Feature rich firmware:
-lets start by firmware that actually works and is really tested before
release
-Vlan capability on the SM to tag packets with Q, also with Vlan filtering
-NAT cabability on the SM with DHCP Client and Server plus Port filtering
and DMZ
-Traffic filter in bridge mode, with
Onboard PSU is 10W max like the RB112. Board draws 3-4W that leaves 6-7W.
It shuld only be able to handle 1 SR9!
- Original Message -
From: "JNA" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'WISPA General List'"
Sent: Saturday, September 23, 2006 5:00 AM
Subject: [WISPA] RB153
> Does anyone know if the R
According to the DOL (department of Labor) an employee can be paid by
the hour or for piece work (by the job)
from http://www.dol.gov/compliance/guide/minwage.htm
The Act requires employers of
covered employees who are not otherwise exempt to pay these employees a
minimum wage of not less tha
Travis Johnson wrote:
Our biggest problem is frequency availability at all (regardless of
radio choice)... we have a 2.4ghz AP at a repeater station that is
"full". We attempted to install a second sector today and ran a site
survey at this location across the entire 2.4ghz band, the
"aver
If you're serving the residential market, and price is the big concern, it's
worth noting that Canopy has a $40 / customer "residential rebate program"
that's been going on for almost 2 years now
It's also worth noting with Canopy that you need to add ~$10 / unit for
power supplies (they are sold
Gino A. Villarini wrote:
GPS sync is extra $$.
Of course you can also just string sync cables between radios for free.
True, but this is truly what makes canopy works and you have nice 3rd party
options like www.lastmilegear.com and www.packetflux.com for the gps sync
units that start @ les
I haven't payed for a power supply in about a year. My distributor
http://www.doubleradius.com usually tosses them in on specials and
such. The prices I listed where from their website.
Anthony Will
Broadband Corp.
Charles Wu wrote:
If you're serving the residential market, and price is the
25 pack:
LITE: $129 NET ($149 - 40 + 10) -- (this is currently a promo that ends
December 31)
Normal: $237 NET ($267 - 40 + 10)
100 pack:
Normal: $186 NET ($216 - $40 + 10)
Lol -- can't add -- should be
25 pack:
LITE: $119 NET ($149 - 40 + 10) -- (this is currently a promo that ends
Decembe
I will agree that Trango prices are lower then Moto Canopy. The 900mhz
can come with integrated or connectorized for different prices but they
are more expensive then what I listed. I just wanted to show that the
difference in pricing is not a world of difference that Alvarion. You
have to
So does anyone out there use the Alvarion VL and willing to give real
pricing and feature set? I am interested in how it stacks up for a BH
solution.
Anthony Will
Broadband Crop.
Travis Johnson wrote:
Hi,
I changed the subject line to reflect more the direction of this
discussion (Trango v
Id never said they couldn't be paid by the hour. I used to work for a roofing
company, and they were regularly questioned about they way they paid their
employees. If you have someone work in your office at for 6 hours, and then
they go and "flat-rate" a 3 hour job, that looks like overtime to m
The biggest reason we use Trango is because we sell our wireless service
as symmetrical. Even on the residential level, if they purchase 512k
they get 512k down and 512k up. So, if I use Canopy, I have to do a
50/50 split, which means even the Advantage product only provides 7Mbps
of "usable" b
That answered my comment. As long as they are employees for everything, there is no problem that I am aware of to pay some piece-rate and some hourly rate.
Scott Reed
Owner
NewWays
Wireless Networking
Network Design, Installation and Administration
www.nwwnet.net
-
Travis Johnson wrote:
The biggest reason we use Trango is because we sell our wireless
service as symmetrical. Even on the residential level, if they
purchase 512k they get 512k down and 512k up. So, if I use Canopy, I
have to do a 50/50 split, which means even the Advantage product only
provi
Keep in mind...although, as techies, we love to get into a "my @[EMAIL
PROTECTED] is
bigger/better then yours" debate, the simple fact is that there's no "magic
bullet" solution that will make your WISP succeed. Heck, the ones that I
see fail or stagnate are generally the ones who spend all their
Matt,
You guys are argueing about irrelevant topics
If memory serves me correctly, you provide non-oversubscribed wireless DIA
(leased line replacement) for SMB/Enterprises in a Tier1/2 urban market and
sell for $200-400 (if not higher) ARPU
Travis provides massively oversubscribed residential b
Good point Charles and exactly the point I was making during a vendor
presentation not long ago. Bottom line is we are a results driven company.
I really don't care if two tin cans and twine is the best solution or if the
solution is pulsed multi-wave fiber as long as the results are what we are
a
Travis,
WE provide Symetrical Business service with Canopy, why you couldn't ?
A Regular AP has 7 Mbps if you split 75/25 that translates to : 5.25 / 1.75
Why can you sell a 512/512 over that type of AP split ?
We use Advantage and have 10/4 MBps of capacity. My biggest Symetrical Plan
is 3 Mb
Hi,
Because you will run out of upload capacity and the sector will be
"full". We sell up to 2Mbps connections (2Mbps down and 2Mbps up)... so
I would have to go to 50/50 split, meaning only 3.5Mbps download
capacity... compared with 10Mbps for my Trango units.
Travis
Microserv
Gino A. Vill
Advantage AP 14 Mbps will give you 7 / 7 Mbps, and thats at the same
time, wheres with Trango you can only get 5 /5 ...
Gino
Travis Johnson wrote:
Hi,
Because you will run out of upload capacity and the sector will be
"full". We sell up to 2Mbps connections (2Mbps down and 2Mbps up)...
so
Yes, but I don't have to set the Trango it changes with the load
automatically so I don't have to limit myself based on what the
customers may be doing at that time. So I can load up the AP until the
total up and down traffic is 10Mbps (which will probably be 8 down 2 up
ratio).
You a
How much detail do you want? Those not familiar with Alvarion are
generally shocked at the level of what can be done in terms of features.
Makes Trango and Canopy look like a kindergartener's product. But to be
candid, that level of detail is also Achilles' heel.
I'll try to find a way to abbrevia
On Sat, 23 Sep 2006, Patrick Leary wrote:
How much detail do you want? Those not familiar with Alvarion are
generally shocked at the level of what can be done in terms of
features. Makes Trango and Canopy look like a kindergartener's
product. But to be candid, that level of detail is also Achi
I believe most if not all of the below are features
not found among Trango or Canopy. I list a few of the advanced features. A few
of these (probably some you have never heard of before or even thought of) I
show in detail. Maybe this post will also explain why the VL is not simply an
Ather
My upstream is trying to obtain a set of ip numbers to use between
ourselves, but ARIN is rejecting the application because they feel that
we do not require or have use for our own ip numbers.
Any tips would be appreciated in assisting to achieve this.
--
You have a Good Day now,
Carl A Jept
Geez Patrick, go to bed!!! Get some rest
Seriously, this is a great list. Definitely shows how the VL is a
completely different animal than the other options out there.
Matt Larsen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Patrick Leary wrote:
I believe most if not all of the below are features not found amon
Carl A Jeptha wrote:
My upstream is trying to obtain a set of ip numbers to use between
ourselves, but ARIN is rejecting the application because they feel that
we do not require or have use for our own ip numbers.
If you're trying to get the IPs for your network, you should probably
apply dir
27 matches
Mail list logo
