Doesn’t that set a precedent?
Frank
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Gruenhagen, Tim
Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2015 10:12 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Parents
Matthew,
Why don’t you get more public IPs from ARIN?
Frank
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Hinson, Matthew P
Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2015 8:04 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject:
We use Qwilt, too – happy with it. Our Netflix cache rate is 59.9%. It’s
just amazing how much Netflix content is commonly viewed.
And we move a lot more traffic than the University of Alaska. =)
Frank
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
Isn’t the certificates thing being described something like EAP-TLS?
Frank
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Lee H Badman
Sent: Friday, January 23, 2015 12:10 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
it implemented that way in a
product we can actually deploy, or supported in a product in use by our
constituents.
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 2:30 PM, Frank Bulk frnk...@iname.com wrote:
Isn’t the certificates thing being described something like EAP-TLS?
Frank
** Participation
Frustrating that I can't drill down on this one: Cisco Wireless LAN
Controller [CSCur02981]
Frank
-Original Message-
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Trent Hurt
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2014 8:47
Steven,
Did you have a SUP720C or B? How do I find out what the limit on the ND
table size is?
Good article on IPv6 MLD snooping here:
http://blog.ipspace.net/2014/09/ipv6-neighbor-discovery-nd-and.html
Frank
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
Some campus networks are larger than service providers, and sometimes even
look like a service provider network.
While the allocation and RFC have service providers as the intended target,
I'm not aware of anything that would preclude it's use for institutional
CGN, especially in
for the initial TCP connection that gets made so it knows to let
the UDP connection back in. Like for FTP and the other protocols that
behave in a similar manner.
-dan
Dan Brisson
Network Engineer
University of Vermont
(Ph) 802.656.8111
dbris...@uvm.edu
On 3/12/14, 8:21 PM, Frank Bulk wrote
This question was discussed on RESNET-L today:
https://listserv.nd.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A1=ind1402DL=RESNET-LX=274F662DDA0949C1
C4#1
Frank
-Original Message-
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Jerry Bucklaew
Note the distance between RIM's headquarters and Dennis's work. =)
Frank
-Original Message-
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Ian McDonald
Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2013 9:15 AM
To:
Doesn't Apple do any staggering?
Frank
-Original Message-
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Todd M. Hall
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2013 1:35 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re:
Latest OUI's can always be found here:
http://standards.ieee.org/develop/regauth/oui/oui.txt
Frank
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Jeffrey Sessler
Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2013 1:42 PM
To:
Brian was address Ron Walczakn, not Ron Stappenbeck. =)
Frank
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Ron Stappenbeck
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2013 10:39 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re:
I assume you have ping-ahead turned off?
Frank
-Original Message-
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Hanset, Philippe C
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2012 1:20 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
The FCC and NTIA govern frequency in the United States. You control
short-range airwaves to the extent that your institution can control what is
brought onto campus by employees, students, and the public. In the same way
it's difficult to legally prevent students from bringing in peanut-based
Ok, I'm confused. If you turn the AP's radios off, how do the wireless
clients participate in Airplay?
Frank
-Original Message-
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Colleen Szymanik
Sent: Wednesday, July
We use Alvarion B-14's for our broadband wireless network and Exalt for TDM
backhaul on our cellular network. They've both been working well for us.
Frank
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Brian David
I have not been able find a quality Wi-Fi hotspot sign that's either styled
after a street sign or can be fastened on the outside of a building. It can
be metal or outdoor grade plastic and I would prefer to uses the Wi-Fi
Alliance logo. I'm not looking for stickers or laminate, but something
Is a portable generator an option?
Frank
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Lee H Badman
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2012 2:54 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Battery packs
And so who was pushing the old 10 Gbps limit pm the WiSM2? ;)
Frank
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Robertson, Joshua
A.
Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2012 9:38 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
http://www.vsuspectator.com/2012/02/02/outage-linked-to-usage/
Looks like VSU had to make some hard choices and is blocking Wi-Fi access by
smartphones. Not sure why they couldn't add another RFC 1918 block, but I'm
sure there's more going on than the school paper shared.
Frank
**
How do you handle RIAA complaints?
Frank
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Joel Coehoorn
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 12:45 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] SSIDs,
http://www.skidmorenews.com/news/information-technology-department-addresses
-wireless-issues-1.2691856#.TrvkfkMUqdA
This article has some details but doesn't make it very clear if all the
problems have been DNS or otherwise, but I thought there might be some
people on this list who find this
@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] MRTG/ARUBA
By any chance, are those any different from the old associated clients
oid? And, is there an oid for open-system clients?
Regards
-le
Sent via mobile device
_
From: Frank Bulk frnk...@iname.com
Sender: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues
The OIDs for graphing authenticated 802.1X, authenticated captive portal
users, CPU usage, total APs, and total users are in Aruba's MIB and we graph
that now.
Frank
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Phil
It's an older article, but the principles remain:
http://informationweek.com/news/global-cio/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=18700
1524
Frank
-Original Message-
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Palmer
I was told by our local college last year already that Meru doesn't support
IPv6 -- is that still the case?
Frank
-Original Message-
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Johnson, Neil M
Sent: Wednesday,
Tristan:
Show me one graph of one AP that shows 16 Mbps of usage over 5 minutes...as
the others have said, it's not a real concern. Very few WLANs shows
aggregate traffic rates above 1 Gbps, and those that do have many more than
500 APs.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: The EDUCAUSE
And the Torch is Wi-Fi certified!
Frank
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:wireless-...@listserv.educause.edu] On Behalf Of Lee H Badman
Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2010 12:14 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN]
Google is already on to that:
http://blog.chromium.org/2010/04/new-approach-to-printing.html
Frank
-Original Message-
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:wireless-...@listserv.educause.edu] On Behalf Of Lee H Badman
Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 8:21
For all things K-12, or wireless for K-12?
Frank
-Original Message-
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:wireless-...@listserv.educause.edu] On Behalf Of Rich Fulton
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 11:30 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject:
AFAIK Aruba doesn't insert itself in the IPv6 path, just like Cisco, but it
does bridge the traffic fine (using it right now). I'm sure Aruba has more
in the works, but I haven't asked/sought for that.
In terms of IDS/IPS vendors, I just engaged TippingPoint on this and they
wrote that the
Another idea is provide long(er) lease times just to the Apple iPads, based
on OUI.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:wireless-...@listserv.educause.edu] On Behalf Of Jeffrey Sessler
Sent: Monday, April 19, 2010 10:28 AM
To:
Officer
The Ohio State University
614-292-9906 holland@osu.edu
On Apr 20, 2010, at 9:34 PM, Frank Bulk wrote:
Another idea is provide long(er) lease times just to the Apple iPads,
based
on OUI.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group
More here:
http://www.fiercemobileit.com/story/apple-ipad-users-report-wifi-connectivit
y-problems/2010-04-06?utm_medium=nl
http://www.fiercemobileit.com/story/apple-ipad-users-report-wifi-connectivi
ty-problems/2010-04-06?utm_medium=nlutm_source=internal
utm_source=internal
Frank
From:
It's a little older, but this might have some value:
http://www.networkcomputing.com/mobile/archives/mobile_archive_011106.html
Generally, WPA2/AES with MS-CHAPv2/PEAPv0 will serve the broadest number of
clients and work with the most back ends.
If you have your passwords stored in the clear in
The feature gaps you mention suggest that despite all the years that this
solution has had to bake, it does not have feature parity with its
competitors. It appears to be more than just a difference in architecture.
I find it interesting that 2+ years after the introduction of 802.11n APs
and
Do you mind me asking why wireless survey/coverage estimations tools were
strongly discouraged?
Frank
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:wireless-...@listserv.educause.edu] On Behalf Of Greg Gardner
Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2009 4:08 PM
To:
Goolgle for RFC 4436, Apple, and wireless, you'll find much more on the
topic.
This is worth reading, too:
http://lists.sans.org/pipermail/unisog/2007-January/027056.html
Frank
-Original Message-
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
Google for RFC 4436, Apple, and wireless, you'll find much more on the
topic.
This is worth reading, too:
http://lists.sans.org/pipermail/unisog/2007-January/027056.html
Frank
-Original Message-
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
You would think there should be a near-hitless upgrade process. Could be as
simple as temporarily restricting APs from downgrading. And that doesn't even
have to be done the AP side, that could be done via a setting on the WLC.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless
There's three options you can take: Windows Policy Editor, ZWLANCFG, and
Aruba's configuration utility.
See here:
http://www.networkcomputing.com/blog/dailyblog/archives/2007/03/wireless_pro
pag_9.html
for more details.
Frank
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group
There are several cellular repeater vendors out there, but the wireless
carriers are generally (very) apprehensive about them because of concern
about feedback (sending back in the repeated signal to the base station) and
excessive roaming events. Spotwave comes to mind. I know an Andrew
For the grammatically correct ones, I would recommend
cedarwireless-insecure. =)
Frank
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:wireless-...@listserv.educause.edu] On Behalf Of Nathan Hay
Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 2:12 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
The KSC_Student SSId as you describe is not a wise setup - the majority of
your user base is operating in the clear. The only place where unencrypted
access should be accessible is guest access which would have limitations in
terms of speed or captive portal, and no access to internal resources,
Here, too - open Wi-Fi for the masses? Cringe It's 2009 now - time to
lock it down.
Frank
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:wireless-...@listserv.educause.edu] On Behalf Of Osborne, Bruce W.
(NS)
Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 6:35 AM
To:
I second the QuickBridge. The Alvarion B-series of products should be looked
at, too.
Frank
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:wireless-...@listserv.educause.edu] On Behalf Of Daniel Eklund
Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2009 8:58 AM
To:
Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:wireless-...@listserv.educause.edu] On Behalf Of Frank Bulk
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2009 15:34
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Aerohive 340AP
I've have had several opportunities to talk to AeroHive
applications to control the fat APS much
like a controller would. They still do not have the control that the
controller firewall gives us.
Bruce
From: Frank Bulk [mailto:frnk...@iname.com]
Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2009 10:43 AM
Subject: Re: Aerohive 340AP
Bruce, and perhaps others
I've have had several opportunities to talk to AeroHive. Competitors like
to poke holes at their product, but my (un-tested) impression is that it's
pretty solid.
If you ask for references, they do have some small to medium-sized build
outs, but I'm not sure if they have any 500+ AP
] Aerohive 340AP
Hi Frank-
Any idea about what aspects of the AeroHive model the other guys pick on?
Lee
_
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:wireless-...@listserv.educause.edu] On Behalf Of Frank Bulk
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2009 3:34 PM
Any good reason why RIM shouldn't have installed the intermediate
certificate on its device? Seems like a missing element.
Frank
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:wireless-...@listserv.educause.edu] On Behalf Of Lee H Badman
Sent: Sunday, February 22,
If you don't use WZC, what supplicant is used in your client base?
Frank
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:wireless-...@listserv.educause.edu] On Behalf Of Charles Bisel
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 10:35 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Brian:
Can you explain how the beacon period relates to management traffic
dominating 802.11g traffic, besides the beacons that are (normally) sent
every 100 msec?
Frank
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:wireless-...@listserv.educause.edu] On Behalf
FYI
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Cisco Security Advisory: Multiple Vulnerabilities in Cisco Wireless
LAN Controllers
Advisory ID: cisco-sa-20090204-wlc
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sa-20090204-wlc.shtml
Revision 1.0
For Public Release 2009 February 04 1600 UTC
Ken:
Since a client radio can connect to only one access point at a time, (3)
will not be an issue. Point (4) seems suspect, too.
Frank
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:wireless-...@listserv.educause.edu] On Behalf Of Christopher DeSmit
Sent: Wednesday,
Chris:
Does this STP issue arise in a WiSM or fat AP configuration?
Frank
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:wireless-...@listserv.educause.edu] On Behalf Of Christopher DeSmit
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2009 10:01 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Of Frank Bulk
[frnk...@iname.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2009 3:56 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Comments about Aruba and Cisco
Chris:
Does this STP issue arise in a WiSM or fat AP configuration?
Frank
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent
I know that this isn't an Aruba Wireless listserv, but I know there are
enough users and there is likely someone who has this specific configuration
in place that will save me some hours of configuration.
I have an existing configuration that server our own employees, but I would
like to provide
-January/027056.html
Dale
On Jan 22, 2009, at 9:27 PM, Frank Bulk wrote:
Kristina:
Is the SE talking about using DHCP INFORM instead of DHCP RENEW?
Frank
-Original Message-
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:wireless-...@listserv.educause.edu
I know that a service provider vendor, Calix, also has a GBIC to do this.
It's not an uncommon thing to do anymore.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:wireless-...@listserv.educause.edu] On Behalf Of acarl...@hot.rr.com
Sent:
It's not mentioned in the literature, so I'm guessing it doesn't.
Frank
**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
Services
404.727.0226
AIM/Y!/Twitter: WLANstan
MSN: wlans...@hotmail.com
GoogleTalk: wlans...@gmail.com
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:wireless-...@listserv.educause.edu] On Behalf Of Frank Bulk
Sent: Monday, December 29, 2008 12:41 PM
Microsemi Powerdsine stops short of saying their Cisco certified, but their
participation in Cisco's Technology Developer Partner Program is probably
more than any other PoE vendor.
See: http://www.microsemi.com/PowerDsine/Partners/Cisco/
Frank
P.S. This was not meant as an endorsement of
Midspans have been available for several months now -- when were you
looking?
Frank
-Original Message-
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lee Weers
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2008 10:08 AM
To:
You're running software from 5 years ago. Upgrade to WM6.1. =)
Frank
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lee H Badman
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2008 7:13 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN]
It's pretty tough to impossible for schools to control what's transmitted in
the air. If the school is not leasing the dormitory room, it's possible a
policy could be put into place that restricted certain equipment on campus.
But that's not going to win any points with the students.
Frank
Someone offline kindly corrected me..it's not Avaya, but Polycom.
Frank
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Frank Bulk - iNAME
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2008 5:18 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS
Manhattan double dutch leagues.
- Original Message -
From: Frank Bulk - iNAME mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2008 6:18 PM
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] WiFi SIP phones
Linksys and ruggedized don't go in the same sentence
I put this together some time ago, but here's what I have on file:
Hitatchi IP5000AE
$320
Pros: light handset; highly configurable; MWI light; vendor is very
standards-focused; 802.11b/g
Cons: might be too small for plant use; not very rugged.
http://www.wirelessip5000.com/eng/index.html
AirMagnet's Enterprise Analyzer can in fact disable switch ports
(http://www.networkcomputing.com/showitem.jhtml?articleID=164302965pgno=4)
. I'm not sure how significantly the Aruba version changes things, but you
should be able to ask your AirMagnet sales person.
Regards,
Frank
-Original
I believe what's your doing is called mixed-mode encryption, and you're
right, some clients deal with it better than others. When I was doing more
testing, that's a combination I would specifically try out. WEP/WPA and
WEP/WPA2 and cleaner combinations to be running together, but I don't
Engineer
Information Technology and Services
Syracuse University
315 443-3003
-Original Message-
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Frank Bulk -
iNAME
Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2008 11:49 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
] On Behalf Of Frank Bulk
Sent: Friday, April 11, 2008 10:07 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] many clients, one room
Based on research and interviews I performed two years ago, it appeared that
for dense client usage in a confined space, Meru was the product most
10:44 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 11n/WiMax
Frank Bulk - iNAME wrote:
WiMAX is a MAN solution will generally offer lower throughput than
802.11n. It's generally not a good enterprise fit.
It sure does look interesting as a secondary/backup Internet
WiMAX is a MAN solution will generally offer lower throughput than 802.11n.
It's generally not a good enterprise fit.
Frank
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lee H Badman
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2008 6:45 PM
To:
failure message in order to get Windows to re-prompt for
the password.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Philippe Hanset [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2008 7:55 AM
To: Frank Bulk
Cc: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.1x and Password
Philippe:
IIRC, there was an issue with some RADIUS servers that was causing the
supplicant not to prompt the user to enter their new password. Is that your
concern?
Regards,
Frank
-Original Message-
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:[EMAIL
Here's a few articles on the topic:
http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,3973,708876,00.asp
http://yves.maguer.free.fr/WiFi/nombre_de_cannaux_disjoints_4_en_france.pdf
It's doable, it's been done, but there's a lot of adjacent channel
interference, so you have to be able tolerate some
Larry:
Here's something to get you started:
http://www.networkcomputing.com/mobile/archives/mobile_archive_022107.html
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Larry Siew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2008 9:41 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject:
Schilling:
All the enterprise AP vendors address this out of the box, some via a
centralized data plane, others distributed, and some both. In the
centralized data plane model, there is a some kind of tunnel that goes to
the core or the distribution layer closet switch/controller. Because
Are you suggesting a dongle that plugs into two Ethernet ports on a Cisco
switch that transports the Ethernet and power over different pairs to the
Aironet 1250?
I'm pretty sure that Cisco will/would not do this. They're in business of
selling switches, too, so they are more likely to point
adopter who has better hardware to choose from- by all the
expectations expressed pretty much everywhere that I'm seeing.
-Original Message-
From: Frank Bulk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu 1/17/2008 3:59 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN
-Original Message-
From: Dale W. Carder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 7:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] The Aesthetics of 11n?
On Jan 17, 2008, at 6:06 PM, Frank Bulk wrote:
I think what the vendors
University
801 22nd Street NW, Suite B148
Washington, DC 20052
Phone: (202)994-5548
Fax: (202)994-0730
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Frank Bulk - iNAME [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2008 1:02 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re
I was asking about a single radio AP (could be dual-band, operating at 2.4
or 5 GHz), not a dual-radio AP.
I think your approach extracts the best performance, but perhaps there are
many more who want a separate overlay operating at 5 GHz, eventually
migrating away and turning down the 2.4 GHz
Just to emphasize on what Dave is saying here - we're already seeing a
feature gap between generation 1 and generation 2 802.11n chipsets/APs in
regards to power consumption. We know that they'll continue to improve
power consumption, IEEE 802.3at will be added to the APs, another spatial
stream
http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/PCWorld/story?id=4083225
Kind of interesting, though it's not the low-hanging fruit. Rather than
attack the PC itself, which is normally cleanable, attackers could create a
rogue version of DD-WRT that installed on any susceptible routers. Most
people leave
Lee:
This is a real issue that we have had with certain DSL modems. What you're
describing is sometimes VPN Passthrough. Netgear is one of the few that
clearly documents this:
http://kbserver.netgear.com/kb_web_files/n101222.asp
Regards,
Frank
From: Lee H Badman [mailto:[EMAIL
Syslog-ng will allow you to preprend information, such as host IP address or
name, to the syslog entry. That should solve your problem.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Farese, Jeffrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 9:17 AM
To:
Punch:
You're asking the right questions. AirTight Networks has a nice planning
tool that helps design the appropriate coverage based on needs. It's like a
reverse site survey tool.
Since the sensors have the same sensor as APs, the same rule of thumb in
regards to co-locating two APs applies.
Besides the being seen by 3 AP requirement, if your wireless network is
voice-ready it can be a proxy for being location-ready. Ekahau has their
own pre-sales tool to help measure what kind of accuracy can be expected. I
assume that the other vendors have something similar.
Regards,
Frank
Take care to maintain sufficient horizontal and vertical separation between
the antennas. Just because they are on different channels, it doesn't means
that the side and rear lobes, because of the higher power, can't
de-sensitize the receivers or interfere with the signal of nearby radios.
You'll
Do any of the bands have lesser/no DFS requirements? If so, those are will
be more attractive.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Jon Freeman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2007 6:32 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n tied to
Remember, it's in Extricom's interest to demonstrate a scarcity of channels
(less channel choice = more co-channel interference) because they have a
coordinated RF approach.
While the second-generation of 802.11n draft 2.0 chips from Atheros deals
with some of DFS challenges, I was led to
. I haven't followed that one as close, last I saw they
hadn't decided on 33 or 48 watts of power per port.
-Original Message-
From: Frank Bulk - iNAME [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2007 8:07 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN
Good point, though those legacy client devices seem to stick around longer
than you think. In any case, shipping chipsets will be predominately
802.11n by 2009 and my guess is that the installed base of clients will
reach 50% that year.
I think Kevin's 5 to 8 years is much too conservative.
For those organizations that are risk-averse and/or price conscious, the
best choice may be deploying 802.11b/g everywhere now (in positions where an
802.11n AP could be dropped in later) and then upgrading to 802.11n in 2-3
years. This best applies to those who have no wireless today.
If you're
Dan:
All the best. I would be most interested in hearing about your PoE and your
approach with existing APs.
Kind regards,
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Dan McCarriar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 5:14 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject:
1 - 100 of 254 matches
Mail list logo
