us the 3702s.
Sent via the Samsung Galaxy Mega™, an ATT 4G LTE smartphone
div Original message /divdivFrom: Kitri Waterman
ki...@uoregon.edu /divdivDate:18/07/2014 12:05 (GMT-06:00)
/divdivTo:
We've been on 7.6.120.6 for a few weeks and have not seen fhis issue running a
mix of 1142 3502 and 3702 aps on two ha cluster in a pair of 650 with sup720 3c
in non vss mode.
Sent via the Samsung Galaxy Mega™, an ATT 4G LTE smartphone
div Original message /divdivFrom:
From what I can find out.
Apple iOS 7.1.2:
iOS 7.1.2 contains bug fixes and security updates, including:
. Improves iBeacon connectivity and stability
. Fixes a bug with data transfer for some 3rd party accessories,
including bar code scanners
. Corrects an issue
Are any of you running 7.6.120.0, and if so have you encountered any issues?
Sent via the Samsung Galaxy Mega™, an ATT 4G LTE smartphone
I had this problem due a VM trying to connect to a shared network drive using
cached credentials and locking out the account. I’ll pass this info on to my
AD folks – thanks!
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf
The issue I saw when I upgraded was that on the web-auth failing was that on
the Management tab of the WiSM-2, under HTTP-HTTPS, the WebAuth
SecureWeb was enabled by default. Our Mac laptops did not like that, so
after disabling that option everything was working fine.
From: The EDUCAUSE
Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Danny Eaton
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2014 10:43 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 7.4 to 7.6 upgrade
The issue I saw when I upgraded was that on the web-auth failing
without issue, however we use web-passthrough.
John,
Did you see this on your anchor controller?
~TJ
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Danny Eaton
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2014 10:43 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN
That setup is similar to what we're doing - if any of our @rice.edu users
join the eduroam, we then assign them in either the 'staff/faculty' or
'student' role/VLAN group which maps to a specific MPLS/VPN. If someone
from @*.edu joins, they get assigned to our 'visitor' role/VLAN group which
You are correct, my apologies. @rice.edu goes to 'staff' or 'student', @*.*
goes to visitor.
That setup is similar to what we're doing - if any of our @rice.edu
users join the eduroam, we then assign them in either the
'staff/faculty' or 'student' role/VLAN group which maps to a specific
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2014 2:43 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Question about the connection of iphone users
(eduroam)
Linchuan, Patrick,
If you use the solution from Frank Sweetser or Danny Eaton, you really don't
care which SSID your own users
We upgraded to WiSM-2s and 7.6.100.0 over Christmas break as well and
many of my students (both Windows and Apple machines) are reporting
intermittent connectivity, slow browsing, and just generally poor wireless
connectivity. Its not in a building with the 3702s (only have one
building
Here at Rice since we began offering campus wide Wi-Fi, we have had a
Visitor SSID that uses a captive web-portal that displays our Acceptable
Use Policy and an accept button. The goal 10 years ago was to make it as
easy as Wi-Fi at a hotel, etc. This visitor SSID maps to a Visitor VRF, and
is
Weve run WiSMs since 3.x days And they've never redirected https.
Sent via the Samsung Galaxy Mega™, an ATT 4G LTE smartphone
Original message
From: Curtis K. Larsen curtis.k.lar...@utah.edu
Date:14/02/2014 17:00 (GMT-06:00)
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
That's my view, too - it's not necessarily that the users will be using the
full 1 Gb of throughput, but the fact that each person has 2, 3 or more
devices connected - time slicing that 1 Gb bandwidth amongst those devices.
The users behavior won't change, they will still be doing YouTube,
: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Danny Eaton
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2014 11:19 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco 7.6.100.0 question..
So, I've been running 2 WiSM-2 HA
case open, but wanted to reach out and see if anyone else
has seen similar behavior.
Respectfully,
Danny Eaton
Snr. Network Architect
Networking, Telecommunications, Operations
Rice University
We've been running 7.6.100.0 for over a month (in the lab), and about 3
weeks in production. So far, we've seen a few small(ish) issues (radios
going offline randomly, I have a ticket open with TAC on that), and issues
using an older version of ACS trying to authenticate various users to an
I've been told that CSCum49200 and CSCum62305 are for Mac clients in either
a Run state unable to ping gateway (first one) or Traffic stops for
iphone/Mac OS in 7.6 on 3600/6700 (second one) is applicable.
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
idea on the WiSM-2's? Or can I create the AP group for that building
and enable the SSID for those APs? Or, do I have to do AP Groups at all?
Anyone else run into this kind of issue?
Respectfully,
Danny Eaton
Snr. Network Architect
of
Critical Radio Alarms, but when I'd drill down into it there was a few
(known, acknowledged) alarms. If not, I suppose I'll open a TAC case, but
wanted to know if it was something only I'm seeing or what.
Respectfully,
Danny Eaton
Snr
For Rice, we allow guests on a separate SSID (Rice Visitor). That has a
splash page with our Acceptable Use Policy, which users (theoretically read)
and Accept. This is a campus wide SSID, and it maps to a visitor MPLS
L3-VPN, that goes through our IDP/IDS, as well as certain firewall policies
1 - 100 of 138 matches
Mail list logo
