2nd that!
Jayson Baker wrote:
Not really, but if MT would come out with a RouterBoard that had 12, 24, 48
ports and was under $300 we'd buy a *ton* of them.
I wouldn't think it'd be that difficult, actually.
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 9:36 PM, Faisal Imtiaz fai...@snappydsl.net wrote:
Agreed! We could use 12 or 24 ports too! It would need to have a fast CPU
and at least one USB port.
Brad
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Jayson Baker
Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 10:45 PM
To:
Anybody out there using Vlan tagging to segment their network? Right now we
are running unrouted level 1 with fixed IP's and starting to see a lot of
bandwidth being eaten up with broadcast packets. Vlan tagging and trunking
seems to be an easy way to segment, but we can't seem to wrap our heads
Has anyone tried the Netgear GS108T? It is a fully managed switch that costs
about $100.00 to $130.00. I buy mine from Staples. I'v had two of them in the
field for over two years with no issues.
- Original Message
From: Tom DeReggi wirelessn...@rapiddsl.net
To:
Anybody have some used Moto Canopy P9 5.2 or 5.4 sm's they want to
part with (qty 3-5 in each band)?
Marco
--
Marco C. Coelho
Argon Technologies Inc.
POB 875
Greenville, TX 75403-0875
903-455-5036
WISPA Wants
lol. We have done this work quite abit, but just a Butch said, you
can't sit there and go, what works for one network, will work with
another network.
---
Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
WISPA Board Member - wispa.org
Some of their better managed switches do these things. Perhaps it's an
incentive for people to who value those features to go upmarket a little.
I do love their switches. I mostly buy used ones.
I think the 26xx series can allow you to label ports. All the
telnet/snmp manageable ones allow
We use the Dell 2816 for small VLAN implementations and the Dell 6248 for
more demanding needs. Both have worked flawlessly with MikroTik VLAN.
Best,
Brad
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Joe Miller
Sent: Thursday,
It's an omni...
I think I'm gonna pull this out and drop in a tranzeo to see what it does as
well.
marlon
- Original Message -
From: Michael Baird m...@tc3net.com
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 8:38 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] ubiquity bullet2
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16833316090
Is that rack mountable?
Matt
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
Marlon,
I thought about this after you mentioned it, we are using Ubiquity on
the tower also, not MT, vendor readings will vary.
Are you using Bullet2HP's or Bullet2M's? The M series isn't wholly G
compatible at this time.
Regards
Michael Baird
It's an omni...
I think I'm gonna pull this
Has either 0 or 2 screw holes on the side - I bet not.
Did anyone else notice ports 1-7 are HP auto-mdix and port 8 is IEEE auto
mdi/x?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
The secret to creativity is knowing how to hide your sources.
Yes.
http://cdn.procurve.com/training/Manuals/2520-ATG-Nov09-S_14_03.pdf
is a pretty good overview of vlan implementation.
We use vlans to keep data separate on the same switch and reduce
broadcasts, scope of mistakes, etc... A MT router might use VLANs to
create separate interfaces (all over
We use VLAN's on every tower.
Typically, we have a single-power gigabit MikroTik router, going into a 24-
or 48-port switch.
There are many VLAN's between the switch and MT. Some ports on the VLAN are
untagged ports (i.e. you plug it in, and go - it comes out on the MT port
as tagged with a
I looked at http://www.mikrotik.com/download/l7-protos.rsc but didnt find
anything existing for L7 and netflix. Does anyone have one they are using?
John Buwa
Michiana Wireless
574-233-7170
- Original Message -
From: Jayson Baker jay...@spectrasurf.com
To: Joe Miller
On Nov 7, 2009, at 2:25 PM, RickG wrote:
In the past, l worked for two electric companies. Their business
models were
dependant on meters. As far as internet access, Compuserve and AOL
had the
right idea from the start. Instead entrepanuers took advantage of
their
weakness at the
Actually, that is not what Rick was suggesting as I understood it. At
one level he's saying he should be able to charge the company who is
NOT in his service territory for responding to a customer enquiry
(looking at a web page, downloading a movie).
Your cell company charges *you* for your
On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 10:54 -0500, sa...@michianawireless.com wrote:
I looked at http://www.mikrotik.com/download/l7-protos.rsc but didnt find
anything existing for L7 and netflix. Does anyone have one they are using?
I don't think one exists. It's one reason I'm working on the smart
QOS
On Nov 7, 2009, at 9:35 PM, RickG wrote:
For $100 a month per phone and the internet access is relatively
slow. Not
really an apples to apples comparison.
In my home, I want unlimited electicity, natural gas, and water too!
Ah, but information wants to be free!
See, we can all trade
Cisco makes great routers but their switches suck. They have port
compatability issues with other equipment.
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 11:48 PM, Faisal Imtiaz fai...@snappydsl.netwrote:
There are tons of great Cisco Switches going for cheap on the secondary
markets in that price range and port
Anyone know of an affordable 8 port managed switch that has 8 fiber ports?
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
3Com makes a good one. I know we use a couple. Can't remember the P/N.
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 11:28 AM, can...@believewireless.net
p...@believewireless.net wrote:
Anyone know of an affordable 8 port managed switch that has 8 fiber ports?
It's not a compatibility issue, it is a should and shall issue.
There is no IEEE standard or RFC for port auto-negotiation so Cisco
does not have one. (period).
ryan
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 10:21 AM, RickG rgunder...@gmail.com wrote:
Cisco makes great routers but their switches suck. They have
No idea.
- Original Message -
From: Michael Baird m...@tc3net.com
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2009 7:40 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] ubiquity bullet2
Marlon,
I thought about this after you mentioned it, we are using Ubiquity on
the tower also,
Do u need it to be hardend ?
If not, then there are a few good choices..
... Used: Cisco WS-C4908G-L3 or WS-C3508-XL
3Com 4070 (24 sfp)
or dell 6024F (24 sfp 8 Copper ports)
or Dell 6024 (24 copper 8 SFP)
Regards
Faisal Imtiaz
Computer Office Solutions Inc. /SnappyDSL.net
Make it a plug-n-play for us non Mikrotik people and I would say sold.
- Original Message
From: Butch Evans but...@butchevans.com
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thu, November 12, 2009 11:39:20 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Netflix, Hula starting to creat issues with network.
If it is free you can have ALL the business!
Ah, but information wants to be free!
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
Well the config interface is very clear about which model it is, also it
would be on the unit and the box.
Regards
Michael Baird
No idea.
- Original Message -
From: Michael Baird m...@tc3net.com
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2009 7:40 AM
Chuck,
That's the point. The consumer is NOT paying for excessive bandwidth use.
When bandwidth runs us over $100/meg and one customer uses $300's worth for
$50/month there is something wrong. The unlimited bandwidth model only works
when you can oversubscribe the bandwidth. With bandwidth usage
LOL, All in good fun! To be clear, I really dont want free electricity, gas,
or water because you get what you pay for every time.
On the serious side, i disagree with your statement. Some information wants
or needs to be free. Especially public domain info such is how to get your
drivers license,
Ryan, I agree with your second statement but my statement is correct
according to the dictionary:
compatible/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [kuhm-pat-uh-buhl] Show IPA
–adjective 1. capable of existing or living together in harmony: the most
compatible married couple I know.
2. able to exist
As one of those big guys...
We have tiers for data usage both on a Daily and a Monthly rate.
For our base line customers on a $25 a month plan, it's 1.5 meg down with
1GB total per month bandwidth; 8 bucks a gig beyond that up to 5 gigs,
everything beyond that is covered at a max $70 cap...
On Nov 8, 2009, at 2:54 AM, Marlon K. Schafer wrote:
LOL
Lets be honest here. At 380 foot well isn't free. The electricity
to pump
the water isn't free either.
So is the electricity needed to run your computer to get the Internet
or for your phone if you have an unlimited local
On Nov 12, 2009, at 2:02 PM, RickG wrote:
Chuck,
That's the point. The consumer is NOT paying for excessive bandwidth
use.
When bandwidth runs us over $100/meg and one customer uses $300's
worth for
$50/month there is something wrong.
Right, but if that's the case you either charge
On Nov 12, 2009, at 2:14 PM, RickG wrote:
LOL, All in good fun! To be clear, I really dont want free
electricity, gas,
or water because you get what you pay for every time.
On the serious side, i disagree with your statement.
Really, it's just a quote, not a statement by me per se. I
I've been watching the thread about it with great interest.Partly
because I was wondering if anyone was going to try my solution, which is,
to attempt to be able to deliver the bandwidth to the people who want to use
these, and have them work fine.
Please understand, I'm not talking about
The boat has arrived..! Shesh I was able to order so much
that now I have to find a way to hide it from the wife.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Data Technology
Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2009
I'm counting on my customer usage to increase in step with Moore's Law,
a doubling every 18-24 months.
If you take a 9.6k modem connection in 1994 which was acceptable and
double it every 2 years, you get 2.5 MB in 2010 - and that's what's
considered acceptable broadband today.
Dave Hulsebus
Eventually we'll all be able to do this. But it'll take quite a while for
the technology to catch up to the demand.
What we also need is better compression mechanisms. With the processor
capacities we have now that should happen as soon as the big boys start
putting bit caps on.
marlon
Where from?
Or was this a case of Nick not being able to detect internet sarcasm.
Nick Olsen
Brevard Wireless
(321) 205-1100 x106
From: Robert West robert.w...@just-micro.com
Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2009 4:10 PM
To: WISPA General List
Wlanparts has it. I also got an email from Ben over at Ubiquiti who says
...the big volumes haven't landed yet...There are some that have hit over
the past couple of days, but the big volumes will be hitting in that 1-2
week period.
Bob-
-Original Message-
From:
I have been hearing 'bout that '1-2 week period' for about 10 weeks now.
Ryan
On Nov 12, 2009, at 3:13 PM, Robert West robert.w...@just-
micro.com wrote:
Wlanparts has it. I also got an email from Ben over at Ubiquiti who
says
...the big volumes haven't landed yet...There are some that
I have some brand new never deployed P9 5250SM's... feel free to hit me
offlist
Daniel White
3-dB Networks
http://www.3dbnetworks.com
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Marco Coelho
Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2009 8:02
Middle next week or at worst end of. Next week.
Keep an eye on our twitter page for updates (twitter.com/wisprouter) .
/Eje
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
-Original Message-
From: D. Ryan Spott rsp...@cspott.com
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:18:01
To: WISPA General
On 12/11/09 05:38, Josh Luthman wrote:
This was brought up in an IRC channel earlier today no one could
answer this question:
What does 3com have that prospective buyers want?
TippingPoint? I do not believe HP has anything in the IPS space at
present. Their products are in use by 30% of
AJ.
I assume you are a wireless isp. My question, what equipment are you using
to provide 15 mg bursting to 20 meg for 60 bucks a month?
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of AJ
Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2009 11:29 AM
To:
I heard the boat was held up for some reason in Somalia, AYE MATEY :)
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Nick Olsen
Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2009 2:18 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Nano Sation 2
Where
Good thing its not the Nano Station 5Ms, you would still be waiting for the
firmware upgrade to actually be able to use them long after the boat finally
arrives once the pirates finally let it go.
Seems like promises, promises for now.
George Morris
Candlelight
866-924-0530 Direct
I think Netgear has one pretty cheap.
Although, used 3550's are pretty easilly found at $1500 a pop, w/ OSPF.
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: can...@believewireless.net p...@believewireless.net
To: wireless@wispa.org
At 03:09 PM 11/12/2009, you wrote:
I've been watching the thread about it with great interest.Partly
because I was wondering if anyone was going to try my solution, which is,
to attempt to be able to deliver the bandwidth to the people who want to use
these, and have them work fine.
I know that used to be an issue, but we have been seeing great results
with Cisco 2960 series switches.
John
RickG wrote:
Cisco makes great routers but their switches suck. They have port
compatability issues with other equipment.
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 11:48 PM, Faisal Imtiaz
51 matches
Mail list logo
