http://securityaffairs.co/wordpress/38234/hacking/802-11n-flaw.html
Fortunately, there are several methods to mitigate the attacks, including
MAC layer encryption, disabling Aggregated Mac Protocol Data Unit (A-MPDU)
frame aggregation, configuring the system to drop corrupted A-MPDUs, the
Ekahau has a built in selection of client adapters that simulate end user
results - you can select various laptop, IPphones, etc. Still waiting for
an ipad/droid selection. You can manually reduce client power to customize.
As user densities increase - shift your process to creation of small
With Meru it is strongly suggested to do entire buildings at a time.
Beyond Meru's suggestions based on how their tech works I still think it
is a good idea.
User experience would be consistent for the whole building instead of
only having better connections in the strategic locations.
I
I agree with Jim...I think you can do it, it's just more work and more
room for error
For example, if you are going to have APs within hearing distance of
each other with different band configurations (like b/g vs b/g/n) they
need to be on separate ESS profiles
at least that's my
Of James F Eyrich
Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2010 10:43 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n phased deployment approaches
With Meru it is strongly suggested to do entire buildings at a time.
Beyond Meru's suggestions based on how their tech works I still think
I should have been more specific - I was talking about Meru ...sorry
about that!
Original Message
Subject:
Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n phased deployment approaches
Date:
Thu, 3 Jun 2010 11:02:10 -0400
From
Is the AP configured with 2 transmit antennas? Try rebooting/
resetting the AP to factory default? Toggling ClientLink?
Bruce T. Johnson | Network Engineer | Partners Healthcare |
617.726.9662 bjohns...@partners.org
On Apr 13, 2010, at 11:33 AM, Mike King m...@mpking.com wrote:
Ok. I
: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:wireless-...@listserv.educause.edu] On Behalf Of Johnson, Bruce T.
Sent: Friday, April 16, 2010 3:15 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n configuration on Cisco
Is the AP configured with 2
Mike,
Make sure WMM Policy is set to allowed for the WLAN config.
-Chris
On Apr 13, 2010, at 11:23 AM, Mike King m...@mpking.commailto:m...@mpking.com
wrote:
Ok. I had my controller tweaked to where I liked it, but I forgot to hit the
save configuration settings button, and the controller
Yep, I have that set to allowed.
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 12:05 PM, Chris Murphy ch...@mit.edu wrote:
Mike,
Make sure WMM Policy is set to allowed for the WLAN config.
-Chris
**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group
discussion list can be
Wireless 802.11a/n or 802.11b/g/n High Throughput (802.11n)
Also, have you made sure that the APs are actually using 40Mhz channels?
WirelessAccessPointsRadios802.11a/n
Finally, what channels have you selected? Remember that some clients
don't support UNII 2 and UNII-2e bands.
Hector
Message-
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:wireless-...@listserv.educause.edu] On Behalf Of Tom Lowry
Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2010 2:41 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n AP recommendations
We have a robotics research
Sorry- meant to say early 11n Mac, not early Mac.
-Original Message-
From: Lee H Badman
Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2010 3:21 PM
To: 'The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv'
Subject: RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n AP recommendations
Tom, I have played with Cisco 11n
@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n AP recommendations
We have a robotics research group that wants the highest-speed wireless
connections possible. All the equipment is in the same room -- approximately
50'x 50'.
Many consumer grade 802.11n APs seem to top out at well below
-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n AP recommendations
We have a robotics research group that wants the highest-speed wireless
connections possible. All the equipment is in the same room -- approximately
50'x 50'.
Many consumer grade 802.11n APs seem to top out at well
We are also a cisco shop and have both 1142 and 1252 AP's on capwap.
We've also recently evaluated Meru wireless gear and found it very
competitive.
You will definitely want to investigate user devices to ensure
throughput. For desktops we have older 2.4 only Belkin USB's (F5D8051)
that
Tom,
One detail that I forgot to mention.
It seems obvious but we got bitten by it many times!
Make sure to use Gigabit ports on switches that uplink the APs.
And if you use a midspan power-injector, also make sure that it supports
Gigabit Ethernet!
Philippe
Univ. of TN
On Apr 8, 2010, at
[mailto:wireless-...@listserv.educause.edu] On Behalf Of Jason Mueller
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 11:25 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n Solutions
Pablo,
Our experience with the HP MSM765 controller is mixed. It has a
conceptually different architecture
-
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:wireless-...@listserv.educause.edu] On Behalf Of Pablo J. Rebollo-Sosa
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 5:55 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n Solutions
Hi,
We are looking for 802.11n
: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 6:55 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n Solutions
Hi,
We are looking for 802.11n solutions. I would like know more about
Enterasys and HP solutions experience.
Best regards,
Pablo J. Rebollo
**
Participation and subscription
Pablo,
Our experience with the HP MSM765 controller is mixed. It has a
conceptually different architecture than most of the other controller
models out there. One key difference is that the controller works much
better in an environment where you forward traffic from wireless users
@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n Solutions
Hi,
We are looking for 802.11n solutions. I would like know more about
Enterasys and HP solutions experience.
Best regards,
Pablo J. Rebollo
**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent
Group
, December 16, 2009 6:55 AM
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n Solutions
Hi,
We are looking for 802.11n solutions. I would like know more about
Enterasys and HP solutions experience.
Best regards,
Pablo J. Rebollo
**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent
Listserv
[wireless-...@listserv.educause.edu] On Behalf Of Pablo J. Rebollo-Sosa
[pablo.rebo...@upr.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 1:24 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n Solutions
He Lee,
We currently own a wireless system with over a 150
[
pablo.rebo...@upr.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 1:24 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n Solutions
He Lee,
We currently own a wireless system with over a 150 autonomous APs. Now
we are working to move the infrastructure to 11n and to have
Nathan,
I am using one now connected to a Cisco 1252. It works just OK. This was
the highest gain I could find in an outdoor MIMO antenna. I have a
challenging application where the distance is several hundred feet
shooting down from a tall building into a ground level coffee shop.
Over a
-
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:wireless-...@listserv.educause.edu] On Behalf Of Johnson, Bruce
T
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2009 11:36 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n testplans
Toivo et al,
Great comments. Does
@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n testplans
Hi Bruce,
We didn't have a formal test plan, but have had many experiences I am
more than willing to share.
Surveying was pretty interesting, as we deployed before there were any
11n capable tools available. Back in the summer
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n testplans
Thank you Matt,
I appreciate the feedback and may want to get more of your Meru
experiences
offline. A 5GHz RSSI (PHY) survey seems to be the common denominator
for legacy
and .11n clients. Its likely this provides adequate coverage for 2.4GHz
-
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:wireless-...@listserv.educause.edu] On Behalf Of Johnson, Bruce
T
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2009 10:25 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n testplans
Thank you Matt,
I appreciate
Listserv
[mailto:wireless-...@listserv.educause.edu] On Behalf Of Lee H Badman
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2009 10:42 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n testplans
I had an interesting exchange with Ekahau (we use them and AirMagnet)
about how 11n should change
...@partners.org
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv on behalf of
Barber, Matt
Sent: Thu 1/29/2009 11:07 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n testplans
Yeah, that is something I should have mentioned
Toivo et al,
Great comments. Does anyone have any 802.11n testplans they are willing to
share?
802.11n Survey experiences? Has it turned the traditional survey methodology on
its head, or do we still have to consider legacy and so the n simply stands
for Nice (if you have it).
Anyone with
: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n and WPA/WPA2...
So, we've been testing 802.11n with a couple of Cisco 1250 radios. In
order to support it on our 802.1X/WPA/TKIP WLAN, we had to add WPA2 to
our layer 2 security parameters. So now we support either WPA or WPA2.
We are finding out that some systems don't like
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paynter,
Jeffrey
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2008 8:32 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n and WPA/WPA2...
We have 1,300 + APs with a mix of 1131AGs, 1242s, and 1250s. We
broadcast our SSIDs and one of them is using Layer 2 security WPA +
WPA2
@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n and WPA/WPA2...
Jeffrey,
Can you confirm that your setup has worked with Vista and Windows
mobile?
I did find out that at least on two Vista machines, upgrading to SP1
solved the issue.
Hector
-Original Message-
From: The EDUCAUSE
] On Behalf Of Hector J Rios
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 1:06 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n and WPA/WPA2...
So, we've been testing 802.11n with a couple of Cisco 1250 radios. In
order to support it on our 802.1X/WPA/TKIP WLAN, we had to add WPA2 to
our layer 2
] On Behalf Of Hector J Rios
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 12:06 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n and WPA/WPA2...
So, we've been testing 802.11n with a couple of Cisco 1250 radios. In
order to support it on our 802.1X/WPA/TKIP WLAN, we had to add WPA2 to
our layer 2
Group Listserv
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Keith Moores
Sent: Sunday, March 16, 2008 4:05 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n WPA2/AES requirement
Just wondering what encryption type those of you that have started
moving to (testing with) 802.11n APs
: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n WPA2/AES requirement
From my testing and from the systems engineer of the vendor's equipment
that I was testing, an 802.11n client with WPA2/AES can connect at
802.11n rates, but if that same 802.11n client connects using WPA/TKIP,
it gets a/b/g rates even though client and AP
+matchallpartial
Nu=P_RollupKey
-Original Message-
From: Jonn Martell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 1:02 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n
I won't speak for Bret but considering the cost differential of 11xx and
12xx models
PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n
Jonn:
According to Cisco, if you have particular models of the 3750E, 4500, and
6500, you may be able to power their new 802.11n APs with full features. If
that's not workable solution in a customer's environment
.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Bret Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 5:50 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n
1. The technology is very new in the enterprise market and when rolling out
thousands
: Bret Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 5:50 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n
1. The technology is very new in the enterprise market and when rolling out
thousands of AP's is just too risky
...?
Philippe Hanset
Univ of TN.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Jonn Martell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2008 10:19 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n
It's interesting, Cisco, which still dominates the WLAN market has
gear.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Philippe Hanset [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 3:48 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n
My question to you: how many of you will go with a single-radio
802.11n-capable AP
From: Dave Molta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2008 11:24 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n
I think Peter has the right perspective here. The risk that a Draft
2.0/Wi-Fi Certified AP purchased today would be incompatible
: Friday, January 11, 2008 10:45 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n
I'd be interested in results being posted on-list...I've not yet
heard of any manufacturer who is guaranteeing free upgrades to the
finalized standard...only,...'should
: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n
Actually, we did get a verbal commitment to that very notion yesterday
from one of the more visible 11n vendors, but would have to see if that
would be put in writing if we ever did proceed down that road.
Lee
From: Jamie Savage [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
University
From: Jamie Savage [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2008 11:26 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n
exactly!...that's why I doubt any manufacturer would sign an
agreement
Doug Payne wrote:
I wonder if you'll have more issues now that Aruba has acquired AirWave?
http://www.arubanetworks.com/company/news/release.php?id=56
Hopefully not, but in 2 years or so I won't have a multivendor wireless
network, so it may not matter if Meru can improve their management
On Jan 11, 2008, at 9:48 AM, Lee H Badman wrote:
Actually, we did get a verbal commitment to that very notion
yesterday from one of the more visible 11n vendors, but would have
to see if that would be put in writing if we ever did proceed down
that road.
For hardware or software
From: Lee Weers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2008 11:46 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n
We have a campus wide wireless project just starting that we are going to do
802.11n everywhere we can place a Cisco
Do any of the bands have lesser/no DFS requirements? If so, those are will
be more attractive.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Jon Freeman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2007 6:32 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n tied
, 2007 5:49 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n tied to 802.3at
Do any of the bands have lesser/no DFS requirements? If so, those are
will
be more attractive.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Jon Freeman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday
On Mon, 19 Nov 2007, Jon Freeman wrote:
As higher level standards in 802.11 call for more AP control, this will
become more valuable in ensuring less co-channel interference across
heterogeneous environments. But, it will also mean less need for IT
intervention as the access device will make
to me by a vendor.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Zeller, Tom S [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2007 1:17 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n, DFS2, and channel assignment in the 5 GHZ
range
Interesting TechWorld article
@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n tied to 802.3at
Good points, Philippe. For those organizations that want to be bleeding
edge, I don't think PoE concerns are going to hold them back. Every
vendor has a way to address them today in a way that's not a
show-stopper.
Has anyone heard
On Nov 18, 2007, at 7:06 PM, Kevin Miller wrote:
One thing to note is that 300Mbps as a symbol rate is only possible
with 40MHz channels (versus the 20MHz standard width for 802.11a/b/
g) .. which in 2.4GHz takes you from 3 non-overlapping to 1 non-
overlapping. In 5GHz you have at least 8
-
From: Frank Bulk - iNAME [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2007 8:07 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n tied to 802.3at
Good points, Philippe. For those organizations that want to be bleeding
edge, I don't think PoE concerns
they
hadn't decided on 33 or 48 watts of power per port.
-Original Message-
From: Frank Bulk - iNAME [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2007 8:07 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n tied to 802.3at
Good points, Philippe. For those
@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n tied to 802.3at
I heard from Cisco 2 days ago that the 3750E and the modules that will
power their 1252 will be availble around the end of Dec/Januarary time
frame. I'm trying to pry out of HP if the 5400's and 3500's will be
firmware upgradable
: Tue 11/13/2007 9:30 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n Draft 2.0
Those are two events with rather technically savvy people who will set their
radios to prefer 802.11a. =)
So I would call 60% the high watermark. Most organizations will see less
than
prove to be
David Gillett
-Original Message-
From: Dan McCarriar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 3:14 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n Draft 2.0
Lee,
As was noted by others earlier today, we recently
practical that would prove to be
David Gillett
-Original Message-
From: Dan McCarriar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 3:14 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n Draft 2.0
Lee,
As was noted by others
: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n Draft 2.0
Hi Lee-
I would encourage an eyes-open, non-biased bake-off if you have no
wireless now. Regardless of what APs you settle on, scrutinize the
management component closely. You may end up with a whiz-bang WLAN, but
if you become a slave to the management tool, you'll
Had they received Wi-Fi certification? I think that could be a
differentiating factor.
I remeber that there was talk of 802.11g being certified *after* the
final release, but not during draft. Some 802.11g draft hardware was
specified as compliant after the final spec was approved, though.
, November 13, 2007 3:42 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n Draft 2.0
For wireless we currently have an Aruba 2400, and a HP WESM xl module.
About a year ago I did a comparison (mostly on paper) of a campus wide
deployment of Aruba, Trapeze, Procurve
Carnegie Mellon just went through an extensive N evalthey chose
Aruba.
http://biz.yahoo.com/iw/071112/0324644.html
From: Lee Weers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 3:25 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n Draft 2.0
: King, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 2:29 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n Draft 2.0
Great question..
Two points you need to know...
1252's require gigabit Ethernet ports. (Any 802.11n is going to need
We are currently rolling out Cisco a/b/g wireless and asked the vendor
about designing with 802.11n in mind. The overall response was that the
technology is too immature and any predictions would be highly
speculative. They also said that the consumer base would not be
populated with N - capable
It probably is no surprise but we have a 1252-based pilot in operation
now, with ongoing conversations about when/how to expand. All of the
concerns raised so far are valid, and under discussion. Currently we're
using individual power injectors to Gig switches, but we all know how
well individual
, November 13, 2007 3:38 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n Draft 2.0
We are currently rolling out Cisco a/b/g wireless and asked the vendor
about designing with 802.11n in mind. The overall response was that the
technology is too immature and any
.
Frank
From: Toby Krohn (tkrohn) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 4:00 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n Draft 2.0
Actually, all but the lowest end of client devices are already shipping with
n. With that said
Lee,
It's all about be willing to pay the price of being an early adopter!
Is it better to deploy an early 802.11n today and deal with the
consequences (two cat5, two 802.3af ports, I wonder if you can
etherchannel two 100 Mbps ports for each AP since you bring two cat5
anyway!)
or wait for a
.
From: Frank Bulk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 5:54 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n Draft 2.0
Good point, though those legacy client devices seem to stick around
longer than you think. In any case, shipping chipsets
Lee,
As was noted by others earlier today, we recently announced our new
Wireless Andrew 2.0 project, which will bring 802.11n to the campus
wireless network using equipment from Aruba and Xirrus. I'm happy to
answer any questions you might have.
-Dan
Dan McCarriar
Assistant
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 2:02 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n Draft 2.0
Lee,
I think you are right on. I think as long as your a/b/g network is working
well, the students aren't going to care about 11n. In my mind
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 4:58 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n Draft 2.0
Lee,
It's all about be willing to pay the price of being an early adopter!
Is it better to deploy an early 802.11n today and deal with the
consequences (two
: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n Draft 2.0
Lee,
As was noted by others earlier today, we recently announced our new
Wireless Andrew 2.0 project, which will bring 802.11n to the campus
wireless network using equipment from Aruba and Xirrus. I'm happy to
answer any questions you might have.
-Dan
-2666
-Original Message-
From: Frank Bulk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 06:05 PM Pacific Standard Time
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject:Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n Draft 2.0
For those organizations that are risk-averse and/or price
, 2007 8:16 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n Draft 2.0
We supplied wi-fi to Interop this year where 60% of all clients connecting
were 11a. We're seeing the same stats at the ITU in Geneva during the world
radio congress last month.
Del'Oro indicated
@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n Draft 2.0
Those are two events with rather technically savvy people who will set their
radios to prefer 802.11a. =)
So I would call 60% the high watermark. Most organizations will see less
than this.
Regards,
Frank
_
From
We just had preliminary discussions with Aruba about this.
Although it's true that we have very little or no need to support 11n
through our infrastructure,
the existence of rogues is a substantial concern. Since 11n uses
different frequencies than 11[abg]
it can't be detected directly by an
period. Users may benefit from some burst headroom,
but that's about it.
Regards,
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Lee Badman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 8:31 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n thoughts?
Looking forward
Lee,
I don't know if it's an issue of not thinking about it. I for one keep
my eye on it, but until a standard is ratified and we get some gear with
that standard on campus to do some real assessment in our environment, I
keep on coming back to the point that it's largely academic at the
86 matches
Mail list logo
