Exactly Lee,
TLS requires a change in user behavior, and a change they are unlikely to
experience in any other setting. It sets up really interesting customer support
issues when, for example, one’s President/Provost, etc. has a guest show up
after-hours and they have no comprehension of a WiFi
I would do a cost/benefit/risk assessment. IMHO, some of the claimed benefits
to EAP-TLS over EAP-PEAP may not hold up under objective analysis especially
when you factor in the added cost to implement/maintain vs the actual risk (or
perceived benefit).
Just off the top of my head:
Use of crede
IT folks in 3 locations so we hope to get good feedback.
I agree that edu is a unique beast for wi-fi but in the end it's seems some
core functions are what is failing us such as code upgrades and APs stuck in
CAPWAP flapping state that require the switch ports to be bounced.
Jimmy
On
I participate in the betas and even run a beta controller in production. This
is complex stuff, and especially in EDU, we see things that no enterprise
customer will even encounter – or test bed can simulate. For the most part,
I’ve had no show-stopper issues going back to the post 5.2 days. Tha
I would go with 8.2.160, especially if you have the new-series x800 WAPs.
Jeff
From: "wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edu"
on behalf of James Helzerman
Reply-To: "wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edu"
Date: Monday, July 31, 2017 at 10:57 AM
To: "wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edu"
Subject: [WI
syr.edu
SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY
syr.edu
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Jeffrey D. Sessler
Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2017 8:24 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco FRA APs
If y
a DCA BEST guy. You should be using the channel width that the
building can support. With FRA, it’s easy to quickly overshoot the amount of
channels available.
That said, if you want to take the advice to use BEST, you should set the max
width to 40MHz.
Also,
On Jul 21, 2017, at 11:28 AM
I’m assuming the bus stops have power for lighting? If so, have you considered
using it as the power source? Even if you don’t own then, renting power from
this is probably less money than the solar install and the long-term maint.
For solar, my guess is you want solar charging with a battery to
One fix for PCI in this case is to use solutions that are cellular based – it
takes your network out of the equation.
Jeff
From: "wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edu"
on behalf of "Joseph M. Karam"
Reply-To: "wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edu"
Date: Monday, July 24, 2017 at 7:33 AM
To: "wir
0 Smith Drive
Syracuse, New York 13244
t 315.443.3003 f 315.443.4325 e lhbad...@syr.edu<mailto:lhbad...@syr.edu> w
its.syr.edu
SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY
syr.edu
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Jeffrey D. Se
In general, here are the important items.
* Make sure your 802.11a/n/ac and b/g/n DCA timers are at the default 10
mins. This is critical since FRA uses the data from DCA runs to decide changes
for the radio. If this runs only once every six hours, FRA will not be able to
make an informed (
ess Issues Constituent Group Listserv
mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>>
on behalf of "Jeffrey D. Sessler"
mailto:j...@scrippscollege.edu>>
Reply-To: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU&
As eduroam is really a guest network, I would never make it the primary network
for my users. Best to treat/deploy it is as a slightly better version of the
WiFi you can get at Starbucks or McDonalds.
Jeff
From: "wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edu"
on behalf of Michael Davis
Reply-To: "wirel
For EDU, I think PPSK (private pre-shared key) is one future. Pretty much
solves all the consumer device connection issues related to the alternatives,
and provides easy over-the-air encryption.
That said, in a world where the average user/student doesn’t typically care
about the security of th
on 2800. Supposedly you have to load-balance on src-dst-port
otherwise you don't get above 1Gbps. Plus the config is a PITA unless you have
a switch that supports the auto-lag feature. I worry that you are getting into
additional operational overhead when you won't be above 1Gbps an
On the 3800-series decision point (and multi-gig):
* New construction – Don’t need to run a 2nd Ethernet cable to the WAP
(spend that money to uplift to the 3800). You also won’t need a 2nd Ethernet
port, and a single multi-gig port is less than the cost of two 1Gb ports.
* New WAPs wit
Bryan,
I would suggest the I (eye) series over e series. FRA is optional but you may
eventually want it and/or want to manually configure roles e.g. dual 5Ghz. You
can’t do that with the e model without using the dart connector (external
antenna). Leave yourself the flexibility and use the 3802
2800/3800 is same platform – only difference being the multi-gig port. I have
hundreds of 3800’s, no such problems on current code. I have a residential hall
that is wireless-only and was/is 3800-series since Aug 2016. The only “problem”
is it averages 10x-30x the bandwidth use vs my 3700-series
FRA requires a close look at your existing configuration. To be the most
effective, you must have your RRM run interval back to default so that it’s
collecting information more often, and with shorter time gaps. If you’ve upped
those defaults you can wind up with FRA making a decision with very
There were issues at FCS (first customer ship), but they’ve been trouble-free
for me on 8.2 MR4 and now MR5. On a side note, client performance on the 3800’s
is significantly better than the 3700’s, especially when coupled with multigig
switches.
Jeff
From: "wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edu"
n that would
be a highly desirable feature.
Todd
-Original Message-
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Jeffrey D. Sessler
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2017 10:35
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.
AUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Jeffrey D. Sessler
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2017 10:35
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Dynamic vs Static Channel Plans
At least on the Cisco si
Have you considered not providing the wireless Internet service, and instead,
use a regular cable Internet provider?
If these are townhomes, the emeritus faculty treat this as their personal
residence, and as such, do residential-type things with their Internet. You
quickly find yourself in a s
At least on the Cisco side, their RRM (radio resource management) and DCA
(dynamic channel assignment) are so good that even the Cisco guys that once
promoted static plans back nearly 10 years ago admitted it now does a much
better job than a human. Environments change, so letting the magic-sauc
iate the feedback
Glenn
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Jeffrey D. Sessler
Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2017 10:11 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Consumer devices - SSID or AP blo
Glenn,
Cisco Prime Infrastructure (PI) product can assist with a lot of this diagnosis
since it collects trend data including information specific to the client such
as AP associations, roaming, RSSI, etc. It is a indispensable tool for getting
to the bottom of reported client issues. If you do
We typically get autocad files, but occasionally PDF too. If the PDF files were
output from autocad, then in my experience, the scaling is always maintained
and it’s trivial to get the critical dimensions back out of it using Acrobat
Pro’s ruler tool (set to the proper scale).
Jeff
On 5/4/17
ppe Hanset
Reply-To: "wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edu"
Date: Friday, April 28, 2017 at 2:51 PM
To: "wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edu"
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Eduroam adoption (and migration process)
On Apr 28, 2017, at 3:49 PM, Jeffrey D. Sessler
mailto:j...@scripps
Philippe,
I’m not arguing the “convenience factor” or OTA encryption, which eduroam
certainly provides, just that users (and universities advocating for it)
shouldn’t blindly trust it any more, or less, than any other guest network.
You touch on my concern with this statement, “Most Schools ten
No matter what direction I come at it, “eduroam” is fundamentally a guest
network with very little intrinsic value, but with many downsides. As such, I
would be reluctant to make it our default SSID, and I caution those that use it
as such to explore its shortcomings.
Why do I say this?
·
I echo Lee’s comment.
There is no magic rule here. If WiFi is the secondary (non-production) network,
then a few ap’s may be enough. If it’s your primary network and your users will
be moving a lot of big data, you’ll likely need a more. Cube spaces are
particularly troublesome since ceiling mo
I'm moving toward this too, although I'm going the PPSK route (once Cisco gets
it out of beta).
In my opinion it just doesn't make sense to push more restrictive methods on
residential/students. It's just a huge hassle they have to endure for 4 years
and then they'll never deal with it again.
Define bad?
For example, most colleges go to extraordinary lengths to locate/deliver DMCA
notices when there is no legal reason to do so.
Jeff
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Bucklaew, Jerry
Sent: Tuesday,
How much do you care about 2.4? I’d decide that first before spending a lot of
time on this.
Will it move indoors? The trend seems to be toward DC-powered LED driven by PoE
switches, so unless it’s a retrofit for conventional high-voltage lighting, I’m
not sure how much traction it will get.
T
Are you speaking about a separately named SSID, or looking to use an existing
SSID and radius to steer those clients into a different “admin” network?
Jeff
From: "wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edu"
on behalf of "lhbad...@syr.edu"
Reply-To: "wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edu"
Date: Wednesd
lhbad...@syr.edu<mailto:lhbad...@syr.edu> w
its.syr.edu
SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY
syr.edu
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Jeffrey D. Sessler
Sent: Monday, March 20, 2017 10:37 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUC
sity of Vermont
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Jeffrey D. Sessler
Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2017 1:54 PM
To:
WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU<mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>
Subject: Re:
release next week.
I am sorry for the inconveniences. I will let you know once I have a specific
date. “
Shayne
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU<mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>]
On Behalf Of Jeffrey D. Sessl
Ken,
For the AP’s that have lost their name and require a reboot. Would you check
the following for me?
On WLC or PI, what do the problematic WAPs report as their backup software
version? Typically, it should be the same as the “backup image” under
commands->config boot on the controller. If i
have had no problems on MR4 either. The devil you know,
trading one set of bugs for another, etc.
-Lee
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Jeffrey D. Sessler
Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2017 11:20 AM
To: WIRELE
able frequency. We had to upgrade. It wasn't a question for us.
On 3/16/2017 12:27 PM, Lee H Badman wrote:
That’s my quandary- have had no problems on MR4 either. The devil you know,
trading one set of bugs for another, etc.
-Lee
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
gt;
uva.nl/profile/g.scharloo
Beschikbaar : Ma | - | Wo | Do | Vr |
Van: wireless-lan namens "Jeffrey D.
Sessler"
Beantwoorden - Aan: wireless-lan
Datum: dinsdag 14 maart 2017 19:55
Aan: wireless-lan
Onderwerp: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco WLC code recommendations
Bruce,
Engineering ver
| Do | Vr |
Van: wireless-lan
mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>>
namens "Jeffrey D. Sessler"
mailto:j...@scrippscollege.edu>>
Beantwoorden - Aan: wireless-lan
mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>>
Datum: dinsdag 14 maart 2017 19:55
Aan: wireless-lan
mailto:W
Bruce,
Engineering version 8.2.150.4 is, to my knowledge, what will become 8.2 MR5.
This is the code I’ve been running on and so far rock solid.
Jeff
From: "wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edu"
on behalf of "bruce_entwis...@redlands.edu"
Reply-To: "wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edu"
Date:
On the issue with the 2800/3800’s are RF leader. There is a Cisco document
covering the proper setup of RF leaders with the XOR-specific WAP’s.
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/wireless/controller/technotes/8-3/b_RRM_White_Paper.html
Basically, they must have a RF leader that is running the c
Follow up – Pending something unforeseen, it was confirmed that 8.2 MR5 is
expected to be released in the later part of next week.
Jeff
From: "wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edu"
on behalf of Jeffrey Sessler
Reply-To: "wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edu"
Date: Friday, March 10, 2017 at 11:5
Bruce,
If you have 2800/3800’s, use the MR5 beta located here. You’ll have to fill out
the form. There is a slightly newer build then is documented.
https://supportforums.cisco.com/discussion/13205296/82mr5-interim-availability
Official MR5 is getting closer but still a few days out (maybe a wee
AVC – turn it off. If you’re using older model WAPs, AVC imparts a high cost on
the controllers. On newer WAPs like the 3800, AVC is hardware accelerated.
If you are going to run 8.2, MR5 is due any day now and you’ll want the new
release.
Jeff
From: "wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edu"
on b
wrote:
Similarly, we haven't looked at it. You can walk into Best Buy today and walk
out with a brand new laptop with no 5GHz wireless.
On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 12:13 PM Jeffrey D. Sessler
mailto:j...@scrippscollege.edu>> wrote:
I don’t think there is a way to get away from 2.4 yet in EDU
I don’t think there is a way to get away from 2.4 yet in EDU. For example,
while most would install high-density 5GHz in every residential room, it’s
likely cost-prohibitive to accomplish the same in hallways and other areas that
devices transit but don’t linger. As such, 2.4 is still important
n
(734) 615-9438
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 11:02 AM, Michael Hulko
mailto:mihu...@uwo.ca>> wrote:
Netscout.. aka Fluke… aka Airmagnet wrote a pretty easy to understand document
related to interference.
M
On Feb 17, 2017, at 10:44 AM, Jeffrey D. Sessler
mailto:j...@scrippscollege.edu>&
442&sdata=fRj0Ny06vnlMGanBNTm8Gz8qwYgaEtNN4zo%2BfxYHits%3D&reserved=0>
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Jeffrey D. Sessler
Sent: Monday, February 20, 2017 3:52 PM
To:
WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU<
amp;sdata=fRj0Ny06vnlMGanBNTm8Gz8qwYgaEtNN4zo%2BfxYHits%3D&reserved=0>
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Jeffrey D. Sessler
Sent: Monday, February 20, 2017 3:52 PM
To:
WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU&l
tin College
900 North Grand Avenue
Sherman, TX 75090
Phone: 903-813-2564
www.austincollege.edu<http://www.austincollege.edu/>
[ttp://www.austincollege.edu/images/AusColl_Logo_Email.gif]
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On B
On the cost of devices.
Some enterprise vendor solutions may be nothing more than the same
off-the-shelf design that the consumer models use, including using the same
radio code. When there are radio code issues, the vendor goes back to
Broadcom, Marvell, or Qualcomm for a fix. Other enterpris
You are fighting a battle that will never be won, and even a stale-mate is
unlikely.
IMHO, your best bet is to work toward abandoning 2.4. In the early days, we did
try outreach and education, but there are just too many devices today that use
2.4, and in many cases, users don’t even know it e.
From a management and finance point of view, SaaS/IaaS are very much preferable
to CapEx (hardware) and the expense of staff. In my experience, these solutions
tend to provide savings or cost containment, where the ongoing cost of the
licensing is offset by the need for less staff, either thru r
Bruce,
I know from personal experience, that the two leaders in this space have issues
with code quality. It’s impossible to judge an old solution abandoned in 2008
with what’s available now, unless you are still running both. Do you have both
solutions in play?
BTW – This isn’t a vendor-neutr
a/ccs
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
on behalf of Jeffrey D. Sessler
Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2016 1:09 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Prime 3.1.4 - 2800/3800 - Maps - b/g clients always
sh
If you are installing in any quantity, do the math on the cost of the locks.
You’ll likely find that you can have a lot walk away (and be replaced) before
equaling the cost of the locks.
If you do go the lock route, stick to the real Kensington locks. The knock-offs
are easy to defeat.
Instead
If you are a Cisco shop look at their lighting solution/integration, it looked
impressive at CiscoLive, including improvements on the switch-side allowing PoE
to stay up during reboots/code upgrades.
Jeff
On 1/10/17, 7:17 AM, "The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
on behalf o
Prime made a huge leap with the release of 3.1, and I’ve been extremely happy
with it now for management of our WiFi. The Prime team seems to have
accelerated their cadence of updates to better support emerging features on the
wireless platform. Back in the old days of WCS, updates to WCS and WL
ks
Roger
University of Tennessee Health Science Center
From: "WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU"
on behalf of "Jeffrey D. Sessler"
Reply-To: "WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU"
Date: Wednesday, December 21, 2016 at 6:07 PM
To: "WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE
works.
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 6:07 PM, Jeffrey D. Sessler
mailto:j...@scrippscollege.edu>> wrote:
Would someone do a sanity check for me.
Prime 3.1.4 (with or without device pack 6) with 2800/3800-series WAPs.
When drilling down into a building, the b/g/n clients are properly reported at
the
Would someone do a sanity check for me.
Prime 3.1.4 (with or without device pack 6) with 2800/3800-series WAPs.
When drilling down into a building, the b/g/n clients are properly reported at
the building view level. If one drills down to the floor view, all 2.4Ghz (XOR)
radios show zero (0) cli
Your best source of information is the management platform that is monitoring
your wireless. For example, if you are a Cisco customer, you have an endless
amount of data in which to judge performance and coverage along with a lot of
other items such as average connection rates, avg RSSI/SNR, % o
lto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU<mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>]
On Behalf Of Jeffrey D. Sessler
Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2016 3:12 AM
To:
WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU<mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 5GHz Channel Width
channels to get to twice that?
If yes, add channels and increase channel width to 2x current channel width.
Hope this helps
Thanks
Jake Snyder
On Nov 30, 2016, at 12:03 PM, Jeffrey D. Sessler
mailto:j...@scrippscollege.edu>> wrote:
Depending on the building construction, and assuming y
Depending on the building construction, and assuming you are using DFS
channels, running 40Mhz and even 80Mhz is very likely with no downside. 5GHz
does not propagate very well, so a static 20Mhz plan in anything but big open
spaces is IMHO unnecessary.
If you are a Cisco customer, enabling DFS
LIBERTY UNIVERSITY
Training Champions for Christ since 1971
-Original Message-
From: Jeffrey D. Sessler [mailto:j...@scrippscollege.edu]
Sent: Monday, November 7, 2016 12:54 PM
Subject: Re: TLS Onboarding Vendors
The idea of using PPSK is that for a
ce Osborne
Wireless Engineer
IT Network Operations - Wireless
(434) 592-4229
LIBERTY UNIVERSITY
Training Champions for Christ since 1971
-Original Message-
From: Jeffrey D. Sessler [mailto:j...@scrippscollege.edu]
Sent: Friday, November 4, 20
-Curtis
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
on behalf of Jeffrey D. Sessler
Sent: Friday, November 4, 2016 11:15 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] TLS Onboarding Vendors
Based on your data
since 1971
-Original Message-
From: Jeffrey D. Sessler [mailto:j...@scrippscollege.edu]
Sent: Thursday, November 3, 2016 4:45 PM
Subject: Re: TLS Onboarding Vendors
Really? So Wii U, Playstation 3 &4, Amazon Fire TV, and Xbox 360/One now
support TLS?
mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Jeffrey D. Sessler
Sent: Thursday, November 3, 2016 11:15 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] TLS Onboarding Vendors
Ryan,
No doubt we’re seeing better support, my question about PPS
Ryan Turner
Manager of Network Operations, ITS
The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
+1 919 274 7926 Mobile
+1 919 445 0113 Office
> On Nov 1, 2016, at 6:31 PM, Jeffrey D. Sessler
wrote:
>
> I think the distinction between enterprise and residen
WPA2-enterprise (eduroam or not) has three main benefits and a cool side effect:
1) You know who is on, one user at a time.
How do you know this? You know that the device is using a particular user’s
id/pass and/or was on-boarded using their account. You have no way to verify
that the device b
alue is, and it's not
protecting the data.
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Jeffrey D. Sessler
Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2016 4:41 PM
To: WIRELESS-LA
No for us.
-Original Message-
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Jeffrey D. Sessler
Sent: Tuesday, November 1, 2016 10:12 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] TLS
form lives through Christ-centered
education and to equip students for lifelong service to God, family, and society
On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 9:12 AM, Jeffrey D. Sessler
mailto:j...@scrippscollege.edu>> wrote:
Just curious. If those using or considering TLS had the option of PPSK
(personal
Just curious. If those using or considering TLS had the option of PPSK
(personal pre-shared key), would you opt for PPSK instead?
Jeff
On 10/31/16, 9:27 AM, "The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
on behalf of Bruce Boardman" wrote:
We are using Cloud Path for onboarding,
that. Shaping, in my experience, is better than limiting. With
new apps/codec’s popping up all the time, rate limiting can cause more angst
than it solves.
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU<mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.ED
the new
cradles.
A follow-up question. Do any of you do rate limiting per device or per student?
If so, what solution/appliance do you use and how is it working? As part of our
project we are upgrading our backbone from 1Gbps to 10Gbps, so a lot bigger
pipe to each building.
On Oct 26, 201
If this is going to be stand-alone and unmanaged, you may also want to look at
Cisco’s Meraki solution. It may be a better fit for a hands-off deployment.
Keep in mind that the 1810w does not have Cisco’s CleanAir, which can be a
pretty important tool for managing the RF space in residential hal
quot;advertising"
Just curious, do you have DFS enabled?
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>>
on behalf of "Jeffrey D. Sessler"
mailto:j...@scrippscollege.edu>>
Reply-To: The EDUCAUSE W
RELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Jeffrey D. Sessler
Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2016 2:40 PM
To:
WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU<mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless "advertising"
I tend to highlight accessibility i.e. dense
I tend to highlight accessibility i.e. dense coverage ensuring seamless access
even in even the most unconventional of spaces. If it’s in a building with
classrooms, emphasize improved support for the academic mission and including
access to emerging and innovative technologies.
In 2003 when we
Lee,
I’ve been running the beta. Based on fixed items, MR3 is mostly focused on the
new AP’s along with fixing a couple of other issues. Our controllers have been
running 8.2.121.14 for 12 days. No issues with that build or the previous
builds. There was a .15 that I believe became MR3, but the
For those interested, 8.2.121.15 includes additional 3800-series fixes. 8.2MR3
is also in late beta and includes the same fixes. This link has info on
participating in the beta along with the resolved items.
https://supportforums.cisco.com/discussion/13123681/82mr3-beta-availability
Jeff
On 9
CSCuy45955 was resolved in 8.2MR2 (8.2.121.0). I’ve not seen the issue you
describe with image corruption in 8.2 so maybe consider moving off 8.3 and back
to 8.2?
On the topic of modular AireOS, Cisco does/can produce AP-only code without the
need to update controller code. It’s just typically
I have an enhancement request in with Cisco to provide the option to dim the
LED's vs turn them off. If I could run them at 10-20% of brightness, I think
people would be ok with them staying on.
Jeff
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.ED
My PSA on this: Since the WAPs can be harmful (or fatal) if they fall off their
mount (especially in earthquake country), I always recommend using a properly
engineered solution. We’re using the Oberon units to wall mount some of our
Cisco WAPs. The brackets seem overkill until you consider the
phased in &
closely watched by Aruba engineers, though.
Due to the intelligence of a central controller-based infrastructure, I doubt
we will return to the independent “fat” APs.
Bruce Osborne
Wireless Engineer
IT Network Operations - Wireless
(434) 592-4229
LIBERTY UNIVERSITY
Training Champ
Have you considered adding more printers in the residence halls, mitigating any
compelling need for a student to have their own printer? There are a number of
solutions out there today that provide air print/google print (or mobile print
clients), making it even simpler.
Basically, you’ll likel
Bruce, having both Cisco and Aruba in our consortium, I echo Lee’s statement.
Unless you stick with trailing-edge (or even EOL) setups where the code has
been picked over for years and you still have 11g-only WAPs, you’re going to
run into occasional problems.
My best advice is to form a relati
I’ve been running 8.2.121.x for months (including beta) as we piloted
3800-series and then deployed in production. It’s been solid here and our
students were back last week, and no reports of issues.
The current 8.2.121.11 (soon to be .12) releases have been primarily quality of
live improvemen
, AUSTRALIA 5005
Ph: +61 8 8313 4800
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Jeffrey D. Sessler
Sent: Tuesday, 30 August 2016 12:28 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Prime
Jason, have you considered moving to CiscoOne, that way you get the Prime
licenses? May be less expensive then purchasing/maintaining Prime alone.
Are you using Prime 3.x or something older? Prime became infinitely more
interesting in 3.x and I depend on the dashboards, history, and reporting fo
Do you have other WAPs to test against i.e. is it specific to the 3802’s or
does it happen on older models too?
Is this happening when the Win 10 machine roams to another WAP, or does it
happen when stationary and anchored to one WAP?
Is this an open WLAN or is authentication involved?
Are the Wi
I’d go with 8.2.121.0 – Been running it (via beta) for a long time and it’s
been rock-solid. That said, if you have 2800/3800-series you may want to
request the current engineering build which is 8.2.121.7. It has a couple of
2800/3800-specifc enhancements/fixes and a couple for the 1810/1830/18
-Original Message-
From: Jeffrey D. Sessler [mailto:j...@scrippscollege.edu]
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2016 11:01 AM
Subject: Re: Wireless Mobility
Really Bruce? LOL
Thank you for the advice, but I for one will stick with
class-leading/unique te
101 - 200 of 304 matches
Mail list logo
