CP has stopped selling Residential. Period. (That is what I was told).
Regards,
Peter
Charles Wu wrote:
Not to kick a dead horse here, but I heard the other day (from a WISP friend
of mine) that Commpartners has stop installing WISP residential connections
(due to E911 compliance issues) for
Not to kick a dead horse here, but I heard the other day (from a WISP friend
of mine) that Commpartners has stop installing WISP residential connections
(due to E911 compliance issues) for the time being
This sucks for him since he's already paid the $5k setup fee and his 1500+
wireless customers
ll apply
to WISP's future of using VOIP.
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: "Charles Wu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'WISPA General List'"
Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 1:49 P
led to competition among network
providers, application and service providers, and content
providers.
Now, lets open the floor for discussion...
Tom DeReggiRapidDSL & Wireless, IncIntAirNet- Fixed Wireless
Broadband
- Original Message -
From:
Charles Wu
To: 'WISPA Ge
>"Again, they should be held accountable for what they have built with
PUBLIC MONEY."
IMO, it's nearly impossible to do a 1/2 and 1/2 type of model
I doubt there is any service provider out there who HAS NOT benefited in
some manner from PUBLIC MONEY at some time (or who would want to close the
do
last 50 years, Oh by
the way lets forget that, and have it to my self now.
Tom DeReggiRapidDSL & Wireless, IncIntAirNet- Fixed Wireless
Broadband
- Original Message -
From:
Charles Wu
To: 'WISPA General List'
Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 6:43
PM
& Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: "Butch Evans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 8:23 PM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] VOIP / CommPartners -- "big dumb
pipeprovider&qu
ture of TCPIP.
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: "Butch Evans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 8:23 PM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] VOIP /
eant to be a complaint regarding WISPA, just a suggestion on
possible goals for WISPA.
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: "Charles Wu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'WISPA General List'"
On Wed, 4 Jan 2006, Charles Wu wrote:
If memory serves me correctly, BPS Networks / Telephone is an rural
ILEC -- you deploy wireless in areas where it doesn't make sense to
deploy DSL over your own infrastructure
BPS Networks is an ISP that is partnered with BPS Telephone (an
ILEC).
Now,
John Scrivner wrote:
I am not too concerned. It is only about $40K a month in recurring
monthly revenues off the SBC network! :-)I do worry what the phone
company will do but I am nearly making as much off of wireless now as I
am off the ILEC copper so in a year or so I could "snip snip"
I am not too concerned. It is only about $40K a month in recurring
monthly revenues off the SBC network! :-)I do worry what the phone
company will do but I am nearly making as much off of wireless now as I
am off the ILEC copper so in a year or so I could "snip snip" the little
copper hab
Do that. I will watch from the "woodwork".
If memory serves me correctly, BPS Networks / Telephone is an rural ILEC --
you deploy wireless in areas where it doesn't make sense to deploy DSL over
your own infrastructure
Now, this isn't meant as a comdemnation or anything, but knowing this
backg
s
---
CWLab
Technology Architects
http://www.cwlab.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mac Dearman
Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 7:58 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] VOIP / CommPa
The way I see it is this: (automatic insertion of my .o2 cents)
If Bell South can charge people extra for added services I can too.
You pay extra for call waiting, call forwarding, call blocking...etc - -
- you pay extra on my internet service to have me give your VoIP packets
prioritizati
On Wed, 4 Jan 2006, Charles Wu wrote:
For some reason, I am getting a feeling that thread may be going
beyond "topic debate" to "personal attacks" -- so I will restate my
If you are referring to my comment, you are missing the point. I am
not, in any way, attacking you personally. I am simp
Title: Message
You seem
to be taking this beyond what anyone has stated. There maybe those
that say the things that you claim above, however what yousaid was that
"...preference of one's own traffic...is not that muchdifferent than..." and
you went on to show a link to a story thatwas NOT E
On Wed, 4 Jan 2006, Charles Wu wrote:
If you take this line reasoning a few iterations further, it can
easily become a "that @[EMAIL PROTECTED] competitor is riding my network for
free to access my customers, so I'm just gonna cut them off" type
of discussion
Let me show you again what I res
---
CWLab
Technology Architects
http://www.cwlab.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Butch Evans
Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 2:44 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: RE: [WISPA] VOIP / CommPartn
On Wed, 4 Jan 2006, Charles Wu wrote:
If you think about it, an argument can be made that preference of
one's own traffic (or depreffing competition traffic) is not that
much different than
These are nowhere NEAR the same thing. Let me give an example.
Let's say that my webserver is somethi
performance to their VOIP servers over our network. Think about it, do you
think I'm going to allow the same performance to our competitive VOIP
provider as I do to our own VOIP services? By getting us to be a Partner for
them, we'd optimize them for our own benefit, and indirectly Comm Parnter
21 matches
Mail list logo
